Alex Pretti was ‘known’ to feds, and had rib broken in anti-ICE protest a week before he was killed by Border Patrol

What is the point of preferring charges in commie Minnesota when the judges will just let them go?
So, they should blow it off, even though, it adds more effectively to the subjects background on future charges, possibly more serious, different agency, different state?
You simply favor, to hell with the paperwork, we can kill them in the street with less bother?
 
Jumped by agents who had the right to do that, as he was interfering with a legal and lawful execution of justice.

This is what happens when you stick your nose.....or whistle.......into something you need to stay out of.
Would you have turned the other way back in the 1930s Germany, of course you would, you're part of the problem.

If you want change in the system, get a job at ICE or get into politics. Don't stop the law from apprehending felons.
So if you'd wanted to change the system back in 1936 in Germany you'd have joined the Nazi party?

Jackass.
 
I'm starting to get a vibe that the technocrats that have ingratiated themselves to the administration are already using this tech.

The death of the Pretti guy seemed very suspect.

Why would they act so aggressively on a guy that did not seem to be a threat. . . AT THAT MOMENT?

. . . and then, a day ago I found out some more disturbing new about the history of this guy. . . . and that is just the data point they are letting the public know about.



Palantir faces criticism over tool used by ICE to track individuals for potential deportation​


What if Palantir is not only gathering data on illegals, but also tracking some of the folks in that ICE WATCH organization? Might it be possible that the machine had warned them that this guy was a high threat to officers?

:tinfoil:

I know in some European nations, the security establishment is just admitting that they are going to start using this tool.




. . . but in America, it seems like there are serious constitutional issues with this tech. So would they even tell us if they started using it?




Might it be, that Pretti is the first American to be a casualty of this technology?

Is it illegal or unconstitutional to use publicly known information? He was detained prior, and most likely seen at prior protests. You are, and have been, tracked since the day you were born, there is nothing new to any of this and it will only get worse as AI expands. I don't think there's any 'conspiracy' about any of it or the 'technocrats' as you call them. They are wealthy businessmen no different than all of the prior wealthy businessmen that used their influence on politicians. Another tactic as old as time.
 
Is it illegal or unconstitutional to use publicly known information? He was detained prior, and most likely seen at prior protests. You are, and have been, tracked since the day you were born, there is nothing new to any of this and it will only get worse as AI expands. I don't think there's any 'conspiracy' about any of it or the 'technocrats' as you call them. They are wealthy businessmen no different than all of the prior wealthy businessmen that used their influence on politicians. Another tactic as old as time.

I was posting about predictive analytics, and the ethics of taking action based upon that tech.

I have no idea what you are going on about TBH.


1769622771232.webp


It might be highly accurate, but that is no. . . "innocent till proven guilty." :rolleyes:
 
No. Simply having a carry permit, implies he carries.
Revenge is viable explanation of intent. He was involved ina violent altercation a week prior. So we ask why was he there with a gun in the first place and insert himself into a situation he had no business being in?
HIs judgement was so poor I have to believe he was acting emotionally. When this happens rational thought is shut down and the brain is running on emotion. That explains his poor judgement
It was still wrong to shoot him as he was never an immanent threat.
 
I was posting about predictive analytics, and the ethics of taking action based upon that tech.

I have no idea what you are going on about TBH.


View attachment 1212173

It might be highly accurate, but that is no. . . "innocent till proven guilty." :rolleyes:

How would predictive analytics have caused Pretti's death or contributed to it? That's what the post I quoted was about.
 
How would predictive analytics have caused Pretti's death or contributed to it? That's what the post I quoted was about.


How should I know? I don't know what data they had on him. . . . but you said yourself;

You are, and have been, tracked since the day you were born, there is nothing new to any of this and it will only get worse as AI expands.


If the establishment put all the data that they had on this guy into their little program, and it spit out that he was a potential criminal risk, and then information popped up that the technocratic panopticon knew he was carrying at the protest?

Who can say?

1769625497686.webp

 
No. Simply having a carry permit, implies he carries.
Yeah, but that doesn't provide an explanation to my post at all...in fact it completely ignores it....
 
So, they should blow it off, even though, it adds more effectively to the subjects background on future charges, possibly more serious, different agency, different state?
You simply favor, to hell with the paperwork, we can kill them in the street with less bother?
As long as libs run Minnesota I’m not impressed by bold talk
 
Revenge is viable explanation of intent. He was involved ina violent altercation a week prior. So we ask why was he there with a gun in the first place and insert himself into a situation he had no business being in?
HIs judgement was so poor I have to believe he was acting emotionally. When this happens rational thought is shut down and the brain is running on emotion. That explains his poor judgement
It was still wrong to shoot him as he was never an immanent threat.
One possible, but by no means the obvious or accurate reason.
Your second paragraph begs questions. Do I think he used poor judgment? Definitely.
Not the brightest place to be carrying, by any means. Plus, he was planning to film using hand held camera phone, which you have to hold up, most often in two hands in front of face, very easy to lose your own situational awareness, hands raised in front, tunnel visioned on view screen. Not bright, if carrying. If nothing else, somebody even not law enforcement can walk up and steal the damned thing, before you know what is going on. Other than being shot by some out of control cop, somebody walking up, taking your weapon and shooting you or somebody else with your own weapon, ranks you pretty low on the Darwin scale. Situational awareness and weapons control are supreme if carrying, even if carrying purely defensive carry. It is a problem with the open carry crowd, as you can see by store camera videos on YouTube. May your last thoughts never be "Damn, he shot me with my own gun!", but it happens.:(
 
So, they should blow it off, even though, it adds more effectively to the subjects background on future charges, possibly more serious, different agency, different state?
You simply favor, to hell with the paperwork, we can kill them in the street with less bother?
How about an eye for an eye?

One dead illegal migrant, lib Karan or Lone Ranger for every American raped or killed by an illegal alien?
 
As long as libs run Minnesota I’m not impressed by bold talk
Nor I. If you have them on something legitimate, you do the paperwork, or leave them dafuk alone. If they are worth beating up or beating down, they are worth charging, unless you are just out there as goon squad showing your superior force abilities.
 
How about an eye for an eye?

One dead illegal migrant, lib Karan or Lone Ranger for every American raped or killed by an illegal alien?
Not exactly the American way, dude. If in law enforcement, revenge is not supposed to be a factor. It is not how you are trained. It is not in the manual, not in procedures, standard practices trained or supposedly tolerated.

We are supposed to be the good guys. Your way, gets them looked upon as storm troopers and Gestapo. Is that what you want?
 
Would you have turned the other way back in the 1930s Germany, of course you would, you're part of the problem.


So if you'd wanted to change the system back in 1936 in Germany you'd have joined the Nazi party?

Jackass.

How retarded are you?

Nazi Germany is nothing like whats happening in this country.

God, you are one FUCKTARDED RETARD, aren't you?!!!!
 
Jumped and mugged by violent thugs for blowing a whistle
They should have shoved that whistle down his throat. Those whistles are part of a coordinated effort to distract officers.
 
15th post
Nor I. If you have them on something legitimate, you do the paperwork, or leave them dafuk alone. If they are worth beating up or beating down, they are worth charging, unless you are just out there as goon squad showing your superior force abilities.
Charging libs, aka democrat voters, with a federal crime in minnesota is a fool’s errand

The state is run by democrats and is totally corrupt
 
We are supposed to be the good guys.
Like the man says, good guys finish last

I dont want to see our side run over by ANTIFA anarchists paid for by George Soros and communist china
 
How retarded are you?

Nazi Germany is nothing like whats happening in this country.
Of course not to you, you've been deceived and are subject to deception every day, I don't expect you to see what I see.
God, you are one FUCKTARDED RETARD, aren't you?!!!!
I only speak English, can you repeat that please?
 
They should have shoved that whistle down his throat. Those whistles are part of a coordinated effort to distract officers.

No, it's to warn people.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom