An Inconvenient Truth

[abu afak]

I talked about the North POLE region.

Meanwhile I noticed your silence about summers of ZERO ice in the interglacial time according to a number is published papers and from a Polar scientist Dr. Meier who runs the SII database.

LOL

You changed months and depcoupled hemispheres
Lying is tough when your Both-Poles OP is still there.

Al Gore’s sci-fi flick was released in May 2006. Sea ice extent at BOTH poles is Higher now than it was in May 2006

LINK

LOL
`

`

 

[Sunsettommy]

You changed months and depcoupled hemispheres
Lying is tough when your Both-Poles OP is still there.



LOL

Yes, but that was in POST ONE you moron then YOU were the one who complained when I talked about the North polar region in a reply to post #7 by Hickerguy83 who only talked about the ARCTIC region which is why I talked about the Arctic only too.

Then you whined that I left out Antarctica which Hickerguy83 didn't talk about which is why I didn't either.

Post one used actual sea ice data from the NSIDC which is a better source than your google search stuff which didn't counter the very latest data chart at May 2025 while your source is in past years back to at least 2012.

You are a flop in this reading comprehension stuff.

Meanwhile I stand by post #12

 

[abu afak]

Yes, but that was in POST ONE you moron then YOU were the one who complained when I talked about the North polar region in a reply to post #7 by Hickerguy83 who only talked about the ARCTIC region which is why I talked about the Arctic only too.

Then you whined that I left out Antarctica which Hickerguy83 didn't talk about which is why I didn't either.

Post one used actual sea ice data from the NSIDC which is a better source than your google search stuff which didn't counter the very latest data chart at May 2025 while your source is in past years back to at least 2012.

You are a flop in this reading comprehension stuff.

Meanwhile I stand by post #12

AI is probably using NSIDC, and and it doesn't agree with you, or your Cherry Picked Month and subequent Decoupling of Hemisperes.

I wonder how it works if one doesn't cherry pick peaks and valleys as you used to Dishonestly do with Temperature... to stay warming stalled/Stopped by picking a Temperorary Trough starting with a high and ending with low.
I made a thread of that: "Going down the UP Escalator."

Since we've started debating it's just gotten warmer and perhaps at an increasing rate.
(like your freind SkookerAssSpill whose Bogus 9 yr thread you participlated in.)
The longer this goes on the more you are shown wrong... of Course!
`

 

[Sunsettommy]

It appears the climate change cultists is just about spent as they now stay away from posts they can't address.

Post one remains unchallenged.

 

[jc456]

This is one of many revelations showing that climate change as explicated by the money, power hungry IPCC which is under government supervision is a SCAM.

The AGW conjecture failed years ago, but this scam continues on and on and on because ethically flat pseudoscientists will lie to get favorable grants to say anything to perpetuate the lies of a many times declared "tipping" point stupidity that a segment of the low IQ leftist camp swallows it uncritically because they are well programmed morons who wouldn't know that post one can't be countered factually.

wuhan 19 explained how the climate nutters utilize bait and switch tactics to fool the ignorant, and the ignorant keep showing up in here tommy, thanks for the OP. I heard the other day that antarctic is increasing so I know you nailed it. It was a secondary source.

 

[jc456]

 

[Sunsettommy]

wuhan 19 explained how the climate nutters utilize bait and switch tactics to fool the ignorant, and the ignorant keep showing up in here tommy, thanks for the OP. I heard the other day that antarctic is increasing so I know you nailed it. It was a secondary source.

The ignorant warmest/alarmists never improve their argumentation because they don't know shit to start with it is all programmed responses such as you are denier!, You are anti science, the IPCC says so (despite their never reading it) the author is a hairstylist and other evasive stupid crap the true discussion never happens that is why they remain stupid and ignorant to this day.

There is NO Hot Spot.

The NOAA does NOT accept Shitwoods garbage papers pretending he found the hotspot data he revised using statistical gimmicks that isn't used in real math classes .... LOL

===

There is NO Positive Feedback Loop.

This is a modeling construct built on impossible scenarios thus worthless while there are easily observed positive "feedback" in action which Meteorologists accounts for in their weather forecasting everyday.

They are two very different things but science illiterates (leftists, Liberals democrats) can't fathom the gaping differences that is why they flail all over the place when they get challenged, the insult laden bellicose reactions are all they have to offer.