And now on to the more serious question of immunity. . .

SCOTUS should rule a President has immunity in conduct of his office

  • Yes

  • No

  • I don't care or have an opinion

Results are only viewable after voting.
mudwhistle said:
If Fani Willis is meeting with Kamala Harris then she's meeting with people that represents the White House.

Or don't you know who the Vice President is, shitforbrains?


Click to expand...

Do you have the transcript of what they talked about or is this just the latest conspiracy theory your cult is pushing this week?
 
mudwhistle said:
No. You asked me about Jan 6th being staged.
Biden admitted that he was trying to keep Trump from running using the constitution, which is why they claimed Jan 6th was an insurrection. Not because it was, but because they felt they could blame Trump for insurrection using the media. Which was going to be the excuse to take him off of the ballot in several states.

Even though he cannot be charged with insurrection.....they all want us to assume he's guilty of it, and a bunch of liberal judges and secretary of states have decided to take him off the ballot, up until the Supreme Court put the Kabash on that false premise permanently.

Are you really this slow, or are you just playing dumb.
Click to expand...
We all saw the evidence of insurrection in the J6 hearings.
 
Foxfyre said:
For the most part that is true. But this is the first time a militarized/weaponized administration has declared political opponents to be public enemies, has taken political prisoners, has maliciously and vindictively tried to destroy a political opponent who was a threat.

So because of this administration, we need protection from the court to prevent it from happening again.

The OP however is not about misconduct by any particular President or administration but rather how SCOTUS should rule in order to protect the country from it happening again.
Click to expand...
That’s one framing.

The other side says this is the first time a president has so brazenly violated the law in a self-serving effort to illegally maintain power. and that going unpunished will assure that this abuse will occur again.

If Trump is actually innocent, the trial will prove it. Why not let the system work the way it always has?
 
Marener said:
That’s one framing.

The other side says this is the first time a president has so brazenly violated the law in a self-serving effort to illegally maintain power. and that going unpunished will assure that this abuse will occur again.

If Trump is actually innocent, the trial will prove it. Why not let the system work the way it always has?
Click to expand...
Because they know full well that he is guilty.

The next time a trump supporter is honest about any of this will be the first.
 
Rawley said:
LOL Seeing a pattern here? Note that they never quote Trump or his lawyers with this bullshit. They want you to believe he's claiming he can assassinate Newsom with impunity.
Click to expand...
That is the claim they forwarded.
 
Who would want to run for office if you could be prosecuted for doing your job after you leave office... WTF people... do you want a president or a captive?....
 
Marener said:
That’s one framing.

The other side says this is the first time a president has so brazenly violated the law in a self-serving effort to illegally maintain power. and that going unpunished will assure that this abuse will occur again.

If Trump is actually innocent, the trial will prove it. Why not let the system work the way it always has?
Click to expand...
Because I never want another malicious administration being able to force a political opponent into a bogus trial.
 
Foxfyre said:
Because I never want another malicious administration being able to force a political opponent into a bogus trial.
Click to expand...
If the charges are bogus, then the former president will be fine.

There’s no need for protection.

But the consequences of protecting presidents could result in lawlessness from the most powerful person in the country. A far worse consequence.
 
Foxfyre said:
Because I never want another malicious administration being able to force a political opponent into a bogus trial.
Click to expand...
Marener is pulling tail in the fox pen. Trump has brought this all on himself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

WATCH LIVE: President Trump to Deliver Remarks on Supreme Court’s 9-0 Win for Trump and America...

< Previous Thread

Hungarian PM Orban: The Only Serious Chance For Peace Is A Trump Win.

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Delldude
Chief Justice John Roberts
Replies
16
Views
209
The Duke
The Duke
J
  • Locked
Trump's One Hundred Day Grade - "F"!
2
Replies
24
Views
228
OKTexas
OKTexas
munkle
Autopen-PardonGate: Biden's Own DOJ Questioned Biden's Mental Capacity as Trump Challenges Biden Pardons
Replies
10
Views
130
Delldude
Delldude
berg80
The SC saved trump from his worst impulses.
2 3
Replies
46
Views
327
Care4all
Care4all
H
Why DOGE, etc. budget cuts are necessary...
2
Replies
39
Views
292
healthmyths
H

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom