About 12% of the population in on SNAP


These are the voters democrats hope to motivate to vote by cutting off their food supply as they implicitly trust the very people who use them as political leverage as they watch them all starve.

Will it work?

Not to worry though, Congress is still getting paid.
I’ve wondered about that number. Is that the number of participants in the program ie parent X qualifies for SNAP but is feeding 4 people with it or the number of people SNAP thinks it’s feeding.
 

About 12% of the population in on SNAP​

about 10% of the population is here illegally.
There are some guesses that we're not a nation of three hundred and whatever million.We're a nation of four hundred million.Nobody really knows
 
No, they aren't.

The Billionaire is a parasite that has convinced you he's a vital organ.
Ok, so what’s your plan to replace 60% of tax revenue after you confiscate the top 10%’s money?

If you confiscated 100% of the billionaire’s money, it would only be enough to fund the government for something like 8 months. Then what? Red famine?

They aren’t “parasites”, they produce the tax revenue, the jobs, the products, the services.

If your philosophy was anywhere near reality, you would expect countries with the smallest number of billionaires to have the best standard of living. Maybe you can see more economic “equity” in those countries because everyone is equally poor and there is no wealthy-class contributing the majority of tax revenue.
 
Ok, so what’s your plan to replace 60% of tax revenue after you confiscate the top 10%’s money?

Well, hardly the top 10%. Maybe just the top 1% that has 43% of the wealth.

Wealth concentration is not good for the economy, regardless of what they tell you on Hate Radio.

If wealth were more evenly distributed, the economy would be stronger. We know this, because we've done it
 
Estimates are 1 in 5 active military are on SNAP, with 15% being food insecure.
 
Well, hardly the top 10%. Maybe just the top 1% that has 43% of the wealth.

Wealth concentration is not good for the economy, regardless of what they tell you on Hate Radio.

If wealth were more evenly distributed, the economy would be stronger. We know this, because we've done it
“Wealth concentration” comes from prosperity, for everyone. It’s not just billionaires who benefit from those economies. As “poor” and sad as the arm-chair commies in the US think they are because someone has more money than them, none of them are opting to go live where they can be free of these “evil billionaires”. The arm-chair commies are the actual parasites.


E323D14E-F64F-4324-A4CE-1B92206E9A85.webp
 
“Wealth concentration” comes from prosperity, for everyone. It’s not just billionaires who benefit from those economies. As “poor” and sad as the arm-chair commies in the US think they are because someone has more money than them, none of them are opting to go live where they can be free of these “evil billionaires”. The arm-chair commies are the actual parasites.

Actually, we had our greatest prosperity when the rich were taxed at a top rate of 93% and 33% of the workforce was unionized.

No, the new Gilded Age of Robber Barons is not good for us.
 
How many that are on EBT are illegals? How many are committing fraud for falsely reporting their income to get SNAP? How many able-bodied persons are on SNAP and not working? A new bill is going to be passed that gets all the illegals off SNAP, people must work 80 hours a month (if not disabled and their children are over the age of 14) so many changes are coming. watch the numbers go down! :)


About 60/360 or ~16% are here and 10% on SNAP EBT so,
6 million?
 
Actually, we had our greatest prosperity when the rich were taxed at a top rate of 93% and 33% of the workforce was unionized.

No, the new Gilded Age of Robber Barons is not good for us.


Why didn't you put those numbers back under 12 years of Obiden? you sniveling groundhog.
 
None of that (except the part about Congress getting paid) is true. Poverty is to Red States as water is to the ocean.
Yep. More than half of SNAP recipients live in states that voted for Trump in 2024.

But don't tell the MAGAs. They will hate you for ruining their bizarre, ignorant, stupid narratives about the poor.
 
So long as our economy is rigged to redistribute a greater and greater percentage of our nation's wealth to the top one percent, there will be a greater number of people who will need food assistance.

So long as the GOP and Trump keep lying about their non-existent Obamacare replacement (a record 15 year running hoax!), and the rubes fail to realize they have been hoaxed (incredible, but true, they STILL don't get it!), then more and more millions of Americans are going to be priced out of the cost of health insurance and will need government assistance.

This means that in a few years, we will have single-payer health care by default!

But that's the poor's fault. :auiqs.jpg:
 
They aren’t “parasites”, they produce the tax revenue, the jobs, the products, the services.
That is such a tired, bullshit, false narrative.


Actually, the oligarchs are parasites.

First, it's the workers who produce, not the oligarchs. And those workers receive a far smaller percentage of the profits than in days past. They are not justly compensated for producing more than ever before.

Second, the oligarchs have bribed our politicians and gamed the system to their advantage such that income inequality is now at the level of the Gilded Age, and getting worse by the day.

They have created multiple unfair advantage for themselves, and our politicians have sold their souls to them in exchange for being re-elected as often as they wish.

For example (I have many), 97 percent of our importers are small businesses, and they are getting fucked by Trump's idiotic and illogical tariffs. Trump actually brags about how much he is soaking them for. Literally brags about it.

But our oligarchs simply put a few millions into Trump's pocket, make the same old empty reshoring promises everyone knows they have never had any intention of carrying out, and they get exempted.

So, you bet your ignorant ass. Parasites.
 
Last edited:
15th post
Actually, we had our greatest prosperity when the rich were taxed at a top rate of 93% and 33% of the workforce was unionized.

No, the new Gilded Age of Robber Barons is not good for us.
IMG_1974.webp

IMG_1975.webp
 
You already posted this.

We had powerful manufacturing because the government was buying things. In short, we nationalized industry for four years.

And when we had gotten done building this powerful industrial machine at the taxpayer's expense (but it was fine because it was the wealthy taxpayers!) we were in the catbird's seat to be an export economy, which we remained until 1976.

The reason why the EEEEEEvil Chinese are beating us is that they are the ones now investing in industrial infrastructure.
 
How do you think we got the most advanced industrial infrastructure, stupid? Oh, yeah, GOVERNMENT SPENDING and HIGH TAXES.
No one was actually paying your parasitic tax 90% tax rate. The government spends more today than it did during WW2. Problem solved.
 
The reason why the EEEEEEvil Chinese are beating us is that they are the ones now investing in industrial infrastructure.
When you advocacy to take 90% of someone’s earnings, that’s slave labor.

IMG_1976.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom