All Threads That Are Based Off of Certain Sites...

[LA RAM FAN]

All threads that are based on The Gateway Pundit, True Pundit, and Info Wars, should automatically be moved to the conspiracy theory section. Seriously, how often are they true? The sections of the forum for political news and current events are being littered with these threads that are totally unreliable. The forum might as well allow people to start posting The Onion in the Politics forum.

The day that the moderators of this forum takes seriously the suggestions of someone with such a limited intellect (such as yourself) with no critical thinking skills? Well, that's the day that I vacate this site. Shall I regale you with the examples of CNN being busted for staging news events using blue screens as if they were on site?

Bless your little heart. If only the mods actually did enforce moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists posts to the correct section of the forum, you still wouldn't leave. Just like the goodbye thread you started only to never leave. You mean well, I'm sure you do.

moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists



So once again you attack the messenger and not the message..





Why can't you see and comprehend how foolish you are?


Posts like this scares me ...



What is wrong with you attack the message not the messenger ...

You dont want news that's not covered by MSM and censored to your liking, you hate the truth ..why dude?


View attachment 174322

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The day that the moderators of this forum takes seriously the suggestions of someone with such a limited intellect (such as yourself) with no critical thinking skills? Well, that's the day that I vacate this site. Shall I regale you with the examples of CNN being busted for staging news events using blue screens as if they were on site?

Bless your little heart. If only the mods actually did enforce moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists posts to the correct section of the forum, you still wouldn't leave. Just like the goodbye thread you started only to never leave. You mean well, I'm sure you do.

moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists



So once again you attack the messenger and not the message..





Why can't you see and comprehend how foolish you are?


Posts like this scares me ...



What is wrong with you attack the message not the messenger ...

You dont want news that's not covered by MSM and censored to your liking, you hate the truth ..why dude?


View attachment 174322

Sorry but asking that threads be put in the proper place of the forum isn't censorship. Censorship would be asking for all the threads to be deleted.

No, what YOU want is that sites that put out articles that YOU don't like should be treated differently than REAL fake news articles and opinion pieces from sites like CNN, The Washington Post and The New York Times.....and that makes you a bit of a chickenshit and overall *****.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Anyone remember "Prop or Not?"

Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story
Unpacking the Shadowy Outfit Behind 2017’s Biggest Fake News Story

". . . . As journalist Robert Parry wrote in October 2016, the propaganda campaign in favor of military confrontation with Russia was driven by “a consensus among the major think tanks of Official Washington, where there is near universal support for Hillary Clinton, not because they all particularly like her, but because she has signaled a return to neocon/liberal-hawk strategies.”


The people who were lining up to take senior positions in a Clinton White House believed that President Obama had been too timid in stressing the dangers of overreach and the need for restraint, especially in the Middle East, and it was time for a more hawkish approach, as embodied by Clinton.


Parry goes on to say that at the forefront of this propaganda campaign was the Atlantic Council, a think tank associated with NATO. Their main goal was “a major confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia,” Parry warned.


So, to make sense of all this, most of the people listed would have held cabinet positions in a Hillary Clinton presidency. If the Interpreter is a project of RFE/RL then the decision to go ahead with PropOrNot would have to go across their desk. That would include, possibly, then Secretary of State, John Kerry.


The unasked question of why would a U.S. Government Agency do this needs to be addressed. All the people listed above were actively working for Clinton to get her elected and throw Donald Trump’s campaign off the rails.


After the election, they were going to take care of Clinton’s “deplorables” by dissecting alternative media. I wrote about this before the election and I warned several major new sites what they could expect. I was right on the money. After she lost, it was already in motion. The deplorable media didn’t fall into a particular political pattern other than they did not promote Hillary Clinton.


The purpose of PropOrNot has been to trick people into demanding that freedom of speech be rolled back. This was/is to be done by destroying fact-based media. If you read further, the entire plan is laid out starting from 2015 when it started coming together.


These people want reality shaped on what the perceived majority (louder) group believes to be true, regardless of what the facts are. Perception based reality is only a Facebook like away from killing one person or elevating another to hero status regardless of what they have done. . . . "


IOW, the need to censor alternative narratives from those other than the one approved by ruling class journalists, is a campaign to control thoughts and minds to push forward the agenda of Washington think tanks and the Federal bureaucracy, AKA, the welfare/warfare Deep State.

Heaven forbid Americans actually choose what is best for them instead of the corporate interests and monied interests that enslave them.

The only conspiracy that Lewdog would have pushed forward is the conspiracy to keep folks from having the ability to be free thinkers.

pretty much.LOL I also like Dale cant add anything more since you pretty much nailed it there on Lewdog..LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Bless your little heart. If only the mods actually did enforce moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists posts to the correct section of the forum, you still wouldn't leave. Just like the goodbye thread you started only to never leave. You mean well, I'm sure you do.

moving fake news stories like the ones Steve McRacists



So once again you attack the messenger and not the message..





Why can't you see and comprehend how foolish you are?


Posts like this scares me ...



What is wrong with you attack the message not the messenger ...

Steve McRacist only posts from 2-3 sites.

So are you going to pick up the bet or not? Or just admit you are wrong?

So the **** what? No one is twisting your flabby arm and making you read what he posts..........or are they? You might need to use your (snicker) "connections" within the law enforcement community and file charges, ya dumb, fat ****.

Bless your heart. I know you mean well.

^^^
Lewdog



View attachment 174332

we all now know what Lewdog looks like in real life.LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

CNN should be moved automatically to satire.
MSNBC should be moved to the gay and lesbian forum.

ADD FOX NEWS TO THAT LIST AS WELL.lol

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The fact of the matter is, the whole notion by the OP is unAmerican.

I don't care if an OP uses the Onion of the National Enquirer.

Every time someone from the far left uses HuffPo, or someone from the far right uses Breitbart, I'll skim the article, but we all know the drill.

If you start a thread but use as your source a compromised piece of journalism, the board will note that.

If the OP looks at the link, and doesn't like that source, move on, don't try to control the conversation. IF they don't like the way the forum is set-up, find a new forum.

We don't knew a ministry of truth here.

Putting threads in the appropriate part of the forum isn't unAmerican. So are you for putting The Onion in the Politics forum?

The Onion clearly states it is for entertainment only.


Don't be disingenuous.

If we should put any articles containing media links in the Conspiracy sub-forum, it should by those that can be proven to have any links to the Anglo-American Ruling Establishment.

As both the Democrats and Republicans are part of the inner circle which is NON-Elected, and it IS a non-Democratic, non-Public entity, it therefor qualifies AS A CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PUBLIC.

If any media source, journalist, editor, or owner can be proven to have ties to the PRATT HOUSE in New York, or the Council on Foreign Affairs or any politician, business, or interest that is a member, then the thread should be put into the conspiracy sub-forum.

ANYTHING by admitted "ruling class journalists" belongs in the conspiracy sub-forum.

RULING CLASS JOURNALISTS
RULING CLASS JOURNALISTS

http://www.pennsylvaniacrier.com/filemgmt_data/files/Ruling Class Journalists.pdf

Sadly, few Americans know that the MSM is almost entirely controlled by CFR members. Those members have a goal which is not for the benefit of the nation or the American people. It is entirely for THEIR benefit, both financially and the attainment of political power. They have been amazingly successful.

In a sane informed nation, these CFR members would be prosecuted and imprisoned. They are traitors.

You pretty much took everyone that was not aware of this little fact to school just now same way Misterbeal has done such an excellent job on in this whole thread.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Onion clearly states it is for entertainment only.


Don't be disingenuous.

If we should put any articles containing media links in the Conspiracy sub-forum, it should by those that can be proven to have any links to the Anglo-American Ruling Establishment.

As both the Democrats and Republicans are part of the inner circle which is NON-Elected, and it IS a non-Democratic, non-Public entity, it therefor qualifies AS A CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PUBLIC.

If any media source, journalist, editor, or owner can be proven to have ties to the PRATT HOUSE in New York, or the Council on Foreign Affairs or any politician, business, or interest that is a member, then the thread should be put into the conspiracy sub-forum.

ANYTHING by admitted "ruling class journalists" belongs in the conspiracy sub-forum.

RULING CLASS JOURNALISTS
RULING CLASS JOURNALISTS

http://www.pennsylvaniacrier.com/filemgmt_data/files/Ruling Class Journalists.pdf

Alex Jones said in court he plays a role and that Info Wars is for entertainment.

We say lots of things in court. Alex Jones knows that a lot of gullible people believe him.

You would say anything in court to continue seeing your grandchildren, right?

That's not the point. Alex Jones knows that a lot of gullible people believe his trash.

...and you think CBS News and PBS are accurate....

Media and CFR: holding hands

The above Muckety map shows well-known media figures who are members of the council. (You might want to view the map in the larger version, for more elbow room.)

Around the periphery of the map, you’ll see the media outlets employing these journalists. They are some of the biggest news companies in America, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, the New Yorker, public broadcasting and commercial broadcast companies.

News Corp., owner of Fox and the Wall Street Journal, is a corporate member. So is Time Warner, owner of Time, Fortune and CNN. Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters are also corporate members.

Individual membership in the Council on Foreign Relations is an honor bestowed on the few. Applicants must be sponsored by sitting members. Acceptance is so highly regarded that it is often listed on CVs.

Media and CFR: holding hands | Muckety - See the news

thats comedy gold anyboby could possibly think PBS

The Onion clearly states it is for entertainment only.


Don't be disingenuous.

If we should put any articles containing media links in the Conspiracy sub-forum, it should by those that can be proven to have any links to the Anglo-American Ruling Establishment.

As both the Democrats and Republicans are part of the inner circle which is NON-Elected, and it IS a non-Democratic, non-Public entity, it therefor qualifies AS A CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PUBLIC.

If any media source, journalist, editor, or owner can be proven to have ties to the PRATT HOUSE in New York, or the Council on Foreign Affairs or any politician, business, or interest that is a member, then the thread should be put into the conspiracy sub-forum.

ANYTHING by admitted "ruling class journalists" belongs in the conspiracy sub-forum.

RULING CLASS JOURNALISTS
RULING CLASS JOURNALISTS

http://www.pennsylvaniacrier.com/filemgmt_data/files/Ruling Class Journalists.pdf

Alex Jones said in court he plays a role and that Info Wars is for entertainment.

We say lots of things in court. Alex Jones knows that a lot of gullible people believe him.

You would say anything in court to continue seeing your grandchildren, right?

That's not the point. Alex Jones knows that a lot of gullible people believe his trash.

...and you think CBS News and PBS are accurate....

Media and CFR: holding hands

The above Muckety map shows well-known media figures who are members of the council. (You might want to view the map in the larger version, for more elbow room.)

Around the periphery of the map, you’ll see the media outlets employing these journalists. They are some of the biggest news companies in America, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, the New Yorker, public broadcasting and commercial broadcast companies.

News Corp., owner of Fox and the Wall Street Journal, is a corporate member. So is Time Warner, owner of Time, Fortune and CNN. Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters are also corporate members.

Individual membership in the Council on Foreign Relations is an honor bestowed on the few. Applicants must be sponsored by sitting members. Acceptance is so highly regarded that it is often listed on CVs.

Media and CFR: holding hands | Muckety - See the news

cant add anything to this excellent post so will just post this-

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Alex Jones said in court he plays a role and that Info Wars is for entertainment.

We say lots of things in court. Alex Jones knows that a lot of gullible people believe him.

You would say anything in court to continue seeing your grandchildren, right?

That's not the point. Alex Jones knows that a lot of gullible people believe his trash.

...and you think CBS News and PBS are accurate....

Media and CFR: holding hands

The above Muckety map shows well-known media figures who are members of the council. (You might want to view the map in the larger version, for more elbow room.)

Around the periphery of the map, you’ll see the media outlets employing these journalists. They are some of the biggest news companies in America, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, the New Yorker, public broadcasting and commercial broadcast companies.

News Corp., owner of Fox and the Wall Street Journal, is a corporate member. So is Time Warner, owner of Time, Fortune and CNN. Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters are also corporate members.

Individual membership in the Council on Foreign Relations is an honor bestowed on the few. Applicants must be sponsored by sitting members. Acceptance is so highly regarded that it is often listed on CVs.

Media and CFR: holding hands | Muckety - See the news

BOOM goes the dynamite.........excellent post, Gipper.......

i could not have said it better myself.Gipper really nailed it there.

 

[gipper]

We say lots of things in court. Alex Jones knows that a lot of gullible people believe him.

You would say anything in court to continue seeing your grandchildren, right?

That's not the point. Alex Jones knows that a lot of gullible people believe his trash.

...and you think CBS News and PBS are accurate....

Media and CFR: holding hands

The above Muckety map shows well-known media figures who are members of the council. (You might want to view the map in the larger version, for more elbow room.)

Around the periphery of the map, you’ll see the media outlets employing these journalists. They are some of the biggest news companies in America, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, the New Yorker, public broadcasting and commercial broadcast companies.

News Corp., owner of Fox and the Wall Street Journal, is a corporate member. So is Time Warner, owner of Time, Fortune and CNN. Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters are also corporate members.

Individual membership in the Council on Foreign Relations is an honor bestowed on the few. Applicants must be sponsored by sitting members. Acceptance is so highly regarded that it is often listed on CVs.

Media and CFR: holding hands | Muckety - See the news

BOOM goes the dynamite.........excellent post, Gipper.......

i could not have said it better myself.Gipper really nailed it there.

It amazes me that so few Americans know anything about the CFR. It is very disheartening. What I find is when you tell someone about them, they often think I am a conspiracy theorist or a kook.

When it comes to our government truth is stranger than fiction, but a lot of Americans haven't figured it out.