Amazing predictions from 1958 that came true will blow your Mind

[Derideo_Te]

Actually, I never claimed to be such. I only responded to the falsehoods posted by RW. Now, if you care to refute those points and, you know, stick to the point of the tread, well that would be most welcome.

Or, you can stick with childish name calling, which is about what we'd expect.

Either way, good luck.

Predictable whack-a-mole response!

Sooo...you cannot refute the points made. Got it.

You never made any valid points in the first place so there is nothing to refute.

 

[Derideo_Te]

If you care to address the points I raised with specificity, great. Otherwise, you've suggested bullshit that I never said. I never said we're suffering from "runaway" inflation. I did point to the very high rates of inflation in energy and food prices during a recession. I showed you where government controls wages and prices...you've avoid addressing that. And I never said "every" aspect of the economy was socialist, but that we've most certainly become increasingly socialistic.

See...that's how a grown up responds with specificity. Are you capable? We'll see I guess...

I don't give a fuck about the points you made. I am addressing the predictions in the OP

Show how they are true or STFU

Sorry, but I get you point out how your points are NOT true. Because they weren't.

So we'll go with "no", you're not capable of defending your lies. That's okay, it's your MO around here. We're used to it.

Deceleration Alert!

[MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION]

 

[Derideo_Te]

Sorry, but I get you point out how your points are NOT true. Because they weren't.

So we'll go with "no", you're not capable of defending your lies. That's okay, it's your MO around here. We're used to it.

Show how the predictions are true or STFU

You cannot defend you lies, we got it. Crystal clear. Exactly what we've come to expect from you.

And no, I am under no obligation to even consider the OP. I am free to respond to your lies specifically, which is exactly what I did.

Look, don't sweat it, we all know your propensity to make shit up and then refuse to defend your lies. Status quo for you.

USMB Rules:

Each post must contain content relevant to the thread subject

Off-topic posts may be edited, trashed, deleted, or moved to an appropriate forum as per administrator & moderator discretion at any time within any forum and/or sub forum.

Utopian Libertarians don't get to make up their own rules!

 

[eflatminor]

I don't give a fuck about the points you made. I am addressing the predictions in the OP

Show how they are true or STFU

Sorry, but I get you point out how your points are NOT true. Because they weren't.

So we'll go with "no", you're not capable of defending your lies. That's okay, it's your MO around here. We're used to it.

Show how the predictions are true or STFU

Show your claims were not lies or STFU.

Hey now...there's a thought!

 

[eflatminor]

Show how the predictions are true or STFU

You cannot defend you lies, we got it. Crystal clear. Exactly what we've come to expect from you.

And no, I am under no obligation to even consider the OP. I am free to respond to your lies specifically, which is exactly what I did.

Look, don't sweat it, we all know your propensity to make shit up and then refuse to defend your lies. Status quo for you.

USMB Rules:

Each post must contain content relevant to the thread subject

Off-topic posts may be edited, trashed, deleted, or moved to an appropriate forum as per administrator & moderator discretion at any time within any forum and/or sub forum.

Utopian Libertarians don't get to make up their own rules!

Thanks for driving the point home that you still got nothing.

Why don't you just see if a moderator feels I cannot refute false points made after the original post. Ha! Man are you reaching!

 

[Derideo_Te]

You cannot defend you lies, we got it. Crystal clear. Exactly what we've come to expect from you.

And no, I am under no obligation to even consider the OP. I am free to respond to your lies specifically, which is exactly what I did.

Look, don't sweat it, we all know your propensity to make shit up and then refuse to defend your lies. Status quo for you.

USMB Rules:

Each post must contain content relevant to the thread subject

Off-topic posts may be edited, trashed, deleted, or moved to an appropriate forum as per administrator & moderator discretion at any time within any forum and/or sub forum.

Utopian Libertarians don't get to make up their own rules!

Thanks for driving the point home that you still got nothing.

Why don't you just see if a moderator feels I cannot refute false points made after the original post. Ha! Man are you reaching!

Ironic!

 

[rightwinger]

I'm still looking for any of those predictions that are "Amazing"

Anyone? Anyone?

 

[daws101]

I'm still looking for any of those predictions that are "Amazing"

Anyone? Anyone?

here's an amazing prediction: the angels will win the world series!

 

[Derideo_Te]

I'm still looking for any of those predictions that are "Amazing"

Anyone? Anyone?

You mean besides being amazingly paranoid and even more amazingly inaccurate?

Gotta when the extreme right has to dredge up Bircher BS from 55 years ago and then they still get it wrong. But at least they are consistent when it comes to being wrong! Got to give them credit where it is due.

 

[eflatminor]

USMB Rules:



Utopian Libertarians don't get to make up their own rules!

Thanks for driving the point home that you still got nothing.

Why don't you just see if a moderator feels I cannot refute false points made after the original post. Ha! Man are you reaching!

Ironic!

That neither you nor RW are able to refute the points I made about his lies? No, not really ironic, but ever so typical.

 

[eflatminor]

I'm still looking for any of those predictions that are "Amazing"

Anyone? Anyone?

You mean besides being amazingly paranoid and even more amazingly inaccurate?

Care to point to a single inaccuracy that I posted?

 

[rightwinger]

I'm still looking for any of those predictions that are "Amazing"

Anyone? Anyone?

You mean besides being amazingly paranoid and even more amazingly inaccurate?

Gotta when the extreme right has to dredge up Bircher BS from 55 years ago and then they still get it wrong. But at least they are consistent when it comes to being wrong! Got to give them credit where it is due.

I predict the end of the world

Hey ...what happened? The world didn't end

Yes it did

 

[Statistikhengst]

I don't give a fuck about the points you made. I am addressing the predictions in the OP

Show how they are true or STFU

Sorry, but I get you point out how your points are NOT true. Because they weren't.

So we'll go with "no", you're not capable of defending your lies. That's okay, it's your MO around here. We're used to it.

Deceleration Alert!

[MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION]

OMG, we need to call the grammar clean-up crew, stat!!!

 

[Statistikhengst]

If you care to address the points I raised with specificity, great. Otherwise, you've suggested bullshit that I never said. I never said we're suffering from "runaway" inflation. I did point to the very high rates of inflation in energy and food prices during a recession. I showed you where government controls wages and prices...you've avoid addressing that. And I never said "every" aspect of the economy was socialist, but that we've most certainly become increasingly socialistic.

See...that's how a grown up responds with specificity. Are you capable? We'll see I guess...

I don't give a fuck about the points you made. I am addressing the predictions in the OP

Show how they are true or STFU

Sorry, but I get you point out how your points are NOT true. Because they weren't.

So we'll go with "no", you're not capable of defending your lies. That's okay, it's your MO around here. We're used to it.

Are you drunk?

 

[eflatminor]

I don't give a fuck about the points you made. I am addressing the predictions in the OP

Show how they are true or STFU

Sorry, but I get you point out how your points are NOT true. Because they weren't.

So we'll go with "no", you're not capable of defending your lies. That's okay, it's your MO around here. We're used to it.

Are you drunk?

Are you also unable to point to any inaccuracies I posted in refuting the bullshit lies that RW posted in response to the OP? They are in post #16.

Thrill us with your acumen...

 

[eflatminor]

Sorry, but I get you point out how your points are NOT true. Because they weren't.

So we'll go with "no", you're not capable of defending your lies. That's okay, it's your MO around here. We're used to it.

Deceleration Alert!

[MENTION=46168]Statistikhengst[/MENTION]

OMG, we need to call the grammar clean-up crew, stat!!!

Yes, I mis-typed "you" instead of "to". Wow, that's quite an indictment...

Any chance you're capable of addressing the point or are you just here to point out typos?

 

[Statistikhengst]

Sorry, but I get you point out how your points are NOT true. Because they weren't.

So we'll go with "no", you're not capable of defending your lies. That's okay, it's your MO around here. We're used to it.

Are you drunk?

Are you also unable to point to any inaccuracies I posted in refuting the bullshit lies that RW posted in response to the OP? They are in post #16.

Thrill us with your acumen...

Do you mean the youtube video?

I am still laughing. Ok:

"a part of that plan, of course, is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty, piece by piece and step by step, to various national organizations, of which the UN the outstanding but far from the only example."

So, are UN blue-helmets occupying US soil? No.
Is any other nation controllling our us military? No.

"Greatly expanded government spending for any convievable means of getting rid of the largest sums of American money, as wastefully as possible"

US DEBT to GDP is still less right now than in 1945.

"Higher and then much higher taxes"

Taxes on millionaires during the Eisenhower administration: 90%
Taxes on the rich today: under 25%.

"an increasingly unbalanced budget, despite the higher taxes"

There is no such thing. A budget is either balanced or it is not and the US has been in debt every year of its existence, save 1835, if I recall.

"wild inflation of our currency"

You may be on to something, there. If you run this calculator, you will see some amazing facts:

http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

With Kennedy/Johnson from 1961-1969, it was 22.7%, under DEMOCRATIC administrations.
With Nixon/Ford from 1969-1977, it was 65%
Under Carter, from 1977-1981, it was 50%
With Reagan/ Bush from 1981-1993, it was 60%.
With Clinton from 1993-2001, it was just 22.5%, under a DEMOCRATIC president.
Under Bush 43, from 2001-2009, it was 21.2%, a very good rate.
Under Obama, from 2009-2014, it was 8.9%, the lowest inflation since the 1950s.

The two highest runaway inflationary periods happened both under Republican rule. Inflation under Carter was even less!


Go ahead, run the calculator yourself.

"government controls of prices, wages and materials will, supposedly to combat inflation"

The only president in recent history to freeze prices or wages was: Richard M. Nixon.

"greatly increased socialistic control over every operation of our economy and every activity of our daily lives"

Dow Jones history, 2000 to the present:

Dow Jones Industrial Average (2000 - Present Daily) - Charting Tools - StockCharts.com

Dow Jones, January 2001: 11,337.90
Dow Jones, December 2008: 7,552.29 (End of Bush era)

Change under Bush: -3,758.61


Dow Jones, January 2009: 6,547.05 (beginning of Obama era)
Dow Jones, current: 15,680.35

Change till now under Obama: +9,133.30

If this is how "socialism" is supposed to destroy the Free Market, I want more of it!!!

"this is to be accompanied...by a huge increase in the size of our bureaucracy and in both the cost and reach of our domestic government"

Ok....

GE/P ratio (number of US employees / US population)

The Growth Of Government: 1980 To 2012 - Forbes

Reagan: 7.2%
Bush 41: 7.3%
Clinton: 7.3%
Bush 43: 7.4%
Obama: 6.9%

Really, this is too easy. Everything that man says I can combat with actual facts that mean that his "prophecies" are nothing more than the butthurt ravings of a John Bircher.

Want to play some more?


[MENTION=41527]Pogo[/MENTION]

 

[Statistikhengst]

5 hours later:


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoiV7c46C1A]Nature Sounds for Relaxing, Meditation & Sleep...Night Time Crickets - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Intense]

I'm still looking for any of those predictions that are "Amazing"

Anyone? Anyone?

You kind of remind me of someone..... I Know....




[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhRUe-gz690]Black Knight - YouTube[/ame]

One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse.

Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document. And he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013 - Forbes

 

[Vandalshandle]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG6taS9R1KM]John Birch Society Song - YouTube[/ame]