Africans Did Not Write The United States Constitution

[sparky]

Africans have nothing to do with it.

nope

cuz they wuz in Africa

~S~

 

[yidnar]

I'm talking in general. It never fails that one of you decide to trot out how there is slavery in Africa when we are talking about white racism in America.

can you guarantee that none of your ancestors in Africa werent selling slaves off the coast ? that none of your relatives were profiting and selling slaves to the white man ? like it or not you may have black slave traders in your family history !

 

[IM2]

nope

cuz they wuz in Africa

~S~

That's the point. Cuz we're talking about white racism in America.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Actually, you have every ability to control your hatred of white people.

It's just that you refuse to do so because you refuse to take responsibility for anything you do and all your phony accusations of racism are allowing you to be as irresponsible as you choose. .

Yet you apparently have no ability to control your obsessive imagination which causes you to hallucinate and see things that aren't there inclulding the false allegations against others who apparently intimidate you.

Post one comment of mine where I claim to "hate white people".

And careful, your insecurities are showing

 

[Kosh]

That's the point. Cuz we're talking about white racism in America.

So you are white?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

nope

cuz they wuz in Africa

~S~

Thanks that's funny because we can't talk about events that shape our current times if they didn't occur in the last few decades.

 

[IM2]

So you are white?

More from the villiage idiot. Junior let me tell you about your republican party and blacks.

ALL RISE

Tonght's Short bus special ed lesson is titled:

I REPEAT, BLACKS WERE REPUBLICAN FOR 100 YEARS!
And what did we get?

Republicans today love telling blacks how the Democratic Party was pro-slavery and how it was the Republican Party that freed the slaves. There is a lot modern republicans choose not to tell blacks as they try luring us into supporting a move back into Jim Crow. First, not all Republicans were for racial equality. The Radical Republicans were for the eradication of slavery. They were not conservatives. Frederick Douglass was a Radical Republican. Lincoln was moderate politically. He opposed the expansion of slavery but did not believe in racial equality.

"I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause] ... I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

Those who have studied Lincoln claim that his views evolved. Did they? The Second Confiscation Act in 1862 had provisions for the colonization of blacks who chose to leave. Both Dr. Henry Louis Gates and the 1619 Project have written about a meeting between blacks and Lincoln whereby he made insulting comments to them, blamed blacks for the Civil War, and demanded they accept his plan to resettle blacks outside of America. According to both sources, on Aug. 14, 1862, Lincoln met with black representatives at the White House to try getting blacks to accept getting shipped out of the country. They refused.

Once Abraham Lincoln was elected, Southern states started leaving. Between Lincoln's victory and his inauguration, seven states seceded. They knew his opposition to slavery could mean the end of the practice. As the country began splitting up, a great panic started consuming the outgoing Buchanan administration and members of congress. They wanted to keep the union together. They did not want the south to leave. They did not want war. President Buchanan declared secession was a constitutional crisis and then asked Congress to develop a plan to keep the south in the union. He wanted Congress to assure the southern states that slavery would be protected once Lincoln took office. Congress offered over 50 different proposals trying to keep the union together. In the end, congress settled for a proposal by Republican Thomas Corwin. It is called the Corwin Amendment, or more accurately, the slavery amendment.

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

The Corwin Amendment was proposed in 1861. It passed both houses of Congress and was then signed by President Buchanan on his way out of office. When Lincoln took over, he supported the Amendment.

“I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service ... holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.”

So the story of republicans freeing the slaves and the democratic party being the party of slavery is not really an honest depiction.

As it appeared the south would lose, the attempt to ratify the amendment was withdrawn from consideration by states due to a senate resolution, ending the effort to ratify The Corwin Amendment. Had the south accepted the terms of The Corwin Amendment, it would have become the thirteenth amendment. America came very close to making slavery a constitutionally protected practice that could only have been repealed by passage of a new amendment with votes by 2/3rds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by 3/4ths of the states. That has only happened once in American history-the repeal of prohibition.

Point number 1: Republicans authored an amendment making slavery a constitutionally protected activity. The Republican Party is the party of The Corwin Amendment that would have made slavery constitutional.

In 1876, America celebrated its 100th birthday. In that same year, there was an election. If you think the 2020 election was crazy, let’s just say that the 1876 election made 2020 look normal except for the insurrection. The 1876 election offered Samuel Tilden from the Democratic party and Rutherford Hayes from the Republican party. Tilden won the popular vote but needed at least 185 electoral votes to become president. He got stuck at 184. Hayes had 166, but 19 unawarded electoral votes remained after the popular vote. The 19 votes belonged to South Carolina, Florida, and Louisiana. To get those 19 votes, Hayes promised to end reconstruction. This promise is known as the 1877 Compromise.

The conditions of the 1877 Compromise are as follows: Hayes would remove federal troops and allow southern states home rule. Rutherford’s agreement to withdraw federal troops took away the protection the newly freed blacks had in the south from physical violence and nullified or ended constitutional protections blacks had due to the Union victory. Allowing the south home rule meant the Republican Party would no longer intervene in local issues in the south. At that point, the Republican Party first turned its back on blacks and ended its commitment to black civil rights in the south.

Point number 2: A Republican president, with the support of the Republican Party, ended reconstruction. The Republican Party is the party of the 1877 Compromise that ended reconstruction and paved the way for Jim Crow.

During the Civil War period, Radical Republicans had great power and were able to get initiatives passed providing blacks with civil rights. The pressure from Radical Republicans was responsible for creating the 14th Amendment and the implementation of the Reconstruction Acts over President Johnson's veto. These two actions allowed protection to the newly freed blacks. The influence of the Radical Republicans was gone once reconstruction ended, and the republican party began to turn away from issues affecting blacks. Southern white Republicans resented that the party had become the “black folks party” to use the kindest description, and felt that they needed to gain support from southern whites to become national. As blacks gained power and started winning elections, white resistance increased, and as a result, there was a backlash against southern black republicans called the lily-white movement.

“The lily-white movement was an all-white faction of the Republican Party in the Southern United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It battled and usually defeated the biracial element called the Black-and-tan faction.

During Reconstruction, following the U.S. Civil War, black leaders in Texas and around the country gained increasing influence in the Republican Party by organizing blacks as an important voting bloc. Conservative whites attempted to eliminate this influence and recover white voters who had defected to the Democratic Party. The effort was largely successful in eliminating African-American influence in the Republican Party leading to black voters predominantly migrating to the Democratic Party for much of the 20th century.

The term lily-white movement was coined by Texas Republican leader Norris Wright Cuney, who used the term in an 1888 Republican convention to describe efforts by white conservatives to oust blacks from positions of Texas party leadership and incite riots to divide the party.[1] The term came to be used nationally to describe this ongoing movement as it further developed in the early 20th century, including through the administration of Herbert Hoover. Localized movements began immediately after the war but by the beginning of the 20th century the effort had become national.” “This movement is largely credited with driving blacks out of the Republican party during the early 20th century, setting the stage for their eventual support of the Democrats.”

Point number 3: Once blacks got a foothold in the Republican Party and gained some semblance of political equality, white republicans took steps to purge blacks from leadership positions in the party.

From the end of slavery until President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act, there were 20 presidents, counting Johnson. Twelve Republicans, eight Democrats. Throughout those 100 years, Republican administrations were not friends with blacks. The general opinion on both sides was that blacks had no place. A Republican may have ended slavery on paper, but lynching, convict leasing, and black codes continued in Republican administrations. During this same period, Apartheid became the law of the land.

There were still blacks who stayed faithful to the Republican Party after years of the party ignoring blacks and breaking promises. Until 1964. That was when a Democrat signed what amounted to our second Emancipation Proclamation when President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act. Members of today’s Republican Party tell a tale about republican support for the Civil Rights and Voting Rights act. They spin a fabulous story about a democratic filibuster and will say that by percentage more democrats opposed these bills than republicans. As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 democrats and 139 republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the house. In the senate, 46 democrats and 27 republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act. In the house, 221 democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 112 republicans did. In the senate, 47 democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 30 republicans did.

By 1964 there were blacks whose families had been Republicans since emancipation. They stayed faithful to a party that really did nothing for blacks after Lincoln signed the proclamation. While Republican, blacks endured Jim Crow Apartheid nationwide, redlining, restrictive covenants, acts of terror, white instigated racial violence, and the refusal to respect the constitutional rights of black people. Despite years of loyal black support, in 1964, Republicans nominated Barry Goldwater for president. His nomination was a slap in the face of black people. Goldwater voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. When we got civil rights, republicans decided that extremism in defense of liberty was patriotism, turned their backs on us, and began letting southern white racists become part of the party.

Point number 4: Republicans consistently broke promises or ignored issues that affected black people. In 1964 the Republican Party turned its back on blacks after nearly 100 years of black support.

On December 6, 2019, The House of Representatives passed H.R. 4, the Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019, by a vote of 228-186. This bill was proposed to undo the damage caused by the Roberts Supreme Court 2013 decision. There were 187 Republicans in the House of Representatives in 2019. One Republican voted for this bill, Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania. In 2021, The John Lewis Voting Rights Act was opposed by every Republican in the senate. Senate Republicans wouldn’t even let the bill come to the floor for debate. They filibustered the John Lewis Voting Rights Act like Dixiecrats did the Voting Rights Act in 1965.

So you see son, when you come at the champ like a chump, you get schooled. I know all about what republicans have not done. This has nothing to do with white elites junior. These are the facts of history, documented and posted for your candy ---. So take your little leftist slave mess elsewhere.

 

[Kosh]

More from the villiage idiot. Junior let me tell you about your republican party and blacks.

ALL RISE

Tonght's Short bus special ed lesson is titled:

I REPEAT, BLACKS WERE REPUBLICAN FOR 100 YEARS!
And what did we get?

Republicans today love telling blacks how the Democratic Party was pro-slavery and how it was the Republican Party that freed the slaves. There is a lot modern republicans choose not to tell blacks as they try luring us into supporting a move back into Jim Crow. First, not all Republicans were for racial equality. The Radical Republicans were for the eradication of slavery. They were not conservatives. Frederick Douglass was a Radical Republican. Lincoln was moderate politically. He opposed the expansion of slavery but did not believe in racial equality.

"I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause] ... I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

Those who have studied Lincoln claim that his views evolved. Did they? The Second Confiscation Act in 1862 had provisions for the colonization of blacks who chose to leave. Both Dr. Henry Louis Gates and the 1619 Project have written about a meeting between blacks and Lincoln whereby he made insulting comments to them, blamed blacks for the Civil War, and demanded they accept his plan to resettle blacks outside of America. According to both sources, on Aug. 14, 1862, Lincoln met with black representatives at the White House to try getting blacks to accept getting shipped out of the country. They refused.

Once Abraham Lincoln was elected, Southern states started leaving. Between Lincoln's victory and his inauguration, seven states seceded. They knew his opposition to slavery could mean the end of the practice. As the country began splitting up, a great panic started consuming the outgoing Buchanan administration and members of congress. They wanted to keep the union together. They did not want the south to leave. They did not want war. President Buchanan declared secession was a constitutional crisis and then asked Congress to develop a plan to keep the south in the union. He wanted Congress to assure the southern states that slavery would be protected once Lincoln took office. Congress offered over 50 different proposals trying to keep the union together. In the end, congress settled for a proposal by Republican Thomas Corwin. It is called the Corwin Amendment, or more accurately, the slavery amendment.

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

The Corwin Amendment was proposed in 1861. It passed both houses of Congress and was then signed by President Buchanan on his way out of office. When Lincoln took over, he supported the Amendment.

“I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service ... holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.”

So the story of republicans freeing the slaves and the democratic party being the party of slavery is not really an honest depiction.

As it appeared the south would lose, the attempt to ratify the amendment was withdrawn from consideration by states due to a senate resolution, ending the effort to ratify The Corwin Amendment. Had the south accepted the terms of The Corwin Amendment, it would have become the thirteenth amendment. America came very close to making slavery a constitutionally protected practice that could only have been repealed by passage of a new amendment with votes by 2/3rds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by 3/4ths of the states. That has only happened once in American history-the repeal of prohibition.

Point number 1: Republicans authored an amendment making slavery a constitutionally protected activity. The Republican Party is the party of The Corwin Amendment that would have made slavery constitutional.

In 1876, America celebrated its 100th birthday. In that same year, there was an election. If you think the 2020 election was crazy, let’s just say that the 1876 election made 2020 look normal except for the insurrection. The 1876 election offered Samuel Tilden from the Democratic party and Rutherford Hayes from the Republican party. Tilden won the popular vote but needed at least 185 electoral votes to become president. He got stuck at 184. Hayes had 166, but 19 unawarded electoral votes remained after the popular vote. The 19 votes belonged to South Carolina, Florida, and Louisiana. To get those 19 votes, Hayes promised to end reconstruction. This promise is known as the 1877 Compromise.

The conditions of the 1877 Compromise are as follows: Hayes would remove federal troops and allow southern states home rule. Rutherford’s agreement to withdraw federal troops took away the protection the newly freed blacks had in the south from physical violence and nullified or ended constitutional protections blacks had due to the Union victory. Allowing the south home rule meant the Republican Party would no longer intervene in local issues in the south. At that point, the Republican Party first turned its back on blacks and ended its commitment to black civil rights in the south.

Point number 2: A Republican president, with the support of the Republican Party, ended reconstruction. The Republican Party is the party of the 1877 Compromise that ended reconstruction and paved the way for Jim Crow.

During the Civil War period, Radical Republicans had great power and were able to get initiatives passed providing blacks with civil rights. The pressure from Radical Republicans was responsible for creating the 14th Amendment and the implementation of the Reconstruction Acts over President Johnson's veto. These two actions allowed protection to the newly freed blacks. The influence of the Radical Republicans was gone once reconstruction ended, and the republican party began to turn away from issues affecting blacks. Southern white Republicans resented that the party had become the “black folks party” to use the kindest description, and felt that they needed to gain support from southern whites to become national. As blacks gained power and started winning elections, white resistance increased, and as a result, there was a backlash against southern black republicans called the lily-white movement.

“The lily-white movement was an all-white faction of the Republican Party in the Southern United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It battled and usually defeated the biracial element called the Black-and-tan faction.

During Reconstruction, following the U.S. Civil War, black leaders in Texas and around the country gained increasing influence in the Republican Party by organizing blacks as an important voting bloc. Conservative whites attempted to eliminate this influence and recover white voters who had defected to the Democratic Party. The effort was largely successful in eliminating African-American influence in the Republican Party leading to black voters predominantly migrating to the Democratic Party for much of the 20th century.

The term lily-white movement was coined by Texas Republican leader Norris Wright Cuney, who used the term in an 1888 Republican convention to describe efforts by white conservatives to oust blacks from positions of Texas party leadership and incite riots to divide the party.[1] The term came to be used nationally to describe this ongoing movement as it further developed in the early 20th century, including through the administration of Herbert Hoover. Localized movements began immediately after the war but by the beginning of the 20th century the effort had become national.” “This movement is largely credited with driving blacks out of the Republican party during the early 20th century, setting the stage for their eventual support of the Democrats.”

Point number 3: Once blacks got a foothold in the Republican Party and gained some semblance of political equality, white republicans took steps to purge blacks from leadership positions in the party.

From the end of slavery until President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act, there were 20 presidents, counting Johnson. Twelve Republicans, eight Democrats. Throughout those 100 years, Republican administrations were not friends with blacks. The general opinion on both sides was that blacks had no place. A Republican may have ended slavery on paper, but lynching, convict leasing, and black codes continued in Republican administrations. During this same period, Apartheid became the law of the land.

There were still blacks who stayed faithful to the Republican Party after years of the party ignoring blacks and breaking promises. Until 1964. That was when a Democrat signed what amounted to our second Emancipation Proclamation when President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act. Members of today’s Republican Party tell a tale about republican support for the Civil Rights and Voting Rights act. They spin a fabulous story about a democratic filibuster and will say that by percentage more democrats opposed these bills than republicans. As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 democrats and 139 republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the house. In the senate, 46 democrats and 27 republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act. In the house, 221 democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 112 republicans did. In the senate, 47 democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 30 republicans did.

By 1964 there were blacks whose families had been Republicans since emancipation. They stayed faithful to a party that really did nothing for blacks after Lincoln signed the proclamation. While Republican, blacks endured Jim Crow Apartheid nationwide, redlining, restrictive covenants, acts of terror, white instigated racial violence, and the refusal to respect the constitutional rights of black people. Despite years of loyal black support, in 1964, Republicans nominated Barry Goldwater for president. His nomination was a slap in the face of black people. Goldwater voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. When we got civil rights, republicans decided that extremism in defense of liberty was patriotism, turned their backs on us, and began letting southern white racists become part of the party.

Point number 4: Republicans consistently broke promises or ignored issues that affected black people. In 1964 the Republican Party turned its back on blacks after nearly 100 years of black support.

On December 6, 2019, The House of Representatives passed H.R. 4, the Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019, by a vote of 228-186. This bill was proposed to undo the damage caused by the Roberts Supreme Court 2013 decision. There were 187 Republicans in the House of Representatives in 2019. One Republican voted for this bill, Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania. In 2021, The John Lewis Voting Rights Act was opposed by every Republican in the senate. Senate Republicans wouldn’t even let the bill come to the floor for debate. They filibustered the John Lewis Voting Rights Act like Dixiecrats did the Voting Rights Act in 1965.

So you see son, when you come at the champ like a chump, you get schooled. I know all about what republicans have not done. This has nothing to do with white elites junior. These are the facts of history, documented and posted for your candy ---. So take your little leftist slave mess elsewhere.

Since this is not your work, please cite the link to which you stole this from

So many errors in this propaganda piece, and you prove that you are on the far left cult plantation.

13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Abolition of Slavery | National Archives

www.archives.gov

Civil Rights Act (1964)

EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Civil Rights Act of 1964; 7/2/1964; Enrolled Acts and Resolutions of Congress, 1789 - 2011; General Records of the United States Government, Record Group 11; National Archives Building, Washington, DC. View All Pages in the National Archives Catalog View Transcript...

www.archives.gov

Text - H.R.4 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019

Text for H.R.4 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019

www.congress.gov

Text - H.R.4 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2021

Text for H.R.4 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2021

www.congress.gov

I was correct you are a slave of the far left and their religious dogma.

 

[IM2]

Since this is not your work, please cite the link to which you stole this from

So many errors in this propaganda piece, and you prove that you are on the far left cult plantation.

13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Abolition of Slavery | National Archives

www.archives.gov

Civil Rights Act (1964)

EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Civil Rights Act of 1964; 7/2/1964; Enrolled Acts and Resolutions of Congress, 1789 - 2011; General Records of the United States Government, Record Group 11; National Archives Building, Washington, DC. View All Pages in the National Archives Catalog View Transcript...

www.archives.gov

Text - H.R.4 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019

Text for H.R.4 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019

www.congress.gov

Text - H.R.4 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2021

Text for H.R.4 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2021

www.congress.gov

I was correct you are a slave of the far left and their religious dogma.

No son, there are no errors. The republican party is the party of the Corwin Amendment. The 1877 Compromise ended Reconstruction, The Civil Rights Cases pretty much nullified the 13th Amendment and convict leasing became the new slavery.

The vote totals for the Civil and voting rights are as documents in the congressional records, the voting rights improvement bill was voted for by 1 republican and the republicans filibustered the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. All these things are fact. You posted the 13th amendment that happened in 1865. The Corwin Amendment was passed 4 years earlier and it never got ratified.

You just got your ass handed to you and can't face it.

Arthur Zilversmit, Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations, Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, Volume 2, Issue 1, 1980, pp. 22-45, Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations

Henry Louis Gates Jr., Did Lincoln Want to Ship Black People Back to Africa? https://www.theroot.com/did-lincoln-want-to-ship-black people-back-to-africa-1790858389

The Corwin Amendment, The Corwin Amendment - The Heritage Post

Robert Longley, The Corwin Amendment, Enslavement, and Abraham Lincoln, Updated July 24, 2019, How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

The Reconstruction Act, Reconstruction Acts passed by Congress ***

Louis Kleber, The Presidential Election of 1876, History Today Volume 20 Issue 11 November 1970, The Presidential Election of 1876 | History Today

The Compromise of 1877, The Compromise of 1877 (article) | Khan Academy

Jeff Charles, Lily-White Movement: Why Black Americans Left The GOP, Liberty Nation News, April 02, 2021, Lily-White Movement: Why Black Americans Left the GOP

Lily-white movement, https://www.americanhistoryusa.com/topic/lily-white-movement/

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- Jun 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A … -- House Vote #182 -- Jul 2, 1964.

TO PASS S. 1564, The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, May 26, 1965, TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965 .

TO PASS H.R. 6400, The 1965 Voting Rights Act, Jul 9, 1965, TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- Jul 9, 1965 .

116TH CONGRESS, 1ST SESSION, Roll Call 654, Bill Number: H. R. 4, Voting Rights Advancement Act, DEC 06, 2019, Roll Call 654 Roll Call 654, Bill Number: H. R. 4, 116th Congress, 1st Session

Josh Israel, Every Senate Republican just voted against voting rights — again, American Independent, January 20, 2022, Every Senate Republican just voted against voting rights — again

You ran your mouth and what you have found tonight is that you ran your mouth to the wrong person.

 

[Kosh]

No son, there are no errors. The republican party is the party of the Corwin Amendment. The 1877 Compromise ended Reconstruction, The Civil Rights Cases pretty much nullified the 13th Amendment and convict leasing became the new slavery.

The vote totals for the Civil and voting rights are as documents in the congressional records, the voting rights improvement bill was voted for by 1 republican and the republicans filibustered the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. All these things are fact. You posted the 13th amendment that happened in 1865. The Corwin Amendment was passed 4 years earlier and it never got ratified.

You just got your ass handed to you and can't face it.

So you can not cite your propaganda piece.

Mine is cited and shows almost the opposite of your propaganda piece.

Just like Democrats in the south were against the civil rights bill in 1964.

You are a slave of the far left and the propaganda you posted without citation proves it.

Yes the devil is in the details, not in the name of the bill.

So you going to show citations or not?

 

[IM2]

So you can not cite your propaganda piece.

Mine is cited and shows almost the opposite of your propaganda piece.

Just like Democrats in the south were against the civil rights bill in 1964.

You are a slave of the far left and the propaganda you posted without citation proves it.

Yes the devil is in the details, not in the name of the bill.

So you going to show citations or not?

You see all the citations.

STFU.

You got your ass whipped. Everything I said was correct.

You're a slave to right wing bs and disinformation.

One more dumb white loser.

 

[IM2]

So you can not cite your propaganda piece.

Mine is cited and shows almost the opposite of your propaganda piece.

Just like Democrats in the south were against the civil rights bill in 1964.

You are a slave of the far left and the propaganda you posted without citation proves it.

Yes the devil is in the details, not in the name of the bill.

So you going to show citations or not?

Arthur Zilversmit, Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations, Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, Volume 2, Issue 1, 1980, pp. 22-45, Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations

Henry Louis Gates Jr., Did Lincoln Want to Ship Black People Back to Africa? https://www.theroot.com/did-lincoln-want-to-ship-black people-back-to-africa-1790858389

The Corwin Amendment, The Corwin Amendment - The Heritage Post

Robert Longley, The Corwin Amendment, Enslavement, and Abraham Lincoln, Updated July 24, 2019, How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

The Reconstruction Act, Reconstruction Acts passed by Congress ***

Louis Kleber, The Presidential Election of 1876, History Today Volume 20 Issue 11 November 1970, The Presidential Election of 1876 | History Today

The Compromise of 1877, The Compromise of 1877 (article) | Khan Academy

Jeff Charles, Lily-White Movement: Why Black Americans Left The GOP, Liberty Nation News, April 02, 2021, Lily-White Movement: Why Black Americans Left the GOP

Lily-white movement, https://www.americanhistoryusa.com/topic/lily-white-movement/

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- Jun 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A … -- House Vote #182 -- Jul 2, 1964.

TO PASS S. 1564, The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, May 26, 1965, TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965 .

TO PASS H.R. 6400, The 1965 Voting Rights Act, Jul 9, 1965, TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- Jul 9, 1965 .

116TH CONGRESS, 1ST SESSION, Roll Call 654, Bill Number: H. R. 4, Voting Rights Advancement Act, DEC 06, 2019, Roll Call 654 Roll Call 654, Bill Number: H. R. 4, 116th Congress, 1st Session

Josh Israel, Every Senate Republican just voted against voting rights — again, American Independent, January 20, 2022, Every Senate Republican just voted against voting rights — again

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Since this is not your work, please cite the link to which you stole this from

So many errors in this propaganda piece, and you prove that you are on the far left cult plantation.

13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Abolition of Slavery | National Archives

www.archives.gov

Civil Rights Act (1964)

EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Civil Rights Act of 1964; 7/2/1964; Enrolled Acts and Resolutions of Congress, 1789 - 2011; General Records of the United States Government, Record Group 11; National Archives Building, Washington, DC. View All Pages in the National Archives Catalog View Transcript...

www.archives.gov

Text - H.R.4 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019

Text for H.R.4 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019

www.congress.gov

Text - H.R.4 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2021

Text for H.R.4 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2021

www.congress.gov

I was correct you are a slave of the far left and their religious dogma.

Why are you citing the 13th Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the various Voting Rights Acts without any commentary?

Do you honestly think we're not familiar with these acts/laws?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

So you can not cite your propaganda piece.

Mine is cited and shows almost the opposite of your propaganda piece.

Just like Democrats in the south were against the civil rights bill in 1964.

You are a slave of the far left and the propaganda you posted without citation proves it.

Yes the devil is in the details, not in the name of the bill.

So you going to show citations or not?

LOL Propaganda piece? Let me guess, a high school drop-out?

 

[Kosh]

Why are you citing the 13th Amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the various Voting Rights Acts without any commentary?

Do you honestly think we're not familiar with these acts/laws?

Yes!

AS it has already been shown, but you skipped over the other far left cult members commentary.

All I needed to do was post it to debunk the far left propaganda!

 

[Kosh]

LOL Propaganda piece? Let me guess, a high school drop-out?

Yes it is a propaganda piece, no citations, no link to the original works.

Far left propaganda and the cult believes without question.

 

[IM2]

Yes!

AS it has already been shown, but you skipped over the other far left cult members commentary.

All I needed to do was post it to debunk the far left propaganda!

You haven't debunked anything. You can't.

 

[Kosh]

Arthur Zilversmit, Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations, Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, Volume 2, Issue 1, 1980, pp. 22-45, Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations

Henry Louis Gates Jr., Did Lincoln Want to Ship Black People Back to Africa? https://www.theroot.com/did-lincoln-want-to-ship-black people-back-to-africa-1790858389

The Corwin Amendment, The Corwin Amendment - The Heritage Post

Robert Longley, The Corwin Amendment, Enslavement, and Abraham Lincoln, Updated July 24, 2019, How the Corwin Amendment of 1861 Would Have Protected Enslavement

The Reconstruction Act, Reconstruction Acts passed by Congress ***

Louis Kleber, The Presidential Election of 1876, History Today Volume 20 Issue 11 November 1970, The Presidential Election of 1876 | History Today

The Compromise of 1877, The Compromise of 1877 (article) | Khan Academy

Jeff Charles, Lily-White Movement: Why Black Americans Left The GOP, Liberty Nation News, April 02, 2021, Lily-White Movement: Why Black Americans Left the GOP

Lily-white movement, https://www.americanhistoryusa.com/topic/lily-white-movement/

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- Jun 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A … -- House Vote #182 -- Jul 2, 1964.

TO PASS S. 1564, The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, May 26, 1965, TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965 .

TO PASS H.R. 6400, The 1965 Voting Rights Act, Jul 9, 1965, TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- Jul 9, 1965 .

116TH CONGRESS, 1ST SESSION, Roll Call 654, Bill Number: H. R. 4, Voting Rights Advancement Act, DEC 06, 2019, Roll Call 654 Roll Call 654, Bill Number: H. R. 4, 116th Congress, 1st Session

Josh Israel, Every Senate Republican just voted against voting rights — again, American Independent, January 20, 2022, Every Senate Republican just voted against voting rights — again

Thank you for showing the opinion piece is just what I said, opinion and propaganda,

Since you do not understand how to read bills, I can see why you just believe what the far left tells you.

 

[IM2]

Yes it is a propaganda piece, no citations, no link to the original works.

Far left propaganda and the cult believes without question.

So you're just going to scroll past the links and lie.

 

[Kosh]

You haven't debunked anything. You can't.

I did very easily and I have, you just posted far left propaganda that is based on opinion and not based on fact.