And Another One Bites The Dust

[Sunsettommy]

So no argument just name calling. Brilliant.

LOL, you haven't offered a single argument in return, avoid questions which indicate you are not here to debate anything.

Cheers.

 

[citygator]

LOL, you haven't offered a single argument in return, avoid questions which indicate you are not here to debate anything.

Cheers.

Yes I did. Read my post.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Yes I did. Read my post.

Your first post #4:

So PC has moved from copying and pasting other people's writings to now simply posting an audio recording of other people talking? And I didn't think PC's threads could get less engaging. Guess I was wrong.

ZERO.

Your second post ignored her detailed argument in post #5 completely in return to your word salad that doesn't work.

ZERO.

Your third post is a single sentence still ignoring Political Chic detailed reply.

Name what? A thread, a scientist.. what?

ZERO.

Your next failed reply while you ignored the contents of Post # 14 she posted with links.

Still trying to get this thread off the ground?

Let's just agree that less pollution into the atmosphere is better than more and work toward moving to green energy to make less pollution rather than more. That isnt contriversial. It's like committing to drinking more water and less soda. Sure you can live off soda, but water is better for you. Why put so much energy into trying to push more polluting methods rather than less?

The thread is doing a great exposing your miserable dead-on arrival replies ignoring what other people talk about in details.

ZERO.

Now this man forgets his name calling earlier in the thread while the man reolutely avoids debate the whole time, I know of a few forums who would have banned from the thread by now for not debating.

So no argument just name calling. Brilliant.

From your biggest babbling post of the thread:

"We've had enough climate threads. At the end of the day we have scientists on one side and politicians, companies, and conspiracy theorists on the other.


As someone who has spent over a decade studying the climate change denial movement, many of the political tactics mainstreamed by Donald Trump and the populist right around 2015–2016 seemed familiar. Attack the experts. Launch personal attacks on opponents. Frame an email scandal to maximize political gain. Delegitimize mainstream media sources. Cast yourself as the savior of traditional American life. Climate change deniers practiced these tactics years before the Republican Party transformed from a Reagan coalition of social conservatives and small-government libertarians to a party of the populist right. While arguing against scientific consensus will always present an uphill battle, the organizers of climate change denial repeatedly prove their ability to strategically adapt to their political environment, seamlessly shifting between narratives of “climate change is not happening,” “climate change is happening but humans are not driving it,” and “climate change is happening but it is nothing to worry about.”

Considering the economic incentives of continued fossil fuel development, I expect that climate change deniers will adapt to shifting political winds for years to come and will continue to employ political tactics. In this article, I review a few facts and events to illustrate this point. For a more comprehensive overview of the players involved in obstructing action on climate change, read “From Denial to Obstruction: A Sociological View of the Effort to Obstruction Action on Climate Change” by Robert Brulle and Riley Dunlap in this issue. Ultimately, members of the climate change denial movement do not concern themselves with building fact-based objections to mainstream scientific consensus. Rather, they are focused on how to coordinate political reactions to any sort of mitigation policy effort that detracts from fossil fuel-based economic growth strategies. Thus, in my view, the tactics used to frame scientists as corrupt, activists as antiprogress, corporations as “woke,” or journalists as liars, represent a crucial element of the contemporary climate change denial movement."

red bolding mine

ZERO.

Your name calling is easy to spot you mewling hypocrite!

Reading your lie filled drivel convinces me that you don't have the brains to realize how big a fool you are in all this since the AGW conjecture has been dead for YEARS that is why climate realists are much louder these days as the stupid AGW ideology has been refuted so many times by published science papers, by the few public debates in colleges and other public arenas which the warmist/alarmists always lose and people like YOU and Crick who stridently ignore the few fatal expose of the AGW conjecture because you can't counter it as there is NOTHING to counter it with.

You ignored this at post #6:

"Leftist stupidity never ends as they push so many failed claims that have blown up in their faces, yet they continue in denial of their failures.

There is NO Climate Crisis developing.

NO Hot Spot existing.

NO Positive Feedback Loop.

NO evidence that CO2 is a..... he he...... ha ha ha.... ooohhhhh, Pollutant."

===

AGW is possibly the most refuted science paradigm in history yet you diminishing number of hysterical liars never admit to it.

FACT: NO Climate Crisis developing which you people never addressed it after I point this out at least 25 times over two forums.

Many knows you are word salad writer not a debater.

 

[citygator]

Your first post #4:



ZERO.

Your second post ignored her detailed argument in post #5 completely in return to your word salad that doesn't work.

ZERO.

Your third post is a single sentence still ignoring Political Chic detailed reply.



ZERO.

Your next failed reply while you ignored the contents of Post # 14 she posted with links.



The thread is doing a great exposing your miserable dead-on arrival replies ignoring what other people talk about in details.

ZERO.

Now this man forgets his name calling earlier in the thread while the man reolutely avoids debate the whole time, I know of a few forums who would have banned from the thread by now for not debating.




From your biggest babbling post of the thread:

"We've had enough climate threads. At the end of the day we have scientists on one side and politicians, companies, and conspiracy theorists on the other.


As someone who has spent over a decade studying the climate change denial movement, many of the political tactics mainstreamed by Donald Trump and the populist right around 2015–2016 seemed familiar. Attack the experts. Launch personal attacks on opponents. Frame an email scandal to maximize political gain. Delegitimize mainstream media sources. Cast yourself as the savior of traditional American life. Climate change deniers practiced these tactics years before the Republican Party transformed from a Reagan coalition of social conservatives and small-government libertarians to a party of the populist right. While arguing against scientific consensus will always present an uphill battle, the organizers of climate change denial repeatedly prove their ability to strategically adapt to their political environment, seamlessly shifting between narratives of “climate change is not happening,” “climate change is happening but humans are not driving it,” and “climate change is happening but it is nothing to worry about.”

Considering the economic incentives of continued fossil fuel development, I expect that climate change deniers will adapt to shifting political winds for years to come and will continue to employ political tactics. In this article, I review a few facts and events to illustrate this point. For a more comprehensive overview of the players involved in obstructing action on climate change, read “From Denial to Obstruction: A Sociological View of the Effort to Obstruction Action on Climate Change” by Robert Brulle and Riley Dunlap in this issue. Ultimately, members of the climate change denial movement do not concern themselves with building fact-based objections to mainstream scientific consensus. Rather, they are focused on how to coordinate political reactions to any sort of mitigation policy effort that detracts from fossil fuel-based economic growth strategies. Thus, in my view, the tactics used to frame scientists as corrupt, activists as antiprogress, corporations as “woke,” or journalists as liars, represent a crucial element of the contemporary climate change denial movement."

red bolding mine

ZERO.

Your name calling is easy to spot you mewling hypocrite!

Reading your lie filled drivel convinces me that you don't have the brains to realize how big a fool you are in all this since the AGW conjecture has been dead for YEARS that is why climate realists are much louder these days as the stupid AGW ideology has been refuted so many times by published science papers, by the few public debates in colleges and other public arenas which the warmist/alarmists always lose and people like YOU and Crick who stridently ignore the few fatal expose of the AGW conjecture because you can't counter it as there is NOTHING to counter it with.

You ignored this at post #6:

"Leftist stupidity never ends as they push so many failed claims that have blown up in their faces, yet they continue in denial of their failures.

There is NO Climate Crisis developing.

NO Hot Spot existing.

NO Positive Feedback Loop.

NO evidence that CO2 is a..... he he...... ha ha ha.... ooohhhhh, Pollutant."

===

AGW is possibly the most refuted science paradigm in history yet you diminishing number of hysterical liars never admit to it.

FACT: NO Climate Crisis developing which you people never addressed it after I point this out at least 25 times over two forums.

Many knows you are word salad writer not a debater.

We’ve had 10,000 climate threads. The tired cycle is right wing nuts pull an opinion from the 1% of paid scientist who think we should keep dumping pollution into the environment instead of methodically shifting to greener energy. If it was up to you losers we’d still be using lead pipes.

 

[Sunsettommy]

We’ve had 10,000 climate threads. The tired cycle is right wing nuts pull an opinion from the 1% of paid scientist who think we should keep dumping pollution into the environment instead of methodically shifting to greener energy. If it was up to you losers we’d still be using lead pipes.

LOL,

Now you are running around in circles, and YOU are one of the idiots who thinks that CO2 a critical molecule for life on the planet is called a BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!

Pollutant.



Pure stupidity, off the charts stupidity.

You have been in extremely few of them and you like Crick ignore the fatal expose of the stupid AGW conjecture and ignore abundant evidence that Climate Crisis doesn't exist and is a proven lie.

FACT: NO Hot Spot exist.

FACT: NO Positive Feedback Loop exists.

FACT: NO Climate Crisis exist.

 

[jc456]

We’ve had 10,000 climate threads. The tired cycle is right wing nuts pull an opinion from the 1% of paid scientist who think we should keep dumping pollution into the environment instead of methodically shifting to greener energy. If it was up to you losers we’d still be using lead pipes.

post one warmer scientist that wasn't paid. name one. Heard the word grant before? ahhahhahhahhaha. tired old circlular logic with you punks.