AvgGuyIA
Gold Member
Someone's wealth in no factor to my happiness. Sorry your life is so tortured.For you advocates of capitalism...please tell us how having the wealth concentrated among the 1% is a good thing for the rest of a society?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone's wealth in no factor to my happiness. Sorry your life is so tortured.For you advocates of capitalism...please tell us how having the wealth concentrated among the 1% is a good thing for the rest of a society?
You deflected from the question like most conservatives do. Cant you guys answer a simple question or do you need someone to provide prescripted answers for you?Someone's wealth in no factor to my happiness. Sorry your life is so tortured.For you advocates of capitalism...please tell us how having the wealth concentrated among the 1% is a good thing for the rest of a society?
For you advocates of capitalism...please tell us how having the wealth concentrated among the 1% is a good thing for the rest of a society?
. It's not capitalism that's the problem, but rather the corruption or greed that might end up exploiting the platform of capitalism. The more and more that a society loses it's moral compass, it is when we find that our most sacred platforms and institutions can become our worst nightmare if becomes even 45% corrupt throughout the system of things. Cleaning up and returning the systems or platforms to their original intent and ownerships is the best solution. Communism, Marxism, and socialism in their pure forms are absolutely not the answers. Capitalism works, we just need to drain the swamps.What the younger people see is the disaster capitalism is in regards to other people. They also do not mind sharing with others as greedy capitalist's can't do.
Capitalism and capitalize have the same root words. Gaining advantage is in the meaning of capitalize. There is an inherent tendency to attract those with little to no moral compass.. It's not capitalism that's the problem, but rather the corruption or greed that might end up exploiting the platform of capitalism. The more and more that a society loses it's moral compass, it is when we find that our most sacred platforms and institutions can become our worst nightmare if becomes even 45% corrupt throughout the system of things. Cleaning up and returning the systems it platforms to their original intent and ownerships is the best solution. Communism, Marxism, and socialism in their pure forms are absolutely not the answers. Capitalism works, we just need to drain the swamps.What the younger people see is the disaster capitalism is in regards to other people. They also do not mind sharing with others as greedy capitalist's can't do.
For you advocates of capitalism...please tell us how having the wealth concentrated among the 1% is a good thing for the rest of a society?
We talking about the criminal who jailed American citizens based on race? That president?they'll be thrown out of power for a long long time like back in the 30's after FDR got in.
Is that what you tell them when they realize that they will have to support you?My grandchildren know what a loser Ronnie the Ray Goon was.
Is Muslim a race?We talking about the criminal who jailed American citizens based on race? That president?they'll be thrown out of power for a long long time like back in the 30's after FDR got in.
What the younger people see is the disaster capitalism is in regards to other people. They also do not mind sharing with others as greedy capitalist's can't do.
I hope I am just getting you mixed up with someone I remember as really stupid but thats the smartest thing I have ever heard you say! I agree with you....to a point. Thats where a little capitalism comes in. However, as I said already, the basis should be socialistic or communistic.They dont have to. They are smart enough to know the first humans employed a communistic approach to life.Liberal leaning children have never experienced real life application of their childish ideas.
![]()
So what! The first humans lived in small groups as hunter/gathers. Communism does work in small groups of people who have an emotional connection, like families. Most family units are fairly communistic. The problem is it doesn’t scale because of the lack of emotional commitment to millions of people. Pretty basic stuff.
What the younger people see is the disaster capitalism is in regards to other people. They also do not mind sharing with others as greedy capitalist's can't do.
Even the people now eating their pets, with prisons dining on other prisoners still want socialism. They reject all forms of capitalism. They just want socialism the way it was promised. There is where the failure is. Even here, those supporting socialism want a socialism that fulfills all its promises and it never happens.
Governor William Bradford honestly believed that communism would work for the Plymouth colony. All would work for the good of all. The fields would be tilled, the animals cared for, the children raised, God celebrated by all working together for the success of the colony. And the reality was, everyone wanted a share, no one wanted to do any work at all. That's why socialism fails. Too many takers, not enough makers.
Depends on if his roommate fulfills another need. Reminds me of when married couples didnt have to have two people working in order to make ends meet.What the younger people see is the disaster capitalism is in regards to other people. They also do not mind sharing with others as greedy capitalist's can't do.
People who haven’t worked and acquired things never have a problem sharing. Wait until they have to work and pay rent and their roommate is short his share of the rent.
Even the people now eating their pets, with prisons dining on other prisoners still want socialism. They reject all forms of capitalism. They just want socialism the way it was promised. There is where the failure is. Even here, those supporting socialism want a socialism that fulfills all its promises and it never happens.
Governor William Bradford honestly believed that communism would work for the Plymouth colony. All would work for the good of all. The fields would be tilled, the animals cared for, the children raised, God celebrated by all working together for the success of the colony. And the reality was, everyone wanted a share, no one wanted to do any work at all. That's why socialism fails. Too many takers, not enough makers.
So, China doesn't work?
Even the people now eating their pets, with prisons dining on other prisoners still want socialism. They reject all forms of capitalism. They just want socialism the way it was promised. There is where the failure is. Even here, those supporting socialism want a socialism that fulfills all its promises and it never happens.
Governor William Bradford honestly believed that communism would work for the Plymouth colony. All would work for the good of all. The fields would be tilled, the animals cared for, the children raised, God celebrated by all working together for the success of the colony. And the reality was, everyone wanted a share, no one wanted to do any work at all. That's why socialism fails. Too many takers, not enough makers.
Do you have a link for that? The reason I ask is there is no way that would have worked. They were in debt due to the capitalism back in England that financed their trip.Even the people now eating their pets, with prisons dining on other prisoners still want socialism. They reject all forms of capitalism. They just want socialism the way it was promised. There is where the failure is. Even here, those supporting socialism want a socialism that fulfills all its promises and it never happens.
Governor William Bradford honestly believed that communism would work for the Plymouth colony. All would work for the good of all. The fields would be tilled, the animals cared for, the children raised, God celebrated by all working together for the success of the colony. And the reality was, everyone wanted a share, no one wanted to do any work at all. That's why socialism fails. Too many takers, not enough makers.