Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Depends how you say it.Twitter and Facebook don’t say they’re the best place to check out unhinged conspiracy theories and harassment of transgendered people, do they?Twitter and Facebook claim the right to take down content they find objectionable because it’s being hosted on their property.Free discourse does not require anyone else to publish your shit posts. Never has. Never will.Ah, the old “I wouldn’t be an authoritarian thug if you just submit to my demands” line. You’re just doing great at this.What’s the fine going to be for kicking shit posters off Twitter?Sounds like a rebranding of authoritarianism.It's a new concept of commons, a digital commons.
Sounds like argumentum ad absurdum.
This coming from someone who supports 430k fines for someone not baking a cake.
Gay people didn’t do anything to the baker. Shit posters on Twitter are turning Twitter into a cesspool.
They don't have to fine them, because twitter wouldn't have to do anything except live up to its supposed goal of being an open discussion platform.
The baker didn't have an issue with serving a gay person, they didn't want to make a wedding cake for a same sex wedding.
The only reason he didn’t want to serve them a cake is because he did have issue with them, through no fault of their own. If the gay couple had been taking a dump in the middle of his bakery, I’d be all for kicking them out. However, someone makes Twitter a cesspool and you want to force Twitter to help them do it. Hell no.
He does not believe same sex unions are marriages, and didn't want to make a cake for that one specific event.
On the other hand Twitter has become vital to the countries political discourse, and thus regulating it is in the best interest of the country.
It’s in the best interest of trolls, but not the nation.
It's in the best interest of free discourse, something you can't stand because you know you would lose.
The internet is a digital commons. Facebook and Twitter are not.
and when someone tries to make an alternative to either, then they go after the servers, then the banks, then the access providers, then the people using it. All to silence the opposition.
Twitter and facebook claim to be open platforms hosting others content, and they are lying, and you are OK with them lying.
I feel the same way.
You want to make laws regarding common carrier status for access providers, I’m all for it. In fact, we already did that.
You only feel the same way because it's people you don't like being silenced. You aren't for free speech, you are for your speech.
I feel that way because I know that the internet is full of trolls who enjoy destroying what other people have built.
And you want the government to force people to let them do it.
you only care about "trolls" you disagree with. Lefty trolls are fine for you.
I want government to force them to live up to what they are saying they are providing.
Because that’s what you’re really defending here.
Saying men are men and women are women is harassment?
Depends how you say it.Twitter and Facebook don’t say they’re the best place to check out unhinged conspiracy theories and harassment of transgendered people, do they?Twitter and Facebook claim the right to take down content they find objectionable because it’s being hosted on their property.Free discourse does not require anyone else to publish your shit posts. Never has. Never will.Ah, the old “I wouldn’t be an authoritarian thug if you just submit to my demands” line. You’re just doing great at this.What’s the fine going to be for kicking shit posters off Twitter?Sounds like a rebranding of authoritarianism.It's a new concept of commons, a digital commons.
Sounds like argumentum ad absurdum.
This coming from someone who supports 430k fines for someone not baking a cake.
Gay people didn’t do anything to the baker. Shit posters on Twitter are turning Twitter into a cesspool.
They don't have to fine them, because twitter wouldn't have to do anything except live up to its supposed goal of being an open discussion platform.
The baker didn't have an issue with serving a gay person, they didn't want to make a wedding cake for a same sex wedding.
The only reason he didn’t want to serve them a cake is because he did have issue with them, through no fault of their own. If the gay couple had been taking a dump in the middle of his bakery, I’d be all for kicking them out. However, someone makes Twitter a cesspool and you want to force Twitter to help them do it. Hell no.
He does not believe same sex unions are marriages, and didn't want to make a cake for that one specific event.
On the other hand Twitter has become vital to the countries political discourse, and thus regulating it is in the best interest of the country.
It’s in the best interest of trolls, but not the nation.
It's in the best interest of free discourse, something you can't stand because you know you would lose.
The internet is a digital commons. Facebook and Twitter are not.
and when someone tries to make an alternative to either, then they go after the servers, then the banks, then the access providers, then the people using it. All to silence the opposition.
Twitter and facebook claim to be open platforms hosting others content, and they are lying, and you are OK with them lying.
I feel the same way.
You want to make laws regarding common carrier status for access providers, I’m all for it. In fact, we already did that.
You only feel the same way because it's people you don't like being silenced. You aren't for free speech, you are for your speech.
I feel that way because I know that the internet is full of trolls who enjoy destroying what other people have built.
And you want the government to force people to let them do it.
you only care about "trolls" you disagree with. Lefty trolls are fine for you.
I want government to force them to live up to what they are saying they are providing.
Because that’s what you’re really defending here.
Saying men are men and women are women is harassment?
You’re distorting the concept of free speech with your newthink. It’s not about speech, we both know this. Everyone has freedom speech, Twitter couldn’t take that away. You’re looking for two things. Freedom from consequences and the right to have an audience. Neither of those are necessary for freedom of speech.
No, it definitely matters how you say it and that should be obvious to anyone with half a brain. Unfortunately your brain is completely consumed with making sure someone like me is never right that it just pumps out stupid nonsense.Wrong, it does not depend on how you say it. All you are doing when saying that is taking a position that woketards like you don't like. your lack of a spine isn't our fucking problem, snowflake.
What you are looking for is the new Inquisition, except run by limp wristed beta cucks like you.
No, it definitely matters how you say it and that should be obvious to anyone with half a brain. Unfortunately your brain is completely consumed with making sure someone like me is never right that it just pumps out stupid nonsense.Wrong, it does not depend on how you say it. All you are doing when saying that is taking a position that woketards like you don't like. your lack of a spine isn't our fucking problem, snowflake.
What you are looking for is the new Inquisition, except run by limp wristed beta cucks like you.
What’s funny is that you’re accusing me of lacking spine when you are throwing such a tizzy over not being able to post on Twitter as if that’s the end of the world. Jesus, you are a child.
Here’s what it looks like getting ones panties in a bunch. Getting kicked off Twitter is like the Holocaust.Nope, sorry if you get the vapors over it while your panties get bunched up.
Here’s what it looks like getting ones panties in a bunch. Getting kicked off Twitter is like the Holocaust.Nope, sorry if you get the vapors over it while your panties get bunched up.
View attachment 465440
LOLHere’s what it looks like getting ones panties in a bunch. Getting kicked off Twitter is like the Holocaust.Nope, sorry if you get the vapors over it while your panties get bunched up.
View attachment 465440
Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
LOLHere’s what it looks like getting ones panties in a bunch. Getting kicked off Twitter is like the Holocaust.Nope, sorry if you get the vapors over it while your panties get bunched up.
View attachment 465440
Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
You poor thing, people paying attention already know what that was about.
That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
What does exposure have to do with free speech?That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
And zero exposure, which is why you idiots love Twitter being the new gatekeeper.
It's only OK with you because your side has the keys to the gate.
What does exposure have to do with free speech?That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
And zero exposure, which is why you idiots love Twitter being the new gatekeeper.
It's only OK with you because your side has the keys to the gate.
Abide by the rules agreed to when joining and anyone can continue to post on those sites. Simple, eh?What does exposure have to do with free speech?That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
And zero exposure, which is why you idiots love Twitter being the new gatekeeper.
It's only OK with you because your side has the keys to the gate.
Before all anyone had was the commons, now there is a digitial commons that should result in more people being heard, but your side doesn't like that and tries to control it.
Abide by the rules agreed to when joining and anyone can continue to post on those sites. Simple, eh?What does exposure have to do with free speech?That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
And zero exposure, which is why you idiots love Twitter being the new gatekeeper.
It's only OK with you because your side has the keys to the gate.
Before all anyone had was the commons, now there is a digitial commons that should result in more people being heard, but your side doesn't like that and tries to control it.
False. The rules do not target one side of the political aisle.Abide by the rules agreed to when joining and anyone can continue to post on those sites. Simple, eh?What does exposure have to do with free speech?That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
And zero exposure, which is why you idiots love Twitter being the new gatekeeper.
It's only OK with you because your side has the keys to the gate.
Before all anyone had was the commons, now there is a digitial commons that should result in more people being heard, but your side doesn't like that and tries to control it.
"Rules" that are only enforced against people with the "wrong" politics.
Being heard isn't necessary to freedom of speech. Laura Loomer can scream all she wants, no one needs to listen to her.Before all anyone had was the commons, now there is a digitial commons that should result in more people being heard, but your side doesn't like that and tries to control it.
What does exposure have to do with free speech?That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
And zero exposure, which is why you idiots love Twitter being the new gatekeeper.
It's only OK with you because your side has the keys to the gate.
Before all anyone had was the commons, now there is a digitial commons that should result in more people being heard, but your side doesn't like that and tries to control it.
False. The rules do not target one side of the political aisle.Abide by the rules agreed to when joining and anyone can continue to post on those sites. Simple, eh?What does exposure have to do with free speech?That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
And zero exposure, which is why you idiots love Twitter being the new gatekeeper.
It's only OK with you because your side has the keys to the gate.
Before all anyone had was the commons, now there is a digitial commons that should result in more people being heard, but your side doesn't like that and tries to control it.
"Rules" that are only enforced against people with the "wrong" politics.
Being heard isn't necessary to freedom of speech. Laura Loomer can scream all she wants, no one needs to listen to her.Before all anyone had was the commons, now there is a digitial commons that should result in more people being heard, but your side doesn't like that and tries to control it.
No one tried to control her. She was free to be an idiot.
What does exposure have to do with free speech?That’s one of your right wing intellectual elite, Laura Loomer who chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters door because she has been kicked off.Wow, a picture with no context or backstory.
Nice work colcuck.
Twitter didn’t even press charges for her stunt, although they probably could have. They just let her hang out until she got bored and went away.
Now that’s free speech.
And zero exposure, which is why you idiots love Twitter being the new gatekeeper.
It's only OK with you because your side has the keys to the gate.
Before all anyone had was the commons, now there is a digitial commons that should result in more people being heard, but your side doesn't like that and tries to control it.
Says the clown ^ who never met a voter suppression law that keeps blacks & browns from voting he didn’t love!
