After Indiana Pizzeria Said They Wouldn’t Cater Gay Weddings, the Backlash Was So Extreme

[boedicca]

The massive coordinated Gay Propaganda campaign has played itself out. Most Americans are completely sick of it. Gays aren't seen as the victim anymore. Now they're seen as the bully. They've pushed too much. It's 'The boy who cried Wolf' now. Most just want them to STFU. Enough is enough already. SHEESH!

Agreed. And sadly, they are a minority. The younger generations are far more accepting of gays, and in the natural course of time, legislation has addressed many gay rights issues. The racial faction wants to force feed the process, which actually alienates many who may have supported changes in the law.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It's principle, and if you serve, serve. That's your job.

Again, no one put you in charge of deciding what someone else's job is. See, in a free country business owners determine for themselves what their job is. That's one reason they start a business.

You don't live in that country, no one does, since everyone has regulated capitalism.

It's true, we don't live in a free country. We live in a fascist police state. I've been saying that for years. This whole queer "right to force business owners to serve them" thing is a classic example.

People said the same thing when they were forced to serve *******, and Jews, and Catholics.

They may have, and if they did they were right. Forcing any person to do what he doesn't want is fascism, even if they are loathsome worms like you who say Jews are scum.

Just more of you not living in the real world, where we have laws against such things.

 

[bripat9643]

I'm pretty sure Adlai Stevenson is one of PMH's Liberal hero's. Too bad he doesn't understand the wisdom he expressed in this comment:

"A free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular."

I understand it very well, but I very much doubt he would have supported the No ******* gas station eh?

Red Herring and Burning Strawman Combined!

Nobody is advocating for that.

Why not, it's the same thing.

Since I assume you will pretend to support freedom of speech, that means you support books that call black people the N-word, right?

Yep, and being used in schools. It's part of America's history, and my family owned *******.

And I don't pretend. I support it the way the ACLU does, that being stand on the sidewalk and scream your fool head, that's your right.

Ah, so you're a racist pig whole believes in calling blacks the N-word. Well, I think you've already demonstrated that by example in this forum.

 

[boedicca]

I'm pretty sure Adlai Stevenson is one of PMH's Liberal hero's. Too bad he doesn't understand the wisdom he expressed in this comment:

"A free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular."

I understand it very well, but I very much doubt he would have supported the No ******* gas station eh?

Red Herring and Burning Strawman Combined!

Nobody is advocating for that.

Why not, it's the same thing.

Since I assume you will pretend to support freedom of speech, that means you support books that call black people the N-word, right?

The first amendment doesnt always apply once you voluntarily engage in commerce

For some reason, its hard for the socially conservative mind to allow for facts and data making them learn.

This is such a misinterpretation of the RFRA. It doesn't enable violating existing anti-discrimination laws. It just provides a legal defense in case one is sued and requires the government to show that laws do not place an undo burden on one's religious beliefs.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Let me ask those up in arms over this if you would feel the same way if a company refused service to a kkk rally, upon principle? The kkk has a right to exist and have rallies. Must those that don't support their beliefs be forced to serve them at a rally?

A KKK Rally?

LOL! These are the people that REFUSED TO EAT at CHIC fil A!

You'll recall that THAT would-be protest resulted in the biggest spike in Chic fil A's Fast Food Sales in fast food history.

I get your point Depotoo... and it's a good one. But your assumption is that the Left are reasonable people, thus they can be reasoned with.

It's an honest mistake that millions have made before you.

 

[thereisnospoon]

"... It May Not Be Safe to Re-Open

Now, I gotta say, THAT appears to be injurious to me... and my guess is that THAT is part and parcel of why homosexuals have felt safer in the closet for all but the entirety of human existence.

People are only going to put up with that crap for so long... .


"Crystal O’Connor, the co-owner of Memories Pizza in Indiana, says it may not be safe to re-open their pizzeria after they said they wouldn’t cater a gay wedding.

“I don’t know if we will re-open, or if we can, if it’s safe to re-open,” O’Connor said on TheBlaze TV’s Dana. “We’re in hiding basically, staying in the house.”

O’Connor recently told WBND-TV, “If a gay couple came in and wanted us to provide pizzas for their wedding, we would have to say no.”

She made it clear that they are happy to serve gay customers, but would not be a part of the wedding because of their religious beliefs. National news outlets quickly picked up the story.

O’Connor said they have since received an endless flood of “bashing” comments on social media, and their Yelp page has been trashed. One reviewer wrote that they serve an “intolerance special with toppings of hate, bigotry, stupidity, and old fashioned beliefs.” And a high school coach from Goshen, Indiana has been suspended after urging people on Twitter to burn down their establishment.

“Who’s going to Walkerton, IN to burn down #memoriespizza w me? Agree with #FreedomofReligion bill? ‘That’s a lifestyle they CHOOSE’ Ignorant,” coach Jess Dooley wrote.

O’Connor said the media is distorting what her family truly believes. They are happy to serve gay customers, she reiterated, but object to being forced to participate in a gay wedding, since they don’t believe in gay marriage.

“We’re very hurt and confused and we stood up for what we believe,” she said. “The news just took it totally out of proportion. They lied about it. We said that we would serve anyone that walked in that door, even gays, but we would not condone a wedding. We would not cater that because it’s against our religious beliefs.”

After Indiana Pizzeria Said They Wouldn t Cater Gay Weddings the Backlash Was So Extreme It May Not Be Safe to Re-Open Video TheBlaze.com

And this is how these intolerant extremist liberals operate. They seek and attempt to destroy anyone who will not kowtow to the far left wing agenda.
This is going to back fire against the radical left.
That teacher who suggested people follw her to burn down the pizza store? She lost her job....

 

[Pop23]

"... It May Not Be Safe to Re-Open

Now, I gotta say, THAT appears to be injurious to me... and my guess is that THAT is part and parcel of why homosexuals have felt safer in the closet for all but the entirety of human existence.

People are only going to put up with that crap for so long... .


"Crystal O’Connor, the co-owner of Memories Pizza in Indiana, says it may not be safe to re-open their pizzeria after they said they wouldn’t cater a gay wedding.

“I don’t know if we will re-open, or if we can, if it’s safe to re-open,” O’Connor said on TheBlaze TV’s Dana. “We’re in hiding basically, staying in the house.”

O’Connor recently told WBND-TV, “If a gay couple came in and wanted us to provide pizzas for their wedding, we would have to say no.”

She made it clear that they are happy to serve gay customers, but would not be a part of the wedding because of their religious beliefs. National news outlets quickly picked up the story.

O’Connor said they have since received an endless flood of “bashing” comments on social media, and their Yelp page has been trashed. One reviewer wrote that they serve an “intolerance special with toppings of hate, bigotry, stupidity, and old fashioned beliefs.” And a high school coach from Goshen, Indiana has been suspended after urging people on Twitter to burn down their establishment.

“Who’s going to Walkerton, IN to burn down #memoriespizza w me? Agree with #FreedomofReligion bill? ‘That’s a lifestyle they CHOOSE’ Ignorant,” coach Jess Dooley wrote.

O’Connor said the media is distorting what her family truly believes. They are happy to serve gay customers, she reiterated, but object to being forced to participate in a gay wedding, since they don’t believe in gay marriage.

“We’re very hurt and confused and we stood up for what we believe,” she said. “The news just took it totally out of proportion. They lied about it. We said that we would serve anyone that walked in that door, even gays, but we would not condone a wedding. We would not cater that because it’s against our religious beliefs.”

After Indiana Pizzeria Said They Wouldn t Cater Gay Weddings the Backlash Was So Extreme It May Not Be Safe to Re-Open Video TheBlaze.com

There is no excuse for the gay and liberal communities attack on these people. It was a hypothetical question proposed by a reporter. I support gay marriage. However, when this place opens again I plan to order a pizza and have it delivered to the local orphanage or homeless shelter!

Excellent idea! I'll join you in that!

Bravo

 

[bripat9643]

Again, no one put you in charge of deciding what someone else's job is. See, in a free country business owners determine for themselves what their job is. That's one reason they start a business.

You don't live in that country, no one does, since everyone has regulated capitalism.

It's true, we don't live in a free country. We live in a fascist police state. I've been saying that for years. This whole queer "right to force business owners to serve them" thing is a classic example.

People said the same thing when they were forced to serve *******, and Jews, and Catholics.

They may have, and if they did they were right. Forcing any person to do what he doesn't want is fascism, even if they are loathsome worms like you who say Jews are scum.

Just more of you not living in the real world, where we have laws against such things.

Not in Indiana. So apparently the queers who are whining about their "right to be served" are "not living in the real world."

 

[OKTexas]

You keep driving when a cop gets behind you to give you a ticket and see how many guns come out when they finally force you to stop.

Because I don't want a larger ticket, or to even be arrested, and since it's the law, I pull over. He could be armed with a stuffed animal and I would do the same, it's the law, dummies.

They won't be armed with a stuffed animal will they?

Would it matter? They have a big fancy car with flashing lights and a radio. To me that says pull over, and that's what the law says. That happened to me just a few months ago, no gun came out and the cop was very polite. So, where is this gun to the head thing coming from?

Show me where I ever said "gun to the head" those were your words, not mine.

Well, that's what it sounds like with all this "the government is forcing me at gunpoint" stuff, and I rarely, if ever, see anything of the kind.

I'm only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to read into it. Are you saying governments don't use coercion and force of arms?

 

[G.T.]

I understand it very well, but I very much doubt he would have supported the No ******* gas station eh?

Red Herring and Burning Strawman Combined!

Nobody is advocating for that.

Why not, it's the same thing.

Since I assume you will pretend to support freedom of speech, that means you support books that call black people the N-word, right?

The first amendment doesnt always apply once you voluntarily engage in commerce

For some reason, its hard for the socially conservative mind to allow for facts and data making them learn.

This is such a misinterpretation of the RFRA. It doesn't enable violating existing anti-discrimination laws. It just provides a legal defense in case one is sued and requires the government to show that laws do not place an undo burden on one's religious beliefs.

Im sorry....i was respondi g to a post by userhandle bripat.

Not the "rfra."

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I understand it very well, but I very much doubt he would have supported the No ******* gas station eh?

Red Herring and Burning Strawman Combined!

Nobody is advocating for that.

Why not, it's the same thing.

Since I assume you will pretend to support freedom of speech, that means you support books that call black people the N-word, right?

Yep, and being used in schools. It's part of America's history, and my family owned *******.

And I don't pretend. I support it the way the ACLU does, that being stand on the sidewalk and scream your fool head, that's your right.

Ah, so you're a racist pig whole believes in calling blacks the N-word. Well, I think you've already demonstrated that by example in this forum.

Your Political Correctness is noted, and rejected of course.

 

[boedicca]

Red Herring and Burning Strawman Combined!

Nobody is advocating for that.

Why not, it's the same thing.

Since I assume you will pretend to support freedom of speech, that means you support books that call black people the N-word, right?

The first amendment doesnt always apply once you voluntarily engage in commerce

For some reason, its hard for the socially conservative mind to allow for facts and data making them learn.

This is such a misinterpretation of the RFRA. It doesn't enable violating existing anti-discrimination laws. It just provides a legal defense in case one is sued and requires the government to show that laws do not place an undo burden on one's religious beliefs.

Im sorry....i was respondi g to a post by userhandle bripat.

Not the "rfra."

Peace.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Because I don't want a larger ticket, or to even be arrested, and since it's the law, I pull over. He could be armed with a stuffed animal and I would do the same, it's the law, dummies.

They won't be armed with a stuffed animal will they?

Would it matter? They have a big fancy car with flashing lights and a radio. To me that says pull over, and that's what the law says. That happened to me just a few months ago, no gun came out and the cop was very polite. So, where is this gun to the head thing coming from?

Show me where I ever said "gun to the head" those were your words, not mine.

Well, that's what it sounds like with all this "the government is forcing me at gunpoint" stuff, and I rarely, if ever, see anything of the kind.

I'm only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to read into it. Are you saying governments don't use coercion and force of arms?

It uses, and is supposed to, one vastly more often than the other. The letter, the law, not the gun, in the vast majority of cases.

 

[bripat9643]

I'm pretty sure Adlai Stevenson is one of PMH's Liberal hero's. Too bad he doesn't understand the wisdom he expressed in this comment:

"A free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular."

I understand it very well, but I very much doubt he would have supported the No ******* gas station eh?

Red Herring and Burning Strawman Combined!

Nobody is advocating for that.

Why not, it's the same thing.

Since I assume you will pretend to support freedom of speech, that means you support books that call black people the N-word, right?

The first amendment doesnt always apply once you voluntarily engage in commerce

Horseshit. Where does the Bill of Rights say that?

For some reason, its hard for the socially conservative mind to allow for facts and data making them learn.

You mean like this rule you just made up?

 

[bripat9643]

They won't be armed with a stuffed animal will they?

Would it matter? They have a big fancy car with flashing lights and a radio. To me that says pull over, and that's what the law says. That happened to me just a few months ago, no gun came out and the cop was very polite. So, where is this gun to the head thing coming from?

Show me where I ever said "gun to the head" those were your words, not mine.

Well, that's what it sounds like with all this "the government is forcing me at gunpoint" stuff, and I rarely, if ever, see anything of the kind.

I'm only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to read into it. Are you saying governments don't use coercion and force of arms?

It uses, and is supposed to, one vastly more often than the other. The letter, the law, not the gun, in the vast majority of cases.

ROFL! What a ******* weasel. So you admit that all laws are enforced with guns.

 

[G.T.]

I understand it very well, but I very much doubt he would have supported the No ******* gas station eh?

Red Herring and Burning Strawman Combined!

Nobody is advocating for that.

Why not, it's the same thing.

Since I assume you will pretend to support freedom of speech, that means you support books that call black people the N-word, right?

The first amendment doesnt always apply once you voluntarily engage in commerce

Horseshit. Where does the Bill of Rights say that?

For some reason, its hard for the socially conservative mind to allow for facts and data making them learn.

You mean like this rule you just made up?

The bill of rights?

Its in the case law regarding the constitution. Maybe youve heard of it.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You don't live in that country, no one does, since everyone has regulated capitalism.

It's true, we don't live in a free country. We live in a fascist police state. I've been saying that for years. This whole queer "right to force business owners to serve them" thing is a classic example.

People said the same thing when they were forced to serve *******, and Jews, and Catholics.

They may have, and if they did they were right. Forcing any person to do what he doesn't want is fascism, even if they are loathsome worms like you who say Jews are scum.

Just more of you not living in the real world, where we have laws against such things.

Not in Indiana. So apparently the queers who are whining about their "right to be served" are "not living in the real world."

Give it another day or so. The new bill, which covers gays and gender identity, is still being passed so that Pence can sign it.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Would it matter? They have a big fancy car with flashing lights and a radio. To me that says pull over, and that's what the law says. That happened to me just a few months ago, no gun came out and the cop was very polite. So, where is this gun to the head thing coming from?

Show me where I ever said "gun to the head" those were your words, not mine.

Well, that's what it sounds like with all this "the government is forcing me at gunpoint" stuff, and I rarely, if ever, see anything of the kind.

I'm only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to read into it. Are you saying governments don't use coercion and force of arms?

It uses, and is supposed to, one vastly more often than the other. The letter, the law, not the gun, in the vast majority of cases.

ROFL! What a ******* weasel. So you admit that all laws are enforced with guns.

No, didn't say that at all. Most laws never need anything like a gun, people simply follow the law.

 

[paulitician]

The massive coordinated Gay Propaganda campaign has played itself out. Most Americans are completely sick of it. Gays aren't seen as the victim anymore. Now they're seen as the bully. They've pushed too much. It's 'The boy who cried Wolf' now. Most just want them to STFU. Enough is enough already. SHEESH!

Agreed. And sadly, they are a minority. The younger generations are far more accepting of gays, and in the natural course of time, legislation has addressed many gay rights issues. The racial faction wants to force feed the process, which actually alienates many who may have supported changes in the law.

It's old & tired now. Everywhere you look on TV, Movies, and so on, it's blatant coordinated aggressive Gay Propaganda. It's too much. The People are over it. It really is just a 'Boy who cried Wolf' scenario now. Time to move on.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Horseshit. Where does the Bill of Rights say that?

LOL! It doesn't... but the High Priests of Anti-Americanism... say that when the Founders sought to protect the rights of the individual from government usurpation, what they REALLY intended to do was to empower the government to usurp the rights of individuals.

You understand ...