Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

[progressive hunter]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

they were free to purchase any wedding cake they have sold for yrs,, what they wanted was something theyve never sold before,,,

the only hypocrisy is yours,, you know damn good and well youre lying and so do we,,,

What specifically did they want that had never been sold?

And again, your hypocrisy is duly noted since you clearly do not apply the same standards to platforms.

you even asking that question shows your nothing but a lying skank,,

you know damn good and well what the issue was,,,

The baker makes custom wedding cakes routinely. That's part of his business. He does not routinely make custom pornographic cakes (used just as an example). If he is refusing to make a custom cake based solely on the couple being same sex then that is violating Colorado's public accommodation law. Yes or no?

So (you lying skank since you can't seem to avoid the gutter) - why don't YOU apply the same standards to platforms? Can't do that can you? Because it doesn't fit your way wah-wah's conservative victimization syndrome.

they have never offered a gay themed cake,,

your lies and hypocrisy is noted and mocked,,,

 

[colfax_m]

they have never offered a gay themed cake,,

The denial of service had nothing to do with the "theme" of the cake.

 

[progressive hunter]

Laura Ingalls Wilder's name removed from prestigious award over 'dated cultural attitudes'

"Her works reflect dated cultural attitudes toward Indigenous people and people of color," the association that issues the award said.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Coyote]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

they were free to purchase any wedding cake they have sold for yrs,, what they wanted was something theyve never sold before,,,

the only hypocrisy is yours,, you know damn good and well youre lying and so do we,,,

What specifically did they want that had never been sold?

And again, your hypocrisy is duly noted since you clearly do not apply the same standards to platforms.

you even asking that question shows your nothing but a lying skank,,

you know damn good and well what the issue was,,,

The baker makes custom wedding cakes routinely. That's part of his business. He does not routinely make custom pornographic cakes (used just as an example). If he is refusing to make a custom cake based solely on the couple being same sex then that is violating Colorado's public accommodation law. Yes or no?

So (you lying skank since you can't seem to avoid the gutter) - why don't YOU apply the same standards to platforms? Can't do that can you? Because it doesn't fit your way wah-wah's conservative victimization syndrome.

they have never offered a gay themed cake,,

your lies and hypocrisy is noted and mocked,,,

Speaking of hypocrisy, I love how you dodge the issue of platforms.

Or...for that matter Amazon opting not to sell certain books?

 

[progressive hunter]

they have never offered a gay themed cake,,

The denial of service had nothing to do with the "theme" of the cake.

theye were free to buy any cake they wanted,,

 

[progressive hunter]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

they were free to purchase any wedding cake they have sold for yrs,, what they wanted was something theyve never sold before,,,

the only hypocrisy is yours,, you know damn good and well youre lying and so do we,,,

What specifically did they want that had never been sold?

And again, your hypocrisy is duly noted since you clearly do not apply the same standards to platforms.

you even asking that question shows your nothing but a lying skank,,

you know damn good and well what the issue was,,,

The baker makes custom wedding cakes routinely. That's part of his business. He does not routinely make custom pornographic cakes (used just as an example). If he is refusing to make a custom cake based solely on the couple being same sex then that is violating Colorado's public accommodation law. Yes or no?

So (you lying skank since you can't seem to avoid the gutter) - why don't YOU apply the same standards to platforms? Can't do that can you? Because it doesn't fit your way wah-wah's conservative victimization syndrome.

they have never offered a gay themed cake,,

your lies and hypocrisy is noted and mocked,,,

Speaking of hypocrisy, I love how you dodge the issue of platforms.

Or...for that matter Amazon opting not to sell certain books?

I didnt dodge anything

 

[progressive hunter]

And then...just like that, conservatives decide businesses are no longer allowed the right to determine their own rules on what they will or won't sell.

1) I would support any legal punitive measure against Progressive Totalitarians.

2) I understand that in USA no such measure can pass.

3) The best solution to Leftist Totalitarianism is formation of Conservative businesses and Media to take up the opportunity.

I have no idea what that gobbledygook is actually supposed to say.

Let business' determine their own ToS within the code of law that applies to them. If there are anti-trust concerns inhibiting competition, then those should be addressed separately.

Conservatives whine about unfair censorship (despite the fact that left extremists have also been banned for violating ToS)....if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company. Biggest snowflakes ever.

I bet if I took time to go back and look you would have been one of the biggest voices demanding the bakers provide the cake for the gay couple,,,


so once again your lies are just pathetic,,,

Maybe. Or Maybe not.

You make or provide a product. Laws say you have to provide equal access to the product.

Laws don't say you can't set limitations on the product. You can't force a baker to make a pornographic gay wedding cake if it doesn't ordinarily do so. Or a platform to host content against it's terms of service.

but the baker didnt offer a gay cake,,

your play on words is noted and just more proof youre a lyin skank,,

Who said he did? It's just a wedding cake. Something he customarily provides.

You're hypocrisy is duly noted, without vulgarity.

they were free to purchase any wedding cake they have sold for yrs,, what they wanted was something theyve never sold before,,,

the only hypocrisy is yours,, you know damn good and well youre lying and so do we,,,

What specifically did they want that had never been sold?

And again, your hypocrisy is duly noted since you clearly do not apply the same standards to platforms.

you even asking that question shows your nothing but a lying skank,,

you know damn good and well what the issue was,,,

The baker makes custom wedding cakes routinely. That's part of his business. He does not routinely make custom pornographic cakes (used just as an example). If he is refusing to make a custom cake based solely on the couple being same sex then that is violating Colorado's public accommodation law. Yes or no?

So (you lying skank since you can't seem to avoid the gutter) - why don't YOU apply the same standards to platforms? Can't do that can you? Because it doesn't fit your way wah-wah's conservative victimization syndrome.

they have never offered a gay themed cake,,

your lies and hypocrisy is noted and mocked,,,

Speaking of hypocrisy, I love how you dodge the issue of platforms.

Or...for that matter Amazon opting not to sell certain books?

 

[Man of Ethics]

if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company.

I agree to an extent.

Conservatives are building new companies right now -- Parler, Gab, SubscribeStar. I hope they will be successful.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Amazon has every right to determine what will and will not be sold in their store. After all, I don't see them selling Obama's books on Trump's site.

Sadly, there is no way to compel Amazon to sell books which offend Progressives.

Hopefully, Conservative sites selling these books will make a good profit.

 

[progressive hunter]

if you don't like the rules and don't want to play by the rules, form a new company or join a new company.

I agree to an extent.

Conservatives are building new companies right now -- Parler, Gab, SubscribeStar. I hope they will be successful.

dollar on a dime if they started banning lefty dems coyote would be the first to whine like the skank she is about it,,,

 

[blackhawk]

Interesting I just checked on Amazon you can buy Hitlers Mein Kampf as well as the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx.

 

[progressive hunter]

Interesting I just checked on Amazon you can buy Hitlers Mein Kampf as well as the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx.

well those are the rules books for leftist politics,,

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I just bought an HP Lovecraft book.

I used to have all of them!


View attachment 462796 View attachment 462797 View attachment 462798
[/QUOTE]

Great bedtime stories for kids. Enlarges their vocabulary too.

 

[colfax_m]

theye were free to buy any cake they wanted,,

They weren't, actually. The owner refused to sell them any cake that was to be used in a marriage ceremony between people of the same sex.

 

[progressive hunter]

theye were free to buy any cake they wanted,,

They weren't, actually. The owner refused to sell them any cake that was to be used in a marriage ceremony between people of the same sex.

LIAR,,,

all they refused to do was put the message on it,,

 

[colfax_m]

all they refused to do was put the message on it,,

There was never any discussion about any message to be put on the cake. The couple was rejected before any such message was discussed.
"Craig and Mullins promptly left Masterpiece without discussing with Phillips any details of their wedding cake."

"The following day, Craig’s mother, Deborah Munn, called Phillips, who advised her that Masterpiece did not make wedding cakes for same-sex weddings because of his religious beliefs and because Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages."

https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-111-op-bel-colo-app.pdf

 

[progressive hunter]

all they refused to do was put the message on it,,

There was never any discussion about any message to be put on the cake. The couple was rejected before any such message was discussed.
"Craig and Mullins promptly left Masterpiece without discussing with Phillips any details of their wedding cake."

"The following day, Craig’s mother, Deborah Munn, called Phillips, who advised her that Masterpiece did not make wedding cakes for same-sex weddings because of his religious beliefs and because Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages."

https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-111-op-bel-colo-app.pdf

got a reliable source??

 

[colfax_m]

got a reliable source??

Already provided. Where's your source?

Another quote:
“I’ll make your birthday cakes, shower cakes, sell you cookies and brownies, I just don’t make cakes for same sex weddings.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf

 

[progressive hunter]

got a reliable source??

Already provided. Where's your source?

Another quote:
“I’ll make your birthday cakes, shower cakes, sell you cookies and brownies, I just don’t make cakes for same sex weddings.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf

a PDF or what ever that is is not a reliable source

 

[progressive hunter]

got a reliable source??

Already provided. Where's your source?

Another quote:
“I’ll make your birthday cakes, shower cakes, sell you cookies and brownies, I just don’t make cakes for same sex weddings.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf

sounds like youre saying its OK for leftist to discriminate against anyone they oppose but not the other way around,,,