An "Epstein Client List" from those who would KNOW

[leftwinger]

LOL Taz Me does irony

MODS posting with rabid TDS, those same few who are moving/deleting honorable posts. Like a bad professor giving A's to girls in short skirts while verbally humiliating only white males during class. Giving automatic D or F where possible to Christians.

Seems unethical?

 

[leftwinger]

The person your buddy is supposedly quoting says that there are plenty of people involved from both parties

How Longtime Epstein Watchers Reacted to the Release of the ‘Epstein Files’

Reporters who have covered the case for years publicly explained why they think an ‘Epstein List’ is unlikely to ever be released.

time.com

There is no there there.

BJ's overseas flights need an explanation. That's all//

 

[Muhammed]

I’d be interested in seeing where you got that and why no Republicans on on that list

Court documents and victim testimony.

If you want any good info you will have to avoid your usual leftist sources. If a source posts a big pic of Epstein with Trump, you'll likely be wasting your time. You'll just be reading a fake news article denigrating Trump and northing substantive about the case.

THINK!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump isn't on the list. If he was, the dems would have shouted it from the rooftops.

And still he hides the Epstein files. After running for President on releasing them.

 

[Muhammed]

This has never been a left / right or Republican / Democrat issue, at least not until Trump told you it "fake news" and you all ran with your new software updates.

You're a pathetic loser.

I have to respectfully disagree with you there. It certainly is a partisan issue because big Democrat donor Jeffrey Epstein and several Democrat government officials were implicated by the victims in their sworn testimony.

And to deflect attention away from all those Democrats who were implicated by the victims, the Democrats are spending $millions to try to insinuate that Trump was somehow implicated, despite a total lack of evidence and the victims' insistence that Trump wasn't involved.

Again, the Democrats are projecting Democrat crimes onto Republicans.

That's why it's a partisan issue.

 

[Lesh]

I have to respectfully disagree with you there. It certainly is a partisan issue because Jeffrey Epstein several Democrat government officials were implicated by the victims in their sworn testimony.

And to deflect attention away from all those Democrats who were implicated by the victims, they are spending $millions to try to insinuate that Trump was somehow involved, despite the victims' insistence that he wasn't.

Again, the Democrats are projecting Democrats crimes onto Republicans.

This is Dems and Repubs and everything in between

All you care about is protecting the Republicans… Trump most particularly

 

[Muhammed]

This is Dems and Repubs and everything in between

All you care about is protecting the Republicans… Trump most particularly

That's a dirty lie.

No Republicans have been implicated by the victims that we know of. I'm not saying that there wasn't any Republican public officials involved, there very well may have been. There's just none that we know about. It just means that, so far, none of the victims have implicated any Republicans in the testimony that the courts have unsealed to date. Nor have the victims publicly implicated any Republican government officials.

 

[Lesh]

That's a dirty lie.

No Republicans have been implicated by the victims that we know of. I'm not saying that there wasn't any Republican public officials involved, there very well may have been. There's just none that we know about. It just means that, so far, none of the victims have implicated any Republicans in the testimony that the courts have unsealed to date. Nor have the victims publicly implicated any Republican government officials.

So Johnson and Trump re protecting Dems?

Sure

 

[Muhammed]

So Johnson and Trump re protecting Dems?

Sure

Protecting? Protecting whom, specifically?

 

[Lesh]

Protecting? Protecting whom, specifically?

They’re obviously protecting someone and it’s doubtful that they would protect Dems

 

[Muhammed]

They’re obviously protecting someone and it’s doubtful that they would protect Dems

Could you be more specific? Protecting whom from what, exactly?

Why are you being so vague?

​

 

[krichton]

The democrats had it for four years. Who were they protecting?

No idea, but we know who the GOP is protecting right now.

 

[Mac1958]

Maybe BOTH parties have a lot to protect. Isn't that possible?

Anyone who doesn't want this information out is simply dishonest and blinded by tribalism. This should be an easy call for any reasonable adult. Especially FATHERS.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Could you be more specific? Protecting whom from what, exactly?

Why are you being so vague?

​

Protecting child molesters and the deep state.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Maybe BOTH parties have a lot to protect. Isn't that possible?

Anyone who doesn't want this information out is simply dishonest and blinded by tribalism. This should be an easy call for any reasonable adult. Especially FATHERS.

There is only one side actively preventing the Epstein files from being released.

Trump's side.

House Republican Says Newly-Elected Democrat Should ...​

Yahoo
https://www.yahoo.com › news › articles › house-repub...
1 day ago — Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ), who has been waiting more than a month to be sworn into office.

 

[Muhammed]

Protecting child molesters and the deep state.

They said they didn't want to prosecute Biden because he's not competent to stand trial due to his cognitive decline.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

They said they didn't want to prosecute Biden because he's not competent to stand trial due to his cognitive decline.

So, the little Trump twerp is protecting BIDEN?

You're as nutty as your dear leader.

 

[Muhammed]

So, the little Trump twerp is protecting BIDEN?

You're as nutty as your dear leader.

Trump isn't protecting any pedophiles, you pathetic low IQ one track mind TDS afflicted moron.

Piss off, piss boy.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Trump isn't protecting any pedophiles, you pathetic low IQ one track mind TDS afflicted moron.

Piss off, piss boy.

Child molester protector.

 

[Muhammed]

Child molester protector.

​

^
Obvious projection.

I'm the only one here calling them out.