Alyssa Farah Griffin: ‘I feel duped’ by Biden’s team

[Slade3200]

Says an advocate for propaganda. There is definitely something wrong with you.

Explain why SCOTUS didn’t back your claims… none of the shit yall claim ever holds up in court. Cause you can’t prove any of it

 

[Blisterfinger]

Explain why SCOTUS didn’t back your claims… none of the shit yall claim ever holds up in court. Cause you can’t prove any of it

It's well known that the FBI camped in Twitter and Facebook and even gave them money. The hunter Biden laptop story which was a true story was labeled and thwarted. Stopped. This action was for the purpose of getting Joe Biden elected, Classic case of election interference . I don't need anybody to back my claims because they're true. I don't really know much about the scotus decision right now, did they decide not to hear the problem? You Democrats sure seem to have a problem these days about lying

 

[Slade3200]

It's well known that the FBI camped in Twitter and Facebook and even gave them money. The hunter Biden laptop story which was a true story was labeled and thwarted. Stopped. This action was for the purpose of getting Joe Biden elected, Classic case of election interference . I don't need anybody to back my claims because they're true. I don't really know much about the scotus decision right now, did they decide not to hear the problem? You Democrats sure seem to have a problem these days about lying

What you thinks well known is irrelevant. You obviously digest garbage propaganda intel. In the end what happens in real life tells the real story. And when a Trump loaded SCOTUS says there ain’t a case backing up the BS you claim, that says it all.

 

[Pure Comedy Gold]

Totally amazing how Biden was getting angry when he is the pedo.

 

[jc456]

The censorship you claim the government imposed on social media companies. The deep state hogwash theories y’all continuously pump out. BS

 

[jc456]

No they actually didn’t. If they did the SCOTUS would have taken the case and held them accountable. But they didn’t. You’ve been duped by the propaganda you listen to.

so I thought Trump loaded SCOTUS to support republicans. They proved you wrong.

 

[jc456]

Explain why SCOTUS didn’t back your claims… none of the shit yall claim ever holds up in court. Cause you can’t prove any of it

explain how they didn't since you claimed that's what Trump intended?

 

[Blisterfinger]

What you thinks well known is irrelevant. You obviously digest garbage propaganda intel. In the end what happens in real life tells the real story. And when a Trump loaded SCOTUS says there ain’t a case backing up the BS you claim, that says it all.

You Democrats really lie a lot, that says it all

 

[Slade3200]

You Democrats really lie a lot, that says it all

Haha, oh please try and back up that statement. What lie do you think I told?

 

[Blisterfinger]

Haha, oh please try and back up that statement. What lie do you think I told?

Did you watch the debate? The 51 intelligence agents was all a lie, you believed it. Are you culpable for being so gullible?

 

[jc456]

You Democrats really lie a lot, that says it all

it's all they got. Truth isn't theirs.

 

[jc456]

Did you watch the debate? The 51 intelligence agents was all a lie, you believed it. Are you culpable for being so gullible?

it suggests they lie about everything. Here, even the young turks say that.

 

[Slade3200]

Did you watch the debate? The 51 intelligence agents was all a lie, you believed it. Are you culpable for being so gullible?

What are you talking about? The letter you’re talking about was an expression of opinion and was clearly stated that none of those signing the letter had any more intel than what was available to the public. The lie is you claiming there was some deep state government censorship aimed at stealing an election from Trump. That’s the BS you’re pushing that you can’t back up and that SCOTUS squashed. So maybe consider giving it a rest and not looking like such a fool

 

[jc456]

What are you talking about? The letter you’re talking about was an expression of opinion and was clearly stated that none of those signing the letter had any more intel than what was available to the public. The lie is you claiming there was some deep state government censorship aimed at stealing an election from Trump. That’s the BS you’re pushing that you can’t back up and that SCOTUS squashed. So maybe consider giving it a rest and not looking like such a fool

they publicized it as fact. on every station every day it was news. they took down anyone disagreeing with it as well.

 

[Blisterfinger]

What are you talking about? The letter you’re talking about was an expression of opinion and was clearly stated that none of those signing the letter had any more intel than what was available to the public. The lie is you claiming there was some deep state government censorship aimed at stealing an election from Trump. That’s the BS you’re pushing that you can’t back up and that SCOTUS squashed. So maybe consider giving it a rest and not looking like such a fool

If you weren't so God damn gullible you would know what I'm talking about. Did you watch that debate? OMG what a liar

 

[Slade3200]

If you weren't so God damn gullible you would know what I'm talking about. Did you watch that debate? OMG what a liar

I know exactly what you’re trying to say, I’m just not buying your spin which is why I’m asking you to explain it. And you’re failing to do so. Give it a try. Back up and support your arguements

 

[Blisterfinger]

I know exactly what you’re trying to say, I’m just not buying your spin which is why I’m asking you to explain it. And you’re failing to do so. Give it a try. Back up and support your arguements

The Supreme Court certainly let the public down with their decision that the murty case had no standing. Perfect for the gullible Democrat.

"in American history. In the face of the most sweeping censorship in American history, the decision fails to recognize either the realities of the censorship or the constitutional barriers to it. In practical terms, the decision invites continuing federal censorship on social media platforms. It thereby nearly guarantees that yet another election cycle will be compromised by government censorship and condemns a hitherto free society to the specter of mental servitude."

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2024/07/02/no_remedy_for_censorship_the_perils_of_murthy_.html

 

[Slade3200]

The Supreme Court certainly let the public down with their decision that the murty case had no standing. Perfect for the gullible Democrat.

Yes it is perfect because it shuts down all the Bs you’ve been spewing. And we know this SCOTUS will go to pretty extreme lengths to support the Trump agenda. For them to dump this case shows there’s really no teeth to it. Yet you persist.

 

[jc456]

I know exactly what you’re trying to say, I’m just not buying your spin which is why I’m asking you to explain it. And you’re failing to do so. Give it a try. Back up and support your arguements

so creepy was coherent for you!! thanks, now I know you're a fking nutjob.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Yes it is perfect because it shuts down all the Bs you’ve been spewing. And we know this SCOTUS will go to pretty extreme lengths to support the Trump agenda. For them to dump this case shows there’s really no teeth to it. Yet you persist.

Did you even read the article? You just seem to insist on having a smooth brain stupid Outlook on suppression of our freedoms. As an intelligent Freedom loving in American I do not want the government involved in censoring and suppressing speech for political gain like the biden administration did with the 51 so-called intelligence experts. They're doing it again right now with a bunch of economic "experts". Perfect for the gullible Democrat to vote on. You persist in defending propaganda and censorship. You have to be stupid. Do you support the Supreme's courts ruling on immunity? Or do you pick and choose which decision they make according to your political agenda?