- Thread starter
- #121
Superidiot.
I'll accept the first part......I am here to save the day.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Superidiot.
Was that before or after this?
Nov 12, 1933 93.5% of German electorate (43,000,000) voted in favor of Nazi policies.
On March 12, 1938, Hitler’s troops rolled over the border from Germany, into Austria. This was the Anschluss, the annexation of Austria into Greater Germany.
Three days later, Hitler entered Vienna, greeted by an enthusiastic crowd of up to one million people.
A plebiscite was held in less than a month, 10 April 1938, and 99.7% of Austrians voted to join the Third Reich.
Soooo.....you goin' with Sieg Heil??????
What makes one human being better than another are their actions in life and their treatment of others. Has
NOTHING
to do with their location on this planet.
The last unmanipulated elections in Germany after world war 1 had been in November 1932! The Nazis got 33% of all votes and had lost 2 million votes (about 15% of theri voters). Your result in 1933 had been a fantasy product of the Nazis.
"Großdeutschland" (Great Germany) meant to include Austria again - what the Prussian had thrown finally out of Germany in the battle of Königgrätz. The Austrians had not been the first victims of the Nazis - Germany had been the first victim of the Austrian Hitler who had practically been the party program of the Nazis.
The Aistaraina had been happy in ost cases because the "solution" of world war 1 had reduced Austria drastically.
Or not. But I think indeed most Austrians agreed with this step. The Austrian house Habsburg leaded for long centuries the Holy Roman empire of German (=united) nation.
The formula "Sieg Heil" was made in world war 1. The so called Thule society - a secret anti-Semitic society - used the greeting formula "Sieg und Heil" = "victory and heal".
I've been all over the world and that hasn't been my experience.Americans Are Just Better Human Beings
I've been all over the world and that hasn't been my experience.
I couldn't disagree more.Freedom make ours a better people
I couldn't disagree more.
Our freedom doesn't define us as good people. If it did we wouldn't have so much crime.
Our actions are what defines us.
Why have US-Americans no manners? Love it your people to be continously attacked from each others? And do you really think all members of the US-American families "Manson" or "Jones" or others are nice people?Seems your German is no better than your English......or are you simply stupid in two languages????
LolYou couldn't be more wrong if your intention was to be more wrong.
It's the freedom that makes room for criminals.
It's the Democrat's refusal to punish crime that amplifies it.
Are you denying this?
Nov 12, 1933 93.5% of German electorate (43,000,000) voted in favor of Nazi policies. ...
Why have US-Americans no manners? Love it your people to be continously attacked from each others? And do you really think all members of the US-American families "Manson" or "Jones" or others are nice people?
Lol
Because no other country has crime right? Even countries under complete authoritarian control gave crime.
And I would take Japan's crime and culture ANY DAY OF THE WEEK over ours. A culture of respect and a major lack of crime.
We have some spectacular freedoms but that doesn't define us. Thinking it does is just silly. We have evil and good just like every other place on the planet.
Did you not read what I wrote? Yes! I deny this! That's an empty phrase of the Nazis themselves. And who believes in Nazis is an idiot. On the other side Hitler had been unbelievable popular worldwide in 1933.
Yea no kidding.I've been all over the world and that hasn't been my experience.
"Why have US-Americans no manners?"
So you politely put all those folks in concentration camps????
"Parliamentary elections were held in Germany took place on 12 November 1933. ...
If you had said all of that in the past tense you'd be correct.Contrary to Obama's misstatemnt of American exceptionalism, we are simply a higher level of human development than any other nation.
1.In support of that judgment, one need be reminded that there is a full spectrum, not just ‘the other end,’ meaning Nazis, Bolsheviks, Maoists, and all sorts of savages.
It is important to carefully consider those nationalities that at first glance appear to be….similar….to America. But aren’t.
Oppression and genocide left out of the calculation….the view of human rights becomes central.
2. Our nation sprang from the loins of our closest relative, Britain…..but there are dramatic differences when one considers what Americans consider unalienable rights.
Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.
Human beings are the only entities that have rights.
Rights belong to each human individually.
Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.
Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.
Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others. (So much for 'abortion rights.')
- To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.
For Americans, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.
3. First, Europe and England threats over free speech:
"EU And UK Warn Musk Over Free Speech: "Elon, There Are ...
https://www.iflscience.com › policy › eu-and-uk-warn-...
— The EU and UK have released warnings to Elon Musk over his goals of transforming Twitter into a platform for free speech.
UK Govt Vows to Jail Elon Musk if He Allows Free Speech on Twitter ...newspunch.com › home › uk govt vows to jail elon musk if he allows free speech on twitter
1 week ago - UK Govt Vows to Jail Elon Musk if He Allows Free Speech on Twitter Fact checked April 27, 2022 Sean Adl-Tabatabai News, UK 15 Comments The UK government on Tuesday threatened to block Twitter and jail its new owner Elon Musk if he allows free speech on his platform.
UK Govt Threatens to Ban Twitter, Potentially Jail Elon Musk If ...americanfaith.com › home › uk govt threatens to ban twitter, potentially jail elon musk if he allows free speech
1 week ago - The UK on Tuesday threatened to ban Twitter altogether and potentially jail Elon Musk if he violates their incoming “Online Safety Bill” by allowing free speech on his platform. The move came just hours after the EU threatened to ban Twitter entirely if Musk allows free speech on the platform ...
Now….how about the nation with which we share a continent?
Nope….not up to America’s level.
Next post.