Adding to the debate about whether we are in a constitutional crisis.

[Delldude]

Compliance with court orders isn't optional depending on your perspective on it.

Suddenly we have a constitutional crisis.

I seem to remember two Scotus decisions Biden totally ignored.

“The Supreme Court blocked it,” Mr. Biden added, “but that didn’t stop me.” He apparently thinks defying the law is a virtue.

 

[berg80]

The judge "has made his decision; now let him enforce it."

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked President Donald Trump after the president called for the impeachment of a federal judge who issued orders blocking Trump’s plan to deport any more alleged members of a Venezuelan gang from the United States.

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said in a statement on Trump’s demand.

“The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,” Roberts said, several hours after Trump in a Truth Social wrote that Chief Judge James Boasberg, “like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!”

Loading…

www.cnbc.com

It appears Baby Donald shook his rattle a bit too loudly for Roberts' taste.

Here's the thing. Pam Bondi should already have stepped in to remind the Orange Insurrectionist that calling for the judge's impeachment, essentially judge shopping, is extra constitutional and completely inappropriate.

 

[berg80]

The subtext of Roberts' statement is, "Mr. President, sit down and shut the fuck up."

 

[BackAgain]

The subtext of Roberts' statement is, "Mr. President, sit down and shut the fuck up."

Advice that should instead be directed at you.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked President Donald Trump after the president called for the impeachment of a federal judge who issued orders blocking Trump’s plan to deport any more alleged members of a Venezuelan gang from the United States.

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said in a statement on Trump’s demand.

“The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,” Roberts said, several hours after Trump in a Truth Social wrote that Chief Judge James Boasberg, “like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!”

Loading…

www.cnbc.com

It appears Baby Donald shook his rattle a bit too loudly for Roberts' taste.

Here's the thing. Pam Bondi should already have stepped in to remind the Orange Insurrectionist that calling for the judge's impeachment, essentially judge shopping, is extra constitutional and completely inappropriate.

.



^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Uses phrases like "Baby Donald" and expects to be respected in a debate.




.

 

[BackAgain]

.



^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Uses phrases like "Baby Donald" and expects to be respected in a debate.




.

If he expects any respect, ever, he’s even more retarded and delusional than we all thought.

 

[berg80]

The Justice Department also doubled down on its efforts to avoid giving the judge, James E. Boasberg, the detailed information he had requested about the deportations. It complied — but only in part — with his instructions to provide specific data about when two flights, with the people accused of being gang members, took off from the United States for El Salvador.

Taken together, the twin moves — made in separate sets of court papers filed on Monday and Tuesday — marked a continuation of the Trump’s administration’s aggressive attempts to push back against Judge Boasberg, the chief judge of the Federal District Court in Washington, who temporarily halted one of President Trump’s signature deportation policies.

Trump Calls for Judge’s Impeachment and Chief Justice Rebukes the Idea: Live Updates

www.nytimes.com

So who gets held in contempt of court over the admin's continued refusal to comply with the judge's orders? The DoJ lawyer appearing before him? Bondi?

 

[munkle]

We are in a Constitutional crisis when people are disappearing from their homes the way people protesters were after J6.

 

[Nostra]

That isnt your role to decide that nor is it Trump's role. He has to listen to the judge's ruling or go to court and appeal. Ignoring courts is not an option.

He abided by the ruling and is appealing, idiot.

Next?

 

[Nostra]

Biden followed the court order on what he could and couldn’t do

Lies.

Explain why they bitchslapped him again if he followed the court order., Trollwinger.

 

[Rawley]

Exactly

They are ignoring the law and dare anyone to do anything about it

They haven't ignored either the law or the Judge's order.

 

[rightwinger]

Lies.

Explain why they bitchslapped him again if he followed the court order., Trollwinger.

Link

 

[Rawley]

The Justice Department also doubled down on its efforts to avoid giving the judge, James E. Boasberg, the detailed information he had requested about the deportations. It complied — but only in part — with his instructions to provide specific data about when two flights, with the people accused of being gang members, took off from the United States for El Salvador.

Taken together, the twin moves — made in separate sets of court papers filed on Monday and Tuesday — marked a continuation of the Trump’s administration’s aggressive attempts to push back against Judge Boasberg, the chief judge of the Federal District Court in Washington, who temporarily halted one of President Trump’s signature deportation policies.

Trump Calls for Judge’s Impeachment and Chief Justice Rebukes the Idea: Live Updates

www.nytimes.com

So who gets held in contempt of court over the admin's continued refusal to comply with the judge's orders? The DoJ lawyer appearing before him? Bondi?

THey didn't refuse to comply. They are not going to jeopardize national security

 

[Delldude]

If Trump ignores a Supreme Court ruling and gets away with it, we're no longer a Constitutional Republic.

Biden already did that.

 

[Nostra]

There has been no judicial procedure establishing that the people being deported are in fact criminals. The legality of the deportations hinges on whether the law from the 18th century that trump is using to justify them is applicable.

Illegals = criminals.

Next?

 

[Nostra]

Link

Are you really that stupid, or just a pathetic troll? My money is on both.

Spin this, dipshit.

NASFAA | A 24-Hour Judicial Whiplash Leaves the Biden Administration’s Debt Cancellation Plans Frozen in their Tracks

www.nasfaa.org

 

[Delldude]

Link

Link:

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked President Donald Trump after the president called for the impeachment of a federal judge who issued orders blocking Trump’s plan to deport any more alleged members of a Venezuelan gang from the United States.

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said in a statement on Trump’s demand.

“The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,” Roberts said, several hours after Trump in a Truth Social wrote that Chief Judge James Boasberg, “like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!”

Loading…

www.cnbc.com

It appears Baby Donald shook his rattle a bit too loudly for Roberts' taste.

Here's the thing. Pam Bondi should already have stepped in to remind the Orange Insurrectionist that calling for the judge's impeachment, essentially judge shopping, is extra constitutional and completely inappropriate.

Rebuked? Wow!
Sounds serious.
DURR

calling for the judge's impeachment, essentially judge shopping, is extra constitutional and completely inappropriate.

Only the left is allowed to judge shop, eh comrade?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Link:

View attachment 1090960

Secret Chimp, one of my favorites!

 

[berg80]

The most curious aspect of this whole incident Is that the president actually does have the authority to deport criminal aliens in the country illegally. But in order to do it legally the case that these immigrants actually engaged in criminal behavior has to first be adjudicated.