American Muslim Declares War on America

Sinatra

Senior Member
Feb 5, 2009
8,013
1,008
48
American born Muslim terrorist Mujahid Muhammad, aged 23, shot and killed U.S. serviceman William Long outside a military recruiting center in Arkansas. Another U.S. soldier was wounded.

Muhammed has since declared the shooting as an act of war, and urged all other American Muslims to do the same. He states what he did was not murder because it was "justified".

Long's family consider the death of their son as an act of terrorism.

During a memorial for Private Long, an American Muslim woman showed up in protest, declaring 9/11 "an inside job".

Islamist crashes memorial for U.S. soldier killed by Muslim jihadi « Creeping Sharia
 
and the department of justice say what? Oh, that's right. They said nothing.!
 
Shoot her on the spot. That's what they would do in Saudi Arabia.


I don't thinking shooting her is the answer, but I would be willing to donate to a fund that would send this women on a fun filled vacation to Riyadh. I don't know about you, but I didn't see her "male family escort", that Islam supposedly demands a woman travel with.

In all seriousness, just like the Phelps family, people like this should just be shunned by normal people. She should have the freedom to stand on the street and make a fool of herself and the rest of the people should have the freedom to treat her like the trash she acts like.
 
Shoot her on the spot. That's what they would do in Saudi Arabia.
For exercising her right to free speech? this isn't Saudi Arabia and by doing that we'd just be turning her into another matyr for the looney, radical muslim cowards to fawn over. The best thing we can do IMHO is point out the fact that she and people that believe the thngs she espouses are fringe lunatics, make fun of her and put her and her ilk on the margins of society where they belong, not put them front and center in the media. See how she likes being the object of ridicule and generally shunned by the rest of society for a while, bet that'll change her tune.
 
I would advise this person to maintain a low profile from this point on.


And in the clip, you see the media scramble to get this Muslim woman's "story".

And yet, the actual story of an American Muslim who shot two soldiers on American soil, killing one of them, and then declaring it an act of war and that all other American Muslims should follow his example - is not a story???

Pathetic.
 
And yet, the actual story of an American Muslim who shot two soldiers on American soil, killing one of them, and then declaring it an act of war and that all other American Muslims should follow his example - is not a story???
There's an upside to that one though, the lunatic, coward that shot that American Soldier WANTED to make as large of a media stir as possible, he did it for the attention, not giving it to him is the best way to thwart his objective.
 
And yet, the actual story of an American Muslim who shot two soldiers on American soil, killing one of them, and then declaring it an act of war and that all other American Muslims should follow his example - is not a story???
There's an upside to that one though, the lunatic, coward that shot that American Soldier WANTED to make as large of a media stir as possible, he did it for the attention, not giving it to him is the best way to thwart his objective.

I suppose - but I don't believe for a second that is the media's intent.

The clear bias is astounding - and potentially dangerous.
 
There's an upside to that one though, the lunatic, coward that shot that American Soldier WANTED to make as large of a media stir as possible, he did it for the attention, not giving it to him is the best way to thwart his objective.

I suppose - but I don't believe for a second that is the media's intent.

The clear bias is astounding - and potentially dangerous.
Of course the media will portray the story exactly the opposite of how they should do it, what the MSM will do is focus on the barbaric, coward that perpetrated this heinous crime and the act itself because that creates more sensational headlines. When what they SHOULD do is focus on the victim and the tragedy the act brought down on him and his loved ones... if we want those on the borderline (i.e. people that might consider doing things like this in the future) to forgo such acts we want them to connect with the VICTIM and not the PERPERTRATOR.

I thought the White Houses response to this crime went in the right direction (expressing sorrow over that young soldiers death) however if I had been President (not trying to imply that I'm qualified) I would have taken the opportunity to go much farther, perhaps a national moment of silence, getting the family front and center, etc.. and deflecting attention away from the nutjob that did this. It's awful difficult for anybody that has even a shred of sanity to go out and commit such crimes when they have their faces shoved right into the stark reality of the pain and suffering such acts cause on a personal level, empathy after all is a powerful weapon and more often than not the MSM points the empathy in the wrong direction in cases like this.
 
I suppose - but I don't believe for a second that is the media's intent.

The clear bias is astounding - and potentially dangerous.
Of course the media will portray the story exactly the opposite of how they should do it, what the MSM will do is focus on the barbaric, coward that perpetrated this heinous crime and the act itself because that creates more sensational headlines. When what they SHOULD do is focus on the victim and the tragedy the act brought down on him and his loved ones... if we want those on the borderline (i.e. people that might consider doing things like this in the future) to forgo such acts we want them to connect with the VICTIM and not the PERPERTRATOR.

I thought the White Houses response to this crime went in the right direction (expressing sorrow over that young soldiers death) however if I had been President (not trying to imply that I'm qualified) I would have taken the opportunity to go much farther, perhaps a national moment of silence, getting the family front and center, etc.. and deflecting attention away from the nutjob that did this. It's awful difficult for anybody that has even a shred of sanity to go out and commit such crimes when they have their faces shoved right into the stark reality of the pain and suffering such acts cause on a personal level, empathy after all is a powerful weapon and more often than not the MSM points the empathy in the wrong direction in cases like this.

The media has not even done that.

This tragedy was swept under the rug.

The media does not wish to report on an anti-Muslim American story.

Much like when the Muslim American news network owner cut his wife's head off.

That too was hardly reported.
 
Of course the media will portray the story exactly the opposite of how they should do it, what the MSM will do is focus on the barbaric, coward that perpetrated this heinous crime and the act itself because that creates more sensational headlines. When what they SHOULD do is focus on the victim and the tragedy the act brought down on him and his loved ones... if we want those on the borderline (i.e. people that might consider doing things like this in the future) to forgo such acts we want them to connect with the VICTIM and not the PERPERTRATOR.

I thought the White Houses response to this crime went in the right direction (expressing sorrow over that young soldiers death) however if I had been President (not trying to imply that I'm qualified) I would have taken the opportunity to go much farther, perhaps a national moment of silence, getting the family front and center, etc.. and deflecting attention away from the nutjob that did this. It's awful difficult for anybody that has even a shred of sanity to go out and commit such crimes when they have their faces shoved right into the stark reality of the pain and suffering such acts cause on a personal level, empathy after all is a powerful weapon and more often than not the MSM points the empathy in the wrong direction in cases like this.

The media has not even done that.

This tragedy was swept under the rug.

The media does not wish to report on an anti-Muslim American story.

Much like when the Muslim American news network owner cut his wife's head off.

That too was hardly reported.




Sinatra,, the media has in fact done it's job well.. The New York Times and MSNBC don't miss a chance to demonize the American soldier as killers and rapists and torturers . the ACLU is actively out to prove to the muslim world the barbarity of the American soldier.. Don't expect them to publish words of sympathy for the American soldier.
 
The media has not even done that.

This tragedy was swept under the rug.

The media does not wish to report on an anti-Muslim American story.

Much like when the Muslim American news network owner cut his wife's head off.

That too was hardly reported.

I agree with you, I think it's a missed opportunity however IMHO it's not nearly as bad as turning the evil prick that did the crime into another poster child for the radical muslims. One might guess that the MSM glossing over the story has quite a bit to do with the Presidents "Kumbaya, we are the world" campaign with the muslim world, although I personally don't have enough information to support that theory.
 
The media has not even done that.

This tragedy was swept under the rug.

The media does not wish to report on an anti-Muslim American story.

Much like when the Muslim American news network owner cut his wife's head off.

That too was hardly reported.

I agree with you, I think it's a missed opportunity however IMHO it's not nearly as bad as turning the evil prick that did the crime into another poster child for the radical muslims. One might guess that the MSM glossing over the story has quite a bit to do with the Presidents "Kumbaya, we are the world" campaign with the muslim world, although I personally don't have enough information to support that theory.

Agreed -and that is a media very distant from the purpose of actual reporting...
 
American born Muslim terrorist Mujahid Muhammad, aged 23, shot and killed U.S. serviceman William Long outside a military recruiting center in Arkansas. Another U.S. soldier was wounded.

Muhammed has since declared the shooting as an act of war, and urged all other American Muslims to do the same. He states what he did was not murder because it was "justified".

Long's family consider the death of their son as an act of terrorism.

During a memorial for Private Long, an American Muslim woman showed up in protest, declaring 9/11 "an inside job".

Islamist crashes memorial for U.S. soldier killed by Muslim jihadi « Creeping Sharia

I wouldn't wish that kind of pain on a CAT... but were such a protest to ever happen within my sphere of influence I would take to beating that or those individuals with every ounce of my strength without regard to their gender or 'peaceful intent'... There is no right to protest at the funeral of a fallen soldier... as such is precluded by the RESPONSIBILITY TO NOT EXERCISE ONE'S RIGHT TO THE DETRIMENT OF ANOTHER AND SUCH SHOULD BE MODERATED BY THE DUTY TO DEFEND ONE'S RIGHTS...

I suspect that it wouldn't take too damn long to see this kind of thing shut right the hell down, in the wake of a few funerals which resulted from such protests...

And it's a RARE jury which would convict someone who did so... of any sort of a crime; on the assumption that such occurs in America... and not on foreign soil, like somewhere in the NE, or the land of fruits and nuts... CALEEFORNEEAAAH
 
American born Muslim terrorist Mujahid Muhammad, aged 23, shot and killed U.S. serviceman William Long outside a military recruiting center in Arkansas. Another U.S. soldier was wounded.

Muhammed has since declared the shooting as an act of war, and urged all other American Muslims to do the same. He states what he did was not murder because it was "justified".

Long's family consider the death of their son as an act of terrorism.

During a memorial for Private Long, an American Muslim woman showed up in protest, declaring 9/11 "an inside job".

Islamist crashes memorial for U.S. soldier killed by Muslim jihadi « Creeping Sharia

I wouldn't wish that kind of pain on a CAT... but were such a protest to ever happen within my sphere of influence I would take to beating that or those individuals with every ounce of my strength without regard to their gender or 'peaceful intent'... There is no right to protest at the funeral of a fallen soldier... as such is precluded by the RESPONSIBILITY TO NOT EXERCISE ONE'S RIGHT TO THE DETRIMENT OF ANOTHER AND SUCH SHOULD BE MODERATED BY THE DUTY TO DEFEND ONE'S RIGHTS...

I suspect that it wouldn't take too damn long to see this kind of thing shut right the hell down, in the wake of a few funerals which resulted from such protests...

And it's a RARE jury which would convict someone who did so... of any sort of a crime; on the assumption that such occurs in America... and not on foreign soil, like somewhere in the NE, or the land of fruits and nuts... CALEEFORNEEAAAH


And you can be assured, if it was a pro-life protest at a memorial of the abortion doctor, the media would be on it post haste and it would be considered big news.

This protest....nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top