Amazon cancels plans to build headquarters in New York

[22lcidw]

Upgrading housing and infrastructure must be better than price controls and tax cut economics.

Housing and infrastructure for who ? The Demon-crat dependents ?? They hope that we will all be dependent before long.

Our welfare clause is General and must cover any contingency the right wing complains about.

So that includes a wall!

no; there is no express wall building power in our Constitution. there is no immigration clause either. There is a Commerce Clause and a naturalization clause that could ensure we generate revenue not lose money, like lousy capitalists do.

There is no words of capitalism, socialism fascism, communism or more isms in that document. But we live with some realities. The wall is general welfare. To protect the citizens. Now in reality we need to go to war. It is long overdue. The Monroe Doctrine has protected these nations and they have screwed up. You are living off of Asia. You are cutting your own throat with your views. Damping down Mexico, Central America and South America will buy us time and continue our way of good living. Handle the truth.

 

[danielpalos]

Upgrading housing and infrastructure must be better than price controls and tax cut economics.

Housing and infrastructure for who ? The Demon-crat dependents ?? They hope that we will all be dependent before long.

Our welfare clause is General and must cover any contingency the right wing complains about.

So that includes a wall!

no; there is no express wall building power in our Constitution. there is no immigration clause either. There is a Commerce Clause and a naturalization clause that could ensure we generate revenue not lose money, like lousy capitalists do.

There is no words of capitalism, socialism fascism, communism or more isms in that document. But we live with some realities. The wall is general welfare. To protect the citizens. Now in reality we need to go to war.

No, a wall is not a general welfare item; it may be a general warfare item or a common defense item. We don't have a common defense problem on our border; we do have a refugee problem.

 

[beagle9]

Housing and infrastructure for who ? The Demon-crat dependents ?? They hope that we will all be dependent before long.

Our welfare clause is General and must cover any contingency the right wing complains about.

So that includes a wall!

no; there is no express wall building power in our Constitution. there is no immigration clause either. There is a Commerce Clause and a naturalization clause that could ensure we generate revenue not lose money, like lousy capitalists do.

There is no words of capitalism, socialism fascism, communism or more isms in that document. But we live with some realities. The wall is general welfare. To protect the citizens. Now in reality we need to go to war.

No, a wall is not a general welfare item; it may be a general warfare item or a common defense item. We don't have a common defense problem on our border; we do have a refugee problem.

A refugee problem that morphs into a serious breach of our soverignty, poses a security risk, over runs our social services without the citizens ok, causes danger to the welfare of our citizens, creates an unbalanced situation, tempt's bad people into exploiting the problem in many ways, creates vulnerability, creates child abusive situations, creates strife, creates second class citizens or the thought of such things by those affected by it all, and so on and so forth. The political class in bed with the donor class creates exploitable situations that American's end up paying for in more ways than can be imagined.

 

[OnePercenter]

They should make HQ in FL or TX

Does Texas or Florida have the subsidy money?

 

[OnePercenter]

Or should I say extortion monies!

 

[danielpalos]

Our welfare clause is General and must cover any contingency the right wing complains about.

So that includes a wall!

no; there is no express wall building power in our Constitution. there is no immigration clause either. There is a Commerce Clause and a naturalization clause that could ensure we generate revenue not lose money, like lousy capitalists do.

There is no words of capitalism, socialism fascism, communism or more isms in that document. But we live with some realities. The wall is general welfare. To protect the citizens. Now in reality we need to go to war.

No, a wall is not a general welfare item; it may be a general warfare item or a common defense item. We don't have a common defense problem on our border; we do have a refugee problem.

A refugee problem that morphs into a serious breach of our soverignty, poses a security risk, over runs our social services without the citizens ok, causes danger to the welfare of our citizens, creates an unbalanced situation, tempt's bad people into exploiting the problem in many ways, creates vulnerability, creates child abusive situations, creates strife, creates second class citizens or the thought of such things by those affected by it all, and so on and so forth. The political class in bed with the donor class creates exploitable situations that American's end up paying for in more ways than can be imagined.

Our Constitution offers solutions; our welfare clause is general and we have a Commerce Clause. Why do You believe we should be Lousy Capitalists and Lose money on border policy?

 

[beagle9]

So that includes a wall!

no; there is no express wall building power in our Constitution. there is no immigration clause either. There is a Commerce Clause and a naturalization clause that could ensure we generate revenue not lose money, like lousy capitalists do.

There is no words of capitalism, socialism fascism, communism or more isms in that document. But we live with some realities. The wall is general welfare. To protect the citizens. Now in reality we need to go to war.

No, a wall is not a general welfare item; it may be a general warfare item or a common defense item. We don't have a common defense problem on our border; we do have a refugee problem.

A refugee problem that morphs into a serious breach of our soverignty, poses a security risk, over runs our social services without the citizens ok, causes danger to the welfare of our citizens, creates an unbalanced situation, tempt's bad people into exploiting the problem in many ways, creates vulnerability, creates child abusive situations, creates strife, creates second class citizens or the thought of such things by those affected by it all, and so on and so forth. The political class in bed with the donor class creates exploitable situations that American's end up paying for in more ways than can be imagined.

Our Constitution offers solutions; our welfare clause is general and we have a Commerce Clause. Why do You believe we should be Lousy Capitalists and Lose money on border policy?

Is this a deflection ? We will be saving money in the long run, but some can't see beyond the nose on their faces.

 

[danielpalos]

no; there is no express wall building power in our Constitution. there is no immigration clause either. There is a Commerce Clause and a naturalization clause that could ensure we generate revenue not lose money, like lousy capitalists do.

There is no words of capitalism, socialism fascism, communism or more isms in that document. But we live with some realities. The wall is general welfare. To protect the citizens. Now in reality we need to go to war.

No, a wall is not a general welfare item; it may be a general warfare item or a common defense item. We don't have a common defense problem on our border; we do have a refugee problem.

A refugee problem that morphs into a serious breach of our soverignty, poses a security risk, over runs our social services without the citizens ok, causes danger to the welfare of our citizens, creates an unbalanced situation, tempt's bad people into exploiting the problem in many ways, creates vulnerability, creates child abusive situations, creates strife, creates second class citizens or the thought of such things by those affected by it all, and so on and so forth. The political class in bed with the donor class creates exploitable situations that American's end up paying for in more ways than can be imagined.

Our Constitution offers solutions; our welfare clause is general and we have a Commerce Clause. Why do You believe we should be Lousy Capitalists and Lose money on border policy?

Is this a deflection ? We will be saving money in the long run, but some can't see beyond the nose on their faces.

No, we won't. Creating an illegal problem only creates friction for our economy and creates an underclass that the right wing likes to blame.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They should make HQ in FL or TX

Does Texas or Florida have the subsidy money?

Wont need it, their costs especially taxes, are far lower

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Fuck Amazon.


Amazon, which doubled its profits and made more than $11 billion in 2018, won't pay any federal income taxes for the second year in a row...

The company will not be required to pay the standard 21 percent income tax rate on its 2018 profits, and is claiming a tax rebate of $129 million...

/—-/ And you also say fuck you to the 25,000 lost jobs who would be paying income tax, property tax and sales tax - you imbecile

Amazon was being exempted from $3 billion of taxes as part of the deal. Minimum wage workers would not be able to make that up. Imbecile.

Amazon pays pretty well....I have a friend that went to work for them...he started at 32,000 a year with full benefits...now he makes nearly 150,000 per year...
The minimum wage workers for Amazon are seasonal employees...most of them are semi retired folks....but even they get top quality health insurance and paid holidays and sick pay...and after the busy season is over they get a sizable bonus....This is NY's loss....

25,000 employees would have to pay an average of $12 million in STATE taxes EACH in order to cancel out the $3 billion tax exemption given to Amazon by New York.

How long will it take for your "friend" to pay $12 million in state income taxes on a $32,000 income?

25,000 employees would have to pay an average of $12 million in STATE taxes EACH in order to cancel out the $3 billion tax exemption given to Amazon by New York.

You're as bad at math as AOC. LOL!

 

[Cellblock2429]

Fuck Amazon.


Amazon, which doubled its profits and made more than $11 billion in 2018, won't pay any federal income taxes for the second year in a row...

The company will not be required to pay the standard 21 percent income tax rate on its 2018 profits, and is claiming a tax rebate of $129 million...

/—-/ And you also say fuck you to the 25,000 lost jobs who would be paying income tax, property tax and sales tax - you imbecile

Amazon was being exempted from $3 billion of taxes as part of the deal. Minimum wage workers would not be able to make that up. Imbecile.

Amazon pays pretty well....I have a friend that went to work for them...he started at 32,000 a year with full benefits...now he makes nearly 150,000 per year...
The minimum wage workers for Amazon are seasonal employees...most of them are semi retired folks....but even they get top quality health insurance and paid holidays and sick pay...and after the busy season is over they get a sizable bonus....This is NY's loss....

25,000 employees would have to pay an average of $12 million in STATE taxes EACH in order to cancel out the $3 billion tax exemption given to Amazon by New York.

How long will it take for your "friend" to pay $12 million in state income taxes on a $32,000 income?

25,000 employees would have to pay an average of $12 million in STATE taxes EACH in order to cancel out the $3 billion tax exemption given to Amazon by New York.

You're as bad at math as AOC. LOL!

/----/ NYS wasn't writing Amazon a check for 3 billion. Instead of collecting $28 billion in taxes over 25 years they'd be collecting $25 billion. Ever go to a department store sale? 15% off on shirts? They aren't giving you the 15% - you still have to buy the shirt but for a few dollars less. Geeeze BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Ame®icano]

Please reconsider. PLEASEEEEE!

New York Gov. Cuomo Appeals to Amazon to Reconsider

NYC Business Leaders Implore Amazon to Reconsider After It Announces It's Pulling Out

Amazon should reconsider, but only if New York gives at least $6 billion in incentives.

 

[martybegan]

Please reconsider. PLEASEEEEE!

New York Gov. Cuomo Appeals to Amazon to Reconsider

NYC Business Leaders Implore Amazon to Reconsider After It Announces It's Pulling Out

Amazon should reconsider, but only if New York gives at least $6 billion in incentives.

I for one hope Cuomo succeeds.

It's an indication of how skewed left NY is that Cuomo can be seen as a "moderate"


I can't stand the guy usually, but most of the other dems are far worse.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Please reconsider. PLEASEEEEE!

New York Gov. Cuomo Appeals to Amazon to Reconsider

NYC Business Leaders Implore Amazon to Reconsider After It Announces It's Pulling Out

Amazon should reconsider, but only if New York gives at least $6 billion in incentives.

/———/ Make AOC apologize- not that she ever would.

 

[Moonglow]

Please reconsider. PLEASEEEEE!

New York Gov. Cuomo Appeals to Amazon to Reconsider

NYC Business Leaders Implore Amazon to Reconsider After It Announces It's Pulling Out

Amazon should reconsider, but only if New York gives at least $6 billion in incentives.

I wouldn't give 'ewm shit no business has the right to hold a city hostage to do business..Amazon has been turned down by several cities because filthy rich billionaires think they are God's gift to humans...

 

[Moonglow]

Please reconsider. PLEASEEEEE!

New York Gov. Cuomo Appeals to Amazon to Reconsider

NYC Business Leaders Implore Amazon to Reconsider After It Announces It's Pulling Out

Amazon should reconsider, but only if New York gives at least $6 billion in incentives.

/———/ Make AOC apologize- not that she ever would.

She didn't have any role in the Amazon people deciding not to build.

 

[Ame®icano]

Please reconsider. PLEASEEEEE!

New York Gov. Cuomo Appeals to Amazon to Reconsider

NYC Business Leaders Implore Amazon to Reconsider After It Announces It's Pulling Out

Amazon should reconsider, but only if New York gives at least $6 billion in incentives.

I wouldn't give 'ewm shit no business has the right to hold a city hostage to do business..Amazon has been turned down by several cities because filthy rich billionaires think they are God's gift to humans...

You got it backwards.

 

[Moonglow]

Please reconsider. PLEASEEEEE!

New York Gov. Cuomo Appeals to Amazon to Reconsider

NYC Business Leaders Implore Amazon to Reconsider After It Announces It's Pulling Out

Amazon should reconsider, but only if New York gives at least $6 billion in incentives.

I wouldn't give 'ewm shit no business has the right to hold a city hostage to do business..Amazon has been turned down by several cities because filthy rich billionaires think they are God's gift to humans...

You got it backwards.

Nope no city offers me a big tax deal to operate. So if the little companies don't get it the big ones should not either.It's called equality, yeah fuck those non-tax paying rich bitches. They can supply their own security, fire control and build their own power generation plants to provide their own infrastructure instead of bumming of the taxpayers.

 

[hadit]

/—-/ And you also say fuck you to the 25,000 lost jobs who would be paying income tax, property tax and sales tax - you imbecile

Amazon was being exempted from $3 billion of taxes as part of the deal. Minimum wage workers would not be able to make that up. Imbecile.

Amazon pays pretty well....I have a friend that went to work for them...he started at 32,000 a year with full benefits...now he makes nearly 150,000 per year...
The minimum wage workers for Amazon are seasonal employees...most of them are semi retired folks....but even they get top quality health insurance and paid holidays and sick pay...and after the busy season is over they get a sizable bonus....This is NY's loss....

25,000 employees would have to pay an average of $12 million in STATE taxes EACH in order to cancel out the $3 billion tax exemption given to Amazon by New York.

How long will it take for your "friend" to pay $12 million in state income taxes?

This is what I mean about shallow thinking^^^^^ you completely leave out all of the jobs that follow Amazon...Trucking...shipping...selling...buying...construction...maintenance......etc etc etc ...short sighted.....

Nope. Giving a $3 billion exemption is what is shortsighted.

All of those jobs will not make up the difference.

$12 million EACH.

How long will it take to make up for the lost $24 billion?

 

[hadit]

$12 million cost for each job created.

It would be cheaper for New York to put 25,000 people in a five star hotel with hookers and blow for life.

And now they don't get the $24 billion. How smart was that?