Actual gun defense..robber has gun pointed at victims...and loses to armed good guy...

[Anathema]

Yes I don't really think either is really a defense. But that is the problem with those gun use surveys. People like you think it is a defense, but the other people just think you are a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason. False positive for a survey.

I don't answer surveys, Brain. I only pull a gun with a very good reason. Don't stick your nose in my business or piss me off and you'll never see it. Simple as that.

 

[Brain357]

Yes I don't really think either is really a defense. But that is the problem with those gun use surveys. People like you think it is a defense, but the other people just think you are a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason. False positive for a survey.

I don't answer surveys, Brain. I only pull a gun with a very good reason. Don't stick your nose in my business or piss me off and you'll never see it. Simple as that.

But you must see how a defense to you might be a crazy guy pulling out a gun to others? I appreciate your honesty with my questions btw and well you didn't shoot anyone so that is also good.

 

[Anathema]

But you must see how a defense to you might be a crazy guy pulling out a gun to others? I appreciate your honesty with my questions btw and well you didn't shoot anyone so that is also good.

The only viewpoint I care about is my own. The only rule in a fight is to be the guy who walks away the winner.

You're welcome. They didn't get shot solely because they decided to run like the cowards they were.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Yes I don't really think either is really a defense. But that is the problem with those gun use surveys. People like you think it is a defense, but the other people just think you are a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason. False positive for a survey.

I don't answer surveys, Brain. I only pull a gun with a very good reason. Don't stick your nose in my business or piss me off and you'll never see it. Simple as that.

But you must see how a defense to you might be a crazy guy pulling out a gun to others? I appreciate your honesty with my questions btw and well you didn't shoot anyone so that is also good.

I guess to you defending yourself with a gun is never right, just let yourself get shot. Typical libtardism.

 

[Brain357]

Yes I don't really think either is really a defense. But that is the problem with those gun use surveys. People like you think it is a defense, but the other people just think you are a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason. False positive for a survey.

I don't answer surveys, Brain. I only pull a gun with a very good reason. Don't stick your nose in my business or piss me off and you'll never see it. Simple as that.

But you must see how a defense to you might be a crazy guy pulling out a gun to others? I appreciate your honesty with my questions btw and well you didn't shoot anyone so that is also good.

I guess to you defending yourself with a gun is never right, just let yourself get shot. Typical libtardism.

No. In both of his cases I'm pretty sure the other guy wasn't armed, so he wouldn't be getting shot. And in both he probably could have resolved them verbally without a gun. Also like I mentioned they both probably think he is a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason.

I am fine with the pharmacist shooting the criminal. I was taught to never steal and never point a gun at someone. The criminal should have been taught the same. That said the criminal probably wouldn't have shot anyone if they had given him what he wanted. The criminal clearly points the gun after he starts getting shot at and could have easily shot the person shooting at him or one of the other people.

 

[Anathema]

No. In both of his cases I'm pretty sure the other guy wasn't armed, so he wouldn't be getting shot. And in both he probably could have resolved them verbally without a gun. Also like I mentioned they both probably think he is a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason.

They had both been given their one opportunity to comply with my verbal demand. They chose not to. I follow the philosophy of Genghis Khan.... offer the enemy one chance to comply. If they don't, crush them immediately.

 

[Brain357]

No. In both of his cases I'm pretty sure the other guy wasn't armed, so he wouldn't be getting shot. And in both he probably could have resolved them verbally without a gun. Also like I mentioned they both probably think he is a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason.

They had both been given their one opportunity to comply with my verbal demand. They chose not to. I follow the philosophy of Genghis Khan.... offer the enemy one chance to comply. If they don't, crush them immediately.

Most people don't think Genghis Khan was that nice of a guy.

 

[Anathema]

Most people don't think Genghis Khan was that nice of a guy.

I never said I was a nice guy either. I said that I will do what's necessary to protect myself, my family and our possessions.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Yes I don't really think either is really a defense. But that is the problem with those gun use surveys. People like you think it is a defense, but the other people just think you are a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason. False positive for a survey.

I don't answer surveys, Brain. I only pull a gun with a very good reason. Don't stick your nose in my business or piss me off and you'll never see it. Simple as that.

But you must see how a defense to you might be a crazy guy pulling out a gun to others? I appreciate your honesty with my questions btw and well you didn't shoot anyone so that is also good.

I guess to you defending yourself with a gun is never right, just let yourself get shot. Typical libtardism.

No. In both of his cases I'm pretty sure the other guy wasn't armed, so he wouldn't be getting shot. And in both he probably could have resolved them verbally without a gun. Also like I mentioned they both probably think he is a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason.

I am fine with the pharmacist shooting the criminal. I was taught to never steal and never point a gun at someone. The criminal should have been taught the same. That said the criminal probably wouldn't have shot anyone if they had given him what he wanted. The criminal clearly points the gun after he starts getting shot at and could have easily shot the person shooting at him or one of the other people.

It's unreasonable to force people to trust the good intentions of a robber. You have no idea what he was "probably" going to do, and people whose lives are at stake have the sacred right to assume the worst and defend against it.

 

[hipeter924]

Would be curious to know whether the gunman was involved in any gang activity, and wanted to steal drugs as well as cash.

But glad that none of the staff or customers were injured severely or killed.

 

[Brain357]

Yes I don't really think either is really a defense. But that is the problem with those gun use surveys. People like you think it is a defense, but the other people just think you are a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason. False positive for a survey.

I don't answer surveys, Brain. I only pull a gun with a very good reason. Don't stick your nose in my business or piss me off and you'll never see it. Simple as that.

But you must see how a defense to you might be a crazy guy pulling out a gun to others? I appreciate your honesty with my questions btw and well you didn't shoot anyone so that is also good.

I guess to you defending yourself with a gun is never right, just let yourself get shot. Typical libtardism.

No. In both of his cases I'm pretty sure the other guy wasn't armed, so he wouldn't be getting shot. And in both he probably could have resolved them verbally without a gun. Also like I mentioned they both probably think he is a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason.

I am fine with the pharmacist shooting the criminal. I was taught to never steal and never point a gun at someone. The criminal should have been taught the same. That said the criminal probably wouldn't have shot anyone if they had given him what he wanted. The criminal clearly points the gun after he starts getting shot at and could have easily shot the person shooting at him or one of the other people.

It's unreasonable to force people to trust the good intentions of a robber. You have no idea what he was "probably" going to do, and people whose lives are at stake have the sacred right to assume the worst and defend against it.

Who said anything about forcing?

 

[Brain357]

Would be curious to know whether the gunman was involved in any gang activity, and wanted to steal drugs as well as cash.

But glad that none of the staff or customers were injured severely or killed.

I believe the article says he has a lot of drug problems. So probably wanted drugs and cash. I believe the second shot of the pharmacist actually hit his gun disabling it. Otherwise when he points to shoot somebody probably get shot. They are all very lucky this time. But like I posted the good guy does not always win.

 

[AmericanFirst]

I don't answer surveys, Brain. I only pull a gun with a very good reason. Don't stick your nose in my business or piss me off and you'll never see it. Simple as that.

But you must see how a defense to you might be a crazy guy pulling out a gun to others? I appreciate your honesty with my questions btw and well you didn't shoot anyone so that is also good.

I guess to you defending yourself with a gun is never right, just let yourself get shot. Typical libtardism.

No. In both of his cases I'm pretty sure the other guy wasn't armed, so he wouldn't be getting shot. And in both he probably could have resolved them verbally without a gun. Also like I mentioned they both probably think he is a crazy guy pulling a gun for no reason.

I am fine with the pharmacist shooting the criminal. I was taught to never steal and never point a gun at someone. The criminal should have been taught the same. That said the criminal probably wouldn't have shot anyone if they had given him what he wanted. The criminal clearly points the gun after he starts getting shot at and could have easily shot the person shooting at him or one of the other people.

It's unreasonable to force people to trust the good intentions of a robber. You have no idea what he was "probably" going to do, and people whose lives are at stake have the sacred right to assume the worst and defend against it.

Who said anything about forcing?

It is what libtards do.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Don't be fooled into thinking the good guy always wins:
defender killed Civilian Gun Defense Blog Page 3
There are a lot of dead people who thought that.

I'll take my chances with a gun rather than be an unarmed victim.

That is your option. But you are probably aware it might be the last thing you ever do.

What do you care?

And who appointed you adviser to gun owners.

You are never going to convince a gun owner to give up his weapons. So let it go

You choose to be unable to defend yourself if the need arises and I will never try to convince you to do otherwise because it's none of my business

 

[Skull Pilot]

Would be curious to know whether the gunman was involved in any gang activity, and wanted to steal drugs as well as cash.

But glad that none of the staff or customers were injured severely or killed.

I believe the article says he has a lot of drug problems. So probably wanted drugs and cash. I believe the second shot of the pharmacist actually hit his gun disabling it. Otherwise when he points to shoot somebody probably get shot. They are all very lucky this time. But like I posted the good guy does not always win.

but he always loses if he's defenseless

 

[Brain357]

Would be curious to know whether the gunman was involved in any gang activity, and wanted to steal drugs as well as cash.

But glad that none of the staff or customers were injured severely or killed.

I believe the article says he has a lot of drug problems. So probably wanted drugs and cash. I believe the second shot of the pharmacist actually hit his gun disabling it. Otherwise when he points to shoot somebody probably get shot. They are all very lucky this time. But like I posted the good guy does not always win.

but he always loses if he's defenseless

No the guy would have taken what he wanted and probably caught later by police. In this case he is lucky himself or coworkers didn't get shot. His coworkers had no choice in the situation.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Would be curious to know whether the gunman was involved in any gang activity, and wanted to steal drugs as well as cash.

But glad that none of the staff or customers were injured severely or killed.

I believe the article says he has a lot of drug problems. So probably wanted drugs and cash. I believe the second shot of the pharmacist actually hit his gun disabling it. Otherwise when he points to shoot somebody probably get shot. They are all very lucky this time. But like I posted the good guy does not always win.

but he always loses if he's defenseless

No the guy would have taken what he wanted and probably caught later by police. In this case he is lucky himself or coworkers didn't get shot. His coworkers had no choice in the situation.

And you know that?

How do you know he wouldn't have shot anyone?

You have far too much trust in scum bag criminals and far too little in law abiding people

 

[Brain357]

Don't be fooled into thinking the good guy always wins:
defender killed Civilian Gun Defense Blog Page 3
There are a lot of dead people who thought that.

I'll take my chances with a gun rather than be an unarmed victim.

That is your option. But you are probably aware it might be the last thing you ever do.

What do you care?

And who appointed you adviser to gun owners.

You are never going to convince a gun owner to give up his weapons. So let it go

You choose to be unable to defend yourself if the need arises and I will never try to convince you to do otherwise because it's none of my business

As long as there are lots of pro gun people saying everyone should have a gun I will mention why they might not want a gun. Just because many of you are brainwashed into buying guns and training you will never need doesn't mean everyone should be. Many people are actually made less safe by carrying. Take the woman with the bra holster or woman who got shot dead by her 2 year old. Go to google news and search accidental shooting. There are general several each day. Way more than you will find defenders that's for sure.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Would be curious to know whether the gunman was involved in any gang activity, and wanted to steal drugs as well as cash.

But glad that none of the staff or customers were injured severely or killed.

I believe the article says he has a lot of drug problems. So probably wanted drugs and cash. I believe the second shot of the pharmacist actually hit his gun disabling it. Otherwise when he points to shoot somebody probably get shot. They are all very lucky this time. But like I posted the good guy does not always win.

but he always loses if he's defenseless

No the guy would have taken what he wanted and probably caught later by police. In this case he is lucky himself or coworkers didn't get shot. His coworkers had no choice in the situation.

Spoken like a true libtard, thinking you know what the thug would have done. Better to be prepared and alive than scared and dead.

 

[Brain357]

Would be curious to know whether the gunman was involved in any gang activity, and wanted to steal drugs as well as cash.

But glad that none of the staff or customers were injured severely or killed.

I believe the article says he has a lot of drug problems. So probably wanted drugs and cash. I believe the second shot of the pharmacist actually hit his gun disabling it. Otherwise when he points to shoot somebody probably get shot. They are all very lucky this time. But like I posted the good guy does not always win.

but he always loses if he's defenseless

No the guy would have taken what he wanted and probably caught later by police. In this case he is lucky himself or coworkers didn't get shot. His coworkers had no choice in the situation.

And you know that?

How do you know he wouldn't have shot anyone?

You have far too much trust in scum bag criminals and far too little in law abiding people

And you are far too brain washed into being scared and paranoid.