Al Gore said fixing issues with American democracy is necessary to properly address climate change.

That's not what he said. Disagreeing with basic science is a stupid choice under ANY circumstance.


The Co2 fraud would have been rejected as fraud long ago under the rules of BASIC SCIENCE.

Instead your side FUDGES DATA and LIES... and that is NOT SCIENCE, but it may be "the science" as used today....
 
That statement is complete nonsense. Tens of thousands of degreed, publishing scientists have found AGW valid in peer-reviewed scientific studies from a dozen different fields. You either do not know what you're talking about or don't have a problem lying to us.


Always there is a magic number. 5, 50, 1000 whatever. Conflicted taxpayer funded liars are liars, no matter how many of them there are. There is DATA and there is FUDGE.

Here is EXHIBIT A


Your theory = increasing atmospheric Co2 will warm THE ATMOSPHERE

The data - two and only two measures of atmospheric data, satellites and balloons, returned highly correlated data showing NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite rising Co2

What did your side do? It FUDGED BOTH SERIES as if we wouldn't notice...
 
Really? Just real quick here, specifically
1) What do you believe to be a lie
2) What scientific study do you believe has not been done
3) What did Obama say


1) This is a lie. No such study has ever been done.

Tens of thousands of degreed, publishing scientists have found AGW valid in peer-reviewed scientific studies from a dozen different fields.


2) You are the one who said such a study exists. Do you refer to a couple of studies done about 10-20 years ago that were roundly debunked?


3) Do you remember Obama saying "97 per cent of climate experts believe global warming is “real, man-made and dangerous.”" It is a lie then and it's a lie now.


What is interesting is that since then not one new study that makes this claim has been done. For all the dissent and disagreement, one might suppose that the AGWers would have followed up with an update. But no, such a study has not been done and if you know of one then by all means specify it. You made the claim, now back it up.
 
1) This is a lie. No such study has ever been done.




2) You are the one who said such a study exists. Do you refer to a couple of studies done about 10-20 years ago that were roundly debunked?


3) Do you remember Obama saying "97 per cent of climate experts believe global warming is “real, man-made and dangerous.”" It is a lie then and it's a lie now.


What is interesting is that since then not one new study that makes this claim has been done. For all the dissent and disagreement, one might suppose that the AGWers would have followed up with an update. But no, such a study has not been done and if you know of one then by all means specify it. You made the claim, now back it up.
AGW ERs have nothing to prove. You deniers have to show why we should believe your made up shit over every university and climate science institute in the world…..IN THE WORLD. Now lets hear your retort; like everyone of these institutes and govts and major related corps in the world is being paid off with bit coin from Hunter’s lap top.
 
AGW ERs have nothing to prove. You deniers have to show why we should believe your made up shit over every university and climate science institute in the world…..IN THE WORLD. Now lets hear your retort; like everyone of these institutes and govts and major related corps in the world is being paid off with bit coin from Hunter’s lap top.


LOL!!!

Our resident comedian insists, only parroting of taxpayer funded conflicted liars is allowed, and DATA refuting it is not allowed...

The warmers cannot even explain a map of the Arctic...

LOL!!!

You should apply to be CNN's new "climate expert" - you might even get a show, you are "qualified" and CNN has no viewers....

Welcome to "Dagosa's Bologna"

CNN's new show to analyze "the science" behind the Co2 fraud
 
LOL!!!

Our resident comedian insists, only parroting of taxpayer funded conflicted liars is allowed, and DATA refuting it is not allowed...

The warmers cannot even explain a map of the Arctic...

LOL!!!

You should apply to be CNN's new "climate expert" - you might even get a show, you are "qualified" and CNN has no viewers....

Welcome to "Dagosa's Bologna"

CNN's new show to analyze "the science" behind the Co2 fraud
Yada Yada yada.
The same old tripe. The only ones who care are the same old science illiterates. Geesus, no wonder Trump was your hero. He’s the bulls shit artist that gave ignorant people a platform they really didn’t earn. Go nuke a hurricane or ingest industrial cleaner if you want....but your tripe is just that.
BTW, no one can explain anything to a dumbass whose mind it set on worshipping Ignorance.
 
"The World Economic Forum wants to reduce the number of cars on the planet from the current level of 1.4 billion to just 400 million by 2050, giving preference to public transport."

This policy was totalitarianism when the communists wanted it, but the initiative from the capitalist spinsters is being chewed up by the people with big spoons and enthusiasm.
 
"The World Economic Forum wants to reduce the number of cars on the planet from the current level of 1.4 billion to just 400 million by 2050, giving preference to public transport."

This policy was totalitarianism when the communists wanted it, but the initiative from the capitalist spinsters is being chewed up by the people with big spoons and enthusiasm.

Who cares what those stupid twats want?

but the initiative from the capitalist spinsters is being chewed up by the people with big spoons and enthusiasm.

The only people who like the idea are the same stupid twats who think communism is a good idea.
 
"The World Economic Forum wants to reduce the number of cars on the planet from the current level of 1.4 billion to just 400 million by 2050, giving preference to public transport."

This policy was totalitarianism when the communists wanted it, but the initiative from the capitalist spinsters is being chewed up by the people with big spoons and enthusiasm.
More fear mongering.
 
Gore told NBC News’s Chuck Todd in an interview that will air on “Meet the Press” on Sunday that public sentiment on climate issues is changing in favor of supporting urgent action, but a “broken” democracy is preventing progress from happening.

“In order to solve the climate crisis, we’re going to have to pay attention to the democracy crisis,” he said.

Gore said Congress cannot pass climate legislation for the same reason it is unable to pass legislation to ban assault rifles.

He said the Senate’s filibuster, which requires most legislation to receive 60 votes to advance, should be eliminated and that “big money” plays too influential a role in politics.

With the Senate evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans 50-50, Democrats would need at least 10 Republican votes to pass most bills.

Democrats have attempted to use reconciliation, a process in the Senate that allows legislation on budget issues to move forward by a simple majority, but they have struggled to pass major climate legislation in that manner during the Biden administration.

Comment:
Al Gore is an idiot.
There is nothing wrong with our "democracy".
It is working as it is supposed to work.
If the greedy and corrupt Democrat Party wants to loot $trillions$ of dollars from the American Taxpayers with their worthless Climate Change Apocalyptic Cult spending, then they will need to elect 60 greedy and corrupt Democrat senators.
Al Gore needs to explain why none of his End Times Cult predictions have come true.
The Democrats also need to do a Cost Benefit explanation on all of their Climate Change Doomsday Cult spending.
In effect, how their spending will change the temperature of the planet and how it will do it.
View attachment 674243View attachment 674244
Gore's comments translation: No more multi-party system. One-party system only.
Everyone mandated to be in lockstep with the one-party system. First, disarm the public, then discard the Constitution and its Bill of Rights. Create a new Constitution, recognizing only the one-party system. Rename the United States as the "Democratic Republic of the United States," partially borrowing North Korea's official name for its nation. Congress and the Senate will be renamed the Politburo and the new nation's leader will be friendly title of "Premier."
Ahh, Gore and his ilk can dream.
 
Gore's comments translation: No more multi-party system. One-party system only.
Everyone mandated to be in lockstep with the one-party system. First, disarm the public, then discard the Constitution and its Bill of Rights. Create a new Constitution, recognizing only the one-party system. Rename the United States as the "Democratic Republic of the United States," partially borrowing North Korea's official name for its nation. Congress and the Senate will be renamed the Politburo and the new nation's leader will be friendly title of "Premier."
Ahh, Gore and his ilk can dream.
All Gore is suggesting is the elimination of the super-majority requirement. That is hardly an assault on the multi-party system nor is it the least bit socialist or communist. It is closer to the actual definition of a democracy.
 
All Gore is suggesting is the elimination of the super-majority requirement. That is hardly an assault on the multi-party system nor is it the least bit socialist or communist. It is closer to the actual definition of a democracy.
Exactly. Opening up the political system is a good thing. Multi party elections can easily work and make all parties responsible to the electorate. Right now, corps only have to buy off two parties.
 

Forum List

Back
Top