An "Epstein Client List" from those who would KNOW

[Seymour Flops]

Given Epstein's motives and the way he operated, my guess is that there are some important names who took advantage of this (and perhaps blackmailed). I'd also guess that those names are far more about wealth size than politics.

Sure, but thise with great wealth are often heavy donors to the most powerful politicians.

No doubt that's why Team Biden did not consider releasing "Epstein's List."

I have a few friends at Goldman Sachs, and they just assume that Epstein was blackmailing people, and they have for a long time. He was not managing money, at least not in the traditional sense. Not to make the kind of money he had.

I dont doubt it.

This is about fat cats using teenaged girls. Personally, I think that's worth our rapt attention.

Why, though?

Epstein is dead and his partner is in the slammer. They wont be exploiting anymore teenagers.

Shouldn't our rapt attention be on young children who were brought to the U.S. during (and by) the last administration? Many were sold into sexual and labor slavery, and they are largely still in that plight.

 

[Mac1958]

Sure, but thise with great wealth are often heavy donors to the most powerful politicians.

No doubt that's why Team Biden did not consider releasing "Epstein's List."

I dont doubt it.

Why, though?

Epstein is dead and his partner is in the slammer. They wont be exploiting anymore teenagers.

Shouldn't our rapt attention be on young children who were brought to the U.S. during (and by) the last administration? Many were sold into sexual and kabor alavery, and they are largely still in that plight.

I think we can walk and chew gum at the same time. There's a lot of things we need to work on.

Learning the full story here wouldn't take much effort in the big picture. I'm a dad of two daughters, and I don't like this.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I have listened to several victims that broke their silence.... they all were referring to Epstein and Epstein alone... they mentioned no one else... I think it is great if they do create their own list of "clients".... but they will have to back up their claims with some evidence or proof.... I have yet to see any names other than Epstein and Maxwell being mentioned... which is exactly what any/ all court filing reflect so far... Virginia Giuffre is the closest yet with a civil, not criminal, case that included a financial payment, but did not involve any admission of liability or wrongdoing.

These girls may not know any of the names. It seems they were mainly middle age and older wealthy men. At that age, they would know that era's equivelent of Justin Bieber and Hawk Thuey, but not the president of Acme Oil or a second tier royal.

 

[MisterBeale]

you think a client list is?

I highly suspect that the evidence Maureen Comey had suppressed from Epstein's trial listed the names of clients who received trafficked women.

Just as the Acosta deal gave blanket immunity to everyone involved.

 

[leftwinger]

If you don't like my posts, put me on ignore.

Otherwise, you'll just have to get over it.

And there we have it the old Mac&Cheese greasy foot dance surrender.

Because the rich and powerful can afford the best lawyers, the poor have practically no legal resources by comparison.

And we already know which side the state would take given how this issue has been handled so far.

The rotten judges are supposed to watch out for poor defendants and not allow them run over by money.

 

[MisterBeale]

Do you want people convicted on someone's word alone? I'm not sure what you expect?

Of course not, the state should release the evidence if there is nothing to it.

George W. Bush didn't, Obama didn't, Trump hasn't, nor did Biden.

. . . but then if they did, we might find that they have declined to prosecute obvious criminals.

 

[Rawley]

Holy crap, I hadn't thought of this: Jeffrey Epstein Survivors Say They’re Compiling Their Own ‘Client List’ of Powerful Associates

They release their "list" yet?

 

[Rawley]

Because Biden's not as stupid as trump, Biden didn't need to dangle the Epstein files in order to get votes as trump did, now trump's promise has come back to bite him in the ass. He assumed everyone would just forget about (more) broken promises.

Many who voted for trump believed he'd release the files but can now see he's a liar.

Link to one campaign rally where Trump promised to release "the Epstein files" You can't, because he didn't.

You should really vet the talking points your masters give to you before your regurgitate them. Otherwise, you come of like an ignorant partisan stooge.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Link to one campaign rally where Trump promised to release "the Epstein files" You can't, because he didn't.

You should really vet the talking points your masters give to you before your regurgitate them. Otherwise, you come of like an ignorant partisan stooge.

Trump suggests he’ll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list’ if elected: ‘I’d have no problem with it’

During an appearance on “The Lex Fridman Podcast,” Trump, 78, insisted that he never visited the dead financier and alleged sex trafficker’s notorious private island, where scores of young women an…

nypost.com

Trump, Who Campaigned On Releasing Epstein Files, Gets Roasted For Calling Them A ‘Democrat Hoax’

A year after making campaign promises to release info on the convicted sex trafficker, the president is now blaming his enemies.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Rawley]

Trump suggests he’ll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list’ if elected: ‘I’d have no problem with it’

During an appearance on “The Lex Fridman Podcast,” Trump, 78, insisted that he never visited the dead financier and alleged sex trafficker’s notorious private island, where scores of young women an…

nypost.com

Trump, Who Campaigned On Releasing Epstein Files, Gets Roasted For Calling Them A ‘Democrat Hoax’

A year after making campaign promises to release info on the convicted sex trafficker, the president is now blaming his enemies.

www.yahoo.com

So you can't. You should stop shilling for your masters. Again, makes you look like an ignorant stooge.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

So you can't. You should stop shilling for your masters. Again, makes you look like an ignorant stooge.

You interpret trump's word anyway you like, so will I.

I know your type, even if there was a video of him saying "I promise I'll release the Epstein files when elected" you'd claim it actually meant something else, so **** off.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Shouldn't our rapt attention be on young children who were brought to the U.S. during (and by) the last administration? Many were sold into sexual and labor slavery, and they are largely still in that plight.

But... But... TRUMP!!!!!

That's about the only answer you will get from the left. I do admit it is a good topic to research and attack the left with about two weeks to go before the midterms. Show America what the democraps really wanted from illegal immigration. Sex slaves and slave labor. Notice that slavery is still a tenet of the democrap party?

 

[OldFlame]

I guess that means all information you don't like must be a lie.

Now you're acting just like the immature looney fringe you claim to not be a part of.

Number one, why wouldn't I 'like it', that makes no sense. I think Epstein was a disgusting pig that got the end he deserved, and anyone else that participated in molesting under age girls deserves the same fate he got. At the same time, I don't want innocent people thrown under the bus if they did nothing wrong. At this point in time it's only going to be based on 'word', and that's not enough for me to ruin someone's life and/or throw them in prison. You have a warped sense of justice if you feel otherwise.

Epstein was smart, he paid these girls lots of money, and I'm guessing most of them took it. Then if they came back to threaten him with exposure, he most likely told them that he paid them and they took it, and that's what the pubic and their families will hear from him, so that kept them quiet. But it also kept a lot of them coming back for the money, right or wrong. I don't think he forced them, I think he manipulated with money. I didn't hear any testimony that anyone was kidnapped or held against their will, I also have not heard anyone else implicated besides Clinton and Prince Andrew. The victims have been apparently compensated financially for what was done to them, Epstein is dead, Maxwell is in prison. So unless there is some solid evidence that anyone else participated with underage girls, taking it any further is a big nothing burger and a waste of time. The very same thing is going on today, every day, yet all you can focus on is Epstein.

You said something in an earlier post about the government never being free from corruption if this isn't addressed and everything they have revealed. The government will never be free of corruption, ever. That's reality, not a conspiracy theory, anywhere there is money and power there will always be corruption.

 

[Rawley]

You interpret trump's word anyway you like, so will I.

I know your type, even if there was a video of him saying "I promise I'll release the Epstein files when elected" you'd claim it actually meant something else, so **** off.

No skin off my nose if you want to portray yourself as an ignorant stooge for your masters. More power to ya,

 

[Dorian Mode]

I also have not heard anyone else implicated besides Clinton and Prince Andrew.

Wasn't Bill Gates implicated? His wife divorced him because of this "friendship" with Epstein.

 

[OldFlame]

Of course not, the state should release the evidence if there is nothing to it.

George W. Bush didn't, Obama didn't, Trump hasn't, nor did Biden.

. . . but then if they did, we might find that they have declined to prosecute obvious criminals.

Maybe there's a legitimate reason the evidence can't be released? But that's never a consideration, it's always some conspiracy theory that it's being withheld to protect people. And even if it is, there's not a damn thing anyone of us can do to change that.

 

[OldFlame]

Wasn't Bill Gates implicated? His wife divorced him because of this "friendship" with Epstein.

I haven't as much info on him, but that's what I've heard..

 

[leftwinger]

According to Dershowitz (Lawyer in the Courtroom) there were millions of pages of documents. Some girls named names (QTY 6?). One girl was proven to be lying. None of the names are "current" Politicians but some are big business (or dignitaries?).

All those names were put under GAG ORDER and redacted or sealed. But now Board Stain want someone to go back into older non-court "evidence" and publish names? Or do you want the Court to un-redact and un-Gag those names?

Yes, it is a mess. Made worse as you run from post to post spouting nonsense and lying. Shame on MAC&Cheese also, He is an Elitist. He is supposed to know better than typical TDS Board Stain.

 

[Dorian Mode]

I haven't as much info on him, but that's what I've heard..

Bill Gates is still doing his thing for the WEF, so being implicated with Epstein isn't going to bring anyone down. While the democraps obsess over this long shot at getting Trump, I think I will turn my attention to much more important things, like all the progress made at the Shanghai summit. Americans are worried about Epstein while the rest of the world is plotting to remove the US as world leader.

 

[jc456]

I highly suspect that the evidence Maureen Comey had suppressed from Epstein's trial listed the names of clients who received trafficked women.

Just as the Acosta deal gave blanket immunity to everyone involved.

So where is verification at? You are now good with just attacking the Elites with no evidence, not even statements?

BTW, Massie said yesterday, names were already out, gave one out in fact, John Paulsen from Epstein's Black Book already out!

Now Tie him to someone. Who does that?