Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Abortion
- Thread starter -Cp
- Start date
Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #482
Look it up. You’ll just reject it anyways like you did with the NASA Link.None, zero, nada, zilch.Not no proof, just not enough.Exactly. You have no proof.Yes. I think it’s a leading candidate, but not irrefutable proof yet.You mean like reincarnation?We can’t know those things yet.
Present your evidence.
Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #483
Ok you win, you have no soul.Look up reincarnation.So you’re saying that that’s when the soul is in the body?“It is the penetration of the ovum by a sperm and the resulting mingling of nuclear material each brings to the union that constitutes the initiation of the life of a new individual.”Not a real science site, just a bunch of religious nuts.
Clark Edward and Corliss Patten’s Human Embryology, McGraw – Hill Inc., 30
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Embryology-Bradley-Merrill-Patten/dp/0070131503&tag=ff0d01-20
Can you prove that souls exist?
I have.
No proof of souls there, either.
If You claim that souls exist.
Prove it.
At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.Which is when according to you?What is not a hard concept is when human life begins.
Out-of-the-pulpit-and-into-the-womb zealots appear hypocritical from my perspective. Most folks do not support State womb control before that stage of gestation where personhood has developed, and few believe in the extremist "instant baby" notion where conception produces a person instantaneously.
People can believe whatever they choose to believe, but to evoke the coercive power of the State and/or religious zealots to impose their personal impression upon others is antithetical to what most Americans agree on.
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
The Developing Human - 10th Edition
Dr Keith Moore confirms embryology in Quran
At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.Which is when according to you?What is not a hard concept is when human life begins.
Out-of-the-pulpit-and-into-the-womb zealots appear hypocritical from my perspective. Most folks do not support State womb control before that stage of gestation where personhood has developed, and few believe in the extremist "instant baby" notion where conception produces a person instantaneously.
People can believe whatever they choose to believe, but to evoke the coercive power of the State and/or religious zealots to impose their personal impression upon others is antithetical to what most Americans agree on.
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
The Developing Human - 10th Edition
Dr Keith Moore confirms embryology in Quran
The DNA confirms it is a new genetically distinct human being.RE: Abortion
⁜→ Taz, et al,
OH, is that true?
(QUESTIONs)At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.
Is DNA a lifeform?
Is a living, replicating cell from my hand a lifeform?
In my father's casket, there is DNA. Does that mean I buried him alive?
(COMMENT)
You use your definition of a "human" to suit your personal belief. But in reality, we do not know when our form becomes endowed with the lifeforce; when it becomes a "human being."
(EXPANDED THOUGHT)
When a human is born with a genetic defect (a genetic disorder caused by abnormality formed in the genome), is it a true - "genetically distinct human being" - or is it some alternative, a mutated lifeform?
Which one of these is genetically distinct from the others. Are all of these human? Are some of these human? Are any of these not human? Which one would be OK to kill?
Most Respectfully,
R
My definition of HUMAN LIFE is not an arbitrary. Furthermore, it is not just any human life. It is a very specific human life. One that had never existed before and will never exist again. Therefore, it is a specific person in it's earliest stage of the human development cycle and has all of the appropriate attributes that it should for that stage of the human life cycle which begins at conception and ends at death.
This is uncomfortable for you because you need to dehumanize its humanity.
My "extremist" view is that at conception a new genetically distinct human being has been created. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Science confirms this because DNA confirms this.Out-of-the-pulpit-and-into-the-womb zealots appear hypocritical from my perspective. Most folks do not support State womb control before that stage of gestation where personhood has developed, and few believe in the extremist "instant baby" notion where conception produces a person instantaneously.
People can believe whatever they choose to believe, but to evoke the coercive power of the State and/or religious zealots to impose their personal impression upon others is antithetical to what most Americans agree on.
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
Yes, that is his opinion.
Your extremist view and your desire to impose it upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist. and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.
“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
Another of your "... because I say so" commandments. Your koranic wisdom on embryology promoted by Keith Moore is a farce.
Roe v. Wade is a consistent position regarding abortion held by most Americans. Most folks consider it essentially a private matter that should be protected from governmental intrusion to the extent that is reasonable. Roe vs. Wade has achieved that reasonability.
On the other hand, fundamentalist extremists like Osama bin bing would abrogate a woman's right to control her own womb.There are clearly controls in place to throttle you.
Ok you win, you have no soul.Look up reincarnation.So you’re saying that that’s when the soul is in the body?“It is the penetration of the ovum by a sperm and the resulting mingling of nuclear material each brings to the union that constitutes the initiation of the life of a new individual.”
Clark Edward and Corliss Patten’s Human Embryology, McGraw – Hill Inc., 30
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Embryology-Bradley-Merrill-Patten/dp/0070131503&tag=ff0d01-20
Can you prove that souls exist?
I have.
No proof of souls there, either.
If You claim that souls exist.
Prove it.
I win on more than that.
So does Ding.
I didn't reject the NASA link. I explained that our present temperature is within the normal range for an interglacial cycle.Look it up. You’ll just reject it anyways like you did with the NASA Link.None, zero, nada, zilch.Not no proof, just not enough.Exactly. You have no proof.Yes. I think it’s a leading candidate, but not irrefutable proof yet.You mean like reincarnation?
Present your evidence.
Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #488
So you’re saying that there’s no such thing as a soul?Ok you win, you have no soul.Look up reincarnation.So you’re saying that that’s when the soul is in the body?
Can you prove that souls exist?
I have.
No proof of souls there, either.
If You claim that souls exist.
Prove it.
I win on more than that.
So does Ding.
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 56,101
- 48,940
- 3,645
Yes it is.pro choice is not pro abortion.
Look it up.
It's even in Webster's
pro choice means to have or not have an abortion.
pro abortion means that is the only choice.
Yes it is.pro choice is not pro abortion.
Look it up.
It's even in Webster's
pro choice means to have or not have an abortion.
pro abortion means that is the only choice.
Don't whine about it to me.
Tell Webster's
No. It is not my say so. Every embryology textbook states that human life begins at conception. Conception is the beginning of the human life cycle and death is the end of the human life cycle. At any point along the continuum it is fully human.My "extremist" view is that at conception a new genetically distinct human being has been created. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Science confirms this because DNA confirms this.“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
Yes, that is his opinion.
Your extremist view and your desire to impose it upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist. and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.
“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
Another of your "... because I say so" commandments. Your koranic wisdom on embryology promoted by Keith Moore is a farce.
Roe v. Wade is a consistent position regarding abortion held by most Americans. Most folks consider it essentially a private matter that should be protected from governmental intrusion to the extent that is reasonable. Roe vs. Wade has achieved that reasonability.
On the other hand, fundamentalist extremists like Osama bin bing would abrogate a woman's right to control her own womb.There are clearly controls in place to throttle you.
You need to dehumanize human life to rationalize it is moral to end human life.
Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #492
Don’t start!I didn't reject the NASA link. I explained that our present temperature is within the normal range for an interglacial cycle.Look it up. You’ll just reject it anyways like you did with the NASA Link.None, zero, nada, zilch.Not no proof, just not enough.Exactly. You have no proof.Yes. I think it’s a leading candidate, but not irrefutable proof yet.
Present your evidence.
“The first cell of a new and unique human life begins existence at the moment of conception (fertilization) when one living sperm from the father joins with one living ovum from the mother. It is in this manner that human life passes from one generation to another. Given the appropriate environment and genetic composition, the single cell subsequently gives rise to trillions of specialized and integrated cells that compose the structures and functions of each individual human body. Every human being alive today and, as far as is known scientifically, every human being that ever existed, began his or her unique existence in this manner, i.e., as one cell. If this first cell or any subsequent configuration of cells perishes, the individual dies, ceasing to exist in matter as a living being. There are no known exceptions to this rule in the field of human biology.”RE: Abortion
⁜→ Taz, et al,
OH, is that true?
(QUESTIONs)At conception. And it isn’t according to me. It is according to DNA.
Is DNA a lifeform?
Is a living, replicating cell from my hand a lifeform?
In my father's casket, there is DNA. Does that mean I buried him alive?
(COMMENT)
You use your definition of a "human" to suit your personal belief. But in reality, we do not know when our form becomes endowed with the lifeforce; when it becomes a "human being."
(EXPANDED THOUGHT)
When a human is born with a genetic defect (a genetic disorder caused by abnormality formed in the genome), is it a true - "genetically distinct human being" - or is it some alternative, a mutated lifeform?
Which one of these is genetically distinct from the others. Are all of these human? Are some of these human? Are any of these not human? Which one would be OK to kill?
Most Respectfully,
R
James Bopp, ed., Human Life and Health Care Ethics, vol. 2 (Frederick, MD: University Publications of America, 1985)
Human Life and Health Care Ethics - Vol. 2, 1985 | Online Research Library: Questia
No. It is not my say so. Every embryology textbook states that human life begins at conception. Conception is the beginning of the human life cycle and death is the end of the human life cycle. At any point along the continuum it is fully human.My "extremist" view is that at conception a new genetically distinct human being has been created. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Science confirms this because DNA confirms this.“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
Another of your "... because I say so" commandments. Your koranic wisdom on embryology promoted by Keith Moore is a farce.
Roe v. Wade is a consistent position regarding abortion held by most Americans. Most folks consider it essentially a private matter that should be protected from governmental intrusion to the extent that is reasonable. Roe vs. Wade has achieved that reasonability.
On the other hand, fundamentalist extremists like Osama bin bing would abrogate a woman's right to control her own womb.There are clearly controls in place to throttle you.
You need to dehumanize human life to rationalize it is moral to end human life.
I simply reject your koranic experts.
Embryology in the Quran - Professor Keith Moore
Is ignorance truly as blissful as they say it is?
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 56,101
- 48,940
- 3,645
Yes it is.pro choice is not pro abortion.
Look it up.
It's even in Webster's
pro choice means to have or not have an abortion.
pro abortion means that is the only choice.
Don't whine about it to me.
Tell Webster's
the word 'ain't' is also in webster's.
Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #496
If it’s fully human at conception, why don’t we have consciousness in the womb. It would appear not fully human.No. It is not my say so. Every embryology textbook states that human life begins at conception. Conception is the beginning of the human life cycle and death is the end of the human life cycle. At any point along the continuum it is fully human.My "extremist" view is that at conception a new genetically distinct human being has been created. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Science confirms this because DNA confirms this.Yes, that is his opinion.
Your extremist view and your desire to impose it upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist. and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.
“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
Another of your "... because I say so" commandments. Your koranic wisdom on embryology promoted by Keith Moore is a farce.
Roe v. Wade is a consistent position regarding abortion held by most Americans. Most folks consider it essentially a private matter that should be protected from governmental intrusion to the extent that is reasonable. Roe vs. Wade has achieved that reasonability.
On the other hand, fundamentalist extremists like Osama bin bing would abrogate a woman's right to control her own womb.There are clearly controls in place to throttle you.
You need to dehumanize human life to rationalize it is moral to end human life.
No. It is not my say so. Every embryology textbook states that human life begins at conception. Conception is the beginning of the human life cycle and death is the end of the human life cycle. At any point along the continuum it is fully human.My "extremist" view is that at conception a new genetically distinct human being has been created. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Science confirms this because DNA confirms this.Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
Another of your "... because I say so" commandments. Your koranic wisdom on embryology promoted by Keith Moore is a farce.
Roe v. Wade is a consistent position regarding abortion held by most Americans. Most folks consider it essentially a private matter that should be protected from governmental intrusion to the extent that is reasonable. Roe vs. Wade has achieved that reasonability.
On the other hand, fundamentalist extremists like Osama bin bing would abrogate a woman's right to control her own womb.There are clearly controls in place to throttle you.
You need to dehumanize human life to rationalize it is moral to end human life.
I simply reject your koranic experts.
Embryology in the Quran - Professor Keith Moore
Is ignorance truly as blissful as they say it is?
You're trying to persuade others?
Yes it is.pro choice is not pro abortion.
Look it up.
It's even in Webster's
pro choice means to have or not have an abortion.
pro abortion means that is the only choice.
Don't whine about it to me.
Tell Webster's
the word 'ain't' is also in webster's.
Interesting.
Ain't it.
Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #499
You seem pretty happy.No. It is not my say so. Every embryology textbook states that human life begins at conception. Conception is the beginning of the human life cycle and death is the end of the human life cycle. At any point along the continuum it is fully human.My "extremist" view is that at conception a new genetically distinct human being has been created. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Science confirms this because DNA confirms this.Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
Another of your "... because I say so" commandments. Your koranic wisdom on embryology promoted by Keith Moore is a farce.
Roe v. Wade is a consistent position regarding abortion held by most Americans. Most folks consider it essentially a private matter that should be protected from governmental intrusion to the extent that is reasonable. Roe vs. Wade has achieved that reasonability.
On the other hand, fundamentalist extremists like Osama bin bing would abrogate a woman's right to control her own womb.There are clearly controls in place to throttle you.
You need to dehumanize human life to rationalize it is moral to end human life.
I simply reject your koranic experts.
Embryology in the Quran - Professor Keith Moore
Is ignorance truly as blissful as they say it is?
No. It is not my say so. Every embryology textbook states that human life begins at conception. Conception is the beginning of the human life cycle and death is the end of the human life cycle. At any point along the continuum it is fully human.My "extremist" view is that at conception a new genetically distinct human being has been created. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Science confirms this because DNA confirms this.“In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun.”
Kaluger, G., and Kaluger, M., Human Development: The Span of Life, page 28-29, The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1974.
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Development-Span-George-Kaluger/dp/0801626110&tag=ff0d01-20
Yes, you can cut and paste links to material you don't understand. However, that does nothing to support your extremist views.
Another of your "... because I say so" commandments. Your koranic wisdom on embryology promoted by Keith Moore is a farce.
Roe v. Wade is a consistent position regarding abortion held by most Americans. Most folks consider it essentially a private matter that should be protected from governmental intrusion to the extent that is reasonable. Roe vs. Wade has achieved that reasonability.
On the other hand, fundamentalist extremists like Osama bin bing would abrogate a woman's right to control her own womb.There are clearly controls in place to throttle you.
You need to dehumanize human life to rationalize it is moral to end human life.
I simply reject your koranic experts.
Embryology in the Quran - Professor Keith Moore
“….it is scientifically correct to say that human life begins at conception.”
Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth, Harvard Medical School: Quoted by Public Affairs Council
THE REGION: IN SUMMARY; Experts Clash at Abortion Hearings
Similar threads
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 147
- Replies
- 44
- Views
- 471
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 132
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 15
- Replies
- 8K
- Views
- 261K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8292
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 476
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-