AMA Journal: Masks are bad for kids. Quit forcing them to wear them.

[EvMetro]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

 

[EvMetro]

Here is another source, in case the federalist is too far outside the MSM box. Lefties, if you feel like you need to attack the source, go after the study.

JAMA Pediatrics study concludes children should not be forced to wear face masks

hotair.com

 

[Vrenn]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

Nice opinion piece. But if you go one step beyond it, you will find
Corona children studies "Co-Ki": First results of a Germany-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children

EDITORIAL NOTE:​

This study is based on a survey regarding the adverse effects of mask wearing in children. Due to multiple limitations, this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old.

They took it out of context from another article. In other words, your Cite is a lie.

 

[Vrenn]

Here is another source, in case the federalist is too far outside the MSM box. Lefties, if you feel like you need to attack the source, go after the study.

JAMA Pediatrics study concludes children should not be forced to wear face masks

hotair.com

Your Cite leads right back to the original which is a lie. And in that cite is the real information that disproves the lie.

Nice opinion piece. But if you go one step beyond it, you will find
Corona children studies "Co-Ki": First results of a Germany-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children

EDITORIAL NOTE:​

This study is based on a survey regarding the adverse effects of mask wearing in children. Due to multiple limitations, this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old.

They took it out of context from another article. In other words, your Cite is a lie.

 

[justinacolmena]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

Partial truth mixed with lie is not adequate.
The truth needs to come out about children being “vaxxed” or shot up with syringes full of harmful substances through hollow needles under their skin or in their bloodstream.
Think kids in a gold mining district, liable to be poisoned or kidnapped for ransom.

The U.S. Marshalls on the kidnapping cases have been yanking kids out of school against their will on child custody disputes in local city or municipal courts.

 

[EvMetro]

Here is another source, in case the federalist is too far outside the MSM box. Lefties, if you feel like you need to attack the source, go after the study.

JAMA Pediatrics study concludes children should not be forced to wear face masks

hotair.com

Your Cite leads right back to the original which is a lie. And in that cite is the real information that disproves the lie.

Nice opinion piece. But if you go one step beyond it, you will find
Corona children studies "Co-Ki": First results of a Germany-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children

EDITORIAL NOTE:​

This study is based on a survey regarding the adverse effects of mask wearing in children. Due to multiple limitations, this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old.

They took it out of context from another article. In other words, your Cite is a lie.

Are you saying that JAMA is a lie? When lefties cannot attack the content, they attack the source, just like you quoted of me. In your case, you attacked the source and then replaced it with propaganda that aligns with the political narrative. Weak...

 

[EvMetro]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

Partial truth mixed with lie is not adequate.
The truth needs to come out about children being “vaxxed” or shot up with syringes full of harmful substances through hollow needles under their skin or in their bloodstream.
Think kids in a gold mining district, liable to be poisoned or kidnapped for ransom.

The U.S. Marshalls on the kidnapping cases have been yanking kids out of school against their will on child custody disputes in local city or municipal courts.

WtF are you talking about?

 

[EvMetro]

Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) is ranked #1

Journal Rankings on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

www.scimagojr.com

 

[Crepitus]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

Nutty conspiracy theories belong in the conspiracy theory forum.

 

[Crepitus]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

From your link;

"this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old."

 

[EvMetro]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

From your link;

"this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old."

Here is the JAMA study. I realize that you will not be attacking the content, and that you will be stuck having to attack the source, so go after the study:

Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children

This randomized clinical trial measured inhaled and exhaled carbon dioxide in children with and without face masks.

jamanetwork.com

 

[EvMetro]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

Nutty conspiracy theories belong in the conspiracy theory forum.

It is common for lefties to cry out to the mods for help when they cannot competently dispute the topic. Even if you are successful in getting a mod to spin the wheel of fortune to see which subforum the thread will be moved to, you still haven't been able to override the credibility of the Journal of American Medical Association or the JAMA study itself.

The Journal of American Medical Association is actually ranked #1.

 

[Vrenn]

Here is another source, in case the federalist is too far outside the MSM box. Lefties, if you feel like you need to attack the source, go after the study.

JAMA Pediatrics study concludes children should not be forced to wear face masks

hotair.com

Your Cite leads right back to the original which is a lie. And in that cite is the real information that disproves the lie.

Nice opinion piece. But if you go one step beyond it, you will find
Corona children studies "Co-Ki": First results of a Germany-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children

EDITORIAL NOTE:​

This study is based on a survey regarding the adverse effects of mask wearing in children. Due to multiple limitations, this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old.

They took it out of context from another article. In other words, your Cite is a lie.

Are you saying that JAMA is a lie? When lefties cannot attack the content, they attack the source, just like you quoted of me. In your case, you attacked the source and then replaced it with propaganda that aligns with the political narrative. Weak...

You just don't get verification, do you. I took the source given, read inside the source the source where they got the information from and discovered that the source they used to justify their opinion disagreed with their "Opinion". But you leave out that bit of information because it would make your "Source" look like a complete idiot which it is. And you end up showing that you aren't any better.

So keep telling the same lie over and over hoping that everyone will forget about the original source that was used for the opinion piece. I realize one of your Heroes once said, "If you tell a lie long enough.....".

 

[Vrenn]

EvMetro

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

From your link;

"this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old."

Here is the JAMA study. I realize that you will not be attacking the content, and that you will be stuck having to attack the source, so go after the study:

Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children

This randomized clinical trial measured inhaled and exhaled carbon dioxide in children with and without face masks.

jamanetwork.com

One huge problem. That study isn't about children wearing masks and the harm in it. Please stop making shit up.

 

[EvMetro]

One huge problem. That study isn't about children wearing masks and the harm in it. Please stop making shit up

Copied directly from JAMA:

Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children​

 

[EvMetro]

That study isn't about children wearing masks

As seen in post 11, here is the JAMA link. JAMA is more credible than your partisan opinion.

Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children

This randomized clinical trial measured inhaled and exhaled carbon dioxide in children with and without face masks.

jamanetwork.com

 

[EvMetro]

Prominent medical journals highlight harm to children from masks, death risk from COVID vaccines​

Prominent medical journals highlight harm to children from masks, death risk from COVID vaccines

One journal has already issued an "expression of concern," however, citing "misrepresentation of the COVID-19 vaccination efforts."

justthenews.com

 

[Crepitus]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

From your link;

"this study cannot demonstrate a causal relationship between mask wearing and the reported adverse effects in children. Most of the respondents were parents, and the survey was distributed preferentially in social media forums that, according to the authors, “criticize the government’s corona protection measures in principle”. The limitations of the study include sampling bias, reporting bias, and confounding bias as well as lack of a control group. The use of masks, together with other precautionary measures, significantly reduces the spread of COVID-19 and is considered safe for children over the age of two years old."

Here is the JAMA study. I realize that you will not be attacking the content, and that you will be stuck having to attack the source, so go after the study:

Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children

This randomized clinical trial measured inhaled and exhaled carbon dioxide in children with and without face masks.

jamanetwork.com

They attacked their own content. I already posted the quote.

 

[Crepitus]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

Nutty conspiracy theories belong in the conspiracy theory forum.

It is common for lefties to cry out to the mods for help when they cannot competently dispute the topic. Even if you are successful in getting a mod to spin the wheel of fortune to see which subforum the thread will be moved to, you still haven't been able to override the credibility of the Journal of American Medical Association or the JAMA study itself.

The Journal of American Medical Association is actually ranked #1.

I was telling you that, not the mods.

 

[Vrenn]

The truth comes out about children wearing masks.

AMA Journal: Masks Are Bad For Kids. Quit Forcing Them To Mask Up

The study found children who wore masks inhaled air with six times the amount of carbon dioxide already considered unacceptable.

thefederalist.com

Nutty conspiracy theories belong in the conspiracy theory forum.

It is common for lefties to cry out to the mods for help when they cannot competently dispute the topic. Even if you are successful in getting a mod to spin the wheel of fortune to see which subforum the thread will be moved to, you still haven't been able to override the credibility of the Journal of American Medical Association or the JAMA study itself.

The Journal of American Medical Association is actually ranked #1.

I was telling you that, not the mods.

He's doing the standard "If you tell a lie enough times" routine.