By definition of being a Mandate, it was NOT a "country" (state) as it was not yet able to "stand alone". That is the entire meaning and purpose of the mandate system. When emerging state was able to stand alone, then the Mandate would be dissolved and the State would declare its independence.
Obviously. No where did I state that only Jews could be citizens. The Mandate for Palestine text clearly outlines this. Don't conflate individual rights with sovereign rights.
But, back to the point. There were not TWO peoples who were to be the recipients of an independent state, with rights to a national homeland, administration, government, immigration, close settlement, etc. There was only one -- the Jewish people.
As has already been demonstrated the term "recipient" is never used, yet you just cannot express yourself without using it, the document has no need for it because the concept itself
is not present in the text.
The "point" was your erroneous claim "The Jewish people were the only recipients of the territory of the Mandate for Palestine" this is Zionist entitlement screwing with your mind again.
The terms "Palestine" and "Jewish national home"
are not synonymous, they are distinct and they mean quite different things.
Of course the document was and is a curse, although it does not say what you think it says, it is still the end result of Zionist lobbying and secret planning with the British and seeks to further the goals of the Zionists, most of which are not evident to anyone reading the mandate.
This is just one of the reasons the Palestinians were resistant and the full list of their grievances are to be found in the telegram to the League of Nations
here. which I strongly encourage any truly interested individuals, to read.
This is of note from that text
5. Great Britain however placed Palestine in such a position as made it possible for the Jews to flood the country with waves of immigrants and factually helped their establishment on the soil despite the saturation of the land with its population which did exceed the absorptive capacity of the country economically and otherwise, thereby neglecting the provided for interests and the rights of its lawful inhabitants. The Arabs used all means at all times to express their deep concern and anxiety at such a policy which they felt was undermining their future and their very existence. But at all such times they were met with utter disregard and harsh treatment such as jail, exile, etc.
You'll note that "flooding the country with waves of immigrants" (and this is speaking of before any Holocaust) is EXACTLY what the US far-right make a huge fuss over in their nimbyism, they decry flooding our country with waves of immigrants yet hypocritically approve of it when those immigrants are Jews and the place being flooded is Palestine.
