- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,518
- 2,165
- Banned
- #21
You continue to be wrong and out of context. The Christians were run out of the Near East when all was said and done. Study history, please.You obviously do not know your history. The Muslims and Christians had been struggling for three hundred years with atrocities for all. The Crusades were no more justified and no more carried out in a Christian way than are the ways of the jihadists today. You need to stay in context.BHO was correct about the sinful nature of mankind. The Christians hit all time highs in the Crusades and during WWII, while worst of the Muslims are doing it now.
hm, we tried treating it as a war in Iraq, and we failed when Bush could not get a SOFA: not because of Bush ineptness but because of Iraqi unwillingness. They only gave it to Obama so we would send him some troops to keep Baghdad from falling.
The war in the ME will be a Muslim affair over all: either the Iraqis and Kurds and Turks will save their asses or lose their asses. We can help, but we can't do it for them.
Here, it is a LEO problem.
The Crusades were in direct response to MUSLIM atrocities. You should actually learn history instead of getting it from the fraud Obungles.
No one is defending the attack here and no one is defending the Muslim and Crusade atrocities of a millennial ago.
I repeat, the Crusades were in response to Muslim atrocities. The Christians said enough is enough and kicked their smelly asses