EvMetro
Platinum Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 10,328
- 6,734
- 970
- Thread starter
- #21
I'm glad to hear that you do not dispute the study that this thread is about.They attacked their own content. I already posted the quote.Here is the JAMA study. I realize that you will not be attacking the content, and that you will be stuck having to attack the source, so go after the study:From your link;The truth comes out about children wearing masks.
AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up
The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.thefederalist.com
"this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old."
Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children
This randomized clinical trial measured inhaled and exhaled carbon dioxide in children with and without face masks.jamanetwork.com