Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
The act kept brown people from immigrating to America you idiot!It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
Bullshit. I made this point numerous times, and you have tried to defend it several different ways, including that bogus nonsense about the Immigration Act of 1964.
Words have meaning, in case you didn't know. And it is pitiful that you cannot even admit when you were wrong.
Yeah, I too usually find most of what Jitts post as bat-shit crazy and blatantly racist.Grab your guns and protect your assets.
A Harvard professor was arrested by the FBI on spying charges he also worked in a bio chemical plant in Wuhan China.
these mother fcukers unleashed this virus on America that will be almost impossible to to rid. Vaccine or no vaccine this thing is extremely contagious, many won’t get a vaccine. Especially made by democrats Who believe in eugenics.
restaurants will never be at full capacity which means it will affect our farmers farming will affect our agriculture, it’ll affect all markets.
It’s going to be chaos.
get your guns out and and fight the slave plantations democrats will try to get us in.
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.www.justice.gov
Heh heh. I had posted about Lieber being arrested when it first happened. Nobody gave it a second thought, much less a response.
Lieber was arrested arrested by the feds for not disclosing his relationship to the Chinese bio-lab in Wuhan. Lieber was involved in the development of nanotechnology.
Here's some recent relevant reading...
REVEALED: Soros Invested Heavily in Chinese Biotech Research Company with Facility in Wuhan that Researches Respiratory Models and Infectious Disease | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Thanks to Yaacov Apelbaum and Eagle1 Documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2011 show Soros Fund Management LLC invested heavily into WUXI Pharmatech Caymen, Inc.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Within that article is a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commision.
Scroll down through that filing document and guess whose name we see?
If true, someone is guilty of mass murder. Basically certain members of the globalist rich boys club.
Figure of speech? Wow that’s weak even for your dumb assIt was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
You gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Now you shift the lie.........They broke up the team but he quit and the others were reassigned.Fake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
They were NSA SPOOKS............now we enter the twilight zone.............they aren't lab rats that went away........the lab rats and nerds are fighting this thing now.............not the spooks.
Idk......used to have her ..him.iggied......but the last 2 posts were typical LIES.She’s a frustrated female.. America voted against her interestNow you shift the lie.........They broke up the team but he quit and the others were reassigned.Fake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
They were NSA SPOOKS............now we enter the twilight zone.............they aren't lab rats that went away........the lab rats and nerds are fighting this thing now.............not the spooks.
LolYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
what are you on? 'cause that makes no sense whatsoever.
Thanks man !Yeah, I too usually find most of what Jitts post as bat-shit crazy and blatantly racist.Grab your guns and protect your assets.
A Harvard professor was arrested by the FBI on spying charges he also worked in a bio chemical plant in Wuhan China.
these mother fcukers unleashed this virus on America that will be almost impossible to to rid. Vaccine or no vaccine this thing is extremely contagious, many won’t get a vaccine. Especially made by democrats Who believe in eugenics.
restaurants will never be at full capacity which means it will affect our farmers farming will affect our agriculture, it’ll affect all markets.
It’s going to be chaos.
get your guns out and and fight the slave plantations democrats will try to get us in.
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.
Heh heh. I had posted about Lieber being arrested when it first happened. Nobody gave it a second thought, much less a response.
Lieber was arrested arrested by the feds for not disclosing his relationship to the Chinese bio-lab in Wuhan. Lieber was involved in the development of nanotechnology.
Here's some recent relevant reading...
REVEALED: Soros Invested Heavily in Chinese Biotech Research Company with Facility in Wuhan that Researches Respiratory Models and Infectious Disease | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Thanks to Yaacov Apelbaum and Eagle1 Documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2011 show Soros Fund Management LLC invested heavily into WUXI Pharmatech Caymen, Inc.
Within that article is a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commision.
Scroll down through that filing document and guess whose name we see?
If true, someone is guilty of mass murder. Basically certain members of the globalist rich boys club.
I do not think it is entirely just a "Chinese Plot." OTH, I cannot say what the specifics are, or who the double agents are, or who is working for whom.
I asked a friend where he got an article that seemed to have confirmed much of the serious genetic information in the NYT, though the NYT was not commenting on the mysterious genomes.
It lead to a dead end, HERE.
Thanks man !Yeah, I too usually find most of what Jitts post as bat-shit crazy and blatantly racist.Grab your guns and protect your assets.
A Harvard professor was arrested by the FBI on spying charges he also worked in a bio chemical plant in Wuhan China.
these mother fcukers unleashed this virus on America that will be almost impossible to to rid. Vaccine or no vaccine this thing is extremely contagious, many won’t get a vaccine. Especially made by democrats Who believe in eugenics.
restaurants will never be at full capacity which means it will affect our farmers farming will affect our agriculture, it’ll affect all markets.
It’s going to be chaos.
get your guns out and and fight the slave plantations democrats will try to get us in.
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.
Heh heh. I had posted about Lieber being arrested when it first happened. Nobody gave it a second thought, much less a response.
Lieber was arrested arrested by the feds for not disclosing his relationship to the Chinese bio-lab in Wuhan. Lieber was involved in the development of nanotechnology.
Here's some recent relevant reading...
REVEALED: Soros Invested Heavily in Chinese Biotech Research Company with Facility in Wuhan that Researches Respiratory Models and Infectious Disease | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Thanks to Yaacov Apelbaum and Eagle1 Documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2011 show Soros Fund Management LLC invested heavily into WUXI Pharmatech Caymen, Inc.
Within that article is a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commision.
Scroll down through that filing document and guess whose name we see?
If true, someone is guilty of mass murder. Basically certain members of the globalist rich boys club.
I do not think it is entirely just a "Chinese Plot." OTH, I cannot say what the specifics are, or who the double agents are, or who is working for whom.
I asked a friend where he got an article that seemed to have confirmed much of the serious genetic information in the NYT, though the NYT was not commenting on the mysterious genomes.
It lead to a dead end, HERE.
Your opinion matters to me greatlyThanks man !Yeah, I too usually find most of what Jitts post as bat-shit crazy and blatantly racist.Grab your guns and protect your assets.
A Harvard professor was arrested by the FBI on spying charges he also worked in a bio chemical plant in Wuhan China.
these mother fcukers unleashed this virus on America that will be almost impossible to to rid. Vaccine or no vaccine this thing is extremely contagious, many won’t get a vaccine. Especially made by democrats Who believe in eugenics.
restaurants will never be at full capacity which means it will affect our farmers farming will affect our agriculture, it’ll affect all markets.
It’s going to be chaos.
get your guns out and and fight the slave plantations democrats will try to get us in.
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.
Heh heh. I had posted about Lieber being arrested when it first happened. Nobody gave it a second thought, much less a response.
Lieber was arrested arrested by the feds for not disclosing his relationship to the Chinese bio-lab in Wuhan. Lieber was involved in the development of nanotechnology.
Here's some recent relevant reading...
REVEALED: Soros Invested Heavily in Chinese Biotech Research Company with Facility in Wuhan that Researches Respiratory Models and Infectious Disease | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Thanks to Yaacov Apelbaum and Eagle1 Documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2011 show Soros Fund Management LLC invested heavily into WUXI Pharmatech Caymen, Inc.
Within that article is a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commision.
Scroll down through that filing document and guess whose name we see?
If true, someone is guilty of mass murder. Basically certain members of the globalist rich boys club.
I do not think it is entirely just a "Chinese Plot." OTH, I cannot say what the specifics are, or who the double agents are, or who is working for whom.
I asked a friend where he got an article that seemed to have confirmed much of the serious genetic information in the NYT, though the NYT was not commenting on the mysterious genomes.
It lead to a dead end, HERE.
The act kept brown people from immigrating to America you idiot!It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
Bullshit. I made this point numerous times, and you have tried to defend it several different ways, including that bogus nonsense about the Immigration Act of 1964.
Words have meaning, in case you didn't know. And it is pitiful that you cannot even admit when you were wrong.
Yes it did.The act kept brown people from immigrating to America you idiot!It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
Bullshit. I made this point numerous times, and you have tried to defend it several different ways, including that bogus nonsense about the Immigration Act of 1964.
Words have meaning, in case you didn't know. And it is pitiful that you cannot even admit when you were wrong.
It didn't keep US citizens from moving around their country.
Yes it did.The act kept brown people from immigrating to America you idiot!It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
Bullshit. I made this point numerous times, and you have tried to defend it several different ways, including that bogus nonsense about the Immigration Act of 1964.
Words have meaning, in case you didn't know. And it is pitiful that you cannot even admit when you were wrong.
It didn't keep US citizens from moving around their country.
It stated color. Go away trollYes it did.The act kept brown people from immigrating to America you idiot!It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
Bullshit. I made this point numerous times, and you have tried to defend it several different ways, including that bogus nonsense about the Immigration Act of 1964.
Words have meaning, in case you didn't know. And it is pitiful that you cannot even admit when you were wrong.
It didn't keep US citizens from moving around their country.
An immigration act would have no effect on American citizens moving around within the US. None. The poverty in Puerto Rico stopped most from moving to the continental US. But not the immigration act.
It stated color. Go away trollYes it did.The act kept brown people from immigrating to America you idiot!It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
Bullshit. I made this point numerous times, and you have tried to defend it several different ways, including that bogus nonsense about the Immigration Act of 1964.
Words have meaning, in case you didn't know. And it is pitiful that you cannot even admit when you were wrong.
It didn't keep US citizens from moving around their country.
An immigration act would have no effect on American citizens moving around within the US. None. The poverty in Puerto Rico stopped most from moving to the continental US. But not the immigration act.
What don’t you get with brown peopleIt stated color. Go away trollYes it did.The act kept brown people from immigrating to America you idiot!It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
Bullshit. I made this point numerous times, and you have tried to defend it several different ways, including that bogus nonsense about the Immigration Act of 1964.
Words have meaning, in case you didn't know. And it is pitiful that you cannot even admit when you were wrong.
It didn't keep US citizens from moving around their country.
An immigration act would have no effect on American citizens moving around within the US. None. The poverty in Puerto Rico stopped most from moving to the continental US. But not the immigration act.
It didn't apply to US citizens.
What don’t you get with brown peopleIt stated color. Go away trollYes it did.The act kept brown people from immigrating to America you idiot!It was a figure of speechThey didn’t come until welfare became more accessible ,, and they didn’t like us until shit became freeLear American history, and the immigration act of 1964 allowed ricans here,, before that they were limited... for good reasonSorry buddy you are wrong againMore fallaciesAnd that’s why you can’t hangMore fallacies,, youYou have never been right about anything you have challenged me in.. NEVEROr readBecause I know this shit,, I sometimes expect people to be as knowledgeable as meIn a five-year contract with Wuhan University, Lieber’s personal research company agreed to make “strategic” scientific proposals, supervise young teachers, conduct nationally “important” projects and take other steps to benefit the institution, according to the report.Let me know when that happensWell add some substance anti trumper.. you communistYou are Irrelevant to this topic until you can add some substance go away you trollYou gotten that link more times then the incel that lives with you has touched you in the past ten years lolThey were paid more money.. stop the deranged lies .. be an AmericanFake news.. don’t you get tired of fake news?They were stealing technology from U.S. labs to copy in China...........That is what it said.
perhaps if donny didn't defund the program, that allowed embedded scientists within china's labs to oversee something like this, couldn't happen, 'eh?
Health News
March 22, 2020 / 8:25 PM / 14 days ago
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
Marisa Taylor
11 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several months before the coronavirus pandemic began, the Trump administration eliminated a key American public health position in Beijing intended to help detect disease outbreaks in China, Reuters has learned.
Exclusive: U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak
lol... link it.
and your a female why are you getting involved?
Because she is smarter than you and can write using complete sentences?
Why wouldn't a female get involved in this conversation?
I like it here. I think I'll stay.
Pointing out your lies is such fun!
I have. And I will continue to do so.
You never did answer why you think he was working in Wuhan. You know, with evidence rather than "I think".
Because he was you moron
Now see, that is what actual evidence looks like. Not this "I think he was in Wuhan" nonsense you posted first. You might actually be learning something her. Maybe your sentence structure will be the next topic.
I would have to suffer a traumatic head injury to be as knowledgeable as you.
A book.. mic drop
Junior, I have read far more books than you. I have had to define words for you, explain how the US Constitution works, explain how our gov't works, and teach you numerous other things. Don't pretend you are well read. With your English skills it is just embarrassing for you.
LMAO!!! Oh that is hilarious.
The most recent discussion we have had is about lynching. According to you, a community can decide to violate someone's 6th amendment rights. That is absolutely wrong.
And what about you claiming that all states and territories added to the Union must be voted on by the people in a popular vote?
Or that Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come here until the 1960s?
You were hilariously wrong on those topics. There are more, but I'll just leave those as examples.
Leave out my context
Context is unnecessary. There is no context that would make any of those right.
I can hang just fine.
You claiming it would be different if I quoted your context is pure nonsense. There is no context in which denying people their 6th amendment rights is justified. You tried that "there are places without lawmen" bullshit. But the overwhelming majority of lynchings were committed in places and times where lawmen and courts exists.
And you stating (at least twice) that Puerto Ricans were not allowed here until the 1960s was just factually wrong.
Facts, not fallacies.
Are you saying that you did not say that a community can vote to deny constitutional rights to an American citizen? I can show you where you said it, if you would like. And it was not one of your "they have no lawmen" places.
Or more recently, are you denying that you said Puerto Ricans were not allowed to come to the U.S. before the 1960s? You said it at least twice.
The Immigration Act of 1964 did not have anything to do with Puerto Ricans. They were US Citizens as of 1917. Them coming to the US was not immigration, it was internal migration. No, they were not limited any more than any other US Citizen. Economics kept most Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico. But they were allowed to come to the US, as citizens, since 1917.
I posted a link to the Jones-Shafroth Act which made them citizens. That you choose to ignore it is not my problem.
The reasons they did come here are debatable. That they were allowed to come here as of 1917 is not. They are US Citizens.
You specifically said they were not allowed to come here. They were.
Bullshit. I made this point numerous times, and you have tried to defend it several different ways, including that bogus nonsense about the Immigration Act of 1964.
Words have meaning, in case you didn't know. And it is pitiful that you cannot even admit when you were wrong.
It didn't keep US citizens from moving around their country.
An immigration act would have no effect on American citizens moving around within the US. None. The poverty in Puerto Rico stopped most from moving to the continental US. But not the immigration act.
It didn't apply to US citizens.
