AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It

Dante said:
One of my US Senators, Adam Schiff went toe to toe with Trump’s attorney general in a Senate hearing, listing Every Question Pam Bondi Ignored. Senator Schiff is a loyal, patriotic, and great American - also an experienced prosecutor. We need more good men like him in the two houses of the US Congress.

1. Did Bondi consult with career ethics lawyers when she approved Trump’s acceptance of a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar’s royal family?

2. Who ordered that Donald Trump’s name be flagged in the FBI’s review of the Epstein files?

3. Did Homan keep his $50,000 from the undercover agents?

4. Did Homan pay taxes on the $50,000?

5. Did DOJ prosecutors determine there was “insufficient evidence” to charge former FBI Director James Comey before he was indicted?

6. How did the administration determine whether U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean were legal?

(Here, Bondi interrupted, asking the senator, who worked for the justice department before his career in politics, “Do you have a law degree, Senator Schiff?”)

7. Did Bondi discuss indicting Comey with Trump?

8. Did Bondi approve the dismissal of antitrust lawyers who opposed the Hewlett Packard–Juniper merger?

9. Does Bondi support a “compensation fund” for people prosecuted in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots?

10. Is Bondi firing career prosecutors for working on January 6 investigations?

11. Does Bondi think government officials must follow court orders?

Pam, she melted down.

“I think it’s valuable that the American people get a sense of what you’ve refused to answer today,” Schiff told Bondi.
Click to expand...
Bondi beat their asses today... :spank:
 
Zincwarrior said:
Coward.

She refused to discuss her Epstein lies
She refused to discuss the Homan bribe video.
She refused to discuss Trump's order to persecute Comey.
Click to expand...
Why should she play that game with them?

Did you not watch Christopher Wray, Rod Rosenstein, Peter Strozk, and many other Democrats who refused to answer substantive questions during what was obviously a deliberately endless pseudo-investigation designed to destroy Trump's effectiveness as POTUS?

Why does his administration owe Senate Democrats any answers whatsoever?

Those Democrats should be focused on why they are de-funding the nation.
 
Dante said:
One of my US Senators, Adam Schiff went toe to toe with Trump’s attorney general in a Senate hearing, listing Every Question Pam Bondi Ignored. Senator Schiff is a loyal, patriotic, and great American - also an experienced prosecutor. We need more good men like him in the two houses of the US Congress.

1. Did Bondi consult with career ethics lawyers when she approved Trump’s acceptance of a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar’s royal family?

2. Who ordered that Donald Trump’s name be flagged in the FBI’s review of the Epstein files?

3. Did Homan keep his $50,000 from the undercover agents?

4. Did Homan pay taxes on the $50,000?

5. Did DOJ prosecutors determine there was “insufficient evidence” to charge former FBI Director James Comey before he was indicted?

6. How did the administration determine whether U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean were legal?

(Here, Bondi interrupted, asking the senator, who worked for the justice department before his career in politics, “Do you have a law degree, Senator Schiff?”)

7. Did Bondi discuss indicting Comey with Trump?

8. Did Bondi approve the dismissal of antitrust lawyers who opposed the Hewlett Packard–Juniper merger?

9. Does Bondi support a “compensation fund” for people prosecuted in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots?

10. Is Bondi firing career prosecutors for working on January 6 investigations?

11. Does Bondi think government officials must follow court orders?

Pam, she melted down.

“I think it’s valuable that the American people get a sense of what you’ve refused to answer today,” Schiff told Bondi.
Click to expand...
She did not melt down. Why did you say this? Schiff is a liar 1,000 over. He lied to Congress and the people of the United States when he said he had proof of Trump's Russian collusion. He never provided this.
The idea that anyone has to follow wicked and unConstitutional Court orders is a Communist. Schiff is a Communist. How did he become wealthy?
 
Seymour Flops said:
Why should she play that game with them?

Did you not watch Christopher Wray, Rod Rosenstein, Peter Strozk, and many other Democrats who refused to answer substantive questions during what was obviously a deliberately endless pseudo-investigation designed to destroy Trump's effectiveness as POTUS?

Why does his administration owe Senate Democrats any answers whatsoever?

Those Democrats should be focused on why they are de-funding the nation.
Click to expand...
Why?

To keep ACA premiums affordable
 
Lesh said:
Why?

To keep ACA premiums affordable
Click to expand...
For the millions of illegal aliens to whom the Autopen Administration granted "legal status."

Americans don't need the COVID-era increase in ACA subsidies. First because COVID is over, and second because the ACA made their subsidies "afforble."
 
Toddsterpatriot said:
Did Schiff ever provide his proof that Russian collusion was real?
Click to expand...

Did Schiff ever provide his proof that Russian collusion was real?

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.

The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.

The report is the culmination of a bipartisan probe that produced what the committee called “the most comprehensive description to date of Russia’s activities and the threat they posed.” The investigation spanned more than three years as the panel’s leaders said they wanted to thoroughly document the unprecedented attack on U.S. elections.

The findings, including unflinching characterizations of furtive interactions between Trump associates and Russian operatives, echo to a large degree those of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and appear to repudiate the Republican president’s claims that the FBI had no basis to investigate whether his campaign was conspiring with Russia. Trump has called the Russia investigations a “hoax.”


and...
even AI has an indictment of the Trump team:

The Senate Intelligence Committee's 2020 report concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 US election to help Donald Trump win the presidency

. The bipartisan, 1,000-page report provided extensive evidence of contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian officials, calling former campaign chairman Paul Manafort's relationship with a Russian intelligence officer a "grave counterintelligence threat".

Key findings on collusion

While the Senate report, like the earlier Mueller investigation, found insufficient evidence to prove a criminal conspiracy, it did detail a pattern of coordination. A key area of disagreement along partisan lines is whether this pattern constitutes "collusion" outside of the narrow legal definition of criminal conspiracy.

Findings regarding the Trump campaign

  • Paul Manafort: The report found that Manafort, Trump's campaign chairman, was a "grave counterintelligence threat." He had a close relationship with Konstantin Kilimnik, who the committee identified as a Russian intelligence officer. Manafort repeatedly shared sensitive internal polling data with Kilimnik, who may have been connected to the Russian hack-and-leak operations.
  • Roger Stone: The committee assessed that Trump did speak with his associate Roger Stone about WikiLeaks on multiple occasions. This contradicted Trump's written testimony during the Mueller investigation. Stone was found guilty of lying to Congress and obstruction in connection with the Russia probe, although his sentence was later commuted by Trump.
  • Trump Tower meeting: The report detailed the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, revealing that the Russian attendees had more extensive ties to the Russian government and its intelligence services than was publicly known.
  • Acceptance of Russian help: The committee concluded that the Trump campaign "sought to maximize the impact" of Russian hacking and leaking of Democratic emails. The campaign "created messaging strategies" to promote and share the stolen material
 
Her verbal *****-slapping of Senator "Whites Only" Whitehouse, was a thing of beauty! Apparently, the gave him ten plus minutes instead of the usual five. I wish they had let it keep going.

 
15th post
Cougarbear said:
She did not melt down. Why did you say this? Schiff is a liar 1,000 over. He lied to Congress and the people of the United States when he said he had proof of Trump's Russian collusion. He never provided this.
Click to expand...
see post #8

then

:anj_stfu:
stuf
 
Zincwarrior said:
No I mean you are protecting the Epstein pedos. WHY?
Click to expand...
I'm not. Joe Biden did. Epstein had a trial. G.Maxwell had a trial. Everything came out during those trials.
1759880640594.webp
 
Zincwarrior said:
Where are the Epstein files?
Click to expand...
and...

1. Did Bondi consult with career ethics lawyers when she approved Trump’s acceptance of a $400 million jet gifted by Qatar’s royal family?

2. Who ordered that Donald Trump’s name be flagged in the FBI’s review of the Epstein files?

3. Did Homan keep his $50,000 from the undercover agents?

4. Did Homan pay taxes on the $50,000?

5. Did DOJ prosecutors determine there was “insufficient evidence” to charge former FBI Director James Comey before he was indicted?

6. How did the administration determine whether U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean were legal?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The FBI has fired agents who illegally spied on GOP senators at the request of the Biden regime

< Previous Thread

DHS posts mugshots of the murderers, pedophiles, and drug dealers they've arrested in Portland

Next Thread >

Similar threads

B
How NATO's Secretary General Described Trump During the Ukraine Peace Talks Will Cause Libs to Melt Down
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
852
JoeB131
JoeB131
B
The CIA Agent Who Said She Authored the 2017 Report on Russian Collusion, Now Says She Didn't
Replies
6
Views
114
EMH
EMH
B
After the Release of the Russian Collusion Docs, We Know Why Obama Tried to Fire His NSA Director
Replies
3
Views
407
imawhosure
imawhosure
B
Former CNN Host Nails Why Dems Are Trying to Destroy John Fetterman
4 5 6
Replies
103
Views
2K
braalian
braalian
DonGlock26
Pam Bondi, AG Nominee, Confirmation Hearing Held By Senate Judiciary Security Committee
4 5 6
Replies
115
Views
2K
Captain Caveman
Captain Caveman

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom