So, republicans wanted democrats to do Trump's job?Why would the Dems protect Trump? They had the files for 4 years.
Well, here's your chance.
Why are they refusing now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, republicans wanted democrats to do Trump's job?Why would the Dems protect Trump? They had the files for 4 years.
If there are prominent Democrats in these materials -- and there certainly could be -- the flock is willing to protect them if it means protecting their orange deity too.
Protect the cult leader at all costs. Rule #1.
That's the template.Why this may certainly be true, since they all belong to the same club, Paradoxical only wishes he had some articulable argument to be made around that theory. Instead he's just throwing the entire kitchen sink at me in the hopes he can actually deflect from defending his own ridiculous claim.
No answer I see.How about actually backing up your assertion the GOP is protecting democrats rather than answering with a question and basically dodging your own point.
They had the files where were you then?So, republicans wanted democrats to do Trump's job?
Well, here's your chance.
Why are they refusing now?
They’re obviously protecting someone and it’s doubtful that they would protect Dems
Just release everything and expose everyone involved. Whether they're Democrats or Republicans, expose them all.
I don't think that's asking too much. And yet here we are with people trying to protect child predators. Unbelievable.
If there are prominent names in the materials -- and it sure looks that way -- the women know they can't just start spraying names around in public unless they have clear evidence. They'd be hauled into court the next day by every name they provided.
I think that's pretty obvious.
So I assume they're willing to confirm names if they came up in the materials, and/or they're providing names to lawyers. Maybe things are going on behind the scenes. Or maybe absolutely nothing is happening. I surely don't know.
What I wonder is why anyone would be downplaying this, mocking this, or trying to block full disclosure of documents. Any number of young girls were abused and taken advantage of, by any number of rich and powerful men. You'd think any decent person would want justice. Especially any father of daughters.
If there are prominent names in the materials -- and it sure looks that way -- the women know they can't just start spraying names around in public unless they have clear evidence. They'd be hauled into court the next day by every name they provided.
I think that's pretty obvious.
So I assume they're willing to confirm names if they came up in the materials, and/or they're providing names to lawyers. Maybe things are going on behind the scenes. Or maybe absolutely nothing is happening. I surely don't know.
What I wonder is why anyone would be downplaying this, mocking this, or trying to block full disclosure of documents. Any number of young girls were abused and taken advantage of, by any number of rich and powerful men. You'd think any decent person would want justice. Especially any father of daughters.
If they had solid evidence they would have exposed it.If there are prominent names in the materials -- and it sure looks that way -- the women know they can't just start spraying names around in public unless they have clear evidence. They'd be hauled into court the next day by every name they provided.
I think that's pretty obvious.
So I assume they're willing to confirm names if they came up in the materials, and/or they're providing names to lawyers. Maybe things are going on behind the scenes. Or maybe absolutely nothing is happening. I surely don't know.
What I wonder is why anyone would be downplaying this, mocking this, or trying to block full disclosure of documents. Any number of young girls were abused and taken advantage of, by any number of rich and powerful men. You'd think any decent person would want justice. Especially any father of daughters.
Keep saying that like a Parrot. A person can get sued for vague accusations.
Where's the "victims" list? Whats stopping them? Money perhaps. They were chirping a month ago. Another payment went in?
There are real crimes and horror stories out there. Not some club med for wayward girls.
Do you want everything released?
Yes love to watch the Hollywood and Deep State "D" in panic mode "cover my butt" denial live.
But if it's just a bunch of scribbled initials like on released flight logs, not interested. They released two or three phases. All crap. Yawning.
Do you want all of the people involved to be punished accordingly?
Too late. Courts already did nothing but silence the Epsteins.
You can't take down foreign dignitaries, Hollywood A list, X-Presidents/Politicians or billion dollar Wall st. CEO types on some sort of here-say story telling BS. Need more than that. When where who what? Got proof? Courts already said NO.
Statue of limitations much? It's all over but the crying. Why you asking me? I'm not any court of law.
I'm just asking you what you want done.
Should the people responsible for the Epstein sex ring be punished accordingly or not?
Simple question.
Wanting people to be punished for taking part in a pedophile sex ring isn't supposed to be a "gotcha" question, and yet here we are. Weird.
Stupid question. You have no crime? No facts? No dates? Names? You got nothing but Leftist commee media feeding you trinkets. And you eat it up like Cheese.
Like asking me do I want Kilkary locked up for murder? Of whom? When? Where? Your just spitting out nonsense.
You have no question, you dumb OX.