- Nov 26, 2011
- 123,665
- 58,163
- 2,290
No, dipsit, I linked to the 38 second mark where the comedy begins.Why did you only watch 38 seconds and then send us the link? You send us some bullshit you didn't even watch yourself? Fuck off.
Idiot
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, dipsit, I linked to the 38 second mark where the comedy begins.Why did you only watch 38 seconds and then send us the link? You send us some bullshit you didn't even watch yourself? Fuck off.
The tards are very carefully trained to avoid the facts. They also can't read anything longer than a tweet.So, you didn’t read the charges.
I guess you are unaware Cohen went to prison for making the hush money payment, along with tax fraud.Hush payments are not illegal.
Anyone who keeps referring to IQ as a valid way of describing intellect, is ignorant. You never fail to disappoint.Low-IQ response. Way to understand the problem moron.
Anyone who can’t/won’t read the charges, their responses are ignorantly irrelevant.The tards are very carefully trained to avoid the facts. They also can't read anything longer than a tweet.
Read the indictment for themselves?
They have been deliberately dumbed down to the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker so they can only parrot what they are told to parrot.
Sad.
Soft on crime ? Guess you think it’s OK for the rich to get away with crimes and only go after those who can’t pay lawyers to obstruct. Normal people feel no one is above the law. Obviously, repugnants think Hillary is above the law; they never tried to prosecute her.At a minimum, Bragg’s soft-on-crime track record makes him look both weak and politically motivated to go after Trump. Most likely, he got told.
so the only way someone is guilty of a crime is if someone prosecutes?repugnants think Hillary is above the law; they never tried to prosecute her.
You can’t be serious. How the fk else do you find out if some is a CRIMINAL unless they are prosecuted and convicted.so the only way someone is guilty of a crime is if someone prosecutes?
Hey, boys and girls:
Can you spell Politics?
How about Corruption?
well, we know one thing about you: you are not a lawyer.You can’t be serious. How the fk else do you find out if some is a CRIMINAL unless they are prosecuted and convicted.
Ask Fix News ?
May be YOU think background checks should include Fix News a accusations.
“Some kind of evidence” does not make a person a criminal.well, we know one thing about you: you are not a lawyer.
Any first yr law student knows you have to have some kind of evidence of a crime before you accuse someone of it
the IRONY!“Some kind of evidence” does not make a person a criminal.
You obviously aren’t a lawyer niether are you a first year law student. You can accuse anyone of anything. That makes them a criminal ? You’re delirious.
Trump confessed to fraud. Big difference. He paid fines and restitution.the IRONY!
maybe you should apply these words of yours to TRUMP
but that, as one friend once put it is apparently "too much like right" for you
hypocrite city
Who says it has to be one or the other? What is Bragg’s track record on violent crime and white color crime? Overall, it is said he is soft and the NYC stats back it up. He got told to go after Trump..Soft on crime ? Guess you think it’s OK for the rich to get away with crimes and only go after those who can’t pay lawyers to obstruct. Normal people feel no one is above the law. Obviously, repugnants think Hillary is above the law; they never tried to prosecute her.
Where ? You’re say so ? The supporter of a habitual liar ?Who says it has to be one or the other? What is Bragg’s track record on violent crime and white color crime? Overall, it is said he is soft and the NYC stats back it up. He got told to go after Trump..
Where ? You’re say so ? The supporter of a habitual liar ?
HahaAlvin Bragg's "Soft on Crime" policies face scrutiny as he goes after Trump
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is accused of being soft on crime. But he's no softie when it comes to investigating Donald Trump.www.newsweek.com
Hilarious. Bragg had evidence. The JUDGE is making the decision, not Bragg dumbo. No judge found Trump credible on election fraud. Obviously Bragg is credible, Trump ISN‘T.Who says it has to be one or the other? What is Bragg’s track record on violent crime and white color crime? Overall, it is said he is soft and the NYC stats back it up. He got told to go after Trump..
Regardless of what Trump says and the evidence brought forth by Bragg, Bragg’s track record shows Bragg is politically motivated in bringing about these charges.Haha
Don‘t you read your own shit ? It was an ACCUSATION by Trump. Hilarious. The TRIAL is about Trump, not Bragg foolish. The judge is binding him over on the evidence presented by Bragg. No judges found Trump credible or election fraud, but the found Bragg credible.