It's did you dumb illiterate bitch.I'll post it again for you.
Durham special counsel investigation - Wikipedia
After three-and-a-half-years, Durham indicted three men. One was an FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an email that was included in a June 2017 application for a surveillance warrant on a former Trump campaign aide; he was sentenced to probation. The other two men were tried and acquitted. In both trials, Durham alleged the defendants had deceived the FBI but did not allege the FBI acted improperly toward Trump. According to conservative lawyer Andrew C. McCarthy, the alleged deception was "only about the identity or status of people from whom they were getting information, not about the information itself.
Why didn’t you read the part where Durbam concluded the corrupt behavior damaged the bureau?It's did you dumb illiterate bitch.
Durham special counsel investigation - Wikipedia
After three-and-a-half-years, Durham indicted three men. One was an FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an email that was included in a June 2017 application for a surveillance warrant on a former Trump campaign aide; he was sentenced to probation. The other two men were tried and acquitted. In both trials, Durham alleged the defendants had deceived the FBI but did not allege the FBI acted improperly toward Trump. According to conservative lawyer Andrew C. McCarthy, the alleged deception was "only about the identity or status of people from whom they were getting information, not about the information itself."
Violating the law.
Pam Bondi also knows that the vast majority of the right wing base are morons who believe the nonsense on TV. If she can get the morons to support her loudly and proudly, it's harder for hesitant Senators to vote against her.
How did they violate the law?
Because that doesn't make your point does it? The one agent actually tried and found guilty was found to be working against the interest of the FBI and the FBI was not working to violate Trump's rights. These are the conclusions from Durham you Dipshit.
Well that’s not for me to say, but I’d look at 18.2 USC 242
Of course it does. I said they were corrupt. What part of that don’t you get?Because that doesn't make your point does it? The one agent actually tried and found guilty was found to be working against the interest of the FBI and the FBI was not working to violate Trump's rights. These are the conclusions from Durham you Dipshit.
Ah, so you're clueless but believe it anyway. That's pretty typical for a lemming.
Huh? What a weird post
They part where you prove it you dipshit. Durhams investigating found the FBI wasn't corrupt. Learn to read you dumb bitch.
You're the one that said they'll be prosecuted so you clearly determined they violated the law.
Being prosecuted doesn’t mean they’ll be found guilty
Being prosecuted means they have convincing evidence of a crime that they believe they are likely to prove in court beyond a reasonable doubt.
By breaking it .
Your own link says otherwise! Your own link says Durbam stated the fbi behavior harmed the reputation of the fbiThey part where you prove it you dipshit. Durhams investigating found the FBI wasn't corrupt. Learn to read you dumb bitch.
Investigating and prosecuting someone is not illegal, even if you disagree with the legal foundation of that prosecution.
