Almost no one would believe in evolution if they weren't taught or indoctrinated to believe it

[Sherlock Holmes]

What a bizarre lie.

You honestly think that, because you dont understand it, nobody does.

I assure you, peole understand evolution.

There are a million questions one can ask an evolutionist that will get "we don't know" as an answer. Answering "we don't know" means they don't actually understand. People who understand a subject don't answer "don't know", they do know.

And belief is for you faithers. Since you cant elevate your own claims and beliefs out of the shitty muck, you try to vandalize other ideas to bring them down to the level of magical religious belief.

 

[scruffy]

Which is a sign your faith is shaky.

Yep.

 

[alang1216]

There are a million questions one can ask an evolutionist that will get "we don't know" as an answer. Answering "we don't know" means they don't actually understand. People who understand a subject don't answer "don't know", they do know.

That is nonsense. If I asked you what will be the result of a single coin flip, you wouldn't know even if you were an expert in statistics.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Most people believe in evolution because they've been taught or indoctrinated into believing it was true. Just as if they had been born in ancient times and were taught that the earth was flat, they'd be believing that as well.

So there's no reason to believe it, unless maybe you discovered it yourself. And most of you haven't.

Same with manmade climate change and for the exact same reason

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

That is nonsense. If I asked you what will be the result of a single coin flip, you wouldn't know even if you were an expert in statistics.

Well I understand that the outcome is random and could prove that by experiments like doing a thousand coin tosses.

Ask an evolutionist how many generations of bacteria does it need to evolve into a jellyfish, you'll get "we don't know".

 

[Woodznutz]

Genesis describes evolution. Its a scientific fact. Refusal to accept it is an act of stupidity and immaturity.

Genesis describes special creation.

 

[Woodznutz]

Yes, you keep saying that. It's not getting any smarter with repetition.

Unlike science, it doesn't change.

 

[Woodznutz]

Most of the peole in this thread.

See? You've never even bothered to TRY to learn the most basic information about evolution.

You're just trolling and wasting everyone's time with your self affirmation crusade. Which is a sign your faith is shaky.

My faith in God is strong, and in true science. Evolution is fake science.

I've read a lot of stuff on evolution. It's shot through with unproven suppositions. In fact, it's held together with suppositions.

 

[Woodznutz]

Horseshit.

There is ZERO evidence for what you just said.

All the evidence points to that.

 

[dblack]

Most people believe in evolution because they've been taught or indoctrinated into believing it was true. Just as if they had been born in ancient times and were taught that the earth was flat, they'd be believing that as well.

So there's no reason to believe it, unless maybe you discovered it yourself. And most of you haven't.

Same goes for most of science.

 

[Hafar1014]

Genesis describes special creation.

Genesis clearly describes evolution by portraying two different Adams. One at the beginning primitive and undeveloped with no moral knowledge, an animal. "God said I will make man" in my "likeness" that means Adam can grow and develop into a higher form, evolve.

After Adam eats form the tree of knowledge of good and evil he has morals and free will. "God says Let us make the man." Use of the royal we means a major accomplishment has occurred. Adam has evolved form the primitively to the highly developed.
If want to know what Genesis is all about ask a Jew we wrote it

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Genesis clearly describes evolution by portraying two different Adams. One at the beginning primitive and undeveloped with no moral knowledge, an animal. "God said I will make man" in my "likeness" that means Adam can grow and develop into a higher form, evolve.

It says "Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness" not "my likeness".

After Adam eats form the tree of knowledge of good and evil he has morals and free will. "God says Let us make the man." Use of the royal we means a major accomplishment has occurred. Adam has evolved form the primitively to the highly developed.
If want to know what Genesis is all about ask a Jew we wrote it

 

[Hafar1014]

It says "Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness" not "my likeness".

Your partly correct abd I am partly wrong. The exact translation is "Let us make man" In any case there are 2 distinct Adams one primitive the other highly developed. Thats called evolution

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Your partly correct abd I am partly wrong. The exact translation is "Let us make man" In any case there are 2 distinct Adams one primitive the other highly developed. Thats called evolution

That's an interpretation of Genesis, I've heard hundreds of them.

 

[alang1216]

Ask an evolutionist how many generations of bacteria does it need to evolve into a jellyfish, you'll get "we don't know".

The answer would be too great a number to count so they really are saying "we don't care".

Ask a creationist how did God manage to create and you'll get "we don't know".

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

The answer would be too great a number to count so they really are saying "we don't care".

Ask a creationist how did God manage to create and you'll get "we don't know".

I can answer it though, it's revealed but the blind cannot see.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There are a million questions one can ask an evolutionist that will get "we don't know" as an answer.

Actually there are infinite questions. Just as with any topic.

This means nothing, except to highlight the difference between religious nutters pretending they know things they don't and honest, rational peole who admit when they dont know things.

Also, it's clear you are unable to separate the basic theory of evolution, made up of only a few factual statements, from detailed explanations of every chemical mechanism.

Scientists dont suffer from this deficit. Neither does such a thing undermine the fundamental theory. You just think and hope it does, because you are now spitballing. Since everything else you attempted ended in failure.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That's an interpretation of Genesis, I've heard hundreds of them.

Well of course, thats the pratfall of religious nonsense.

You wont find multiple interpretations of the fundamental facts of evolution.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Actually there are infinite questions. Just as with any topic.

This means nothing, except to highlight the difference between religious nutters pretending they know things they don't and honest, rational peole who admit when they dont know things.

Also, it's clear you are unable to separate the basic theory of evolution, made up of only a few factual statements, from detailed explanations of every chemical mechanism.

Scientists dont suffer from this deficit. Neither does such a thing undermine the fundamental theory. You just think and hope it does, because you are now spitballing. Since everything else you attempted ended in failure.

Tell me then, how do you know when a person understands something?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Well of course, thats the pratfall of religious nonsense.

You wont find multiple interpretations of the fundamental facts of evolution.

All evidence is interpreted.