“Americans Must Stand Up to the Fraud. Kari Lake Did that. Thank God for Kari Lake!”

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Sadly for you, no one is obligated to prove a negative.

And by avoiding showing proof that someone intentionally sabotaged the tabulators, you reveal there is no such proof.

* POOF *

There goes Lake's lawsuit.

.



Luckily for you, is what I think you mean.



.

 

[Faun]

Once again show proof that there wasn't any fraud. You can't.

LOL

Is that going to be Lake's argument in court?

 

[Faun]

.



Luckily for you, is what I think you mean.

Poor baby.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

LOL

Is that going to be Lake's argument in court?

.


Translation: "Whew! I think I got out of that one".



.

 

[Blaster]

LOL

Is that going to be Lake's argument in court?

I'm not her lawyer.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Poor baby.

.


Thanks for almost participating.

You could, however, use some original material. Getting a bit stale.



.

 

[Faun]

.


Translation: "Whew! I think I got out of that one".

Got out of what, RedWave? Seems you too don't understand how this works. Kari Lake filed an affirmative lawsuit claiming election fraud. The burden to prove that falls on her. I'm challenging her supporters here to show she has a case and all I see is, nuh-uh, prove she doesn't.

 

[Faun]

I'm not her lawyer.

Didn't say you were. But you are supporting her. Yet you can't even show she has a valid argument.

 

[Faun]

.


Thanks for almost participating.

You could, however, use some original material. Getting a bit stale.

 

[Blaster]

Didn't say you were. But you are supporting her. Yet you can't even show she has a valid argument.

I don't need to show the validity of her argument. You seem upset by this.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I don't need to show the validity of her argument. You seem upset by this.

.


The demon triggers easily.



.

 

[Faun]

I don't need to show the validity of her argument. You seem upset by this.

Why would that upset me? I suspect she can't either.

 

[Chillicothe]

"Once again show proof that there wasn't any fraud. You can't."

And that's your go-to argument, poster Blaster? "Proving" a negative?

I don't mean this disrespectfully, but......but really, what level of education do you have?
You seemed to have skipped some classes.

 

[Blaster]

I don't mean this disrespectfully, but......but really, what level of education do you have?
You seemed to have skipped some classes.

I have a masters degree.

 

[Chillicothe]

"I have a masters degree."

Well, thank you for answering, but.........

....but if cannot prove there is a God....does that mean there isn't one?

.....but if I cannot proves there isn't a God.....does that mean there is one?

 

[Lastamender]

Because there was no fraud as she claims.

How do you know that? Let a court decide. She has standing and her case will be heard.

 

[Faun]

How do you know that? Let a court decide. She has standing and her case will be heard.

Like her last two cases?

 

[Lastamender]

Like her last two cases?

The Ninth Circuit Court said she has standing. The next trial will be different.

 

[Faun]

The Ninth Circuit Court said she has standing. The next trial will be different.

Oh? What evidence does she have now that wasn’t considered "baseless" in her last trial?

Judge calls election lawsuit ‘baseless,’ orders Kari Lake, Mark Finchem to pay court fees

County election officials will have 14 days to list out all of the court costs.

www.azfamily.com

 

[Lastamender]

Oh? What evidence does she have now that wasn’t considered "baseless" in her last trial?

Judge calls election lawsuit ‘baseless,’ orders Kari Lake, Mark Finchem to pay court fees

County election officials will have 14 days to list out all of the court costs.

www.azfamily.com

A judge cannot make that determination without an investigation. Again the Ninth Circuit took care of that. Their decision is now history and there will be a trial.