Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 38,246
- 34,914
- 2,788
If they wanted to speak then why didn't they speak under Biden?Iām not them nor should I speak for them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they wanted to speak then why didn't they speak under Biden?Iām not them nor should I speak for them
I suspect that such a list would damage both parties.Holy crap, I hadn't thought of this: Jeffrey Epstein Survivors Say Theyāre Compiling Their Own āClient Listā of Powerful Associates
NOW we're talking. The victims seem willing to spill the beans on the pigs who used them. These will be wealthy people who think they can get away with anything.
Time to fight back, ladies. Good luck.
===
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein told NBC News Tuesday that they are taking matters into their own hands and will compile their own āclient listā as frustration mounts over the Justice Departmentās failure to release unredacted records from the notorious pedophileās network.
Six survivors told NBC News in an exclusive sit-down that they have begun compiling their own lists of powerful figures linked to Epstein, accusing federal authorities of dragging their feet following outright denials in July from the Trump administration that a fabled blackmail list of the disgraced financierās āclientsā even exists.
āIām coming here because thereās been a severe miscarriage of justice, a delay in accountability,ā said Jess Michaels, one of the women speaking out.
Stupid for Biden, I don't give a shit myself.No you don't. You just said releasing the files was stupid.
Do you have a transcript of everything I said and wrote during Biden's term?And you never mentioned it when Biden was president.
How did you figure that? I'm not the one who'd like to date his own daughter and getting compared to Woody Allen.You're trying to protect the pedos, as I expected.
Who claimed they were threatened, and by whom?because they were threatened.
When has that ever stopped democrats?It would be heresay until proven in court.
This, along with all other such list are horribly irresponsible.
This is trying cases via media and crowd jury
Wow, already defending Epstein and dismissing his victims. Nice
I mentioned a bit earlier, remember that Epstein was about MONEY. So I'd guess any group of perpetrators would cut across the political spectrum. Then both tribes could have their fun with this.I suspect that such a list would damage both parties.
But Clinton being outed, for example, would be less damaging than trump being outed would be to the Gop.
trump is the current Prez and even for maga that might be too much to swallow.
I mentioned a bit earlier, remember that Epstein was about MONEY. So I'd guess any group of perpetrators would cut across the political spectrum. Then both tribes could have their fun with this.
Not in the court of public opinion, it wouldn't.It would be heresay until proven in court.
Are we supposed to make something up now, or is that your job?If they wanted to speak then why didn't they speak under Biden?
Luckily we don't run our justice system that way.Not in the court of public opinion, it wouldn't.
You don't come across as a Sherlock really, more accurately like a Clouseau.Stupid for Biden, I don't give a shit myself.
Do you have a transcript of everything I said and wrote during Biden's term?
How did you figure that?
????????????????????? What do you mean? We have two facts:Are we supposed to make something up now, or is that your job?
You don't come across as a Sherlock really, more accurately like a Clouseau.
There is lots of money being thrown at these survivors guaranteed, I do not even mind as long as they tell the absolute truth and do not make stuff up just to get paid????????????????????? What do you mean? We have two facts:
1. Under Biden they didn't say a damn word, not even against Trump
2. Now, all of a sudden, they want to make their own list and go public with that.
Those are both facts.
Literally no other reason? Someone with an ax to grind claimed that Don't Taz Me Bro was routinely banging 13 and 14 year olds. There's four pages in the FBI files calling out Don't Taz Me Bro.There is literally no other reason for them to oppose this.
There is lots of money being thrown at these survivors guaranteed, I do not even mind as long as they tell the absolute truth and do not make stuff up just to get paid
Only politics can make people this ugly.
Literally no other reason? Someone with an ax to grind claimed that Don't Taz Me Bro was routinely banging 13 and 14 year olds. There's four pages in the FBI files calling out Don't Taz Me Bro.
You have no problem with that repeated accusation being printed on the front page of the NYTimes? Really? What would you're boss think of it? Your neighbors? Your co-workers? Your friends?