CDZ Abortion

Considering that in the Bible, Adam and Eve didn't actually come to life until God "breathed the Breath of Life into them".

Until a baby draws it's first breath, it's still not a "human".
I wasn't aware Adam was a fetus in the womb. But leave it to stupid shitlibs like you to employ shoddy jew logic traps.

Man, you are so brilliant.

By the way, your definition of human differs with that of science. You are a human being at conception, when you are a separate and unique chromosomal entity.
until then you are a wad of cells.
 
Considering that in the Bible, Adam and Eve didn't actually come to life until God "breathed the Breath of Life into them".

Until a baby draws it's first breath, it's still not a "human".
I wasn't aware Adam was a fetus in the womb. But leave it to stupid shitlibs like you to employ shoddy jew logic traps.

Man, you are so brilliant.

By the way, your definition of human differs with that of science. You are a human being at conception, when you are a separate and unique chromosomal entity.
until then you are a wad of cells.
We are all "wads of cells". All living beings are made up of cells.
 
No need to dress it up -

At 5 weeks a living human being in the womb has a heart.

Do you admit abortion is murder?
Can you defend that it is not?

At 5 weeks a human fetus is virtually identical to a fish fetus with gills and a tail. You might as well argue that eating caviar is akin to abortion except on the scale of trillions.
 
No need to dress it up -

At 5 weeks a living human being in the womb has a heart.

Do you admit abortion is murder?
Can you defend that it is not?

At 5 weeks a human fetus is virtually identical to a fish fetus with gills and a tail. You might as well argue that eating caviar is akin to abortion except on the scale of trillions.
"Virtually identical", except it has a totally different dna and chromosomal makeup and doesn't look like a fish at all.
 
No need to dress it up -

At 5 weeks a living human being in the womb has a heart.

Do you admit abortion is murder?
Can you defend that it is not?

At 5 weeks a human fetus is virtually identical to a fish fetus with gills and a tail. You might as well argue that eating caviar is akin to abortion except on the scale of trillions.
"Virtually identical", except it has a totally different dna and chromosomal makeup and doesn't look like a fish at all.

Except that you can't tell the difference in the DNA at that point either.

Embryos Show All Animals Share Ancient Genes Discovery News Discovery News
 
No need to dress it up -

At 5 weeks a living human being in the womb has a heart.

Do you admit abortion is murder?
Can you defend that it is not?
Yes, and it also develops a brain and a spinal cord like other mammals. That does not make the fetus, a baby.
 
Last edited:
It is not murder until it's viable. Until then, it's part of it's mother and her rights supercede the fetus'.
 
No need to dress it up -

At 5 weeks a living human being in the womb has a heart.

Do you admit abortion is murder?
Can you defend that it is not?

At 5 weeks a human fetus is virtually identical to a fish fetus with gills and a tail. You might as well argue that eating caviar is akin to abortion except on the scale of trillions.
"Virtually identical", except it has a totally different dna and chromosomal makeup and doesn't look like a fish at all.

Except that you can't tell the difference in the DNA at that point either.

Embryos Show All Animals Share Ancient Genes Discovery News Discovery News

Yea, no shit we share DNA with all animals, we are all related at some point. We share 98% of our DNA with chimps, but we aren't identical to chimps. Sponges share 70% of the same genes as humans, we aren't identical to sponges. No where in your article does it say human beings in the womb have identical DNA. Learn to read your own links.
 
...and all cells contain and are controlled by DNA, and DNA has been continuously alive for billions of years, so all living things began life way back then. When does life begin for a human? We can impose almost any limit we desire. We make decisions all the time about when to end it. 'Abortion' is just another decision. Who has the right to make this for a woman other than the woman?
 
No need to dress it up -

At 5 weeks a living human being in the womb has a heart.

Do you admit abortion is murder?
Can you defend that it is not?

No human being has a right to the use of the body of another human being against their will.
 
No need to dress it up -

At 5 weeks a living human being in the womb has a heart.

Do you admit abortion is murder?
Can you defend that it is not?

At 5 weeks a human fetus is virtually identical to a fish fetus with gills and a tail. You might as well argue that eating caviar is akin to abortion except on the scale of trillions.
"Virtually identical", except it has a totally different dna and chromosomal makeup and doesn't look like a fish at all.

Except that you can't tell the difference in the DNA at that point either.

Embryos Show All Animals Share Ancient Genes Discovery News Discovery News

Yea, no shit we share DNA with all animals, we are all related at some point. We share 98% of our DNA with chimps, but we aren't identical to chimps. Sponges share 70% of the same genes as humans, we aren't identical to sponges. No where in your article does it say human beings in the womb have identical DNA. Learn to read your own links.

Great job backpedaling away from your fallacious claim that the fetus has "totally different DNA".

:ROFL:
 
...and all cells contain and are controlled by DNA, and DNA has been continuously alive for billions of years, so all living things began life way back then. When does life begin for a human? We can impose almost any limit we desire. We make decisions all the time about when to end it. 'Abortion' is just another decision. Who has the right to make this for a woman other than the woman?
Human beings didn't exist billions of years ago, don't try to implement your talmudic logic here.

Life begins for a human at conception, when it is a unique biological entity with 46 chromosomes

If we can impose any limit, than I impose it at conception, when the human life starts. A woman does not have the right to murder another human being in her womb.
 
It is not murder until it's viable. Until then, it's part of it's mother and her rights supercede the fetus'.
Biologically, it is a separate genetic entity from the mother, and not "her body".

You don't get to override her constitutional rights with your belief system.
Biology isn't a belief system, it is reality.

And your XXXX analogy doesn't make sense. The Constitution and rule of law are "belief systems" that override conflicting laws all the time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Forum List

Back
Top