An "Epstein Client List" from those who would KNOW

[jc456]

Because the rich and powerful can afford the best lawyers, the poor have practically no legal resources by comparison.

I thought there was corroboration between the ladies? Isn't that why there are 27 of them represented by Gloria Allred?

And we already know which side the state would take given how this issue has been handled so far.

One needs something other than innuendo. And I'm sorry, are you affirming support for guilty before a trial?

 

[Care4all]

Why did Biden and Maureen Comey keep that information from us?

same same

Yes, ok....agree!

So why isn't Trump revealing them now, and why didn't Biden release them before.....? You're wasting time on Comey, under law she can't reveal them....but presidents have power....

Are we really going to deflect to the past hiding, to give the ok for the present hiding them, to get away with it? If Trump gets Doj to turn the FBI investigation of Epstein's over, we can find out WHY the Biden admin didn't.

 

[playtime]

Trump calling it a "hoax" is a pretext to him either pardoning Maxwell or commuting her sentence. And of course his MAGA cult lapdogs will once again defend him because whatever he does is ok with them.

I'll say it again. He could be caught on video molesting a child & they'd still defend him. In fact, they'd blame the kid. And that includes his W.H. toadies & asskissers.

100%.

 

[playtime]

He was invited with Epstein’s brother! Flew to NY, corroborated by the brother. Is that illegal?

Already provided by Epstein’s brother and where they went

okey dokey.

any idea what kinda spin you'll try to perform should there actually be a 50th birthday album with donny actually drawing a nasty pic & his thoughts within it about secrets & signing his name where her short & curlies are?

 

[jc456]

okey dokey.

any idea what kinda spin you'll try to perform should there actually be a 50th birthday album with donny actually drawing a nasty pic & his thoughts within it about secrets & signing his name where her short & curlies are?

well, I doubt you'll have evidence it was from trump, now will you?

 

[jc456]

100%.

ironic

 

[jc456]

Yes, ok....agree!

So why isn't Trump revealing them now, and why didn't Biden release them before.....? You're wasting time on Comey, under law she can't reveal them....but presidents have power....

Are we really going to deflect to the past hiding, to give the ok for the present hiding them, to get away with it? If Trump gets Doj to turn the FBI investigation of Epstein's over, we can find out WHY the Biden admin didn't.

maybe there's nothing there.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

EVIDENCE PLEASE!!!

Greg

Nobody is going to serve it up for a bunch of lazy asses who will only proceed to label it "fake news" or find some other fault with it.

You want evidence, go out & get it yourself, not that you would know what constitutes real evidence even if you were smacked across the face with it.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

I don't know of any Trump accusers.

I'd like to know about those who took advantage of the girls. As I said in the OP.

The thread is not about him. It was MADE to be about him.

There is one, she filed under the pseudonyms “Katie Johnson” and “Jane Doe.”

The 2016 civil suit alleged that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein raped her in 1994 when she was 13; she later voluntarily dismissed the case. Trump denied the allegation. pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.comCourthouse NewsThe GuardianPBS

Sources

• 2016 SDNY complaint (Jane Doe v. Trump & Epstein) – full filing. pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.com
• Refiled complaint (June 2016) PDF (archived by Courthouse News). Courthouse News
• Guardian: accuser (as “Jane Doe”) cancels planned press conference citing threats. The Guardian
• Guardian: lawsuit voluntarily dismissed Nov. 4, 2016. The Guardian
• CourtListener docket for Doe v. Trump, 1:16-cv-07673 (SDNY). CourtListener
• PBS overview of allegations against Trump (includes this case). PBS

 

[WEATHER53]

Part of the problem right now for custody cases and restraining order is the woman does not have to prove one damn thing. All she had to state is “I’m afraid” No police records or anything., no pictures or evidence. They can renew the time the man can’t be around after the initial expiration of the order by stating “I’m still afraid” Thev courts at one time were not enough of an advocate for the woman but it has swung absurdly now the other way.

 

[jc456]

Nobody is going to serve it up for a bunch of lazy asses who will only proceed to label it "fake news" or find some other fault with it.

You want evidence, go out & get it yourself, not that you would know what constitutes real evidence even if you were smacked across the face with it.

Game’s people play who are demofks

 

[MisterBeale]

Now you're acting just like the immature looney fringe you claim to not be a part of.

Number one, why wouldn't I 'like it', that makes no sense. I think Epstein was a disgusting pig that got the end he deserved, and anyone else that participated in molesting under age girls deserves the same fate he got. At the same time, I don't want innocent people thrown under the bus if they did nothing wrong. At this point in time it's only going to be based on 'word', and that's not enough for me to ruin someone's life and/or throw them in prison. You have a warped sense of justice if you feel otherwise.

Epstein was smart, he paid these girls lots of money, and I'm guessing most of them took it. Then if they came back to threaten him with exposure, he most likely told them that he paid them and they took it, and that's what the pubic and their families will hear from him, so that kept them quiet. But it also kept a lot of them coming back for the money, right or wrong. I don't think he forced them, I think he manipulated with money. I didn't hear any testimony that anyone was kidnapped or held against their will, I also have not heard anyone else implicated besides Clinton and Prince Andrew. The victims have been apparently compensated financially for what was done to them, Epstein is dead, Maxwell is in prison. So unless there is some solid evidence that anyone else participated with underage girls, taking it any further is a big nothing burger and a waste of time. The very same thing is going on today, every day, yet all you can focus on is Epstein.

You said something in an earlier post about the government never being free from corruption if this isn't addressed and everything they have revealed. The government will never be free of corruption, ever. That's reality, not a conspiracy theory, anywhere there is money and power there will always be corruption.

So where is verification at? You are now good with just attacking the Elites with no evidence, not even statements?

BTW, Massie said yesterday, names were already out, gave one out in fact, John Paulsen from Epstein's Black Book already out!

Now Tie him to someone. Who does that?

I thought there was corroboration between the ladies? Isn't that why there are 27 of them represented by Gloria Allred?

One needs something other than innuendo. And I'm sorry, are you affirming support for guilty before a trial?

You have made a lot of supposition not supported by facts.

There is some far more corrupt and sinister than just trafficking of minors.

Everything in Webb's work is footnoted, and she always makes clear when she is speculating.

If you want to continue to discuss this with me, you will have to watch the whole thing.

I'm guessing you don't even know that Epstein was likely thrown under the bus, (in a legal manner,) by forces most folks can't even begin to comprehend.

Whitney Webb: EPSTEIN, Intelligence & the Global Network of Power | Peter McCormack Show​

9 hours ago

One Nation Under Blackmail​

https://dn721605.ca.archive.org/0/items/one-nation-under-blackmail-vol-1-2-whitney-alyse-webb_202401/One%20Nation%20Under%20Blackmail--Vol%201%262%20-%20Whitney%20Alyse%20Webb.pdf

One Nation Under Blackmail

One Nation Under Blackmail is now available.

unlimitedhangout.com

So why isn't Trump revealing them now, and why didn't Biden release them before.....?

Review all the known information, and I think you can figure it out. Tilll I finished watching this, even I did not know the nature of the connections between Khashoggi and Epstein.

 

[MisterBeale]

Maybe there's a legitimate reason the evidence can't be released?

Nothing "legitimate," no.

 

[MisterBeale]

You have made a lot of supposition not supported by facts.

There is some far more corrupt and sinister than just trafficking of minors.

Everything in Webb's work is footnoted, and she always makes clear when she is speculating.

If you want to continue to discuss this with me, you will have to watch the whole thing.

I'm guessing you don't even know that Epstein was likely thrown under the bus, (in a legal manner,) by forces most folks can't even begin to comprehend.

Whitney Webb: EPSTEIN, Intelligence & the Global Network of Power | Peter McCormack Show​

9 hours ago

One Nation Under Blackmail​

https://dn721605.ca.archive.org/0/items/one-nation-under-blackmail-vol-1-2-whitney-alyse-webb_202401/One%20Nation%20Under%20Blackmail--Vol%201%262%20-%20Whitney%20Alyse%20Webb.pdf

One Nation Under Blackmail

One Nation Under Blackmail is now available.

unlimitedhangout.com

Review all the known information, and I think you can figure it out. Tilll I finished watching this, even I did not know the nature of the connections between Khashoggi and Epstein.

 

[gtopa1]

Nobody is going to serve it up for a bunch of lazy asses who will only proceed to label it "fake news" or find some other fault with it.

You want evidence, go out & get it yourself, not that you would know what constitutes real evidence even if you were smacked across the face with it.

So you don't have any. What about Epstein's FIRST TRIAL and conviction?

You are not only lazy; you're uninformed and ignorant!!!

Greg

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Part of the problem right now for custody cases and restraining order is the woman does not have to prove one damn thing. All she had to state is “I’m afraid” No police records or anything., no pictures or evidence. They can renew the time the man can’t be around after the initial expiration of the order by stating “I’m still afraid” Thev courts at one time were not enough of an advocate for the woman but it has swung absurdly now the other way.

That's a horrible generalization especially since it's not true.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

None of these women will say anything. They are enjoying publicity and looking to make a few bucks off appearances.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

So you don't have any. What about Epstein's FIRST TRIAL and conviction?

You are not only lazy; you're uninformed and ignorant!!!

Greg

It's not my fault you're disadvantaged and can't relieve your own ignorance without relying on others who are more knowledgeable that yourself.

Normally I would tell you that not knowing something is nothing to be ashamed of but in your case, attacking someone and projecting all of your failings onto them is not only stupid but just pathetic so I just don't care about your emotional and mental problems.

 

[jc456]

It's not my fault you're disadvantaged and can't relieve your own ignorance without relying on others who are more knowledgeable that yourself.

Normally I would tell you that not knowing something is nothing to be ashamed of

Cause you’re experienced in knowing nothing

but in your case, attacking someone and projecting all of your failings onto them is not only stupid but just pathetic so I just don't care about your emotional and mental problems.

Blah blah blah

 

[OldFlame]

Nothing "legitimate," no.

How would you know?

You're a conspiracy theorist, along with having zero respect for anyone else's opinion because they haven't gone down the same rabbit holes you have. How do you know that anything you've read is true?