You can’t name any actual prosecutorial misconduct, which is a very high bar.
It’s weird you think abuse their office and political prosecutions is their job.I'm on board with you Dipshit MAGAts frailing about trying to charge prosecutors for doing their jobs.
It doesn't have to succeed to be successful. Call it a warning shot to prove that Lawfare can cut both ways.
Sorry about any confusion. Sent my post to the wrong person. Good info. Thanks!OK, so you are a Low-IQ democrat. If you knew how to read you would understand that Merchan's & Bragg's Lawfare against Trump won't get thru the appeal process for the following reasons, just read the following link if you are able.
Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal
Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…jonathanturley.org
Never underestimate the unearned hubris of privileged white people who confuse their privilege for capability.
It's funny that you think crying about it is the same as getting an indictment for it. How's that Durham report coming along?
huh? It's done, it's been filed a long time ago.It's funny that you think crying about it is the same as getting an indictment for it. How's that Durham report coming along?
Well he was also investigating the investigators and came up with nothing. I don't know why you dumb Simps would get your hopes up again.
Not sure where you got the idea he came up with nothing. That couldn’t be further from the truthWell he was also investigating the investigators and came up with nothing. I don't know why you dumb Simps would get your hopes up again.
Did you not read your link? He found the fbi had in fact acted corruptly..
Maybe you didn't which is why you didn't bother to quote that part and instead made believe it instead.
You got to keep reading. There is more to itMaybe you didn't which is why you didn't bother to quote that part and instead made believe it instead.
Here's what it actually says you illiterate coward....
Durham special counsel investigation - Wikipedia
After three-and-a-half-years, Durham indicted three men. One was an FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an email that was included in a June 2017 application for a surveillance warrant on a former Trump campaign aide; he was sentenced to probation. The other two men were tried and acquitted. In both trials, Durham alleged the defendants had deceived the FBI but did not allege the FBI acted improperly toward Trump. According to conservative lawyer Andrew C. McCarthy, the alleged deception was "only about the identity or status of people from whom they were getting information, not about the information itself."
Where you dumb bitch? Quote it because the part I quoted says the opposite. My actual quote is superior to your make believing one.
No the part you quoted didn’t say the oppositeWhere you dumb bitch? Quote it because the part I quoted says the opposite. My actual quote is superior to your make believing one.
What exactly are you trying to achieve? It seems like your goal is to make it impossible to investigate and prosecute anyone in government.
It's did you dumb illiterate bitch.
I'll post it again for you.Not at all. They will be investigated and prosecuted
What will they be investigated and prosecuted for doing?
