All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Sovereignty • Supreme Authority • Occupation • Civil Rights (Self-Determination) (S2OCR)
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

(COMMENT)

There is no question but that the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) DID NOT have any Supreme Authority over the territories during the period 1948 to the present; except for Area "A".

None whatsoever.

(REHASH - supra)
✦ sovereignty
‘Sovereignty as a principle of international law must be sharply distinguished from other related uses of the term: sovereignty in its internal aspects and political sovereignty. Sovereignty in its internal aspects is concerned with the identity of the bearer of supreme authority within a State. Parry & Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law. Copyright ˝ 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. p563
Territorial Sovereignty Under International Law - Law Corner

Territorial Sovereignty Under International Law - Law Corner

Territorial Sovereignty - World Encyclopedia of Law


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Let's do a timeline. In 1924 Palestine was created as a new state inside its international borders according to post war treaties. Palestine was administered by the Mandate. However, the Mandate acquired no territory or sovereignty.

Resolution 181 attempted to divide Palestine into two states. However, the resolution was never implemented. No territory or sovereignty were ceded.

In 1949, after the end of the 1948 war, armistice agreements were signed. Armistice lines were drawn around and through Palestine to limit troop movements. However, Palestine and its international borders remained intact. No territory or sovereignty were ceded.

So, what happened after 1949?
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Sovereignty • Supreme Authority • Occupation • Civil Rights (Self-Determination) (S2OCR)
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Let's do a timeline. In 1924 Palestine was created as a new state inside its international borders according to post war treaties.
(COMMENT)

FALSE: There was NO NEW STATE of PALESTINE created by any Post-War Treaty.

Palestine was administered by the Mandate. However, the Mandate acquired no territory or sovereignty.
(COMMENT)

TRUE: However, it was the 1920 San Remo Convention (Extract) by the Allied Powers "adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country; and

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connexion of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country;"
Resolution 181 attempted to divide Palestine into two states. However, the resolution was never implemented. No territory or sovereignty were ceded.
(COMMENT)

A/RES/181 (II) was a Recommendation and not a creation document or binding agreement.

EXTRACT:
Press Release PAL/169 17 May 1948
During today's brief meeting, Dr. Eduardo Morgan (Panama) said that this resolution of the Assembly merely "relieves responsibility. The Commission has not been dissolved. In fact the resolution of last November 29 has been implemented."

In 1949, after the end of the 1948 war, armistice agreements were signed. Armistice lines were drawn around and through Palestine to limit troop movements. However, Palestine and its international borders remained intact. No territory or sovereignty were ceded.

So, what happened after 1949?
(COMMENT)

The UN never had any intention of making a territorial assignment based on the Armistice Agreements.

In 1950, the status of the West Bank changed from being unassigned to being annexed by Jordan. This made it part of the Hashemite Kingdom. This status remained in place until 1988. This particular stretch of territory was Jordanian Territory Occupied by Israel during the period 1967 to 1988.

From 1988 through the Oslo Accords (1993 and 1995) the territory was divided into Areas "A, B, C."

It was not until 2012 did the State of Palestine emerge:

Legal status of the State of Palestine - Wikipedia

There are a wide variety of views regarding the legal status of the State of Palestine, both among the states of the international community and among Ali Iqbal, but there is a general consensus that the State of Palestine is de jure sovereign. [1] [2] [3] [4] It is a non-member observer state at the United Nations since November, 2012.


EXTRACT: • Dec 2012 UN Legal Affairs MEMO
1668588265262.png


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
There are a wide variety of views regarding the legal status of the State of Palestine, both among the states of the international community and among Ali Iqbal, but there is a general consensus that the State of Palestine is de jure sovereign. [1] [2] [3] [4] It is a non-member observer state at the United Nations since November, 2012.
Th UN does not create states. It only recognizes what already exists.

For John Quigley, Palestine's existence as a state predates the 1988 declaration. Tracing Palestine's status as an international entity back to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, he recalls that the Palestine Mandate (1918–1948), an arrangement made under Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, held as its "ultimate objective", the "self-determination and independence of the people concerned." He says that in explicitly referring to the Covenant, the 1988 declaration was reaffirming an existing Palestinian statehood.[137] Noting that Palestine under the Mandate entered into bilateral treaties, including one with Great Britain, the Mandatory power, he cites this as an example of its "sovereignty" at that time. He also notes the corollary of the Stimson Doctrine and the customary prohibition on the use of force contained in the Restatement of Foreign Relations Law of the United States, "[a]n entity does not necessarily cease to be a state even if all of its territory has been occupied by a foreign power".[81]

 

Forum List

Back
Top