All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Toddsterpatriot]

Israel's version of close to civilian structures could be 200 yards or more.

The Palestinians do not fire rockets into Israel.

Israel's version of close to civilian structures could be 200 yards or more.

Or more often, less than 50 yards.

The Palestinians do not fire rockets into Israel.

The ones that fall short and kill Gazans don't make it into Israel. Most do.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel's version of close to civilian structures could be 200 yards or more.

Or more often, less than 50 yards.

The Palestinians do not fire rockets into Israel.

The ones that fall short and kill Gazans don't make it into Israel. Most do.

Nice deflection.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nice deflection.

I would never deflect from Palestinian war crimes.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: The Palestinian promotion of discrimination, hostility, or violence.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Military occupation is a recognized status under international law and since 1967, the international community has designated the West Bank and the Gaza Strip as militarily occupied. As long as the occupation continues, Israel has the right to protect itself and its citizens from attacks by Palestinians who reside in the occupied territories. However, Israel also has a duty to maintain law and order, also known as “normal life,” within territory it occupies. This obligation includes not only ensuring but prioritizing the security and well-being of the occupied population. That responsibility and those duties are enumerated in Occupation Law.
Occupation Law is part of the laws of armed conflict; it contemplates military occupation as an outcome of war and enumerates the duties of an occupying power until the peace is restored and the occupation ends. To fulfill its duties, the occupying power is afforded the right to use police powers, or the force permissible for law enforcement purposes.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

Police action not military action. Read article 68.

(COMMENT)

First, neither Article 43 of the Hague Regulation or Article 68 of the GCIV use the term, "Police Action." That is a political term. The current terminology is;

◈ International Armed Conflict (IAC)​

​

◈ Non-International Armed Conflict (NIAC)​

IF you want to insist that the territory is occupied by the Israelis, THEN you must accept the consequential limitations... No matter how you interpret it, the Customary and International Humanitarian Law prohibits the Arab Palestinians from attempting to harm the Occupation Power. IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian makes any attempt to harm or inflict damage to the Israeli contingent, THEN Article 68 prosecution sets in.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: The Palestinian promotion of discrimination, hostility, or violence.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,


(COMMENT)

First, neither Article 43 of the Hague Regulation or Article 68 of the GCIV use the term, "Police Action." That is a political term. The current terminology is;

◈ International Armed Conflict (IAC)​

​

◈ Non-International Armed Conflict (NIAC)​

IF you want to insist that the territory is occupied by the Israelis, THEN you must accept the consequential limitations... No matter how you interpret it, the Customary and International Humanitarian Law prohibits the Arab Palestinians from attempting to harm the Occupation Power. IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian makes any attempt to harm or inflict damage to the Israeli contingent, THEN Article 68 prosecution sets in.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Palestinians have the right for armed struggle against the occupation.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: The Palestinian promotion of discrimination, hostility, or violence.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: The Hostile Arab Palestinians have to believe that they have a "Right to Armed Struggle." If they did not have such a right (The Right to Armed Struggle) then their justification for the death, destruction, and havoc they spread would be without any basis.

The Palestinians have the right for armed struggle against the occupation.

(COMMENT)
.
The United Nations General Assembly passed A/RES/3314 (XXIX) (14 December 1974), which adopted a Definition of Aggression and which some interpreted as a Legal Mandate (International Law) and which includes what some considered the basis for the legal Right to Armed Struggle. However, if A/RES/3314 is taken to be an enforceable prohibition, then it contradicts Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL). A/RES/3314 contains the "Three-Nothings:"

• Bearing in mind that nothing in this Definition shall be interpreted as in any way affecting the scope of the provisions of the Charter with respect to the functions and powers of the organs of the United Nations,
• Nothing in this Definition shall be construed as in any way enlarging or diminishing the scope of the Charter, including its provisions concerning cases in which the use of force is lawful.
• Nothing in this Definition, and in particular article 3, could in any way prejudice the right to self-determination, freedom and independence, as derived from the Charter, of peoples forcibly deprived of that right and referred to in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, particularly peoples under colonial and racist regimes or other forms of alien domination; nor the right of these peoples to struggle to that end and to seek and receive support, in accordance with the principles of the Charter and in conformity with the above-mentioned Declaration.

As I've commented many times before, there is a paradox here. The Israelis are protected by the Rule behind the Customary and IHL. They are exercising the Right of Self-Determination, and they are following the Hague Regulation (1907) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR). The paradox of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) is set in the practice they have of looking at one single excerpt of one document and basing their argument on that interpretation. But the international law is much like a stained glass window in European Cathedrals (ex → Theodosius Arrives at Ephesus, from a Scene from the Legend of the Seven Sleepers of Ephesus). One piece of the glass window, or even the entire set of one color, will not reveal the picture itself.

The practical matters of these concepts are still being practiced in modern times. Whether it be the various issue with the Chinese (India, South China Sea, Taiwan), The Russian Federation and the Crimea, and East Timor (as a couple of examples).
.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

The United Nations General Assembly passed A/RES/3314 (XXIX) (14 December 1974), which adopted a Definition of Aggression and which some interpreted as a Legal Mandate (International Law) and which includes what some considered the basis for the legal Right to Armed Struggle.

Self defense is not aggression.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Student Day of Action for Palestine - Palestine Solidarity Campaign

MON 29TH NOVEMBER // STUDENT DAY OF ACTION FOR PALESTINE FACEBOOK EVENT HERE! In recent weeks, the Israeli government has stepped up its systematic attacks on Palestinians advocating for their rights. Late last month, Israel moved to criminalise six Palestinian human rights and civil...

www.palestinecampaign.org

 

[P F Tinmore]

King Abdullah: Jordan stands with Palestine

Jordan has offered more support for the Palestinian cause

www.middleeastmonitor.com

 

[P F Tinmore]

The right to protest is as precious as freedom of speech

Student protests on campus are nothing new and trying to deny controversial speakers a platform is not a recent invention. Protestors have, over the years, argued that some speakers pose a threat simp...

www.middleeastmonitor.com

 

[P F Tinmore]

Court overrules EU effort to shield Israel's settlements

Brussels unlawfully torpedoed initiative to halt trade with illegal colonies.

electronicintifada.net

 

[Hollie]

Self defense is not aggression.

Armed gee-had attacks in furtherance of the stated goals in the Hamas Charter is aggression.

 

[Hollie]

The Palestinians have the right for armed struggle against the occupation.

You consistently fail to identify sovereign Arab-Moslem territory that is occupied.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

Oh. Well. C-list “Celebrities”

How impressive.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Deadliest Israeli bombing so far marks Nakba day in Gaza | DW News​

 

[Hollie]

The Palestinians do not fire rockets into Israel.

Re-read the above when you fully emerge from your coma.