Unchanged. You made the same counter-arguments as the AI. They are all over the internet, so it is hardly surprising AI found them.What about your argument that the gospels all don’t say the same thing?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unchanged. You made the same counter-arguments as the AI. They are all over the internet, so it is hardly surprising AI found them.What about your argument that the gospels all don’t say the same thing?
Ther is no devil in the Old Testamenthowabout the supernatural ...
according to most desert dwellers - a1 is satan. votto lost their mind long ago or would know better than pandering with the devil.
Actually the AI argument was different than the one I made. Basically AI concluded that the differences were consistent with how humans make observations. That each person sees or picks up on different things when viewing the same event. AI concluded that they had all been exactly the same - as you were suggesting they should be - that it would be a sign that they were manufactured to be the same. That anytime witnesses of an event describe the event exactly the same way, it's a red flag.Unchanged. You made the same counter-arguments as the AI. They are all over the internet, so it is hardly surprising AI found them.
It is certainly possible all the resurrection accounts are valid but that is hardly the only explanation and, IMHO, hardly the most likely reason for the differences.Actually the AI argument was different than the one I made. Basically AI concluded that the differences were consistent with how humans make observations. That each person sees or picks up on different things when viewing the same event. AI concluded that they had all been exactly the same - as you were suggesting they should be - that it would be a sign that they were manufactured to be the same. That anytime witnesses of an event describe the event exactly the same way, it's a red flag.
At least 2/3 through but my problem with it was the same issue I have with the Bible. I was getting a interpretation of the GROK results and I'm inherently skeptical of second hand information, especially if I don't know the biases of the authors. If the authors of the video were identified I must have missed it.Did you watch the whole video or did you stop about halfway through?
Ok, but how do you explain the apostles worshiping Jesus as God after he rose from the dead and Jewish texts which state that Jesus was put to death for SORCERY and inciting Israel to apostasy?It is certainly possible all the resurrection accounts are valid but that is hardly the only explanation and, IMHO, hardly the most likely reason for the differences.
Because that is what they wanted to see and expected to see.Ok, but how do you explain the apostles worshiping Jesus as God after he rose from the dead
Sanhedrin 43a relates the trial and execution of Jesus and his five disciples. Here, Jesus is a sorcerer who has enticed other Jews to apostasy. A herald is sent to call for witnesses in his favour for forty days before his execution. No one comes forth and in the end he is stoned and hanged on the Eve of Passover.and Jewish texts which state that Jesus was put to death for SORCERY and inciting Israel to apostasy?
or notBecause these HISTORICAL FACTS corroborate the accounts of the gospels.
GROK 4 went off script. GROK was tasked with finding inconsistencies in the bible. So GROK's programming wasn't biased and GROK is a machine which has no bias unless it is programmed into it. GROK is designed to think on its own. So unless you believe there is a conspiracy in the programming of GROK, you have no basis for dismissing its conclusions.At least 2/3 through but my problem with it was the same issue I have with the Bible. I was getting a interpretation of the GROK results and I'm inherently skeptical of second hand information, especially if I don't know the biases of the authors. If the authors of the video were identified I must have missed it.
That's dumb and not supported by any evidence. Why would they risk their lives if they didn't witness the miracles and resurrection first hand?Because that is what they wanted to see and expected to see
Garbage in, garbage out. It is possible to ask questions in such a way to get the answers you want. You can then interpret those answers any way you wishGROK 4 went off script. GROK was tasked with finding inconsistencies in the bible. So GROK's programming wasn't biased and GROK is a machine which has no bias unless it is programmed into it. GROK is designed to think on its own. So unless you believe there is a conspiracy in the programming of GROK, you have no basis for dismissing its conclusions.
Like the GROK video, what you know about the events are from biased, second-hand accounts written decades after the events, mainly be people that were not there to witness them.As for the authors of the gospels, you yourself have already admitted that if you had seen Jesus perform 40 miracles and rise from the dead, you would have believed Jesus was God too. So it shouldn't be surprising when those who witnessed Jesus perform 40 miracles began worshiping Jesus as God IMMEDIATELY AFTER Jesus rose from the dead.
If there were accounts which challenged the miracles performed by Jesus or challenged that Jesus didn't rise from the dead or the Jewish texts didn't mention that Jesus was put to death for sorcery and apostasy, you might have a point.
That's your bias speaking. There's a whole lot of evidence you are having to pretend doesn't exist or isn't important to arrive at the conclusion you want it to be. You can add GROK's conclusions to that list.Garbage in, garbage out. It is possible to ask questions in such a way to get the answers you want. You can then interpret those answers any way you wish
No. I don't know that. I know that history recorded the first Christians - who were Jewish - worshiped Jesus as God because they witnessed the miracles and resurrection of Christ.Like the GROK video, what you know about the events are from biased, second-hand accounts written decades after the events, mainly be people that were not there to witness them.
Paul risked his life and he didn't witness the miracles and resurrection first hand.That's dumb and not supported by any evidence. Why would they risk their lives if they didn't witness the miracles and resurrection first hand?
I could say the same about you.That's your bias speaking. There's a whole lot of evidence you are having to pretend doesn't exist or isn't important to arrive at the conclusion you want it to be. You can add GROK's conclusions to that list.
Acts was written decades after the events, probably by someone who was not an eyewitness to them. Plenty of time for dissenting voices to be removed.No. I don't know that. I know that history recorded the first Christians - who were Jewish - worshiped Jesus as God because they witnessed the miracles and resurrection of Christ.
After Jesus' resurrection, the apostles, especially Peter, immediately began preaching the Gospel, notably starting with Peter's sermon on Pentecost (Acts 2), which led to thousands of conversions, with all the apostles dispersing to preach globally, including Paul (an apostle to the Gentiles) and Thomas (to India). They all became witnesses to the resurrection, traveling widely, establishing churches, and facing martyrdom to spread the message of Jesus' death, burial, and resurrection.
Key Apostles & Their Post-Resurrection Ministry:
The Apostolic Mission:
- Simon Peter: Preached the first sermon after Pentecost, leading thousands to Christ, and ministered to Jews and Gentiles, eventually martyred in Rome.
- John: A key leader alongside Peter and James, he also wrote significant parts of the New Testament.
- James, son of Zebedee: Part of Jesus' inner circle, he was martyred early.
- Matthew: The evangelist, he preached in various Mediterranean communities before his martyrdom in Ethiopia.
- Thomas (Doubting Thomas): Known for his missionary work in India, where he established churches and was martyred.
- James, brother of Jesus: Became the first bishop of Jerusalem and a major leader in the early church.
- Paul: Though not one of the original twelve, he became a prominent apostle, chosen to preach the gospel to the Gentiles, emphasizing the resurrection message.
- Witnessing the Resurrection: Their primary role became bearing witness to Jesus' resurrection, as seen in Peter's powerful sermon in Acts.
- Dispersion: After Jesus' ascension, the apostles scattered to different parts of the world, fulfilling the command to preach the Gospel everywhere.
- Martyrdom: Most apostles, including Peter, Paul, and Matthew, faced persecution and were martyred for their faith, solidifying their commitment to the resurrected Christ.
I don't fear subversives. I defeat them.
AI was asked to critique the Bible in terms of its supposed contradictions, but AI said otherwise.
Then you only watched the first half.This video is half an hour of repeating the same thing over and over again but that in itself may not prove anything because most YouTube trash is exactly that. REPETITION.
You mean other than witnessing the risen Christ and performing miracles of his own in the name of Jesus Christ?Paul risked his life and he didn't witness the miracles and resurrection first hand.
The difference being I am not making up unsupported alternate explanations to explain the evidence. You are and you are doing so for no other reason than your bias. I on the other hand accept that Jesus performed many supernatural feats, claimed and acted as if he were equal to God, never rebuked anyone who worshiped him as God and that he was worshiped as God by those who witnessed his supernatural feats and went out and proclaimed the good news at great risk. So how is my bias altering the evidence?I could say the same about you.
You are arguing conspiracy again. Do you have any evidence of a conspiracy? Because Christianity began immediately after Christ rose from the dead. Your timeline of conspiracy is illogical.Acts was written decades after the events, probably by someone who was not an eyewitness to them. Plenty of time for dissenting voices to be removed.