protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 61,784
- 21,914
- 2,250
Hint: Nobody cares.Where are the Epstein files?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hint: Nobody cares.Where are the Epstein files?
So color yourself ignorantNo
Not real world
I don't need to see anything. I'll just use the Democrat way of answering questions... You know....
It's all mute because of the fact Schiff colluded with Clinton and others to make up the fake dossier that everything was built on. Schiff and the rest that conspired to attempt the insurrection against Trump need to be hanged for treason.
I think Bondi is performing a desirable service, at least from the senators' perspective.Judiciary Comm. refuse to answer questions?
Defiant Bondi Stonewalls Democrats on Epstein and Homan Investigations
Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee, opened the questioning by asking if the White House had consulted Ms. Bondi on the deployment of federal troops to Chicago. She ignored the question and instead raised her voice to accuse Mr. Durbin, a 28-year veteran of the Senate who has delivered billions of dollars in criminal justice funding to his state, of disloyalty to his constituents.
“I wish you loved Chicago as much as you hate President Trump,” she said.
The rest of her testimony went the same way. Questions were asked, Pam responded with prepared accusations against Dem senators she read from a notebook.
While watching some of her testimony I thought to myself I wish one of the senators had the presence of mind to say, "Mr Chairman, I move that the AG be given 10 minutes to read all of her prepared insults so we can move past them and she can begin to answer our questions."
But that was never going to happen. She knew when she walked in the hearing room the task assigned to her by the prez, to be as contemptuous as possible in refusing to answer, was her only reason for being there. Not to be forthright and give answers the American people deserve to hear.
If she doesn’t answer questions she can’t be charged with perjuryJudiciary Comm. refuse to answer questions?
Defiant Bondi Stonewalls Democrats on Epstein and Homan Investigations
Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee, opened the questioning by asking if the White House had consulted Ms. Bondi on the deployment of federal troops to Chicago. She ignored the question and instead raised her voice to accuse Mr. Durbin, a 28-year veteran of the Senate who has delivered billions of dollars in criminal justice funding to his state, of disloyalty to his constituents.
“I wish you loved Chicago as much as you hate President Trump,” she said.
The rest of her testimony went the same way. Questions were asked, Pam responded with prepared accusations against Dem senators she read from a notebook.
While watching some of her testimony I thought to myself I wish one of the senators had the presence of mind to say, "Mr Chairman, I move that the AG be given 10 minutes to read all of her prepared insults so we can move past them and she can begin to answer our questions."
But that was never going to happen. She knew when she walked in the hearing room the task assigned to her by the prez, to be as contemptuous as possible in refusing to answer, was her only reason for being there. Not to be forthright and give answers the American people deserve to hear.
As a commentator I listened to pointed out, the $50K Homan took in a paper bag was given to him by undercover FBI agents. Meaning it's taxpayer money. We have a right to know what happened to it. We also have a right to hear the audio of the tape of him talking about what he could do to earn more bribes once Dotard got elected.That was a total embarrassment today. Bondi would not answer simple ******* questions. Instead, all she did was attack Democratic Senators and it came off as so fake and disingenuous.
She is so unprofessional, a total ******* child.
Of course! I guess the Dem senators were all absent the day in law school when they taught about executive privilege.Asked about her possible conversations with the President, of course AG Bondi refuses to answer.
My thought exactly. She didn't answer because she couldn't answer honestly without getting members of the regime, like Homan, in trouble. And herself too for ending the investigation in to Homan. So she stonewalled.If she doesn’t answer questions she can’t be charged with perjury
She SHOULD-be charged with contempt
On perjury charges if it can be shown she does have that knowledgeAs a commentator I listened to pointed out, the $50K Homan took in a paper bag was given to him by undercover FBI agents. Meaning it's taxpayer money. We have a right to know what happened to it. We also have a right to hear the audio of the tape of him talking about what he could do to earn more bribes once Dotard got elected.
For Bondi to tell the obvious lie she knows nothing about the existence of the tape is worthy of her being held in contempt of Congress and or impeached.
So color yourself ignorant
It’s fact
She stomped your democrat asses today. She called out all of their lies, their bullshit and their hypocrisy.Judiciary Comm. refuse to answer questions?
Defiant Bondi Stonewalls Democrats on Epstein and Homan Investigations
Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee, opened the questioning by asking if the White House had consulted Ms. Bondi on the deployment of federal troops to Chicago. She ignored the question and instead raised her voice to accuse Mr. Durbin, a 28-year veteran of the Senate who has delivered billions of dollars in criminal justice funding to his state, of disloyalty to his constituents.
“I wish you loved Chicago as much as you hate President Trump,” she said.
The rest of her testimony went the same way. Questions were asked, Pam responded with prepared accusations against Dem senators she read from a notebook.
While watching some of her testimony I thought to myself I wish one of the senators had the presence of mind to say, "Mr Chairman, I move that the AG be given 10 minutes to read all of her prepared insults so we can move past them and she can begin to answer our questions."
But that was never going to happen. She knew when she walked in the hearing room the task assigned to her by the prez, to be as contemptuous as possible in refusing to answer, was her only reason for being there. Not to be forthright and give answers the American people deserve to hear.
Like a democrat who lied about his military career calling her untrustworthy?That was a total embarrassment today. Bondi would not answer simple ******* questions. Instead, all she did was attack Democratic Senators and it came off as so fake and disingenuous.
She is so unprofessional, a total ******* child.
The only thing you can charge her with is kicking your asses. Verbal murder.If she doesn’t answer questions she can’t be charged with perjury
She SHOULD-be charged with contempt
Sounds like the democratic officials called before congress who evaded and outright lied.Judiciary Comm. refuse to answer questions?
Defiant Bondi Stonewalls Democrats on Epstein and Homan Investigations
Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee, opened the questioning by asking if the White House had consulted Ms. Bondi on the deployment of federal troops to Chicago. She ignored the question and instead raised her voice to accuse Mr. Durbin, a 28-year veteran of the Senate who has delivered billions of dollars in criminal justice funding to his state, of disloyalty to his constituents.
“I wish you loved Chicago as much as you hate President Trump,” she said.
The rest of her testimony went the same way. Questions were asked, Pam responded with prepared accusations against Dem senators she read from a notebook.
While watching some of her testimony I thought to myself I wish one of the senators had the presence of mind to say, "Mr Chairman, I move that the AG be given 10 minutes to read all of her prepared insults so we can move past them and she can begin to answer our questions."
But that was never going to happen. She knew when she walked in the hearing room the task assigned to her by the prez, to be as contemptuous as possible in refusing to answer, was her only reason for being there. Not to be forthright and give answers the American people deserve to hear.
Only a person who does not have an understanding of the government as created by the founding fathers would think Pam Bondi represented the Judicial department in a professional way and the way our Constitution wants our judicial sytem to interact with copngress and the executive branch.Attorney General Pam Bondi came out swinging today during her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Democrats' plan was clear from the start: to distract and divert from their government shutdown, lawlessness in cities, rogue judges, and the death and destruction Joe Biden's open border policies unleashed.
Pam Bondi was having none of it and continuously brought the conversation back to what Democrats tried to avoid.
It’s one of those things: Democrats need to shift the focus on who’s to blame to mask their incompetence.
She came prepared, bringing a gun to the Democrats’ knife fight. When liberal media reporters admit that she was cooking Democrats, you know it’s bad.
Ken Dilanian
@DilanianMSNBC
Senate Democrats seem completely unprepared for the personal attacks
@AGPamBondi
came prepared to launch at each one of them today, and they are failing to rebut them.
11:36 AM · Oct 7, 2025
![]()
AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It
Pam Bondi dominates Senate Judiciary Committee, challenging Democrats on key issues.townhall.com
BJ -
Spectacular today.
Not every day.
Some days less -, but not today.
·