Alvin Bragg's soft-on-crime policies scorched after Trump charges: Things have gotten 'progressively worse'

So, you didn’t read the charges.
The tards are very carefully trained to avoid the facts. They also can't read anything longer than a tweet.

Read the indictment for themselves? :auiqs.jpg:

They have been deliberately dumbed down to the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker so they can only parrot what they are told to parrot.

Sad.
 
Hush payments are not illegal.
I guess you are unaware Cohen went to prison for making the hush money payment, along with tax fraud.

Now, I know you are going to parrot some bullshit that he was railroaded/forced to plead guilty, but that's just because your propagandists have not properly explained to you what law he broke.

They like you being this stupid and ignorant. It would gravely concern them if you got a brain.

In fact, they are literally terrified that if they told you the truth you would stop listening to them and go somewhere else!
 
The tards are very carefully trained to avoid the facts. They also can't read anything longer than a tweet.

Read the indictment for themselves? :auiqs.jpg:

They have been deliberately dumbed down to the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker so they can only parrot what they are told to parrot.

Sad.
Anyone who can’t/won’t read the charges, their responses are ignorantly irrelevant.
 
At a minimum, Bragg’s soft-on-crime track record makes him look both weak and politically motivated to go after Trump. Most likely, he got told.
 
At a minimum, Bragg’s soft-on-crime track record makes him look both weak and politically motivated to go after Trump. Most likely, he got told.
Soft on crime ? Guess you think it’s OK for the rich to get away with crimes and only go after those who can’t pay lawyers to obstruct. Normal people feel no one is above the law. Obviously, repugnants think Hillary is above the law; they never tried to prosecute her.
 
repugnants think Hillary is above the law; they never tried to prosecute her.
so the only way someone is guilty of a crime is if someone prosecutes?

:bang3:

Hey, boys and girls:

Can you spell Politics?

How about Corruption?
 
so the only way someone is guilty of a crime is if someone prosecutes?

:bang3:

Hey, boys and girls:

Can you spell Politics?

How about Corruption?
You can’t be serious. How the fk else do you find out if some is a CRIMINAL unless they are prosecuted and convicted.
Ask Fix News ?
May be YOU think background checks should include Fix News a accusations.
 
You can’t be serious. How the fk else do you find out if some is a CRIMINAL unless they are prosecuted and convicted.
Ask Fix News ?
May be YOU think background checks should include Fix News a accusations.
well, we know one thing about you: you are not a lawyer.

Any first yr law student knows you have to have some kind of evidence of a crime before you accuse someone of it
 
well, we know one thing about you: you are not a lawyer.

Any first yr law student knows you have to have some kind of evidence of a crime before you accuse someone of it
“Some kind of evidence” does not make a person a criminal.
You obviously aren’t a lawyer niether are you a first year law student. You can accuse anyone of anything. That makes them a criminal ? You’re delirious.
 
“Some kind of evidence” does not make a person a criminal.
You obviously aren’t a lawyer niether are you a first year law student. You can accuse anyone of anything. That makes them a criminal ? You’re delirious.
the IRONY!

maybe you should apply these words of yours to TRUMP

but that, as one friend once put it is apparently "too much like right" for you

hypocrite city
 
the IRONY!

maybe you should apply these words of yours to TRUMP

but that, as one friend once put it is apparently "too much like right" for you

hypocrite city
Trump confessed to fraud. Big difference. He paid fines and restitution.
 
Soft on crime ? Guess you think it’s OK for the rich to get away with crimes and only go after those who can’t pay lawyers to obstruct. Normal people feel no one is above the law. Obviously, repugnants think Hillary is above the law; they never tried to prosecute her.
Who says it has to be one or the other? What is Bragg’s track record on violent crime and white color crime? Overall, it is said he is soft and the NYC stats back it up. He got told to go after Trump..
 
Who says it has to be one or the other? What is Bragg’s track record on violent crime and white color crime? Overall, it is said he is soft and the NYC stats back it up. He got told to go after Trump..
Where ? You’re say so ? The supporter of a habitual liar ?
 
Haha
Don‘t you read your own shit ? It was an ACCUSATION by Trump. Hilarious. The TRIAL is about Trump, not Bragg foolish. The judge is binding him over on the evidence presented by Bragg. No judges found Trump credible or election fraud, but the found Bragg credible.
 
Who says it has to be one or the other? What is Bragg’s track record on violent crime and white color crime? Overall, it is said he is soft and the NYC stats back it up. He got told to go after Trump..
Hilarious. Bragg had evidence. The JUDGE is making the decision, not Bragg dumbo. No judge found Trump credible on election fraud. Obviously Bragg is credible, Trump ISN‘T.
Hilarious. Tucker loves you for your diversions.
 
Haha
Don‘t you read your own shit ? It was an ACCUSATION by Trump. Hilarious. The TRIAL is about Trump, not Bragg foolish. The judge is binding him over on the evidence presented by Bragg. No judges found Trump credible or election fraud, but the found Bragg credible.
Regardless of what Trump says and the evidence brought forth by Bragg, Bragg’s track record shows Bragg is politically motivated in bringing about these charges.
 

Forum List

Back
Top