Amy Coney Barrett Is Making Liberal Heads Explode and It’s GLORIOUS

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
62,526
Reaction score
20,342
Points
2,250
Location
Left Coast, Classified
“The idea that the Democrats can suddenly stop on a dime and cease being the vile creatures they’ve become especially since 2017 seems a little far-fetched to me. These people are proud of their aberrant behavior. They are already in tantrum mode and that’s not going to get any better between now and the beginning of the hearing.”

It is truly glorious. Everything you expect from the Left exposed at the touch of a button. Racism, religious bigotry, lies, anti-Americanism.

 

AzogtheDefiler

The Pale Orc
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
32,027
Reaction score
8,709
Points
1,340
Location
Boston, MA
“The idea that the Democrats can suddenly stop on a dime and cease being the vile creatures they’ve become especially since 2017 seems a little far-fetched to me. These people are proud of their aberrant behavior. They are already in tantrum mode and that’s not going to get any better between now and the beginning of the hearing.”

It is truly glorious. Everything you expect from the Left exposed at the touch of a button. Racism, religious bigotry, lies, anti-Americanism.

1601298817938.png
 

miketx

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
83,934
Reaction score
22,534
Points
2,220
“The idea that the Democrats can suddenly stop on a dime and cease being the vile creatures they’ve become especially since 2017 seems a little far-fetched to me. These people are proud of their aberrant behavior. They are already in tantrum mode and that’s not going to get any better between now and the beginning of the hearing.”

It is truly glorious. Everything you expect from the Left exposed at the touch of a button. Racism, religious bigotry, lies, anti-Americanism.

I wish she really was making their heads pop. I would pay to see that.
 

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
60,076
Reaction score
8,331
Points
2,070
it's not merely things that upsets liberals, it's their opinion about them that does!
 

ImAlwaysRight

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
401
Reaction score
928
Points
158
Location
Texas
“The idea that the Democrats can suddenly stop on a dime and cease being the vile creatures they’ve become especially since 2017 seems a little far-fetched to me. These people are proud of their aberrant behavior. They are already in tantrum mode and that’s not going to get any better between now and the beginning of the hearing.”

It is truly glorious. Everything you expect from the Left exposed at the touch of a button. Racism, religious bigotry, lies, anti-Americanism.

The democrat senate judiciary committee members lack the intellect, morality, and professionalism to sit in the same room with Amy Coney Barrett.
 

LiberalsLIE

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
253
Reaction score
361
Points
158
“The idea that the Democrats can suddenly stop on a dime and cease being the vile creatures they’ve become especially since 2017 seems a little far-fetched to me. These people are proud of their aberrant behavior. They are already in tantrum mode and that’s not going to get any better between now and the beginning of the hearing.”

It is truly glorious. Everything you expect from the Left exposed at the touch of a button. Racism, religious bigotry, lies, anti-Americanism.


Now we are replacing a demonic baby-killing hag with an all-American mom on SCOTUS.

Yah baby, thats my America
 

Rambunctious

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
36,597
Reaction score
15,932
Points
1,590
It is unconstitutional to bring up her faith during any confirmation hearing...lets see if the dems cross that line......
 

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
65,281
Reaction score
22,262
Points
2,290
1601308160731.png




Democrats are walking a tight-rope....trying to figure out just before an election how to attack & completely destroy a highly educated, extremely intelligent, highly qualified, professional, accomplished Catholic female Judge without coming across as misogynist, racist, and anti-Christian/Catholicism (especially when the former VP is a Catholic)....
 

DBA

Platinum Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Messages
2,909
Reaction score
1,888
Points
940
she follows the law as it is written, not as she wishes it was written, that's why they give her so much hate asunder
Yes, she and most other Conservative judges tend to actually to their jobs instead of acting as activists who follow the party line with nearly every single vote. No wonder they hate them so much.
 

Richard-H

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
5,604
Reaction score
915
Points
245
I'm perfectly O.K. with ACB's nomination and appointment to the USSC. The Republicans are acting in accordance with the Constitution.

What I object to is their 2016 refusal to consider Garland. It is their constitutional obligation to hold hearing and vote on all Presidential USSC nominations.

If the Senate does not have to consider USSC nominations, then it effectively gives the Senate the power to obliterate the USSC. That obviously is not the intention of the Constitution.

If the Senate takes no action in a reasonable amount of time then the President's nominee should be appointed by default.

I know that Trumpbots only see this through the eyes of extreme partisanship, but it's the principal of the Senate having the power to obliterate the USSC that's the real problem.
 

bendog

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
34,924
Reaction score
4,130
Points
1,140
Location
Dog House in back yard
I'm perfectly O.K. with ACB's nomination and appointment to the USSC. The Republicans are acting in accordance with the Constitution.

What I object to is their 2016 refusal to consider Garland. It is their constitutional obligation to hold hearing and vote on all Presidential USSC nominations.

If the Senate does not have to consider USSC nominations, then it effectively gives the Senate the power to obliterate the USSC. That obviously is not the intention of the Constitution.

If the Senate takes no action in a reasonable amount of time then the President's nominee should be appointed by default.

I know that Trumpbots only see this through the eyes of extreme partisanship, but it's the principal of the Senate having the power to obliterate the USSC that's the real problem.
I have to disagree on putting someone in if the Senate does not take up the vote. Suppose a Senate of the same party as the Pres sees a nominee of having really negative attributes. Don't give them a vote and make the potus withdraw the nominee and try again.

I don't think McConnell has really done anything untoward …. beyond telling RGB she couldn't retire because he'd never confirm three seats for Obama. But the effect of McConnell saying "no vote" to Garland and then shoving Barrett though, plus the RGB shannaigans will be, very possibily, the dems never confirming ANY justice if they hold the senate and republican is president.

THAT would be a clusterfk.
 

Votto

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
25,182
Reaction score
7,684
Points
350
That's right friends, the new Supreme Court justice is part of the notorious cult called Catholicism.

Now don't get me wrong, Catholics in government are perfectly fine so long as they have a "D" by their name and ignore their religious beliefs about such things as abortion that they profess to believe in, like the self identified Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden, but to actually live your faith instead of living their lives for their political party and their beliefs, that is unacceptable.

Barrett is a danger to us all.

Only the DNC has a belief system we can all adopt and live our lives for.
 

Votto

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
25,182
Reaction score
7,684
Points
350
Putting conservatives on the bench to rule over Roe vs. Wade is just wrong.

Only women should make such decisions..................................oh wait.






Never mind.
 

Votto

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
25,182
Reaction score
7,684
Points
350
To think that religious folk should impose their silly notions of God on us is unacceptable.

I mean really, an invisible God? That's just silly, right?

We all know that the unborn are not really human beings because to become a human being you need the Birth Fairy to wave her magic wand over the fetus as "it" exists the womb, thus making it human.




Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people?
 

jwoodie

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
14,638
Reaction score
3,326
Points
280
But the effect of McConnell saying "no vote" to Garland and then shoving Barrett though, plus the RGB shannaigans will be, very possibily, the dems never confirming ANY justice if they hold the senate and republican is president.
That effect is already in place. The Dems do not respect any norms of behavior or rule of law that is not to their benefit. The Reps seem to finally be waking up to this. One has to fight fire with fire.

P.S. It takes the approval of the Senate to confirm a judicial nominee. Whether or not a vote or even a hearing takes place is immaterial if a majority of senators do not support the nominee.
 

Richard-H

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
5,604
Reaction score
915
Points
245
I'm perfectly O.K. with ACB's nomination and appointment to the USSC. The Republicans are acting in accordance with the Constitution.

What I object to is their 2016 refusal to consider Garland. It is their constitutional obligation to hold hearing and vote on all Presidential USSC nominations.

If the Senate does not have to consider USSC nominations, then it effectively gives the Senate the power to obliterate the USSC. That obviously is not the intention of the Constitution.

If the Senate takes no action in a reasonable amount of time then the President's nominee should be appointed by default.

I know that Trumpbots only see this through the eyes of extreme partisanship, but it's the principal of the Senate having the power to obliterate the USSC that's the real problem.
I have to disagree on putting someone in if the Senate does not take up the vote. Suppose a Senate of the same party as the Pres sees a nominee of having really negative attributes. Don't give them a vote and make the potus withdraw the nominee and try again.

I don't think McConnell has really done anything untoward …. beyond telling RGB she couldn't retire because he'd never confirm three seats for Obama. But the effect of McConnell saying "no vote" to Garland and then shoving Barrett though, plus the RGB shannaigans will be, very possibily, the dems never confirming ANY justice if they hold the senate and republican is president.

THAT would be a clusterfk.
The Senate should be obligated to hold a hearing and vote. If the nominee has really 'negative attribute' they can vote to reject them.

The on;y problem with the nominee getting the appointment by default is if the leadership of the senate wants a nominee to get the appointment but knows that the Senate will never approve - it would allow them to get the appointment by the Senate doing nothing. That really wouldn't work either.

Either way some rule should be made that requires the Senate to hold hearings and vote.

Shoving Barret through is typical of how things have always been done in Washington. It was the refusal to hold hearing and vote on Garland that was really highly unusual.

But now the Republican Senate has proven that they have no principals. I'm surprised they can trust each other.
 

Dragonlady

Designing Woman
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
25,814
Reaction score
8,254
Points
910
Location
Niagara Escarpment
“The idea that the Democrats can suddenly stop on a dime and cease being the vile creatures they’ve become especially since 2017 seems a little far-fetched to me. These people are proud of their aberrant behavior. They are already in tantrum mode and that’s not going to get any better between now and the beginning of the hearing.”

It is truly glorious. Everything you expect from the Left exposed at the touch of a button. Racism, religious bigotry, lies, anti-Americanism.

Once again, you prove your agenda is not the good governance of the country, but rather to sow division, and "make liberal heads explode". Hate, division and

The good news is that in making this nomination BEFORE the election, Trump can't leverage the possibility of his making the nomination an election issue. Vote for Trump to secure the Court for decades. Trump thinks that women will for him because he nominated a woman. But in nominatingn a woman with a stated agenda of reversing Roe v. Wade, Trump has motivated women to come out and vote AGAINST him, in order to give Democrats everything but the judiciary, and using it to undermine the Conservative Court and codify rights for women, gays, and minorities.

I'm THRILLED that Trump is doing it. As always and with every decision, Trump has done the one thing that will most damage him politically with women in nominating this patently unqualified woman on the basis of her promise to overturn Roe v. Wade.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top