And so it begins.

[JGalt]

Lee Zeldin has been tapped to run the EPA. He says the administration is going to restore US energy dominance, bring back jobs, revitalize the auto industry, and make the US number one in AI. Too late, Biden already did that.

You're seriously delusional.

 

[berg80]

Trump doesn't make mistakes.

 

[berg80]

You're seriously delusional.

How would you know. You wouldn't know a fact if you found it in the closet looking for the Demo bogeyman.

 

[JGalt]

How would you know. You wouldn't know a fact if you found it in the closet looking for the Demo bogeyman.

I'll give you a fact, bro: You went to the polls and cast your vote for a decrepit old pervert who got his ass whipped in a debate. Except your own party decided for you that they were going to discard not only your constitutionally-protected vote, but the sacred votes of 14 million other's just like your's.

They Jim Crowed your ass. Your vote was rendered null and void. They shredded it and dumped it in the garbage. How about that "Democracy", eh?

Then to top it all off, your party deciding that you weren't intelligent enough to elect your own presidential candidate, shoved some cackling, underachieving hack down your throat, namely Kamala Harris. A woman who couldn't even perform the duties she was assigned to do. A women whose rise in politics was founded by giving oral pleasure to a corrupt Mayor of San Francisco.

Now most normal people would have been outraged that their own party had done such a thing to them. But were you? Naww, they handed you a steaming pile of shit on a silver platter, and you gobbled it down like it was a three-course meal from a fancy French restaurant. And then of course, she lost.

Now I'm trying to wrap my head around how anyone could be such a nutless cuck and stand by while their own party did something like that to them. But it's hard for me to grasp, seeing how I'm endowed a fair amount of self-respect. So maybe you can tell me: How does it feel to be such a cuck and a loser? I can't even imagine.

 

[marvin martian]

Be patient. Destroying the government will take time.

I don't think it will. Rebuilding it as the constitutional republic it once was, instead of the fascist monstrosity you voted for, will take time, though.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[IM2]

Trump transition figure warns DOJ lawyers: Get on board or get out

A conservative lawyer working on Donald Trump’s transition, Mark Paoletta, offered a stark warning to career Justice Department lawyers Monday that those who refuse to advance Trump’s agenda should resign or face the possibility of being fired.

“Once the decision is made to move forward, career employees are required to implement the President’s plan,” Paoletta wrote in a post on X responding to a POLITICO story detailing widespread fear among DOJ lawyers about being asked to advance or defend policies they consider unethical or illegal.

“If these career DOJ employees won’t implement President Trump’s program in good faith, they should leave,” Paoletta said. “Those employees who engage in so-called ‘resistance’ against the duly-elected President’s lawful agenda would be subverting American democracy (or upholding it). … [t]hose that take such actions would be subject to disciplinary measures, including termination.”

Paoletta recited a laundry list of Trump goals, including mass deportations, ending birthright citizenship, issuing pardons and commutations to Jan. 6 defendants, reversing “lawfare and persecution of political opponents,” and “holding accountable those who weaponized their government authority to abuse Americans.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...-paoletta-justice-department-lawyers-00188772

Let's begin with this, trump's goal coming in to the start of his admin is to purge the government of those viewed to be disloyal. This has been well advertised.

Now consider the ACLU plans to challenge the legality of trump using the law he plans to use to facilitate mass deportations.

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/i-heard-an-interesting-interview-with-the-head-of-the-aclu-yesterday.1134492/#post-35690588

If members of the DoJ agree with the ACLU's position, will they be fired before the matter can be adjudicated? Because it seems to me the admin is already looking for a pretense to fire people opposed to their policies...........policies which may be illegal.

In his first admin a number of high ranking DoJ officials said they world resign if Jeff Clark was made acting AG. No such officials will be part of the new admin if trump has his way.

To be clear, if DoJ employees try to block legal and ethical policy goals firing them is appropriate.

Here comes Project 2025.

 

[IM2]

Do you support what jack smith did to Trump and every one of his family? Shit...even tiffany got the 3rd degree.

Jack Smith prosecuted trump according to the law.

 

[Thunk]

Jack Smith prosecuted trump according to the law.

If he can prove that in court he'll be allowed to keep his freedom.

 

[IM2]

If he can prove that in court he'll be allowed to keep his freedom.

Prove what? The grand juries put those 91 indIctments on trump. Is trump going to arrest all of them?

 

[marvin martian]

Prove what? The grand juries put those 91 indIctments on trump. Is trump going to arrest all of them?

If they broke the law, why not?

 

[Thunk]

Is trump going to arrest all of them?

 

[blackhawk]

SUPERSIZED TDSSSDD.

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump transition figure warns DOJ lawyers: Get on board or get out

A conservative lawyer working on Donald Trump’s transition, Mark Paoletta, offered a stark warning to career Justice Department lawyers Monday that those who refuse to advance Trump’s agenda should resign or face the possibility of being fired.

“Once the decision is made to move forward, career employees are required to implement the President’s plan,” Paoletta wrote in a post on X responding to a POLITICO story detailing widespread fear among DOJ lawyers about being asked to advance or defend policies they consider unethical or illegal.

“If these career DOJ employees won’t implement President Trump’s program in good faith, they should leave,” Paoletta said. “Those employees who engage in so-called ‘resistance’ against the duly-elected President’s lawful agenda would be subverting American democracy (or upholding it). … [t]hose that take such actions would be subject to disciplinary measures, including termination.”

Paoletta recited a laundry list of Trump goals, including mass deportations, ending birthright citizenship, issuing pardons and commutations to Jan. 6 defendants, reversing “lawfare and persecution of political opponents,” and “holding accountable those who weaponized their government authority to abuse Americans.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...-paoletta-justice-department-lawyers-00188772

Let's begin with this, trump's goal coming in to the start of his admin is to purge the government of those viewed to be disloyal. This has been well advertised.

Now consider the ACLU plans to challenge the legality of trump using the law he plans to use to facilitate mass deportations.

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/i-heard-an-interesting-interview-with-the-head-of-the-aclu-yesterday.1134492/#post-35690588

If members of the DoJ agree with the ACLU's position, will they be fired before the matter can be adjudicated? Because it seems to me the admin is already looking for a pretense to fire people opposed to their policies...........policies which may be illegal.

In his first admin a number of high ranking DoJ officials said they world resign if Jeff Clark was made acting AG. No such officials will be part of the new admin if trump has his way.

To be clear, if DoJ employees try to block legal and ethical policy goals firing them is appropriate.

Who could be against that?

 

[Billiejeens]

Dear President Trump:

Please gut the DOJ from the top down.

Signed, a voter.

Two

 

[Billiejeens]

Legal and ethical isn't a Trumpster thing.

That's not true.

 

[daveman]

How is that different than any other administration?

its TRUMP TROOOOOMP!!! ORANGE MAN BAD

 

[daveman]

Do you support what trump said he's going to do to Jack Smith, and likely everyone on his staff?

If they've violated their oaths of office, you damn skippy.

 

[westwall]

Trump transition figure warns DOJ lawyers: Get on board or get out

A conservative lawyer working on Donald Trump’s transition, Mark Paoletta, offered a stark warning to career Justice Department lawyers Monday that those who refuse to advance Trump’s agenda should resign or face the possibility of being fired.

“Once the decision is made to move forward, career employees are required to implement the President’s plan,” Paoletta wrote in a post on X responding to a POLITICO story detailing widespread fear among DOJ lawyers about being asked to advance or defend policies they consider unethical or illegal.

“If these career DOJ employees won’t implement President Trump’s program in good faith, they should leave,” Paoletta said. “Those employees who engage in so-called ‘resistance’ against the duly-elected President’s lawful agenda would be subverting American democracy (or upholding it). … [t]hose that take such actions would be subject to disciplinary measures, including termination.”

Paoletta recited a laundry list of Trump goals, including mass deportations, ending birthright citizenship, issuing pardons and commutations to Jan. 6 defendants, reversing “lawfare and persecution of political opponents,” and “holding accountable those who weaponized their government authority to abuse Americans.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...-paoletta-justice-department-lawyers-00188772

Let's begin with this, trump's goal coming in to the start of his admin is to purge the government of those viewed to be disloyal. This has been well advertised.

Now consider the ACLU plans to challenge the legality of trump using the law he plans to use to facilitate mass deportations.

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/i-heard-an-interesting-interview-with-the-head-of-the-aclu-yesterday.1134492/#post-35690588

If members of the DoJ agree with the ACLU's position, will they be fired before the matter can be adjudicated? Because it seems to me the admin is already looking for a pretense to fire people opposed to their policies...........policies which may be illegal.

In his first admin a number of high ranking DoJ officials said they world resign if Jeff Clark was made acting AG. No such officials will be part of the new admin if trump has his way.

To be clear, if DoJ employees try to block legal and ethical policy goals firing them is appropriate.

Remember when obummer said elections have consequences?

Here's lookin at you, sport.

 

[westwall]

Exactly what I'd expect a sycophant to say.

Kinda like you...huh...