All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

Status
Not open for further replies.
She is saying that the Temple Mount must be an exclusively Muslim site, and Jews should be banned from visiting it even to peacefully stroll, let alone pray – while at the same time pretending to care about freedom of worship! (She also calls all Jews, no matter where they live, “illegal Israeli settlers.”)

By the criteria of the Leftist self-defined anti-racists, isn’t that prima facie evidence of racism?

But the rule is, only Jews can be racists in the Middle East. Arabs cannot be even when they do worse than what the Jews are accused of (falsely, nearly always.)

Which is a modern justification for antisemitism.

The people who claim to be in the forefront against bigotry are the real bigots.

(full article online)

 
Israeli in LA: Palestinians piggybacking on riots
to wreck synagogues


“I saw a PLO flag and them shouting to ‘free Palestine.’ I don’t think it was black protesters who did this damage,” says 41-year L.A. resident Eyal Dahan.

The riots over the killing of George Floyd have turned Eyal Dahan’s Los Angeles neighborhood into “a war zone”—and according to Dahan, some Palestinians are taking advantage of the chaos to wreck synagogues.

A number of Los Angeles synagogues have been vandalized or even destroyed during the riots, including one in Beverly Hills. According to Dahan, an Israeli living in Los Angeles, the buildings were not targeted by any of the protesters demonstrating against Floyd’s death, but rather by Palestinians who “exploited the opportunity.”

“I saw a PLO flag and them shouting to ‘free Palestine.’ I don’t think it was black protesters who did this damage,” he said.

Dahan, a clothing supplier who has lived in the United States for 41 years, told Israel Hayom the chaos is “immense.”

“The [National Guard] is in the streets. Businesses have been burned and torn apart. [Rioters] tore down pharmacies, stole all the medicine. All the electronics stores have been destroyed. It started bad, and because the police didn’t pressure them, it got worse,” he said.

From Corona Crisis to Riot Mode
According to Dahan, the businesses that haven’t yet managed to get back on their feet from the coronavirus crisis are crashing.

It was terror on Saturday and Sunday, the entire city was engulfed. [Monday] there was some quiet, but that night the break-ins and looting started again. … Right now, 90 percent of the demonstrators are peaceful, but the 10 percent who come after them have been looting and causing huge damage,” he said.

The National Guard deployment, he added, has been only partially effective.

“They brought in the [National Guard] and they started to patrol the big shopping malls, but the small stores, which are barely hanging on, caught it. The [National Guard] can’t arrest civilians, they can only protect certain places,” he said.

While speaking with Israel Hayom, Dahan reported a new wave of rioting and looting: “Now the looting has started again. After eight or nine at night, they start their mess.”

Dahan, who was in Los Angeles during the Rodney King riots in 1992, said that “this time, it’s completely different. I didn’t think it would happen again, I thought that the police learned a lesson about how to handle it, but it was the rioters who learned. Social media helped them form groups, split people—like platoons in a war. It’s completely organized.”

 
[ Will the PA live out to their word? ]

What difference would Oslo make?

If renounced the PA has no jurisdiction.
What is little known is that the Palestinians established a constitutional government with their Basic Law in 2003. Israel was not mentioned. The occupation was not mentioned. Oslo was not mentioned. This evolved into the Unity Government in March of 2007.

In June of 2007 the US took out this government and reinstalled the old PA in the West Bank but with little success in Gaza.

The PA is part of the occupation. I don't rhing anyone would allow it to collapse.
 
[ Will the PA live out to their word? ]

What difference would Oslo make?

If renounced the PA has no jurisdiction.
What is little known is that the Palestinians established a constitutional government with their Basic Law in 2003. Israel was not mentioned. The occupation was not mentioned. Oslo was not mentioned. This evolved into the Unity Government in March of 2007.

In June of 2007 the US took out this government and reinstalled the old PA in the West Bank but with little success in Gaza.

The PA is part of the occupation. I don't rhing anyone would allow it to collapse.
Your islamo version of history is a hoot.
 
[ Will the PA live out to their word? ]

What difference would Oslo make?

If renounced the PA has no jurisdiction.
What is little known is that the Palestinians established a constitutional government with their Basic Law in 2003. Israel was not mentioned. The occupation was not mentioned. Oslo was not mentioned. This evolved into the Unity Government in March of 2007.

In June of 2007 the US took out this government and reinstalled the old PA in the West Bank but with little success in Gaza.

The PA is part of the occupation. I don't rhing anyone would allow it to collapse.

Doesn't matter.
The legal authority of that govt is a function of Oslo.
Not only are they renouncing their status in the ICC case,
but also effectively nullify the very document that created that govt.

Imagine trying to rob a store while threatening with a gun to your own head....
 
Last edited:
Israel is a democracy with a large Jewish majority. Since 1967, and the three ‘Nos’ at the Arab Summit in Khartoum, Israel has been trying to navigate a geo-political nightmare. On the one hand, it would very much like to build bridges with all its neighbours, on the other it faces a hostile Arab population that is unable to come to terms with Israel’s existence. Several of Israel’s leaders have tried, and failed, to find a peaceful solution. Every time there appeared to be a serious opportunity, violence erupted from the Arab side to close the imaginary window.

The truth remains that the population in Gaza and Ramallah are only a united people in the context of an anti-Zionist conflict. Outside of this paradigm, they are warring factions with little connecting them beyond a fable of a once prosperous nation, a picture of Yasser Arafat, a national history that is little more than a web of lies and conspiracy, and finally, a roll call of heroes who were nothing but terrorists. This should not be misunderstood. It is not to say that underneath the mess that those calling themselves Palestinians have become, there aren’t human beings who have gone through tragedy, but simply to highlight that the choices that Arab nations and local leaders have made for them, the education that they have been given, has rendered them incapable of providing a unified coherent argument for anything but a conflict with Zionism.

It can be deceptive. Walk through the streets of Ramallah and you will meet the friendliest, most hospitable people you would ever hope to meet. Lend them your ear, and you will hear little but a rendition of the web of lies and conspiracy. Hold their hand and they will lead you through the carefully selected hotspots such as a tiny corner of Hebron, pointing out as they go, why it shows that their version of events is true. They will talk of justice, suggesting that if they can receive it, then everyone will live in peace. This tale, coming as it does from the underdog, spins a story that is swallowed wholesale throughout the west.

Truths, lies and demographics
It is this disparity, that creates two incompatible narratives. The true tale – of an Israel that cannot find a partner for peace because one does not exist, and the falsehood – that if Israel were just nicer, then peace would come. Inside this stalemate, Israel has struggled to come to terms with the geo-political consequences. How can Israel finalise its borders without anyone to finalise those borders with?

Complicating this further is the changing demographic in the west. Once upon a time only the Arab states had to worry about popular uprising if Israel made a unilateral move. This is no longer the case. Throughout Europe, politicians become nervous whenever Israel takes any action, however justified. European leaders are scared of their own streets. It does not even matter if they understand Israel’s position, they want Israel to refrain from doing anything that will unsettle their own European Muslim and Arab populations.

(full article online)

 
Critics of Israel’s anticipated sovereignty move claim that it contravenes international law and will spark violence, destabilize the region and cost Israel European and Democratic support. A calmer and more accurate assessment indicates otherwise.

(full article online)

 
‘Molotov Cocktail’ Girl Could Face Life in Prison

Urooj Rahman, the Israel-hating human rights lawyer who brought some palestinian tactics to Brooklyn when she hurled a Molotov cocktail in to a police cruiser while wearing a keffiyeh over her face, may face life in prison.

urooj-rahman.png


Samantha Shader, 27, of Catskill, is accused of hurling the makeshift explosive at an NYPD vehicle occupied by four police officers on early Saturday morning, May 30.

Prosecutors allege Shader bit one of the officer’s legs when she was being taken into custody.

Around the same time, Brooklyn lawyers Urooj Rahman, 31, and Colinford Mattis, 32, were accused of tossing their own Molotov cocktail at an unoccupied police vehicle in Brooklyn during a separate attack.

All three face life in prison on the seven-count indictments, charging them with the use of explosives, arson, use of explosives to commit a felony, arson conspiracy, use of a destructive device, civil disorder, and making or possessing a destructive device.


 
Last edited:
By what right does the EU condemn Israel's applying sovereignty in Judea and Samaria?

Some 20 of 27 EU members were also League of Nations members and voted in 1922 to have Judea and Samaria part of the Jewish Homeland.

961802.jpg


The frenzied rush by the European Union (EU) to condemn Israel’s restoration of Jewish sovereignty in 30% of Judea and Samaria ('West Bank') reflects poorly on an organization which has adopted an exceptionally confrontational approach to the Jewish State.

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has led the charge:

“We strongly urge Israel to refrain from any unilateral decision that would lead to the annexation of any occupied Palestinian territory and would be, as such, contrary to International Law”

So many false statements appearing in such a short sentence by this high-ranking EU official is breathtaking:

-Israel’s action is not unilateral

Such action is being taken in tandem with President Trump following the outright refusal by the PLO to enter into negotiations with Israel on the basis of Trump’s detailed plan released on 28 January 2020.

-70% of Judea and Samaria awaits the PLO - or any other Arab interlocutor such as Jordan – prepared to step up and negotiate on its future sovereignty.

-Israel will not be annexing occupied Palestinian territory contrary to international law

“Annexing occupied Palestinian territory” means taking territory belonging to someone else to which Israel has no entitlement.

“Contrary to international law”: Israel will be applying sovereignty in 30% of Judea and Samaria pursuant to vested legal rights to reconstitute the Jewish National Home in this specific area conferred on the Jewish people by:
  • The San Remo Resolution and the Treaty of Sevres 1920
  • The League of Nations Mandate for Palestine 1922
  • Article 80 United Nations Charter 1945
The EU’s attempt to trash these existing Jewish legal rights in Judea and Samaria is extremely disturbing - since 20 of the 27 current member States of the EU – plus former member the United Kingdom - were among the 51 member States of the League of Nations that had unanimously included Judea and Samaria as part of the area in which the Jews were entitled to reconstitute their biblical Jewish homeland after 3000 years.

Article 25 of the Mandate for Palestine - approved on 24 July 1922 - had provided for the provisions of the Mandate relating to the establishment of the Jewish National Home to be postponed or withheld “In the territories lying between the Jordan and the eastern boundary of Palestine as ultimately determined”.

Judea and Samaria (West Bank) - was thus clearly being reserved for the Jewish National Home.

Minutes of the Council of the League of Nations held on 16 September 1922 (below) confirmed this decision.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZqYIWaUcAAEOty?format=jpg&name=medium


78% of the territory of Palestine originally proposed for reconstitution of the Jewish National Home east of the Jordan River in 1920 had thus been denied to the Jewish people by 1922 – but the area of Judea and Samaria clearly was not excluded.

Those 20 EU member States who actually voted in favour of creating these Jewish rights in 1922 were: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden

These reasons, however, help explain the EU’s strenuous opposition to Israel’s sovereignty move: “first, [Israel] is proudly nationalist; second – thanks to the ideological cover provided by the KGB’s propaganda offensive of the 1960s and 70s – [Israel] can be falsely portrayed as colonialist and racist, thus providing the Europeans a way to assuage their guilt for their own colonialist and racist past; third, [Israel’s] local enemies are Muslims, providing a way for Europe to pay jizya to its own uneasy Muslim minorities; and finally, [Israel’s] a Jewish state – and here no further explanation is necessary.”

Europe’s antipathy to Jews is becoming fashionable - once again.

And the EU has acted shamefully - once again.

 
[ Will the PA live out to their word? ]

What difference would Oslo make?

If renounced the PA has no jurisdiction.
What is little known is that the Palestinians established a constitutional government with their Basic Law in 2003. Israel was not mentioned. The occupation was not mentioned. Oslo was not mentioned. This evolved into the Unity Government in March of 2007.

In June of 2007 the US took out this government and reinstalled the old PA in the West Bank but with little success in Gaza.

The PA is part of the occupation. I don't rhing anyone would allow it to collapse.

Doesn't matter.
The legal authority of that govt is a function of Oslo.
Not only are they renouncing their status in the ICC case,
but also effectively nullify the very document that created that govt.

Imagine trying to rob a store while threatening with a gun to your own head....
Who says that Palestinians cannot form their own government?
 
[ Will the PA live out to their word? ]

What difference would Oslo make?

If renounced the PA has no jurisdiction.
What is little known is that the Palestinians established a constitutional government with their Basic Law in 2003. Israel was not mentioned. The occupation was not mentioned. Oslo was not mentioned. This evolved into the Unity Government in March of 2007.

In June of 2007 the US took out this government and reinstalled the old PA in the West Bank but with little success in Gaza.

The PA is part of the occupation. I don't rhing anyone would allow it to collapse.

Doesn't matter.
The legal authority of that govt is a function of Oslo.
Not only are they renouncing their status in the ICC case,
but also effectively nullify the very document that created that govt.

Imagine trying to rob a store while threatening with a gun to your own head....
Who says that Palestinians cannot form their own government?

We can it's called Israel.

And frankly, it's common knowledge, the Arab population usually prefers the Jewish Orthodox MK's when it comes to actually helping the community. Ask an Israeli Arab, or one from Ramallah how he feels about visiting Jordan, and when off-camera they'll tell you,
they all want to be governed by Israel.

But you won't go and talk personally to the people who live there,
and prefer propaganda that serves nothing but to fill the pockets of their oligarchy.
 
[ Will the PA live out to their word? ]

What difference would Oslo make?

If renounced the PA has no jurisdiction.
What is little known is that the Palestinians established a constitutional government with their Basic Law in 2003. Israel was not mentioned. The occupation was not mentioned. Oslo was not mentioned. This evolved into the Unity Government in March of 2007.

In June of 2007 the US took out this government and reinstalled the old PA in the West Bank but with little success in Gaza.

The PA is part of the occupation. I don't rhing anyone would allow it to collapse.

Doesn't matter.
The legal authority of that govt is a function of Oslo.
Not only are they renouncing their status in the ICC case,
but also effectively nullify the very document that created that govt.

Imagine trying to rob a store while threatening with a gun to your own head....
Who says that Palestinians cannot form their own government?

We can it's called Israel.

And frankly, it's common knowledge, the Arab population usually prefers the Jewish Orthodox MK's when it comes to actually helping the community. Ask an Israeli Arab, or one from Ramallah how he feels about visiting Jordan, and when off-camera they'll tell you,
they all want to be governed by Israel.

But you won't go and talk personally to the people who live there,
and prefer propaganda that serves nothing but to fill the pockets of their oligarchy.
External interference is Illegal.

Would Palestinians rather live in Israel where they can get work and a passport or live in the Israeli prison called Palestine?
 
[ Will the PA live out to their word? ]

What difference would Oslo make?

If renounced the PA has no jurisdiction.
What is little known is that the Palestinians established a constitutional government with their Basic Law in 2003. Israel was not mentioned. The occupation was not mentioned. Oslo was not mentioned. This evolved into the Unity Government in March of 2007.

In June of 2007 the US took out this government and reinstalled the old PA in the West Bank but with little success in Gaza.

The PA is part of the occupation. I don't rhing anyone would allow it to collapse.

Doesn't matter.
The legal authority of that govt is a function of Oslo.
Not only are they renouncing their status in the ICC case,
but also effectively nullify the very document that created that govt.

Imagine trying to rob a store while threatening with a gun to your own head....
Who says that Palestinians cannot form their own government?

You?
 
[ Will the PA live out to their word? ]

What difference would Oslo make?

If renounced the PA has no jurisdiction.
What is little known is that the Palestinians established a constitutional government with their Basic Law in 2003. Israel was not mentioned. The occupation was not mentioned. Oslo was not mentioned. This evolved into the Unity Government in March of 2007.

In June of 2007 the US took out this government and reinstalled the old PA in the West Bank but with little success in Gaza.

The PA is part of the occupation. I don't rhing anyone would allow it to collapse.

Doesn't matter.
The legal authority of that govt is a function of Oslo.
Not only are they renouncing their status in the ICC case,
but also effectively nullify the very document that created that govt.

Imagine trying to rob a store while threatening with a gun to your own head....
Who says that Palestinians cannot form their own government?

We can it's called Israel.

And frankly, it's common knowledge, the Arab population usually prefers the Jewish Orthodox MK's when it comes to actually helping the community. Ask an Israeli Arab, or one from Ramallah how he feels about visiting Jordan, and when off-camera they'll tell you,
they all want to be governed by Israel.

But you won't go and talk personally to the people who live there,
and prefer propaganda that serves nothing but to fill the pockets of their oligarchy.
External interference is Illegal.

Would Palestinians rather live in Israel where they can get work and a passport or live in the Israeli prison called Palestine?

I don't know if you're even serious about discussion,
with all these banally vulgar idioms.

As I said, to know what people under Arab control actually think,
one has to go casual, and listen like a normal guy, people will tell you.
They will also tell you whether their gov really allows them to speak freely.

And leave all your preconceptions at the door.

Otherwise you're just another outsider with radical ideas about figures on TV.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top