Americans being FORCED OUT OF THEIR HOME to allow illegal aliens a place to live.

[Nostra]

you defend those who will not address that.

So do you by opposing the wall

The wall is nothing more then an excuse for not enforcing employment laws. The wall.will take decades. Enforcing employment laws can be done now. People will still come with a wall. You can not wall in the country. If the jobs aren't here they do not come.

The wall is nothing more then an excuse for not enforcing employment laws.

Those in charge of securing the border say you are full of shit. So they agree with 99.99% of anyone who has every seen anything you post.

It's an excuse. If the jobs aren't here there is very little to enforce and border patrols job becomes far easier.

No. The wall is for securing the border.

Claiming it is an excuse for not enforcing employment laws makes you look like a raving lunatic.

 

[Nostra]

The wall is nothing more then an excuse for not enforcing employment laws.

Actually its the other way around

opposing the wall is your way of keeping the border open

which I think is what you really want

Our borders will always be open. There is NO possible way to close our borders. But you know this.

Sure there is. It could be done in a matter of weeks.

 

[Nostra]

You parrot this over and over again as if you have data yet you offer no statistics....So show us; what percentage of illegals come for the jobs cleaning shitters and what percentage come for all the free shit?

I've posted that there is very little in benefits available for illegals many times.

Yeah, what you post is always 100% BULLSHIT.

Illegal Immigration a $113 Billion a Year Drain on U.S. Taxpayers | FAIRUS.org

www.fairus.org

That doesn't dispute what I said. I never said they cost us nothing. I said they do NOT qualify for welfare. They do not.

What they cost us is more corporate welfare.

Another of your lies. The children do qualify for welfare, and they use all that money to support the family.

That's what you do, you lie, lie and lie

I have already pointed out to pknopp the exact pages of the report that detail what welfare costs are for illegals...........amounts to almost $5 billion per year when the study was done.

The troll has ignored having his lies exposed as if that will change the fact he has been caught being a lying sack.

 

[jc456]

There are thousands of miles of borders that there will never be a wall.

We dont need a wall along many areas

but it does require electronic monitoring

LOL......and the people are long gone by time anyone checks it out.

So what’s the solution?

 

[WTH_Progs?]

American's have been kicked out of their jobs for decades.

Are you literally retarded?

He's PROG, like every PROG on this board they're incapable of expressing a coherent thought greater than one word.

Look at ALL PROG posts, which are generally one sentence that only mean distortion, distraction, projection and trash.

 

[pknopp]

There are thousands of miles of borders that there will never be a wall.

We dont need a wall along many areas

but it does require electronic monitoring

LOL......and the people are long gone by time anyone checks it out.

So what’s the solution?

I should have simply down voted your reply. I've noted over and over what we need to do.

 

[badger2]

POSPOTUS JoeXi: Dem-Opportunist Theologian-Whore

That JoeXi’s Catholic-CIA handlers know it’s classic Jeffersonian at the Mexican border (even more complete with blm opportunist violence) is reinforced by previous American history:

‘On December 9, 1863, Secretary Chase approved the final language: “In God We Trust.” Congress made the change official a few months later when it passed a new coinage bill, though it did not actually vote on the new language — it simply gave the Mint director, Pollock, the power to fix the shape, motto, and devices of the coins, with the approval of the Treasury secretary.

So, at the advice of a proselytizing preacher, two government officials—one with a religious agenda so all-consuming he was trying to amend the Constitution to honor his god — deliberately used the time of “national peril and danger,” when people were too busy dying for the Constitution to protect it from a rear-guard assault, to promote their personal religion. Even if this addition were not decades after the founding, it’s hard to see how three men betraying a founding principle — keeping church and state separate — is itself a founding principle. Watkinson, Pollock, and Chase took advantage of a fearful, distracted nation and abused their government offices to impose their personal religious beliefs on all citizens.

There is a perverse irony in three men choosing to promote the world’s most divisive force, religion, when fighting a war to preserve a national union. To choose something so quintessentially divisive to replace a unifying sentiment in the middle of a war that aсtually sundered the nation shows hubris typical of religious privilege.’
(Seidel, The Founding Myth: Why Christian Nationalism is Un-American, Сh. 24 “In God We Trust”: The. Belligerent Motto)

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Trump tore families apart and the parent was not a criminal and did not go to jail.
Bush, Clinton, and Obama were not divisive. Trump is belligerent and knows
nothing about governing.

Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. How about documenting what you claim instead of just
spewing stuff out your backside? To claim children were ripped from parents who were NOT illegally
in the country is just utter bull!
Saying other presidents were not divisive when Bush, Clinton and Obama split the nation down the middle
is utter idiocy.

I should rip the rest of your stupid screed a new butt hole, like I did just the first two sentences, but it isn't worth my time since facts and common sense are completely lost on you.
It's like arguing with a farm animal except farm animals have more common sense. Just know your drivel
should be put in a time capsule when future generations try to understand why America went crashing off
the tracks.

I deeply regret legitimizing you to this point by attempting to discuss issues with you but never more.

 

[badger2]

On the current Illegal Mexican-catholic injection, there is historical resonance in another example of protection-racket fearmongering opportunism. Whereas xians opportunized the Civil War in this Jeffersonian pathology, catholics took their place at the start of the Cold War:

’Injecting a deity into the Pledge of Allegiance has proved central to the Christian nationalist narrative and identity. As with “In God We Trust,” the phrase’s history tells us more about christian nationalism than about America’s founding, especially given the timing. As with “In God We Trust,” a unifying national maxim was made divisive. In this instance, rather than seeking to replace the unifying motto, the religious proponents drove a sectarian wedge into it.

Prior to the change, the pledge glorified “one nation indivisible,” an important theme for a nation that was still recovering from the Civil War when Francis Bellamy wrote the pledge in 1892. In a fitting precursor to American companies actively selling religion to undermine governmental regulation, Bellamy was hired to write the pledge buy a children’s magazine, the Youth’s Companion, for their campaign to sell flags to schools to help boost subscriptions.

Bellamy would go on to become a New York ad man, even penning a book called Effective Magazine Advertizing. But when he wrote the pledge, Bellamy was a Baptist minister and thought the pledge complete without references to his personal god. Some six decades later, the Catholic fraternal order, Knights of Columbus, disagreed. It conceived of a pious pledge and pushed Congress to include the nod to their god in the early 1950s. The Knights found a champion for their crusade in Michigan representative Louis C. Rabaut, himself a devout Catholic — three of his dauighters were nuns and one of his sons was a Jesuit priest. More than sixty years later, “One nation, indivisible” became “one nation, under God, indivisible.” This change places religion, history’s most belligerent, contentious force, smack in the middle of the unifying sentiment. It literally divides the indivisible with religion. Dividing the indivisible might be ironic if not for the method used: the politics of fear.’
(Seidel, op cit)

 

[badger2]

Ah, The Great Outdoors!

We are much less surprised about OP’s news coming from Renton, because of both the Obama connection and the corporate connection: Sally served under the first Arab president of the United States and was also CEO of REI.

Renton, Washington

Renton, Washington - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Sally Jewell

Sally Jewell - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This is an excellent example of how the catholics **** Americans once they get a puppet in the White House.

 

[badger2]

It seems apropo to honor Sassy’s Irish spirit at this point. Having a working knowledge of Migne’s Patrologia Latina, whose volumes took up an entire wall of the Stanbrook Library, Helen Waddell:

’It is the theologians, but not the poets, who divide the undivided trinity in the pot-houses of Paris. Urania and Nature cover their faces and worship before the mystery of the triple-shafted fire.’
(Waddell, The Wandering Scholars)

Waddell also said....”I won’t go to heaven when I die. Just let me walk the green of Shillelagh.”

 

[danielpalos]

On the current Illegal Mexican-catholic injection, there is historical resonance in another example of protection-racket fearmongering opportunism. Whereas xians opportunized the Civil War in this Jeffersonian pathology, catholics took their place at the start of the Cold War:

’Injecting a deity into the Pledge of Allegiance has proved central to the Christian nationalist narrative and identity. As with “In God We Trust,” the phrase’s history tells us more about christian nationalism than about America’s founding, especially given the timing. As with “In God We Trust,” a unifying national maxim was made divisive. In this instance, rather than seeking to replace the unifying motto, the religious proponents drove a sectarian wedge into it.

Prior to the change, the pledge glorified “one nation indivisible,” an important theme for a nation that was still recovering from the Civil War when Francis Bellamy wrote the pledge in 1892. In a fitting precursor to American companies actively selling religion to undermine governmental regulation, Bellamy was hired to write the pledge buy a children’s magazine, the Youth’s Companion, for their campaign to sell flags to schools to help boost subscriptions.

Bellamy would go on to become a New York ad man, even penning a book called Effective Magazine Advertizing. But when he wrote the pledge, Bellamy was a Baptist minister and thought the pledge complete without references to his personal god. Some six decades later, the Catholic fraternal order, Knights of Columbus, disagreed. It conceived of a pious pledge and pushed Congress to include the nod to their god in the early 1950s. The Knights found a champion for their crusade in Michigan representative Louis C. Rabaut, himself a devout Catholic — three of his dauighters were nuns and one of his sons was a Jesuit priest. More than sixty years later, “One nation, indivisible” became “one nation, under God, indivisible.” This change places religion, history’s most belligerent, contentious force, smack in the middle of the unifying sentiment. It literally divides the indivisible with religion. Dividing the indivisible might be ironic if not for the method used: the politics of fear.’
(Seidel, op cit)

I thought it was about the Cold War and how alleged Capitalists gave up their firm Belief in Capitalism for the socialism of Religion.

 

[Disir]

There are thousands of miles of borders that there will never be a wall.

We dont need a wall along many areas

but it does require electronic monitoring

LOL......and the people are long gone by time anyone checks it out.

So what’s the solution?

I should have simply down voted your reply. I've noted over and over what we need to do.

What cracks me up is that Bobob is putting all the crap you maintain is the problem and are against right next to yours and there is not a peep from you about it. It's too damn funny. #LOLDEM BS

 

[pknopp]

There are thousands of miles of borders that there will never be a wall.

We dont need a wall along many areas

but it does require electronic monitoring

LOL......and the people are long gone by time anyone checks it out.

So what’s the solution?

I should have simply down voted your reply. I've noted over and over what we need to do.

What cracks me up is that Bobob is putting all the crap you maintain is the problem and are against right next to yours and there is not a peep from you about it. It's too damn funny. #LOLDEM BS

Enforce the laws.

 

[Disir]

There are thousands of miles of borders that there will never be a wall.

We dont need a wall along many areas

but it does require electronic monitoring

LOL......and the people are long gone by time anyone checks it out.

So what’s the solution?

I should have simply down voted your reply. I've noted over and over what we need to do.

What cracks me up is that Bobob is putting all the crap you maintain is the problem and are against right next to yours and there is not a peep from you about it. It's too damn funny. #LOLDEM BS

Enforce the laws.

Posting right ******* next to him.

 

[JoeB131]

Simply outrageous. There are no words to describe how utterly fucked up this is.
One child hospitalized as a result and one ran away.

So it wasn't actually THEIR home, it was a home the government gave them, but decided some other family was more qualified under the rules they give those homes out under.

Wow, talk about misleading.

 

[otto105]

THIS is why the Capitol NEEDS to be invaded..they are not LISTENING or doing the common sense things

The Capitol is listening to the voters who sent them there.

Why is that hard for you to understand.

 

[Nostra]

Simply outrageous. There are no words to describe how utterly fucked up this is.
One child hospitalized as a result and one ran away.

So it wasn't actually THEIR home, it was a home the government gave them, but decided some other family was more qualified under the rules they give those homes out under.

Wow, talk about misleading.

New rules under No Border Joe: Illegals get preferential treatment, **** American kids.

 

[Nostra]

There are thousands of miles of borders that there will never be a wall.

We dont need a wall along many areas

but it does require electronic monitoring

LOL......and the people are long gone by time anyone checks it out.

So what’s the solution?

I should have simply down voted your reply. I've noted over and over what we need to do.

What cracks me up is that Bobob is putting all the crap you maintain is the problem and are against right next to yours and there is not a peep from you about it. It's too damn funny. #LOLDEM BS

Enforce the laws.

The immigration laws?

 

[pknopp]

There are thousands of miles of borders that there will never be a wall.

We dont need a wall along many areas

but it does require electronic monitoring

LOL......and the people are long gone by time anyone checks it out.

So what’s the solution?

I should have simply down voted your reply. I've noted over and over what we need to do.

What cracks me up is that Bobob is putting all the crap you maintain is the problem and are against right next to yours and there is not a peep from you about it. It's too damn funny. #LOLDEM BS

Enforce the laws.

The immigration laws?

You understand what I'm saying. All laws. Quit making excuses for corporate crooks.