Adressed To Democrat Voters: " they have been led astray by false gods"

You think Trump's ear was shot...interesting.

I will give you Scalise. And thats the thing, there are plenty of crazies to go around.
No I don’t think it.

There are plenty of crazies but it’s only one party that has embraced assassination culture and political violence…_’and that’s the Dem party
 
You think Trump's ear was shot...interesting.

I will give you Scalise. And thats the thing, there are plenty of crazies to go around.
The standard three responses from the savages, the Democrats who don't belive in our biblical roots, in the sanctity of human life, are these:

1. They celebrate the murders, as they did for Charlie Kirk

2. If the attempt is unsuccessful, the bemoan it

3. They claim it was staged......see this dolt's post about Butler,Pa.
 
The greatest lie they ever got away with is one that is responsible for the savage Democrats today:

That our Constitution demands separation of church and state.
 
The standard three responses from the savages, the Democrats who don't belive in our biblical roots, in the sanctity of human life, are these:

1. They celebrate the murders, as they did for Charlie Kirk

2. If the attempt is unsuccessful, the bemoan it

3. They claim it was staged......see this dolt's post about Butler,Pa.
It’s a true sign of cult behavior, denying reality to protect their cult
 
JFK, RFK, MLK, Harvey Mudd, etc. etc.
This is the fact:
Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal/Democrat- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.



a. John Wilkes Booth was opposed to President Lincoln’s Republican war policies. His letter to is family explained he was furious with Lincoln for having brought war to the South! THE MURDERER OF MR. LINCOLN.; Extraordinary Letter of John Wilkes Booth Proof that He Meditated His Crime Months Ago His Excuses for the Contemplated Act His Participation in the Execution of John Brown. Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction. Fires. The Seventh Ward Fire Note from Chief Engineer Decker. (Published 1865)

Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, “…an angry Copperhead, a.k.a., ‘peace democrat,’ (when that meant pro-slavery, of course.) John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia

liberapedia.wikia.com







John Wilkes Booth was the assassin of President Abraham Lincoln. (By Executive Order Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, which changed the federal legal status of more than 3 million enslaved people). Booth was a Confederate sympathizer during the Civil War and resented...liberapedia.wikia.com



"In the 1860s, the Copperheads comprised a vocal faction of Democrats in the Northern United States of the Union who opposed the American Civil War, wanting an immediate peace settlement with the Confederates. Republicans started calling anti-war Democrats "Copperheads", likening them to the venomous snake."

en.wikipedia.org





en.wikipedia.org





b. Charles J. Guiteau, who shot President James Garfield, was part of a utopian commune, the Oneida Community, where free love was practiced. Ackerman, “Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield,” p.135



c. Leon Czolgosz, who killed President McKinley, was a socialist and anarchist, whose act was instigated by a speech he heard by socialist Emma Goldman. American Experience | PBS



d. John Schrank, who shot and wounded Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, seemed to have no affiliation other than opposition to a third term. Theodore Roosevelt shot in Milwaukee



e. Giuseppe Zangara, who came close to killing President Roosevelt in 1933, (he killed Mayor Cermak) hated the rich and sought to “make even with the capitalists.” Outside of shooting elected officials, he would have made an ideal pick for Obama’ws cabinet. http://digital.library.miami.edu/gov/FDRAssn.html



f. Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot JFK, had been a communist ever since he read a communist pamphlet about the Rosenbergs. As soon as he was arrested, he called John Abt, lawyer for the American Communist Party. "CIA confirmed Oswald contacted Cubans, Soviets before assassination, memo shows" CIA confirmed Oswald contacted Cubans, Soviets before assassination, memo shows





4. Let's add these non-presidential assassinations by Leftists.



g. Sirhan Sirhan, who killed Robert Kennedy, was a Palestinian who hated Kennedy’s support of Israel.



h. Arthur Bremer shot George Wallace in 1972, due to Wallace’s support for segregation.

http://basicfamouspeople.com//index.php?aid=7134

Upon his release, Bremer showed no remorse: “ ‘shooting segregationist dinosaurs’ is not like shooting people because ‘they are extinct by act of God.’ This mention of God was the only blemish on Bremer’s otherwise impeccable liberal credentials.” Coulter, “Guilty,” p. 260.



i. Lynette ‘Squeaky’ Fromme, tried to shoot President Ford because she was incensed about the plight of the California redwoods. http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=209933



j. Sara Jane Moore also tried to kill President Ford because “the government had declared war on the left.” http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=4900159







k. John Hinckley shot President Reagan to impress a girl. The jury found him “not guilty by reason of insanity.” “

…which is as good a definition of liberalism as I’ve heard.”

Coulter, “Guilty.” P. 260.




Where is the apology?
 
This is the fact:
Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal/Democrat- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.



a. John Wilkes Booth was opposed to President Lincoln’s Republican war policies. His letter to is family explained he was furious with Lincoln for having brought war to the South! THE MURDERER OF MR. LINCOLN.; Extraordinary Letter of John Wilkes Booth Proof that He Meditated His Crime Months Ago His Excuses for the Contemplated Act His Participation in the Execution of John Brown. Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction. Fires. The Seventh Ward Fire Note from Chief Engineer Decker. (Published 1865)

Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, “…an angry Copperhead, a.k.a., ‘peace democrat,’ (when that meant pro-slavery, of course.) John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia

liberapedia.wikia.com







John Wilkes Booth was the assassin of President Abraham Lincoln. (By Executive Order Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, which changed the federal legal status of more than 3 million enslaved people). Booth was a Confederate sympathizer during the Civil War and resented...liberapedia.wikia.com



"In the 1860s, the Copperheads comprised a vocal faction of Democrats in the Northern United States of the Union who opposed the American Civil War, wanting an immediate peace settlement with the Confederates. Republicans started calling anti-war Democrats "Copperheads", likening them to the venomous snake."

en.wikipedia.org





en.wikipedia.org





b. Charles J. Guiteau, who shot President James Garfield, was part of a utopian commune, the Oneida Community, where free love was practiced. Ackerman, “Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield,” p.135



c. Leon Czolgosz, who killed President McKinley, was a socialist and anarchist, whose act was instigated by a speech he heard by socialist Emma Goldman. American Experience | PBS



d. John Schrank, who shot and wounded Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, seemed to have no affiliation other than opposition to a third term. Theodore Roosevelt shot in Milwaukee



e. Giuseppe Zangara, who came close to killing President Roosevelt in 1933, (he killed Mayor Cermak) hated the rich and sought to “make even with the capitalists.” Outside of shooting elected officials, he would have made an ideal pick for Obama’ws cabinet. http://digital.library.miami.edu/gov/FDRAssn.html



f. Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot JFK, had been a communist ever since he read a communist pamphlet about the Rosenbergs. As soon as he was arrested, he called John Abt, lawyer for the American Communist Party. "CIA confirmed Oswald contacted Cubans, Soviets before assassination, memo shows" CIA confirmed Oswald contacted Cubans, Soviets before assassination, memo shows





4. Let's add these non-presidential assassinations by Leftists.



g. Sirhan Sirhan, who killed Robert Kennedy, was a Palestinian who hated Kennedy’s support of Israel.



h. Arthur Bremer shot George Wallace in 1972, due to Wallace’s support for segregation.

http://basicfamouspeople.com//index.php?aid=7134

Upon his release, Bremer showed no remorse: “ ‘shooting segregationist dinosaurs’ is not like shooting people because ‘they are extinct by act of God.’ This mention of God was the only blemish on Bremer’s otherwise impeccable liberal credentials.” Coulter, “Guilty,” p. 260.



i. Lynette ‘Squeaky’ Fromme, tried to shoot President Ford because she was incensed about the plight of the California redwoods. http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=209933



j. Sara Jane Moore also tried to kill President Ford because “the government had declared war on the left.” http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=4900159







k. John Hinckley shot President Reagan to impress a girl. The jury found him “not guilty by reason of insanity.” “

…which is as good a definition of liberalism as I’ve heard.”

Coulter, “Guilty.” P. 260.




Where is the apology?
Lincoln was 186 years ago.

Frankly Trump and Vance being in the same room is insane, to the extent it fosters conspiracy opinions. We are in a war with an opponent who has historically used terrorism and would love to do it again.
 
Lincoln was 186 years ago.

Frankly Trump and Vance being in the same room is insane, to the extent it fosters conspiracy opinions. We are in a war with an opponent who has historically used terrorism and would love to do it again.
If there was any doubt about what an imbecile this one is.....

"Lincoln was 186 years ago."
 
This is the fact:
Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal/Democrat- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.



a. John Wilkes Booth was opposed to President Lincoln’s Republican war policies. His letter to is family explained he was furious with Lincoln for having brought war to the South! THE MURDERER OF MR. LINCOLN.; Extraordinary Letter of John Wilkes Booth Proof that He Meditated His Crime Months Ago His Excuses for the Contemplated Act His Participation in the Execution of John Brown. Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction. Fires. The Seventh Ward Fire Note from Chief Engineer Decker. (Published 1865)

Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, “…an angry Copperhead, a.k.a., ‘peace democrat,’ (when that meant pro-slavery, of course.) John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia

liberapedia.wikia.com







John Wilkes Booth was the assassin of President Abraham Lincoln. (By Executive Order Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, which changed the federal legal status of more than 3 million enslaved people). Booth was a Confederate sympathizer during the Civil War and resented...liberapedia.wikia.com



"In the 1860s, the Copperheads comprised a vocal faction of Democrats in the Northern United States of the Union who opposed the American Civil War, wanting an immediate peace settlement with the Confederates. Republicans started calling anti-war Democrats "Copperheads", likening them to the venomous snake."

en.wikipedia.org





en.wikipedia.org





b. Charles J. Guiteau, who shot President James Garfield, was part of a utopian commune, the Oneida Community, where free love was practiced. Ackerman, “Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield,” p.135



c. Leon Czolgosz, who killed President McKinley, was a socialist and anarchist, whose act was instigated by a speech he heard by socialist Emma Goldman. American Experience | PBS



d. John Schrank, who shot and wounded Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, seemed to have no affiliation other than opposition to a third term. Theodore Roosevelt shot in Milwaukee



e. Giuseppe Zangara, who came close to killing President Roosevelt in 1933, (he killed Mayor Cermak) hated the rich and sought to “make even with the capitalists.” Outside of shooting elected officials, he would have made an ideal pick for Obama’ws cabinet. http://digital.library.miami.edu/gov/FDRAssn.html



f. Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot JFK, had been a communist ever since he read a communist pamphlet about the Rosenbergs. As soon as he was arrested, he called John Abt, lawyer for the American Communist Party. "CIA confirmed Oswald contacted Cubans, Soviets before assassination, memo shows" CIA confirmed Oswald contacted Cubans, Soviets before assassination, memo shows





4. Let's add these non-presidential assassinations by Leftists.



g. Sirhan Sirhan, who killed Robert Kennedy, was a Palestinian who hated Kennedy’s support of Israel.



h. Arthur Bremer shot George Wallace in 1972, due to Wallace’s support for segregation.

http://basicfamouspeople.com//index.php?aid=7134

Upon his release, Bremer showed no remorse: “ ‘shooting segregationist dinosaurs’ is not like shooting people because ‘they are extinct by act of God.’ This mention of God was the only blemish on Bremer’s otherwise impeccable liberal credentials.” Coulter, “Guilty,” p. 260.



i. Lynette ‘Squeaky’ Fromme, tried to shoot President Ford because she was incensed about the plight of the California redwoods. http://minx.cc/?blog=86&post=209933



j. Sara Jane Moore also tried to kill President Ford because “the government had declared war on the left.” http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&id=4900159







k. John Hinckley shot President Reagan to impress a girl. The jury found him “not guilty by reason of insanity.” “

…which is as good a definition of liberalism as I’ve heard.”

Coulter, “Guilty.” P. 260.




Where is the apology?
RFk’s assassin would be front runner for DNC chair today
 
From Amos 2, New Testament.

1. It appears that our traditions, and the Judeo-Christian beliefs about the sanctity of human life, are being rejected......mostly by Democrats.

"In April, the Network Contagion Research Institute, along with Rutgers University, found that 55% of self-identified left-of-center respondents said that it was at least somewhat justified to murder President Trump. Forty-eight percent said the same of Elon Musk, and 40% of respondents, including 59.6% of left-of-center respondents, said it was at least somewhat acceptable to destroy a Tesla dealership in protest."


"...violence can be justified was more prominent among Democrats and independents than among Republicans, with 14% of Democrats, 13% of independents, and only 6% of Republicans holding that opinion, according to the Sept. 10 poll. On the other end of the scale, 81% of Republicans said violence is never justified, compared with 72% of Democrats and 65% of independents."




2. Trump has faced assassination more than any other President: SIX ATTEMPTS ON HIS LIFE.
a. AI Overview
A North Dakota man, Gregory Lee Leingang, pleaded guilty to federal charges after plotting to flip President Donald Trump's limousine with a stolen forklift during a visit to Mandan, North Dakota, on September 6, 2017,
b. Michael Sandford who seized a policeman's gun, in Los Vegas, to shoot Trump
c. Thomas Crooks, in Butler, Pa.
d. Sniper Ryan Routh
e. Austin Tucker Martin "entered Mar-a-Lago with a shotgun and gas can and ignored orders to drop his weapon before being killed."
f. The latest Democrat Cole Allen



3. No other President has been directly targetted with this many actual attempts on his life.
If you still believe the lie about the grestest threat being white supremacy, not that there was just one such attack on Obama:
"On November 11, 2011, Oscar Ramiro Ortega-Hernandez, an unemployed 21-year-old man, fired multiple shots at the White House using a semi-automatic rifle. At least seven bullets hit the second floor. Neither President Barack Obama nor First Lady Michelle Obama were home at the time; the president was not in Washington, D.C., having been on a trip abroad."
Wikipedia



4. It's hard to miss the violence of the "Free Palestine Democrats," including
"Prosecutors have formally charged a suspect in the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staff members in Washington DC in May with hate crimes and first-degree murder.
...Mr Rodriguez opened fire on couple Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and Sarah Lynn Milgrim, 26, outside the Capital Jewish Museum before shouting "Free Palestine" during his arrest."



5. Even Democrat Josh Shapiro's house was firebombed by another Democrat anti-Semite Free Palestine freak.


6.



I'll be your Huckleberry. You’re doing the same thing every right wing partisan crank does: take a real problem (political violence), jam it through bad sources, ignore the facts, and pretend it proves your preferred tribe is uniquely violent.


It doesn’t.


1. Political violence is bad. It is also not a “Democrat” phenomenon or even prevelant on the Democrat side​


That part is easy: political violence is unacceptable. Full stop.

What doesn’t follow is your claim that this is somehow uniquely a Democratic pathology. It isn’t.

The last decade alone includes:
  • the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter
  • the El Paso shooter
  • the Buffalo shooter
  • the Charlottesville murderer
  • the January 6 attack on Congress
  • the Pelosi hammer attack
  • the Whitmer kidnapping plot
  • the killing of Mellissa Hortman and her husband
  • the arson of Shapiro's home
  • the shooting of John Hoffman and his wife
  • and sure.... the attempts on Trump

Pretending only one side produces violent extremists is not analysis. It’s propaganda.

2. Your “55% of the left supports murdering Trump” stat is garbage framing.​


That number comes from the NCRI “assassination culture” survey - a non-probability online survey of about 1,200 people, not some gold-standard national sample.

That means:
  • it is not a clean representative sample,
  • it is highly sensitive to wording,
  • and “at least somewhat justified” is doing absurdly heavy lifting.
“Somewhat justified” in a seven-point online rage-click survey is not the same thing as “supports assassination.”

That’s not a defense of the sentiment - it’s a reminder that you’re laundering a sensational headline into a social fact it does not prove.

If you want to argue political polarization is driving tolerance for violence, fine.
If you want to claim “Democrats support assassination,” that study does not get you there.


3. “Trump has faced more assassination attempts than any president” is unsupported nonsense.​


This is just historically illiterate.

Presidents and presidential candidates have been targeted constantly:

  • Abraham Lincoln was assassinated
  • James A. Garfield was assassinated
  • William McKinley was assassinated
  • John F. Kennedy was assassinated
  • Theodore Roosevelt was shot while campaigning
  • Ronald Reagan was shot
  • Harry S. Truman survived an armed attack at Blair House
  • Gerald Ford had two attempts in 17 days
  • 11-13 attempts on Obama were thwarted
And that’s before you get to foiled plots, cranks, and unstable loners.

Padding Trump’s list with every disturbed person, every crank threat, and every half-formed plot does not make him uniquely persecuted. It means he is a polarizing president in a country with millions of armed lunatics.

That is not the same claim.


4. You are doing collective guilt by slogan.​


A murderer yelling “Free Palestine” does not make all Democrats responsible.
By that logic, every right-wing slogan shouted before violence becomes a Republican indictment.

That standard would destroy your own argument immediately.

If a left-wing extremist commits violence, blame the extremist.
If a right-wing extremist commits violence, blame the extremist.
That’s how adults do this.

Not:

“Someone shouted a slogan I dislike, therefore millions of people share guilt.”

That’s tribal brain rot.

5. Your sourcing is bad and your conclusions are worse.​


You cite:
  • NCRI press-cycle outrage bait
  • RealClear aggregation
  • AI summaries
  • isolated crimes
  • then leap to “Democrats reject the sanctity of life”
That’s not evidence. That’s a vibes collage.

You’re not showing that Democrats are uniquely violent.
You’re showing that America is polarized, radicalized, and full of unstable people - and that you only notice it when the violence can be pinned on your political enemies.

That’s not moral clarity. It’s partisan filtering.

6. The REAL problem is broader than your tribal script.​


Political violence is rising because:
  • trust in institutions is collapsing,
  • media ecosystems reward outrage,
  • conspiracy is profitable,
  • and millions of Americans now treat opponents as existential enemies.
That disease is not confined to one party but one president is pushing it along more than anyone.

And anyone pretending otherwise is part of the problem.
 
I'll be your Huckleberry. You’re doing the same thing every right wing partisan crank does: take a real problem (political violence), jam it through bad sources, ignore the facts, and pretend it proves your preferred tribe is uniquely violent.


It doesn’t.


1. Political violence is bad. It is also not a “Democrat” phenomenon or even prevelant on the Democrat side​


That part is easy: political violence is unacceptable. Full stop.

What doesn’t follow is your claim that this is somehow uniquely a Democratic pathology. It isn’t.

The last decade alone includes:
  • the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter
  • the El Paso shooter
  • the Buffalo shooter
  • the Charlottesville murderer
  • the January 6 attack on Congress
  • the Pelosi hammer attack
  • the Whitmer kidnapping plot
  • the killing of Mellissa Hortman and her husband
  • the arson of Shapiro's home
  • the shooting of John Hoffman and his wife
  • and sure.... the attempts on Trump

Pretending only one side produces violent extremists is not analysis. It’s propaganda.

2. Your “55% of the left supports murdering Trump” stat is garbage framing.​


That number comes from the NCRI “assassination culture” survey - a non-probability online survey of about 1,200 people, not some gold-standard national sample.

That means:
  • it is not a clean representative sample,
  • it is highly sensitive to wording,
  • and “at least somewhat justified” is doing absurdly heavy lifting.
“Somewhat justified” in a seven-point online rage-click survey is not the same thing as “supports assassination.”

That’s not a defense of the sentiment - it’s a reminder that you’re laundering a sensational headline into a social fact it does not prove.

If you want to argue political polarization is driving tolerance for violence, fine.
If you want to claim “Democrats support assassination,” that study does not get you there.


3. “Trump has faced more assassination attempts than any president” is unsupported nonsense.​


This is just historically illiterate.

Presidents and presidential candidates have been targeted constantly:

  • Abraham Lincoln was assassinated
  • James A. Garfield was assassinated
  • William McKinley was assassinated
  • John F. Kennedy was assassinated
  • Theodore Roosevelt was shot while campaigning
  • Ronald Reagan was shot
  • Harry S. Truman survived an armed attack at Blair House
  • Gerald Ford had two attempts in 17 days
  • 11-13 attempts on Obama were thwarted
And that’s before you get to foiled plots, cranks, and unstable loners.

Padding Trump’s list with every disturbed person, every crank threat, and every half-formed plot does not make him uniquely persecuted. It means he is a polarizing president in a country with millions of armed lunatics.

That is not the same claim.


4. You are doing collective guilt by slogan.​


A murderer yelling “Free Palestine” does not make all Democrats responsible.
By that logic, every right-wing slogan shouted before violence becomes a Republican indictment.

That standard would destroy your own argument immediately.

If a left-wing extremist commits violence, blame the extremist.
If a right-wing extremist commits violence, blame the extremist.
That’s how adults do this.

Not:



That’s tribal brain rot.

5. Your sourcing is bad and your conclusions are worse.​


You cite:
  • NCRI press-cycle outrage bait
  • RealClear aggregation
  • AI summaries
  • isolated crimes
  • then leap to “Democrats reject the sanctity of life”
That’s not evidence. That’s a vibes collage.

You’re not showing that Democrats are uniquely violent.
You’re showing that America is polarized, radicalized, and full of unstable people - and that you only notice it when the violence can be pinned on your political enemies.

That’s not moral clarity. It’s partisan filtering.

6. The REAL problem is broader than your tribal script.​


Political violence is rising because:
  • trust in institutions is collapsing,
  • media ecosystems reward outrage,
  • conspiracy is profitable,
  • and millions of Americans now treat opponents as existential enemies.
That disease is not confined to one party but one president is pushing it along more than anyone.

And anyone pretending otherwise is part of the problem.
Yes it’s a dem problem and promoted by the dems

 

Since 2000, when political violence in the U.S. has targeted elected officials or their immediate families in their capacity as public figures, the victims have overwhelmingly — and in the most direct cases exclusively — been Democrats.

  • The only sitting elected official assassinated in recent years was Melissa Hortman, a Democrat, killed in 2025.
  • The only sitting elected officials shot and seriously wounded in targeted attacks since 2011 include Gabby Giffords and John Hoffman — both Democrats.
  • The only spouses of elected officials killed in targeted political attacks in that period was the husband of a Democratic lawmaker: Mark Hortman (2025).
  • The only spouse of a major elected official attacked with a hammer was Paul Pelosi, husband of Democrat Nancy Pelosi.
  • The most prominent politically motivated arson attack on the home of a sitting elected official was against Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, while he and his family slept inside.
  • The most prominent kidnapping plot against a sitting governor was the 2020 militia plot against Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat.
 
15th post
I'll be your Huckleberry. You’re doing the same thing every right wing partisan crank does: take a real problem (political violence), jam it through bad sources, ignore the facts, and pretend it proves your preferred tribe is uniquely violent.


It doesn’t.


1. Political violence is bad. It is also not a “Democrat” phenomenon or even prevelant on the Democrat side​


That part is easy: political violence is unacceptable. Full stop.

What doesn’t follow is your claim that this is somehow uniquely a Democratic pathology. It isn’t.

The last decade alone includes:
  • the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter
  • the El Paso shooter
  • the Buffalo shooter
  • the Charlottesville murderer
  • the January 6 attack on Congress
  • the Pelosi hammer attack
  • the Whitmer kidnapping plot
  • the killing of Mellissa Hortman and her husband
  • the arson of Shapiro's home
  • the shooting of John Hoffman and his wife
  • and sure.... the attempts on Trump

Pretending only one side produces violent extremists is not analysis. It’s propaganda.

2. Your “55% of the left supports murdering Trump” stat is garbage framing.​


That number comes from the NCRI “assassination culture” survey - a non-probability online survey of about 1,200 people, not some gold-standard national sample.

That means:
  • it is not a clean representative sample,
  • it is highly sensitive to wording,
  • and “at least somewhat justified” is doing absurdly heavy lifting.
“Somewhat justified” in a seven-point online rage-click survey is not the same thing as “supports assassination.”

That’s not a defense of the sentiment - it’s a reminder that you’re laundering a sensational headline into a social fact it does not prove.

If you want to argue political polarization is driving tolerance for violence, fine.
If you want to claim “Democrats support assassination,” that study does not get you there.


3. “Trump has faced more assassination attempts than any president” is unsupported nonsense.​


This is just historically illiterate.

Presidents and presidential candidates have been targeted constantly:

  • Abraham Lincoln was assassinated
  • James A. Garfield was assassinated
  • William McKinley was assassinated
  • John F. Kennedy was assassinated
  • Theodore Roosevelt was shot while campaigning
  • Ronald Reagan was shot
  • Harry S. Truman survived an armed attack at Blair House
  • Gerald Ford had two attempts in 17 days
  • 11-13 attempts on Obama were thwarted
And that’s before you get to foiled plots, cranks, and unstable loners.

Padding Trump’s list with every disturbed person, every crank threat, and every half-formed plot does not make him uniquely persecuted. It means he is a polarizing president in a country with millions of armed lunatics.

That is not the same claim.


4. You are doing collective guilt by slogan.​


A murderer yelling “Free Palestine” does not make all Democrats responsible.
By that logic, every right-wing slogan shouted before violence becomes a Republican indictment.

That standard would destroy your own argument immediately.

If a left-wing extremist commits violence, blame the extremist.
If a right-wing extremist commits violence, blame the extremist.
That’s how adults do this.

Not:



That’s tribal brain rot.

5. Your sourcing is bad and your conclusions are worse.​


You cite:
  • NCRI press-cycle outrage bait
  • RealClear aggregation
  • AI summaries
  • isolated crimes
  • then leap to “Democrats reject the sanctity of life”
That’s not evidence. That’s a vibes collage.

You’re not showing that Democrats are uniquely violent.
You’re showing that America is polarized, radicalized, and full of unstable people - and that you only notice it when the violence can be pinned on your political enemies.

That’s not moral clarity. It’s partisan filtering.

6. The REAL problem is broader than your tribal script.​


Political violence is rising because:
  • trust in institutions is collapsing,
  • media ecosystems reward outrage,
  • conspiracy is profitable,
  • and millions of Americans now treat opponents as existential enemies.
That disease is not confined to one party but one president is pushing it along more than anyone.

And anyone pretending otherwise is part of the problem.




I have written that the morality of the Left/Democrats is closer to Satan than to the Judeo-Christian views of the Right, or to put that more succinctly, the Left endorses death while the Right endorses life.



Let's see if we can verify that.





Sanctity in the sense of being kept intact as the main obligation of government.





Do you believe in the sanctity of human life?





In the words of the illustrious Brown Bomber, you can run but you can't hide.
 
I have written that the morality of the Left/Democrats is closer to Satan than to the Judeo-Christian views of the Right, or to put that more succinctly, the Left endorses death while the Right endorses life.

Let's see if we can verify that.

Sanctity in the sense of being kept intact as the main obligation of government.

Do you believe in the sanctity of human life?

In the words of the illustrious Brown Bomber, you can run but you can't hide.
Have you agreed that my dispatching of your argument is accepted by you and you are now shifting the debate to something else? Lets close out that point first: You agree that I dismantled your OP?
 
Since 2000, when political violence in the U.S. has targeted elected officials or their immediate families in their capacity as public figures, the victims have overwhelmingly — and in the most direct cases exclusively — been Democrats.

  • The only sitting elected official assassinated in recent years was Melissa Hortman, a Democrat, killed in 2025.
  • The only sitting elected officials shot and seriously wounded in targeted attacks since 2011 include Gabby Giffords and John Hoffman — both Democrats.
  • The only spouses of elected officials killed in targeted political attacks in that period were the husbands of Democratic lawmakers: Mark Hortman (2025) and the attempted killing of Paul Pelosi in 2022. Mark Hortman was killed; Paul Pelosi survived.
  • The only spouse of a major elected official attacked with a hammer was Paul Pelosi, husband of Democrat Nancy Pelosi.
  • The most prominent politically motivated arson attack on the home of a sitting elected official was against Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, while he and his family slept inside.
  • The most prominent kidnapping plot against a sitting governor was the 2020 militia plot against Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat.
Hortman was shot by the Dem gov’s political appointee…

You ignore Trump and Scalie being shot? Not surprised

Nancy’s husband was attacked by a drug use homeless guy that are all over dem run Cali

Sharpio was attacked because he was Jewish…anti Jewish is embraced by the Dems

Again this is a Dem problem
 
Have you agreed that my dispatching of your argument is accepted by you and you are now shifting the debate to something else? Lets close out that point first: You agree that I dismantled your OP?
I couldn't wait to have the stereotypical Democrat voter, you, come out from under the rock and be forces to run from this simple question: do you believe in the sanctity of human life.


As one who has been trained to deny same, you are the proof of the OP.


Now, would I be correct that you suffer from government schooling?



Here's why I didn't succumb to the indoctrination that you did:


1777491597611.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom