j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
And where is that argued? On the street?The 1st amendment of the Constitution, and decisions by the US Supreme Court say different.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And where is that argued? On the street?The 1st amendment of the Constitution, and decisions by the US Supreme Court say different.
Goes both ways. We have tons of footage showing the protesters/agitators causing mayhem, injuring people who they disagree with, and actually taking over parts of the city, and demanding ID from other citizens...Unacceptable.And January 6th.
It's to show the raw political hypocrisy of republicans.
Like not confirming supreme court justices in the middle of a presidential election.
Citation?
Except the BCA isn't allowed to investigate.Everyone need to quit being armchair investigators, and let the investigations speak for themselves...
Republicans do not defend storming the Capital officesAnd January 6th.
It's to show the raw political hypocrisy of republicans.
Like not confirming supreme court justices in the middle of a presidential election.
Did Pretti and his co-protestors stay on the sidewalk?When Permits Cannot Be Required
Small Groups: Small groups that stay on the sidewalk and obey traffic signals generally do not need a permit.
Spontaneous Reactions: If a protest is in immediate response to a current, "breaking news" event, the government cannot enforce strict advance-notice permit requirements.
Cox v. New Hampshire
United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 569 (1941)
Acxually republicans have done nothing but defend the storming of the US Capitol.Republicans do not defend storming the Capital offices
Dems otoh, are fully invested in the street riots
It was a spontaneous reaction.Did Pretti and his co-protestors stay on the sidewalk?
What did your eyes tell you about this video?
Thats not trueAcxually republicans have done nothing but defend the storming of the US Capitol.
Saying it the same as a tourist visit.
It was not an attempted coup
Does your Supreme Court case carve out exceptions for spontaneous reactions ?It was a spontaneous reaction.
YESDoes your Supreme Court case carve out exceptions for spontaneous reactions ?
A “spontaneous action” that pretti many times during the past weeksIt was a spontaneous reaction.
Notwithstanding the fact the Pretti was removed from the street and came back.....was that repeated spontaneous reaction.
I did not defend 6-1There you go defending the attack on the Capitol on January 6th.
Totally related. Your premise is you know exactly what happened from cell phone video.Really? Entirely unrelated.
You think that justifies your support of ICE murdering an unarmed man.
Think better.
It was NOT an attempt to overthrow the government.There you go defending the attack on the Capitol on January 6th.
When did the constitution require amateur status?A “spontaneous action” that pretti many times during the past weeks
He had no job other than being a professional anarchist