Advances in batteries/energy thread

You are on crack. You cannot have reserves of something that does not occur naturally.

If lithium doesn't occur naturally, then where does it come from? Did space aliens place it here?
It comes from chemically processing minerals such as spodumene or petalite/castorite and more recently saltwater. Unlike the clueless parrots posting say it is produced primarily outside the US as it cannot be found in North America. The only place here where it is extracted in limited amounts is from brine pools in Nevada.

Two or three years ago, you would have been correct;

The Bolivian dream lithium batteries included GlobalPost

LA PAZ, Bolivia — Is Bolivia poised to become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” the vital ingredient in batteries for smartphones and electric cars?

The Uyuni salt flats, stretching across a remote Andean plateau in the southwest of the country, are easily the world’s largest reserve of the soft, light, whitish metal coveted by high-tech firms from Silicon Valley to Tokyo.

This year, President Evo Morales has moved swiftly ahead with plans to finally begin reaping a potential lithium windfall of billions of dollars for the impoverished South American nation.

In January, Bolivia opened its first trial plant. It will produce 40 tons of lithium carbonate a year. Over time, the government wants to ramp production up to 30,000 tons — roughly a fifth of current global demand.

However, Bolivia faces a series of technical challenges.

Uyuni’s lithium deposits are unusually salty and humid, with the entire salt flats flooded by seasonal rainfall every February and resembling an endless mirror perfectly reflecting the sky.

The lithium is mixed with magnesium, complicating the extraction process. The remote location will raise the cost of bringing in energy, water and other inputs.

But that was yesterday

Massive deposit of lithium found in Wyoming could meet all U.S. demand TreeHugger

First, production of lithium from brines requires soda ash (sodium carbonate), and importation of soda ash to lithium production facilities often represents a large expense. However, the Rock Springs Uplift CO2 storage site is located within 20 to 30 miles of the world’s largest industrial soda ash supplies, so the costs of soda ash delivery (by rail, truck or pipeline) would be minimal.

Second, magnesium must be removed from brines before they can be used for lithium recovery, which makes the entire lithium recovery process more expensive. Fortunately, the brines from the Rock Springs Uplift reservoirs contain much less magnesium than brines at existing, currently profitable lithium mining operations.

Third, brines must be heated and pressurized before lithium can be extracted from them. However, because the Rock Springs Uplift brines lie so far underground, they are already at a higher pressure and temperature than brines at existing lithium operations. This would allow operators to essentially eliminate this step in the process, resulting in significant cost savings. (source)

Lithium the Salton Sea and a startup that 8217 s trying to change the game mdash Tech News and Analysis

The project is only at the demonstration scale right now, but the company plans to build a much larger (1,000 times larger in terms of volume produced) commercial-scale factory just south of the current one that could eventually create 15,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent a year. Lithium carbonate is one of the two lithium products that Simbol’s tech can deliver; the other is lithium hydroxide. Depending on the type of battery chemistry used, lithium ion battery makers would buy one or the other.
 
In a new Fortune report interviewing President of Vorbeck Materials, John Lettow, we learn that fully charging a smartphone in ten minutes flat is only about two years away. Here's to hoping that Apple is working with this company or has a similar plan on the drawing board in their secret lab, because this kind of battery breakthrough could be a game changer for the industry. Graphene based Batteries Could Charge an iPhone in 10 Minutes - Patently Apple
 
Improved solar panels and printed electronics on the horizon with new discovery
11 hours ago by David Scott
solarpanels.jpg

New and improved solar panels could result from the discovery of a new liquid crystal material, making printable organic solar cells better performing.
lg.php

lg.php

Published today in Nature Communications, University of Melbourne researchers say their discovery of the highly sought-after 'nematic liquid crystals' can now lead to vastly improved organic solar cell performance.

Lead author Dr David Jones of the University's School of Chemistry and Bio 21 Institute, said these cells will be easier to manufacture, with the new crystals now able to work in cells that are double in thickness on the previous limit of 200 nanometers.

"We have improved the performance of this type of solar cell from around 8 per cent efficient to 9.3 per cent, finally approaching the international benchmark of 10 per cent."

Read more at: Improved solar panels and printed electronics on the horizon with new discovery
 
LENR power generation technology looks increasingly legitimate: Ecat reactor has been successfully replicated by an independent scientist for the first time (self.Futurology)

submitted 4 hours ago * by paxtana
Russian scientist Alexander Parkhomov has documented his results and presented them at a cold fusion seminar 2 weeks ago. More details will likely be revealed when he presents his findings on the 27th at a LENR Seminar at the Russian Nuclear Institute. Properly translated text available here.

I understand that many will still be skeptical of what would be a game-changing breakthrough in physics. Despite the multiple verifications from independent third parties, successful delivery of multiple 1MW powerplants to military and commercial customers, and the purchase of all intellectual property relating to it by a large American company. Skepticism may still be reasonable but reproducibility should not be casually dismissed.

So if it is true what does this mean for the future of energy? A rough estimate of cost to use an ecat powerplant puts it at $10/megawatt hour, about ten times cheaper than any currently used energy source.

Edited by request:
Press release showing Industrial Heat acquired all IP relating to Ecat technology
Latest 3rd party verification, 2014
Earlier verification 2013
A paper that briefly notes the current 1MW plants, one is a confidential military customer and the other is a commercial partner of Industrial Heat. After 1 year of operation (December 2015) the customer will publish findings of how well the plant worked out
Likely there are better sources for some of these links, if anyone wishes to look around. This was just the result of some quick googling.
 
Deep-fried graphene may be the key to long-lasting batteries
Deep-fried graphene may be the key to long-lasting batteries

jon-fingas-january-2013_24x24.jpg
by Jon Fingas | @jonfingas | January 18th 2015 at 11:52 pm


The deep frying process isn't just useful for livening up your food -- it might also be the ticket to better batteries in your mobile devices. South Korean researchers have created highly conductive, stable electrode materials by spraying graphene oxide droplets into a very hot blend of acid and organic solvent, much like you'd dip chicken into oil. The resulting "pom-poms" (what you see above) aren't at all tasty, but their open 3D structure makes them far better for transferring electrical charges than plain graphene.
 
It is affordable! And reportedly being developed!!! How amazing!! But...if it is in the process of being developed...how do we know it is ...affordable?

matthew, have you used this affordable technology to verify these maybes and possibles, or are you just advertising again?

I haven't used or tested this affordable techonology...I just enjoy reading and posting the latest advancement in science & tech. I feel such subjects improve the board as it is far better than the mindless political crap you see within the political section.
You post, "mindless", energy "crap".

I just paid 4 bucks for 4 AA batteries, in which 50 years of research resulted in said battery, so how much will I have to pay for these "magic" batteries that do not exist, enough batteries to power a house for a lifetime, its 4 bucks a simple light, a 100 dollars for a battery used a couple times a day to start a car, how much for these batteries that will supply a house 24/7 as well as industry.

Most likely a battery could never supply industry so you only speak of the burden of me, or the public, having to purchase many expensive, disposable batteries.

And what of industry, why should we be forced by the DICTATORSHIP of Government to buy expensive batteries by government created industry?

It is all garbage, ultimately all the batteries produced today are garbage as soon as tomorrow, I guess government can never produce enough garbage, huh?
 
Most research is funded by either government or corporation. Government has been funding research for over 100 years!

We wouldn't remain a world power without it. ;) China, india and all first world countries do this. Stop bitching, retarded losertrian.
 
No matter how much lithium is found in America it will not drive down the cost of batteries. Because Obama's EPA will not allow it to be mined.
Ah Henry, if you had a brain, you would be dangerous. We are presently mining lithium in the US, in Nevada. And the mining that you are refering to is done on a brine, the water that is left over then being pumped back down to the resovoir it came from. Often that water is hot, and used to drive geo-thermal plants for power. The Salton Sea plant is an example.
 
We are presently mining lithium in the US, in Nevada. And the mining that you are refering to is done on a brine, the water that is left over then being pumped back down to the resovoir it came from. Often that water is hot, and used to drive geo-thermal plants for power. The Salton Sea plant is an example.


OMG !!!

And nobody has told Algore?
 
Lithium-Sulfur Battery Performance Improved Via New Cathode Stabilization Strategy
Lithium-Sulfur Battery Performance Improved Via New Cathode Stabilization Strategy CleanTechnica

January 21st, 2015 by James Ayre
An effective new strategy to stabilizing the cathodes in lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries was recently developed by researchers at the University of Waterloo in Canada + BASF.

The new strategy allows for significantly improved cycle life performance, improving the number of times that the battery can be charged/discharged without losing significant capacity — which addresses one of the main issues with Li-S batteries, that the cathode degrades rapidly.
 
Most research is funded by either government or corporation. Government has been funding research for over 100 years!

We wouldn't remain a world power without it. ;) China, india and all first world countries do this. Stop bitching, retarded losertrian.
Most research is done by Governments, Free Governments, Democracy's or Dictators?

Funding research over a 100 years, great, got some examples?

Last I checked they did not fund Rockefeller or Tesla.

This is an energy forum, so..... Show us the Government research dollars back in the late 1800's.
 
No matter how much lithium is found in America it will not drive down the cost of batteries. Because Obama's EPA will not allow it to be mined.
Ah Henry, if you had a brain, you would be dangerous. We are presently mining lithium in the US, in Nevada. And the mining that you are refering to is done on a brine, the water that is left over then being pumped back down to the resovoir it came from. Often that water is hot, and used to drive geo-thermal plants for power. The Salton Sea plant is an example.
Liar, where is your LINK.
 
Lithium-Sulfur Battery Performance Improved Via New Cathode Stabilization Strategy
Lithium-Sulfur Battery Performance Improved Via New Cathode Stabilization Strategy CleanTechnica

January 21st, 2015 by James Ayre
An effective new strategy to stabilizing the cathodes in lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries was recently developed by researchers at the University of Waterloo in Canada + BASF.

The new strategy allows for significantly improved cycle life performance, improving the number of times that the battery can be charged/discharged without losing significant capacity — which addresses one of the main issues with Li-S batteries, that the cathode degrades rapidly.
Lithium is not RENEWABLE, hence an Industry dependent on Lithium will suffer Peak Lithium.

Oil can actually be made from plants, or animals, hence Oil has a better future than the Solar and Wind Industry who wish to increase the demand on Lithium.

So now we get to pay more for Cell Phones and Computers, anything with Lithium batteries will rise in price.
 
The more lithium diverted to battery production the harder it will be for liberals to stay on their meds. You think Paris was bad? Wait until a week or two after the lithium doses run out!
 

Forum List

Back
Top