AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It

Russia Investigation Transcripts and Documents

Materials from the Committee's Investigation into Russian Active Measures

In 2017 and 2018, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) undertook an investigation into Russia’s interference campaign targeting the 2016 U.S. election. The Committee’s investigation came on the heels of an Intelligence Community assessment, which found:
“Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.”
 
For the millions of illegal aliens to whom the Autopen Administration granted "legal status."

Americans don't need the COVID-era increase in ACA subsidies. First because COVID is over, and second because the ACA made their subsidies "afforble."
Again. Illegal aliens aren’t eligible for ACA benefits so that’s stupid.

And if Republicans win this, ACA premiums are going to DOUBLE

And that means a lot to a lot of people
 
One of my US Senators, Adam Schiff went toe to toe with Trump’s attorney general in a Senate hearing, listing Every Question Pam Bondi Ignored. Senator Schiff is a loyal, patriotic, and great American - also an experienced prosecutor. We need more good men like him in the two houses of the US Congress.

1. Did Bondi consult with career ethics lawyers when she approved Trump’s acceptance of a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar’s royal family?

2. Who ordered that Donald Trump’s name be flagged in the FBI’s review of the Epstein files?

3. Did Homan keep his $50,000 from the undercover agents?

4. Did Homan pay taxes on the $50,000?

5. Did DOJ prosecutors determine there was “insufficient evidence” to charge former FBI Director James Comey before he was indicted?

6. How did the administration determine whether U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean were legal?

(Here, Bondi interrupted, asking the senator, who worked for the justice department before his career in politics, “Do you have a law degree, Senator Schiff?”)

7. Did Bondi discuss indicting Comey with Trump?

8. Did Bondi approve the dismissal of antitrust lawyers who opposed the Hewlett Packard–Juniper merger?

9. Does Bondi support a “compensation fund” for people prosecuted in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots?

10. Is Bondi firing career prosecutors for working on January 6 investigations?

11. Does Bondi think government officials must follow court orders?

Pam, she melted down.

“I think it’s valuable that the American people get a sense of what you’ve refused to answer today,” Schiff told Bondi.
She refused to answer questions that she didn't want to answer, just as countless Democrat operatives did when the GOP was trying to get answers in the endless Trump-Russia hoax investigations.

Those Democrats in the Senate in particular deserve no answers, no paychecks, and no respect, so long as they are de-funding the nation in order to give taxfunded healthcare to people who crossed the border illegally and were granted mass "legal status" by the Autopen Administration.
 
She refused to answer questions that she didn't want to answer, just as countless Democrat operatives did when the GOP was trying to get answers in the endless Trump-Russia hoax investigations.

Those Democrats in the Senate in particular deserve no answers, no paychecks, and no respect, so long as they are de-funding the nation in order to give taxfunded healthcare to people who crossed the border illegally and were granted mass "legal status" by the Autopen Administration.
fake news

insane rant

weirdo magatoid
 
Got any accusers? No? Didn't think so.
Bondi could have said “The only pictures like that that I am aware of are AI fakes (because those are floating around) but the didn’t.

Why ? Because if the FBI DOES have pictures like that and she denies knowing about it, she’s guilty of perjury
 
Last edited:
LMAO. She looks like she has been rode hard and hung up wet. Just nasty. And the OP was trash. Townhall thinks Bondi kicked ass, I am so surprised. Her performance was horrifying. Behaved like a spoiled child. Reading between the lines of the Townhall article, and watching some video. Reminded me of a feral cat, trapped in a corner, now forced to lash back, snarling, howling even.

Look, this is really comical, too bad it is serious. But Bondi has no qualifications, not for her current position. Her law school is laughable, Stetson? As AG in Florida, are you kidding me, 2011 to 2019. The state dropped the ball on some major cases. I mean let's be real, she is out of her depth, and drowning. But the comical part, well she was the fall back girl, it could have been Matt, "I go git em boss" Gaetz, LOL.
Apparently, Bondi is not quite up to your standards.

1759881338986.webp
 
Bondi could have said “The only pictures like that that I am aware of are AI fakes (because those are floating around) but the didn’t.

Why ? Because of the FBI DOES have pictures like that and she denies knowing about it, she’s guilty of perjury
She could have said "You fricken loonies are full of sh*t" but she didn't.
 
Bondi could have said “The only pictures like that that I am aware of are AI fakes (because those are floating around) but the didn’t.
Why ? Because of the FBI DOES have pictures like that and she denies knowing about it, she’s guilty of perjury
LIAR. If the FBI had anything now, why didn't they come out during the trials of Epstein or G.Maxwell?

What would the FBI be doing with those photos after the trials?
 
One of my US Senators, Adam Schiff went toe to toe with Trump’s attorney general in a Senate hearing, listing Every Question Pam Bondi Ignored. Senator Schiff is a loyal, patriotic, and great American - also an experienced prosecutor. We need more good men like him in the two houses of the US Congress.

1. Did Bondi consult with career ethics lawyers when she approved Trump’s acceptance of a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar’s royal family?

2. Who ordered that Donald Trump’s name be flagged in the FBI’s review of the Epstein files?

3. Did Homan keep his $50,000 from the undercover agents?

4. Did Homan pay taxes on the $50,000?

5. Did DOJ prosecutors determine there was “insufficient evidence” to charge former FBI Director James Comey before he was indicted?

6. How did the administration determine whether U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean were legal?

(Here, Bondi interrupted, asking the senator, who worked for the justice department before his career in politics, “Do you have a law degree, Senator Schiff?”)

7. Did Bondi discuss indicting Comey with Trump?

8. Did Bondi approve the dismissal of antitrust lawyers who opposed the Hewlett Packard–Juniper merger?

9. Does Bondi support a “compensation fund” for people prosecuted in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots?

10. Is Bondi firing career prosecutors for working on January 6 investigations?

11. Does Bondi think government officials must follow court orders?

Pam, she melted down.

“I think it’s valuable that the American people get a sense of what you’ve refused to answer today,” Schiff told Bondi.
If she didnt answer, it's mostly becasue they are all loaded and stupid questions. What Schiff, and everybody, should be asking her, is why is she not putting sanctuary city mayors (ex. Wu, Bass, Johnson) and sanctuary governors (ex. Newsomes, Pritzker, Hochul) in prison where they belong (US Code 8, Section 1324 et al)
 
Bondi beat their asses today... :spank:
Bondi had two choices today when asked about Epstein & Trump's ties to him. Commit perjury or being another one of Trump's attack dogs by attacking Democrat Senators like Schiff. She chose the latter. Over & over again.

Maybe you should ask yourself WHY she did that.
 
Did Schiff ever provide his proof that Russian collusion was real?

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.

The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.

The report is the culmination of a bipartisan probe that produced what the committee called “the most comprehensive description to date of Russia’s activities and the threat they posed.” The investigation spanned more than three years as the panel’s leaders said they wanted to thoroughly document the unprecedented attack on U.S. elections.

The findings, including unflinching characterizations of furtive interactions between Trump associates and Russian operatives, echo to a large degree those of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and appear to repudiate the Republican president’s claims that the FBI had no basis to investigate whether his campaign was conspiring with Russia. Trump has called the Russia investigations a “hoax.”


and...
even AI has an indictment of the Trump team:

The Senate Intelligence Committee's 2020 report concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 US election to help Donald Trump win the presidency

. The bipartisan, 1,000-page report provided extensive evidence of contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian officials, calling former campaign chairman Paul Manafort's relationship with a Russian intelligence officer a "grave counterintelligence threat".

Key findings on collusion

While the Senate report, like the earlier Mueller investigation, found insufficient evidence to prove a criminal conspiracy, it did detail a pattern of coordination. A key area of disagreement along partisan lines is whether this pattern constitutes "collusion" outside of the narrow legal definition of criminal conspiracy.

Findings regarding the Trump campaign

  • Paul Manafort: The report found that Manafort, Trump's campaign chairman, was a "grave counterintelligence threat." He had a close relationship with Konstantin Kilimnik, who the committee identified as a Russian intelligence officer. Manafort repeatedly shared sensitive internal polling data with Kilimnik, who may have been connected to the Russian hack-and-leak operations.
  • Roger Stone: The committee assessed that Trump did speak with his associate Roger Stone about WikiLeaks on multiple occasions. This contradicted Trump's written testimony during the Mueller investigation. Stone was found guilty of lying to Congress and obstruction in connection with the Russia probe, although his sentence was later commuted by Trump.
  • Trump Tower meeting: The report detailed the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, revealing that the Russian attendees had more extensive ties to the Russian government and its intelligence services than was publicly known.
  • Acceptance of Russian help: The committee concluded that the Trump campaign "sought to maximize the impact" of Russian hacking and leaking of Democratic emails. The campaign "created messaging strategies" to promote and share the stolen material

So, that's a no.

Why not?
 
If she didnt answer, it's mostly becasue they are all loaded and stupid questions. What Schiff, and everybody, should be asking her, is why is she not putting sanctuary city mayors (ex. Wu, Bass, Johnson) and sanctuary governors (ex. Newsomes, Pritzker, Hochul) in prison where they belong (US Code 8, Section 1324 et al)
Oversight Committee
 
What is she hiding?

What was she trying to avoid?

We know she lied to the Upper house of the US Congress during her confirmation hearing.
 
15th post
Again. Illegal aliens aren’t eligible for ACA benefits so that’s stupid.

Are they if they illegally immigrated and were then granted "legal status?" That's what I said.
And if Republicans win this, ACA premiums are going to DOUBLE
What happened to the ACA making them affordable? Something about the same sort of suggests it,
And that means a lot to a lot of people
Shouldn't have passed that absurd ACA in the first place.

Besides, the Senate ransom demand is much more than granting taxfunded healthcare to illegal aliens who were granted legal status:

1759881787481.webp


 
Bondi could have said “The only pictures like that that I am aware of are AI fakes (because those are floating around) but the didn’t.

Why ? Because if the FBI DOES have pictures like that and she denies knowing about it, she’s guilty of perjury
She didn't deny knowing about it. She refused to aswer such an absurd question.
 
The Democrat Counterfeit Resolution:

  • Restores taxpayer-funded free healthcare for illegal aliens.
  • Props up liberal news programs.
  • Prioritizes electric vehicle access to HOV lanes, regardless of vehicle occupancy.
  • Removes work requirements for able-bodied, non-working adults on taxpayer-funded health programs.
  • Resumes DEI projects in foreign countries.
  • Hands criminals over $1 billion more for taxpayer-funded defense.
  • Repeals $50 billion in rural health care funding, hurting hospitals and clinics in vulnerable communities.
  • Reverses lawful executive actions made by the President.
  • Rescinds border security measures passed through the Working Families Tax Cuts.
  • Usurps the President’s authority over emergency funds.
  • Locks in Biden Administration grant policies in direct contrast to President Trump’s executive orders.
  • Handcuffs the Trump Administration’s ability to make agile decisions.
  • Burdens Trump Administration officials with added bureaucracy meant to slow down progress.
  • Includes $1.5 trillion in new spending for just a month of keeping government funding extended.

It is not just about giving taxfunded healthcare to illegal aliens granted "legal status."
 
Back
Top Bottom