Adam Schiff says Republicans must justify impeachment hearing witnesses

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,860
400
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff on Thursday released a tightened set of guidelines over what potential witnesses can be called in the impeachment hearings, saying Republicans must justify their relevance according to a three-point criteria.

The California Democrat, in a letter to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the ranking member of the committee, formally asked for the GOP members’ requests for witnesses they would like to call for next week’s public hearings.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

Can this farce become anymore of a KANGAROO court than it has been for weeks now?

adamschifftiaposchifftpos2-jpg.282676
 
The GOP should refuse to show up.................Go on vacation.......and let the Dems play with themselves...........

All those subpenoed.............should tell them to screw themselves.....

All those not taking the last advice should walk in...........5th Amendment..........and walk out.

The Dems have no HONOR............NO INTEGRITY...........and are a PACK OF LIARS.

Don't cooperate.......when they whine.........OH WELL.
 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff on Thursday released a tightened set of guidelines over what potential witnesses can be called in the impeachment hearings, saying Republicans must justify their relevance according to a three-point criteria.

The California Democrat, in a letter to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the ranking member of the committee, formally asked for the GOP members’ requests for witnesses they would like to call for next week’s public hearings.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

Can this farce become anymore of a KANGAROO court than it has been for weeks now?

adamschifftiaposchifftpos2-jpg.282676
Here's what needs to happen someone in Congress needs to walk up to shit for brains and beat the shit out of him.
 
This is an investigation into a specific set of questions. It is actually to the president's advantage that this is not an investigation into all of his questionable activities. If republicans really want to open the house hearings to side issues in the interest of delay it could absolutely blow up in their face. Imagine everything getting trotted out for examination. Plenty of material there to build the case that Trump is generally unfit for office.
 
As bad as Pencil Neck is, folks, who the fuck voted for that obese midget Nadler. The individuals who voted for these anti-American, anti-White scumbags are the ones who should face street justice unless we see some prosecutions in the next few weeks for the Democrats' treasonous actions that attacked our country, attacked our government, and attacked our personal right to vote and have our elected officials be our elected officials.
 
Schiff is not going to let Republicans turn this into a wing nut circus.

Sucks to be you
 
A whistleblower makes Trump look bad

Dems: Protect the whistleblower

A whistleblower makes Dem's look bad

Dems: FIRE the whistleblower :aargh::102::aargh:

That's just silly. The whistle blower performed a great service for out country, however, the case has moved beyond the information he provided, and the more accurate and more complete information that has been exposed, thanks to the whistle blower is where the focus is now. You don't get that? I understand you want the opportunity to try to discredit the whistle blower, but it's too late for that to do you any good anyway, no matter how much you want it to.
 
A whistleblower makes Trump look bad

Dems: Protect the whistleblower

A whistleblower makes Dem's look bad

Dems: FIRE the whistleblower :aargh::102::aargh:

That's just silly. The whistle blower performed a great service for out country, however, the case has moved beyond the information he provided, and the more accurate and more complete information that has been exposed, thanks to the whistle blower is where the focus is now. You don't get that? I understand you want the opportunity to try to discredit the whistle blower, but it's too late for that to do you any good anyway, no matter how much you want it to.

And Monica Lewinsky performed a great service for Bill Clinton.

The "outcome" was about the same.
 
That's just silly. The whistle blower performed a great service for out country, however, the case has moved beyond the information he provided, and the more accurate and more complete information that has been exposed, thanks to the whistle blower is where the focus is now. You don't get that? I understand you want the opportunity to try to discredit the whistle blower, but it's too late for that to do you any good anyway, no matter how much you want it to.
The whistleblower never had credibility. That's why he was kept a secret.

Just Russian Collusion 2.0... Another attempt to purposely use lies to undo a Constitutional election.

That's how Fascists get power when they lose elections.
 
That's just silly. The whistle blower performed a great service for out country, however, the case has moved beyond the information he provided, and the more accurate and more complete information that has been exposed, thanks to the whistle blower is where the focus is now. You don't get that? I understand you want the opportunity to try to discredit the whistle blower, but it's too late for that to do you any good anyway, no matter how much you want it to.
The whistleblower never had credibility. That's why he was kept a secret.

Just Russian Collusion 2.0... Another attempt to purposely use lies to undo a Constitutional election.

That's how Fascists get power when they lose elections.

You keep telling yourself that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top